This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2605

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Binding to VGSC leads to Altered kinetics of sodium channel

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Binding to voltage gate sodium channels during development leads to cognitive impairment adjacent Iris Mangas (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite Under Review

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Vertebrates Vertebrates High NCBI
Invertebrates Invertebrates High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

VGSCs are critical in generation and conduction of electrical signals in multiple excitable tissues. Various chemicals and agents can interfere with VGSC function through several mechanisms, leading to alterations of VGSC function. The type of alteration depends on how the compound interacts with the VGSC. Hydrophobic anesthetics may bind within the hydrophobic zone in the pore, blocking the channel in the closed state, while hydrophilic anesthetics may bind to the pore on an intracellular site blocking the channel in the inactivation phase. For the latter, high or low dissociation rates affect anesthetic potency in situations of high or low frequency firing, respectively. Other chemicals, like the antiepileptic carbamazepine or the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-treatment drug riluzole, bind to the voltage sensors in the channels and thereby shift the voltage dependency of their open/closed configurations. In contrast, toxins like tetrodotoxin (TTX) bind to the extracellular regions of VGSCs, block the passage of ions and cannot be removed by either changing the membrane voltage or the gating of the channel (Eijkelkamp et al. 2012; Catterall 2007). The pyrethroid insecticides also bind to VGSCs but in a manner that slows both activation and deactivation of the gate and results in a more hyperpolarized membrane potential and in higher firing rates (Eijkelkamp et al., 2012; Trainer et al., 1997; O’Reilly et al., 2006; Meyer et al., 2008; Soderlund et al., 2002).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

This KER was originally created as part of an evidence-based AOP informed IATA for deltamethrin for developmental neurotoxicity hazard characterization. The IATA case study was developed to support human health risk assessment of deltamethrin pesticide active substance and as a proof-of-concept on the applicability of the data provided in the Developmental Neurotoxicity In vitro Battery to apply mechanistic understanding of toxicity pathways for regulatory decision making (DNT IVB OECD., 2023). Using systematic searches and expert knowledge the initial KER was updated by an EFSA Working Group.

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

The biological plausibility for this KER is strong. It is a well-accepted fact that ion channels are integral membrane proteins that control the passage of various ions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Cl−) across membranes in cells. The direction of ion transport through an open ion channel is governed by the electrochemical gradient for the particular ion species across the membrane in question. There is overwhelming evidence that binding of a chemical to a VGSC alters sodium channels kinetics. This is well supported by studies in which individual channel residues are mutated, and these mutations alter the ability of different chemicals to interact with the sodium channel to alter its gating kinetics (e.g. Vais et al., 2000; 2001). The stereospecific nature of effects of many different compounds on VGSC function further supports that specific binding leads to alterations in the kinetics of the channel (Soderlund 1985; Brown et al., 1988; Narahashi 1982).

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

The fact that binding of chemicals to VGSCs results in altered sodium channel gate kinetics is well accepted and supported by abundant evidence. However, some minor uncertainties can be detected as reported below. Uncertainties in the overall knowledge remain; complete characterization of interactions of chemicals with all α isoforms of the channel, especially in mammals, as well as different subunit combinations have not been conducted, and differences likely exist based on different α and α/β subunit combinations. This is especially true for those channels that might be expressed during development, as the ontogeny of sodium channels is a complex process. Since brain development in both humans and rodents extends from early gestation well into the postnatal period it is not possible to state with certainty which isoform of the sodium channel’s α subunits is preferentially affected.

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Species differences are demonstrated for orthologous channels with a high degree of amino acid sequence conservation, which differ in both their functional properties and their sensitivities to pyrethroid insecticides, e.g. with human Nav1.3 channels being not only less sensitive than the rat Nav1.3 channels but also less sensitive than rat Nav1.2 channels (Sun et al., 2009)

Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

There are currently no quantitative models that predict the relationship between these KEs. However, it is possible to compute the population of VGSC that are affected by pyrethroid binding, and it has been estimated that less than 1% of the VGSC population (Narahashi et al., 1998) needs to be bound by pyrethroid to disrupt excitability in the neuron (KER2).

Chemicals may bind to VGSCs at various sites leading to different types of changes in the VGSC gate kinetics, and these changes also depend on the affinity of the chemicals to the binding sites (see section above, on KER description). Moreover, there are 9 different types of VGSCs including a complex ontology for the subunits. This complexity currently impedes the characterization of quantitative understanding.

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

The KER is active within milli-seconds and the upstream event occurs before the downstream event.

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

There are currently no known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER.

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Most of the evidence for this key event comes from work in rodent species (i.e., rat, mouse) and in vitro human test systems.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Brown GB, Gaupp JE, Olsen RW. Pyrethroid insecticides: stereospecific allosteric interaction with the batrachotoxinin-A benzoate binding site of mammalian voltage-sensitive sodium channels. Mol Pharmacol. 1988 Jul;34(1):54-9.PMID: 2455860

Catterall WA, Cestèle S, Yarov-Yarovoy V, Frank HY, Konoki K and Scheuer T, 2007. Voltage-gated ion channels and gating modifier toxins. Toxicon, 49(2), 124–141. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2006.09.022

Eijkelkamp N, Linley JE, Baker MD, Minett MS, Cregg R, Werdehausen R, Rugiero F, Wood JN. Neurological perspectives on voltage-gated sodium channels. Brain. 2012 Sep;135(Pt 9):2585-612. 

Meyer DA, Carter JM, Johnstone AF and Shafer TJ, 2008. Pyrethroid modulation of spontaneous neuronal excitability and neurotransmission in hippocampal neurons in culture. Neurotoxicology, 29(2), 213–225. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2007.11.005.

Narahashi T, Aistrup GL, Lindstrom JM, Marszalec W, Nagata K, Wang F, Yeh JZ. Ion channel modulation as the basis for general anesthesia. Toxicol Lett. 1998 Nov 23;100-101:185-91. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4274(98)00184-2. PMID: 10049141.

Narahashi T. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of action of insecticides: neurophysiological approach. Neurobehav Toxicol Teratol. 1982 Nov-Dec;4(6):753-8.

O'Reilly AO, Khambay BP, Williamson MS, Field LM, Wallace BA and Davies TG, 2006. Modelling insecticide-binding sites in the voltage-gated sodium channel. Biochemical Journal, 396(2), 255–263.

Soderlund DM, Clark JM, Sheets LP, Mullin LS, Piccirillo VJ, Sargent D, … and Weiner ML, 2002. Mechanisms of pyrethroid neurotoxicity: implications for cumulative risk assessment. Toxicology, 171(1), 3–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0300–483X(01)00569–8

Soderlund DM.Neurotoxicology. Pyrethroid-receptor interactions: stereospecific binding and effects on sodium channels in mouse brain preparations. 1985 Summer;6(2):35-46.PMID: 2410831

Song JH, Narahashi T. Modulation of sodium channels of rat cerebellar Purkinje neurons by the pyrethroid tetramethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996 Apr;277(1):445-53.PMID: 8613953

Sun XQ, Xu C, Leclerc P, Benoît G, Giuliano F, Droupy S. Spinal neurons involved in the control of the seminal vesicles: a transsynaptic labeling study using pseudorabies virus in rats. Neuroscience. 2009 Jan 23;158(2):786-97.

Tabarean IV, Narahashi T. Kinetics of modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by tetramethrin and deltamethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2001 Dec;299(3):988-97.PMID: 11714887

Tabarean IV, Narahashi T. Potent modulation of tetrodotoxin-sensitive and tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels by the type II pyrethroid deltamethrin. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1998 Mar;284(3):958-65.

Trainer VL, McPhee JC, Boutelet-Bochan H, Baker C, Scheuer T, Babin D, … and Catterall WA, 1997. High affinity binding of pyrethroids to the α subunit of brain sodium channels. Molecular Pharmacology, 51(4), 651–657

Vais H, Atkinson S, Eldursi N, Devonshire AL, Williamson MS, Usherwood PN. A single amino acid change makes a rat neuronal sodium channel highly sensitive to pyrethroid insecticides. FEBS Lett. 2000 Mar 24;470(2):135-8.

Vais H, Williamson MS, Devonshire AL, Usherwood PN. The molecular interactions of pyrethroid insecticides with insect and mammalian sodium channels. Pest Manag Sci. 2001 Oct;57(10):877-88.

Wu G, Li Q, Liu X, Li-Byarlay H, He B.Pestic Biochem Physiol. Differential state-dependent effects of deltamethrin and tefluthrin on sodium channels in central neurons of Helicoverpa armigera. 2021 Jun;175:104836.