This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2437

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

foxi1 expression, increased leads to six1b expression, increased

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
GSK3beta inactivation leading to increased mortality via defects in developing inner ear adjacent Low Low Vid Modic (send email) Open for citation & comment

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
zebrafish Danio rerio High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Embryo High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Increased foxi1 expression leads to increased six1b expression.

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

The forkhead family member, foxi1 is an important player not only in the induction of the otic placode (Solomon et al., 2003) but also in the proper activation of differentiation pathways in the inner ear (Hans et al., 2004). Foxi1 transcription factor regulate six and eya gene expression during anamniote preplacodal induction. When foxi1 is knocked down, the ear anlagen is either entirely missing or greatly reduced (Solomon et al., 2003) and no expression of six1b is detectable (Bricaud et al., 2006). With loss-of-function experiment (Bricaud et al., 2006) demonstrated that foxi1 can regulate, directly or indirectly, six1b transcription in developing zebrafish inner ear. Six1b acts early in both hair cell and neuronal lineages. When six1b is overexpressed, not only are fewer neural progenitors formed but many of these progenitors do not go on to differentiate into neurons. Gain-of-function, together with the six1b loss-of-function results, suggest that six1b is necessary and sufficient for the normal formation of hair cells in the anterior macula, although it inhibits neuronal fate in the developing inner ear (Bricaud et al., 2006).

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

Foxi1 is an early inducer of the otic placode and  positively regulates the expression of six1b transcription factor.

  • When foxi1 is knocked down, the ear anlagen is either entirely missing or greatly reduced (Solomon et al., 2003) and no expression of six1b is detectable in otocyst. Because, at 28 hpf, the lack of six1b expression could be secondary to the overall absence of the otic placode attributable to foxi1 loss-of-function, six1b expression was studied at either 28 hpf in embryos with less severe phenotype or at 16.5 hpf when the placode just arises. In both cases, no expression of six1b was detected (Bricaud et al., 2006).
  • Overexpression of six1b during inner development was achieved by injecting a synthetic six1b mRNA at early stages. Such gain-of- function experiments gave the opposite phenotype to that seen after six1b loss-of-function. At 3 dpf, more hair cells are present. This overproduction of hair cells is detectable as early as 28 hpf, with an average of four hair cells observed instead of the two in wild-type embryos. (Bricaud et al., 2006) assayed for the presence of differentiated neurons at 3 dpf and neural precursors at 32 hpf with the neuronal markers HuC and neuroD, respectively. At 32 hpf in the six1b overexpressing embryos, fewer neuroD positive cells are detectable in the otic ganglion than in control embryos, suggesting that fewer neural progenitors are formed when six1b is overexpressed. At 3 dpf, the decrease in number of SAG neurons versus controls is even more dramatic. In extreme cases, SAG neurons are completely eliminated. These results indicate that, when six1b is overexpressed, not only are fewer neural progenitors formed but many ofthese progenitors do not go on to differentiate into neurons. In conclusion, these, together with the six1b loss-of-function results, suggest that six1b is necessary and sufficient for the normal formation of hair cells in the anterior macula, although it inhibits neuronal fate in the developing inner ear.
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Foxi1 gene is critical for zebrafish otic induction (Solomon et al., 2003), while it is not essential for this process in mice (Hulander et al., 2003).

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

No Data.

Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

No Data.

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help
  • Expression of zebrafish six1b in the Inner Ear and Neuromasts: Expression of six1b was observed in the developing inner ear and neuromasts of the lateral line until 96 hpf, the latest stage analyzed in this study. Transcripts of six1b were detected in all five sensory patches of the inner ear as well as in the semicircular canals. Detected first at 48 hpf, six1b expression in neuromasts of the midbody lateral line reached its peak at 72 hpf  with stronger staining at the basal region of the neuromast, where bodies of hair cells are localized (Webb & Shirey, 2003).
  • Expression of zebrafish six1b in Muscles: Since the beginning of segmentation six1b was expressed in the somites. At 72 hpf, the expression of six1b became more pronounced in the ventral somites with stronger staining in the most ventral cells. It continued in the pectoral fin and ventral abdomen muscle. Six1b expression was also found in the muscles of the eye and the lower jaw. (Bricaud et al., 2006).
  • Temporal changes in gene expression and the emergence of sensory placode progenitors. As development proceeds gene expression domains sharpen through mutually repressive interactions; in the head region, the neural crest and placode precursor specific transcripts begin to be expressed at early neurula stages. Initially their boundaries are fuzzy, but gene expression resolves to distinct domains by late neurula (black dashed lines). NP: neural plate; NC: neural crest; PPR: preplacodal region; Epi: future epidermis. Right: diagram of an embryo at early neurula stages; dashed lines indicate the medial boundaries of non-neural transcripts (Lleras-Forero & Streit, 2012).Temporal changes in gene expression and the emergence of sensory placode progenitors. As development proceeds gene expression domains sharpen through mutually repressive interactions; in the head region, the neural crest and placode precursor specific transcripts begin to be expressed at early neurula stages. Initially their boundaries are fuzzy, but gene expression resolves to distinct domains by late neurula (black dashed lines). NP: neural plate; NC: neural crest; PPR: preplacodal region; Epi: future epidermis. Right: diagram of an embryo at early neurula stages; dashed lines indicate the medial boundaries of non-neural transcripts (Lleras-Forero & Streit, 2012).
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

No Data.

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Data was provided for zebrafish (Bricaud et al., 2006; Lleras-Forero & Streit, 2012), mice and chick (Hulander et al., 2003; Lleras-Forero & Streit, 2012)

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Bricaud, O., Leslie, A. C., & Gonda, S. (2006). Development/Plasticity/Repair The Transcription Factor six1 Inhibits Neuronal and Promotes Hair Cell Fate in the Developing Zebrafish (Danio rerio) Inner Ear. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(41), 10438–10451. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1025-06.2006

Hans, S., Liu, D., & Westerfield, M. (2004). Pax8 and Pax2a function synergistically in otic specification, downstream of the Foxi1 and Dlx3b transcription factors. Development, 131(20), 5091–5102. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.01346

Hulander, M., Kiernan, A., Blomqvist, S., Carlsson, P., Samuelsson, E., Johansson, B., Steel, K., & Enerbäck, S. (2003). Lack of pendrin expression leads to deafness and expansion of the endolymphatic compartment in inner ears of Foxi1null mutant mice 2013. Development, 130, 2013–2025. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00376

Lleras-Forero, L., & Streit, A. (2012). Development of the sensory nervous system in the vertebrate head: The importance of being on time. Current Opinion in Genetics and Development, 22(4), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2012.05.003

Solomon, K. S., Kudoh, T., Dawid, I. B., & Fritz, A. (2003). Zebrafish foxi1 mediates otic placode formation and jaw development. Development, 130(5), 929–940. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00308

         Webb, J. F., & Shirey, J. E. (2003). Postembryonic Development of the Cranial Lateral Line Canals and Neuromasts in Zebrafish. Developmental Dynamics, 228(3), 370–385. https://doi.org/10.1002/dvdy.10385