This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Relationship: 2605
Title
Binding to VGSC leads to Altered kinetics of sodium channel
Upstream event
Downstream event
Key Event Relationship Overview
AOPs Referencing Relationship
AOP Name | Adjacency | Weight of Evidence | Quantitative Understanding | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Binding to voltage gate sodium channels during development leads to cognitive impairment | adjacent | Iris Mangas (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | Under Review |
Taxonomic Applicability
Sex Applicability
Sex | Evidence |
---|---|
Male | High |
Female | High |
Life Stage Applicability
Term | Evidence |
---|---|
All life stages | High |
Key Event Relationship Description
VGSCs are critical in generation and conduction of electrical signals in multiple excitable tissues. Various chemicals and agents can interfere with VGSC function through several mechanisms, leading to alterations of VGSC function. The type of alteration depends on how the compound interacts with the VGSC. Hydrophobic anesthetics may bind within the hydrophobic zone in the pore, blocking the channel in the closed state, while hydrophilic anesthetics may bind to the pore on an intracellular site blocking the channel in the inactivation phase. For the latter, high or low dissociation rates affect anesthetic potency in situations of high or low frequency firing, respectively. Other chemicals, like the antiepileptic carbamazepine or the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-treatment drug riluzole, bind to the voltage sensors in the channels and thereby shift the voltage dependency of their open/closed configurations. In contrast, toxins like tetrodotoxin (TTX) bind to the extracellular regions of VGSCs, block the passage of ions and cannot be removed by either changing the membrane voltage or the gating of the channel (Eijkelkamp et al. 2012; Catterall 2007). The pyrethroid insecticides also bind to VGSCs but in a manner that slows both activation and deactivation of the gate and results in a more hyperpolarized membrane potential and in higher firing rates (Eijkelkamp et al., 2012; Trainer et al., 1997; O’Reilly et al., 2006; Meyer et al., 2008; Soderlund et al., 2002).
Evidence Collection Strategy
Evidence Supporting this KER
This KER was originally created as part of an evidence-based AOP informed IATA for deltamethrin for developmental neurotoxicity hazard characterization. The IATA case study was developed to support human health risk assessment of deltamethrin pesticide active substance and as a proof-of-concept on the applicability of the data provided in the Developmental Neurotoxicity In vitro Battery to apply mechanistic understanding of toxicity pathways for regulatory decision making (DNT IVB OECD., 2023). Using systematic searches and expert knowledge the initial KER was updated by an EFSA Working Group.
Biological Plausibility
The biological plausibility for this KER is strong. It is a well-accepted fact that ion channels are integral membrane proteins that control the passage of various ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Cl−) across membranes in cells. The direction of ion transport through an open ion channel is governed by the electrochemical gradient for the particular ion species across the membrane in question. There is overwhelming evidence that binding of a chemical to a VGSC alters sodium channels kinetics. This is well supported by studies in which individual channel residues are mutated, and these mutations alter the ability of different chemicals to interact with the sodium channel to alter its gating kinetics (e.g. Vais et al., 2000; 2001). The stereospecific nature of effects of many different compounds on VGSC function further supports that specific binding leads to alterations in the kinetics of the channel (Soderlund 1985; Brown et al., 1988; Narahashi 1982).
Empirical Evidence
The empirical evidence for this KER is strong. A wide variety of natural-occurring toxins have been demonstrated to interact with VGSCs and alter function of the channel. These toxins include TTX, the poison in fugu (pufferfish); scorpion and sea anemone toxins, brevotoxins from dinoflagellates, ciguatoxins and some conotoxins from fish-hunting snails. VGSCs possess six or more distinct receptor sites on the VGSC protein, and binding to each of these sites has differential effects on channel kinetics. For example, TTX binds at site 1, irreversibly blocking the pore of the channel and preventing sodium from moving through the channel. Brevotoxin binds to site 5, enhancing activation and preventing inactivation of the channel. The binding of delta conotoxin to site 6 slows channel inactivation (Catterall et al. 2007).
Ample knowledge is also available for synthetic pyrethroid insecticides which bind to the sodium channel α-subunit altering the normal gating kinetics of VGSC. Initial studies attempting to label the specific binding site of pyrethroids were unsuccessful due to the extreme lipophilicity and the modest potency of pyrethroid radioligands. The subsequent development of more potent radioligands demonstrated high affinity saturable binding to sodium channels in the brain. However, the high lipophilicity of pyrethroids still limited the sensitivity of the assay and obscured the identification of the single binding site responsible for pyrethroid action (Soderlund et al., 2002; Trainer et al., 1997). Despite these limitations, there remains overwhelming evidence that binding of pyrethroids to VGSC alters sodium channel kinetics. Mutations in the VGSC in insects alter gating kinetics by decreasing the sensitivity of the channel to pyrethroids, and provide resistance to their toxicity (Vais et al., 2000; 2001). In addition, the effects of pyrethroids are stereospecific where some isomers can interact with and modify channel function while other isomers are unable to bind and have no effect on channel kinetics (Soderlund 1985; Brown et al., 1988; Narahashi 1982). These properties of this class of insecticides on VGSCs are well established in the literature and have been extensively reviewed (Soderlund et al. 2002).
Dose and temporal concordance
Dose-dependent actions of pyrethroids on VGSC kinetics are well documented in the peer-reviewed literature (see Song and Narahashi, 1996, Tabarean and Narahashi, 1998). On the other hand, temporal concordance for this KER is difficult to measure because of the rapidity (msec) with which chemical binding to the VGSC changes the conformation of the channel and its gating kinetics. However, from the detailed biological understanding of the KER binding needs to precede the change in conformation and gating kinetics. In addition, there is clear evidence that the binding to VGSC by some pyrethroids is dependent on states of the channel (e.g. open, closed, activated, deactivated). In such cases, modification of the channel kinetics is “use-dependent”, i.e., activation is increased with subsequent stimuli that result in channel opening (Wu et al., 2021; Tabarean and Narahashi, 2001). This characteristic of use-dependence is strong evidence that binding to the channel affects its gate properties.
Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
The fact that binding of chemicals to VGSCs results in altered sodium channel gate kinetics is well accepted and supported by abundant evidence. However, some minor uncertainties can be detected as reported below. Uncertainties in the overall knowledge remain; complete characterization of interactions of chemicals with all α isoforms of the channel, especially in mammals, as well as different subunit combinations have not been conducted, and differences likely exist based on different α and α/β subunit combinations. This is especially true for those channels that might be expressed during development, as the ontogeny of sodium channels is a complex process. Since brain development in both humans and rodents extends from early gestation well into the postnatal period it is not possible to state with certainty which isoform of the sodium channel’s α subunits is preferentially affected.
Known modulating factors
Species differences are demonstrated for orthologous channels with a high degree of amino acid sequence conservation, which differ in both their functional properties and their sensitivities to pyrethroid insecticides, e.g. with human Nav1.3 channels being not only less sensitive than the rat Nav1.3 channels but also less sensitive than rat Nav1.2 channels (Sun et al., 2009)
Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage
There are currently no quantitative models that predict the relationship between these KEs.
Response-response Relationship
There are currently no quantitative models that predict the relationship between these KEs. However, it is possible to compute the population of VGSC that are affected by pyrethroid binding, and it has been estimated that less than 1% of the VGSC population (Narahashi et al., 1998) needs to be bound by pyrethroid to disrupt excitability in the neuron (KER2).
Chemicals may bind to VGSCs at various sites leading to different types of changes in the VGSC gate kinetics, and these changes also depend on the affinity of the chemicals to the binding sites (see section above, on KER description). Moreover, there are 9 different types of VGSCs including a complex ontology for the subunits. This complexity currently impedes the characterization of quantitative understanding.
Time-scale
The KER is active within milli-seconds and the upstream event occurs before the downstream event.
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
There are currently no known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER.
Domain of Applicability
Most of the evidence for this key event comes from work in rodent species (i.e., rat, mouse) and in vitro human test systems.
References
Brown GB, Gaupp JE, Olsen RW. Pyrethroid insecticides: stereospecific allosteric interaction with the batrachotoxinin-A benzoate binding site of mammalian voltage-sensitive sodium channels. Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Jul;34(1):54-9.PMID: 2455860
Catterall WA, Cestèle S, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Frank HY, Konoki K and Scheuer T, 2007. Voltage-gated ion channels and gating modifier toxins. Toxicon, 49(2), 124–141. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.09.022
Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Baker MD, Minett MS, Cregg R, Werdehausen R, Rugiero F, Wood JN. Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain. 2012 Sep;135(Pt 9):2585-612.
Meyer DA, Carter JM, Johnstone AF and Shafer TJ, 2008. Pyrethroid modulation of spontaneous neuronal excitability and neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology, 29(2), 213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.11.005.
Narahashi T, Aistrup GL, Lindstrom JM, Marszalec W, Nagata K, Wang F, Yeh JZ. Ion channel modulation as the basis for general anesthesia. Toxicol Lett. 1998 Nov 23;100-101:185-91. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00184-2. PMID: 10049141.
Narahashi T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of insecticides: neurophysiological approach. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1982 Nov-Dec;4(6):753-8.
O'Reilly AO, Khambay BP, Williamson MS, Field LM, Wallace BA and Davies TG, 2006. Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biochemical Journal, 396(2), 255–263.
Soderlund DM, Clark JM, Sheets LP, Mullin LS, Piccirillo VJ, Sargent D, … and Weiner ML, 2002. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology, 171(1), 3–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300–483X(01)00569–8
Soderlund DM.Neurotoxicology. Pyrethroid-receptor interactions: stereospecific binding and effects on sodium channels in mouse brain preparations. 1985 Summer;6(2):35-46.PMID: 2410831
Song JH, Narahashi T. Modulation of sodium channels of rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons by the pyrethroid tetramethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Apr;277(1):445-53.PMID: 8613953
Sun XQ, Xu C, Leclerc P, Benoît G, Giuliano F, Droupy S. Spinal neurons involved in the control of the seminal vesicles: a transsynaptic labeling study using pseudorabies virus in rats. Neuroscience. 2009 Jan 23;158(2):786-97.
Tabarean IV, Narahashi T. Kinetics of modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by tetramethrin and deltamethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Dec;299(3):988-97.PMID: 11714887
Tabarean IV, Narahashi T. Potent modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by the type II pyrethroid deltamethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Mar;284(3):958-65.
Trainer VL, McPhee JC, Boutelet-Bochan H, Baker C, Scheuer T, Babin D, … and Catterall WA, 1997. High affinity binding of pyrethroids to the α subunit of brain sodium channels. Molecular Pharmacology, 51(4), 651–657
Vais H, Atkinson S, Eldursi N, Devonshire AL, Williamson MS, Usherwood PN. A single amino acid change makes a rat neuronal sodium channel highly sensitive to pyrethroid insecticides. FEBS Lett. 2000 Mar 24;470(2):135-8.
Vais H, Williamson MS, Devonshire AL, Usherwood PN. The molecular interactions of pyrethroid insecticides with insect and mammalian sodium channels. Pest Manag Sci. 2001 Oct;57(10):877-88.
Wu G, Li Q, Liu X, Li-Byarlay H, He B.Pestic Biochem Physiol. Differential state-dependent effects of deltamethrin and tefluthrin on sodium channels in central neurons of Helicoverpa armigera. 2021 Jun;175:104836.