This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2842

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increase, Cell death leads to Altered Bone Cell Homeostasis

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of bone loss adjacent High Low Vinita Chauhan (send email) Open for citation & comment WPHA/WNT Endorsed

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens Low NCBI
mouse Mus musculus Moderate NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male Low
Female Low
Unspecific Moderate

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
Adult Moderate
Juvenile Low

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

With respect to bone, an increase in cell apoptosis can overwhelm bone homeostasis leading to the release of pro-inflammatory factors, such as tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukin (IL)-6, and IL-1, that can promote disbalance of bone homeostasis (Fadeel & Orrenius, 2005). For example, increased apoptosis of osteocytes can lead to increased bone resorption and decreased bone deposition. Although the exact mechanism is still debated, it is believed that apoptotic osteocytes release various osteoclast stimulatory factors, such as the receptor activator of nuclear factor kappa B ligand (RANKL), upon death. Neighbouring viable osteocytes also release signals to recruit macrophages/pre-osteoclasts to stimulate osteoclastogenesis, leading to increased bone resorption locally (Jilka, Noble, and Weinstein, 2013; Komori et al., 2013; Plotkin, 2014). Additionally, some studies suggest osteoblast apoptosis may augment bone resorption as the pool of active osteoblasts is reduced and unable to counteract the activity of osteoclasts (Xiong et al., 2013). 

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The strategy for collating the evidence on radiation stressors to support the relationship is described in Kozbenko et al 2022. Briefly, a scoping review methodology was used to prioritize studies based on a population, exposure, outcome, endpoint statement.

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

Overall weight of evidence: High

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

The biological rationale for the connection of cell death and altered bone cell homeostasis is well-supported in the literature. Bone homeostasis is regulated by the balanced action of bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts and by the action of osteocytes, the “mechano-sensing cells” in the compact bone. Research has shown that osteocyte apoptosis-induced bone resorption plays a role in regulating bone homeostasis/bone mass (Komori, 2013). Briefly, apoptotic osteocytes release of osteoclast stimulatory factors that recruit pre-/osteoclasts locally to the apoptotic cell (Jilka, Noble, and Weinstein, 2013; Komori, 2013; O’Brien, Nakashima, and Takayanagi, 2013; Plotkin, 2014; Xiong and O’Brien, 2012). Further osteoblast death may impair bone formation as the pool of active bone-forming osteoblasts decreases. 

Regardless of if cells undergo apoptosis or autophagy, death is completed with the removal of the cells through engulfment by scavengers. In these cases, the cells are quietly removed without inflammation, because the integrity of the cytoplasmic membranes is maintained when phagocytosis occurs. In the case of apoptotic osteocytes, scavengers cannot reach osteocytes that are embedded in the compact bone and, thus, any type of osteocyte death will end in the rupture of the cytoplasmic membrane (Komori, 2013). After cell rupture, immunostimulatory factors are released to the bone surface and vascular channels and facilitate the recruitment and activation of macrophages, thereby promoting the production of proinflammatory cytokines that in turn facilitates osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption (Komori, 2013). The relationship between osteocyte apoptosis and increased local bone resorption has been verified by studies showing co-localization of apoptotic osteocytes and recruited osteoclasts, blockade of osteocyte apoptosis reduced bone resorption, and osteocyte apoptosis preceding osteoclast recruitment (Jilka, Noble, and Weinstein, 2013; O’Brien, Nakashima, and Takayanagi, 2013; Plotkin, 2014; Xiong et al., 2013). However, the exact mechanism how apoptotic osteocytes recruit osteoclasts is still debated.  

It has been shown that after rupture of the plasma membrane of dead osteocytes immunostimulatory factors such as high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) are released, facilitating the recruitment and activation of macrophages, thereby promoting the production of proinflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-6 and IL-1. IL-6 and IL-1 induce RANKL expression, that in turn facilitates osteoclastogenesis and bone resorption (Jilka, Noble, and Weinstein, 2013; Komori, 2013). Other studies, however, propose that apoptotic osteocytes signal to viable osteocytes in their vicinity to express high ratios of RANKL/OPG (RANKL being the main stimulator of osteoclastogenesis and OPG, osteoprotegerin, its inhibitor) and other pro-osteoclastogenic factors that directly stimulate osteoclast recruitment and enhance the production of mature osteoclasts (O’Brien, Nakashima, and Takayanagi, 2013; Plotkin, 2014).  

Autophagy is part of the regulation process of osteoclast differentiation and function and thus linked to bone resorption. Regarding bone resorption, osteoclasts encounter a low oxygen tension in their local environment as they are living at the surface and interior parts of the bone (Shapiro et al., 2014). Different studies have reported that hypoxia via activation of HIF-1α (hypoxia inducing factor-1α) enhances osteoclast differentiation and activity along with autophagic flux (Knowles and Athanasou, 2009). HIF-1α induces the expression of its downstream target BNIP3, which stimulates Beclin-1 release, increases the expression level of autophagic-related genes such as ATG5 and ATG12, recruits LC3 to autophagosome, and enhances the expression of osteoclast genes (nuclear factor of activated T cells 1 (NFATc1), tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP), Cathepsin K (CTSK), and matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs)) (Zhao et al., 2012). It also has been shown that upon activation of the osteoclast receptor RANK, by osteoblast-secreted and osteocyte-secreted RANKL, leads to the recruitment of TRAF6 and an increase of Beclin-1 and ATG5/7/12 with enhanced activation of LC3. Further, formed autophagosomes and lysosomes are directed to the ruffled border where bone resorption takes place (Chatziravdeli et al., 2019; Lacombe, Karsenty, and Ferron, 2013). 

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • The exact mechanism by which apoptotic osteocytes recruit osteoclasts is disputed. Some studies support the notion that apoptotic osteocytes in bone cannot be engulfed by phagocytes, due to physical restriction, and thus allow for rupture of the cell membrane; this allows for the release of a variety of osteoclast stimulatory factors that directly enhance bone resorption (Jilka, Noble, and Weinstein, 2013; Komori et al., 2013). Other studies, however, propose that dying osteocytes signal to viable osteocytes in their vicinity to release osteoclast stimulatory molecules, which then enhance osteoclast activity (O’Brien, Nakashima, and Takayanagi, 2013; Plotkin, 2014). Further research in this area may aid in elucidating the mechanisms of osteoclast recruitment directed to apoptotic osteocytes. 

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

Modulating factor

Details

Effects on the KER

References

Genotype 

Transgenic mice showed no effect of microgravity on apoptosis. 

Microgravity effect on TRAP-5b was partially reversed in transgenic mice. Microgravity effect on OCN activity was fully reversed in transgenic mice. 

Yang et al., 2020 

Drug 

α2M 

Treatment at 0.25 and 0.5 mg/mL slightly restored ALP activity and decreased the rate of apoptosis. 

Liu et al., 2018 

Drug 

Amifostine 

Treatment returned both apoptosis and ALP activity to control levels. 

Huang et al., 2018 

Drug 

Doxycycline autophagy inhibitor 

Treatment slightly reduced the increase in apoptosis and autophagy and slightly increased ALP activity. 

Li et al., 2020 

Drug 

Sem3a  

Treatment after 2 Gy irradiation stimulated an increase in cell apoptosis and decreased bone resorption. 

Huang et al., 2018 

Drug 

4-AAQB 

Treatment reduced autophagy and decreased the number of TRAP+ cells. 

Wu et al., 2020 

Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

Dose/Incidence Concordance- Apoptosis  

Reference 

Experiment Description 

Result 

Aguirre et al., 2006 

In vivo. Female Swiss Webster mice (C57BL/6 genetic background) were suspended via their tail to stimulate microgravity conditions. Bone resorption was determined by evaluating osteoclast number. Osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis were detected. 

Following tail suspension of mice, significant increases in osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis were observed by day 3. There was a maximum increase of ~2.3-fold and 

~1.8-fold in cortical and cancellous osteocyte apoptosis, respectively, on day 7. A ~2.6- fold increase in osteoblast apoptosis was measured at day 3 and sustained until day 7. This was associated with a significant 0.53-fold decrease in osteoblast number on day 3, which was restored to above controls on day 18 as it increased by 1.9-fold compared to the group without tail suspension. A 4.6-fold increase was observed in 

osteoclast number on day 18 relative to controls. 

Yang et al., 2020 

In vitro. Male 14-week-old wildtype and transgenic mice (CD1 background) were unloaded using tail suspension. Apoptosis was measured by TUNEL staining. Bone blood serum markers were measured via enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for osteocalcin (OCN) as an indicator for bone formation, and TRAP-5b as an indicator for bone resorption. In bone sections, osteoclasts and osteoblasts were identified by hematoxylin, eosin and TRAP staining. 

Hindlimb unloaded wildtype mice had an overall ~2.7-fold increase in osteocyte apoptosis, as well as a 3-fold increase in osteoblast apoptosis after 7 days of unloading. 

At day 7 and 28, significantly reduced number of osteoblasts (~0.3-fold and ~0.7-fold) was found in conjunction with reduced ALP (~0.4-fold and ~0.6-fold) gene expression. Further, serum marker OCN was significantly reduced (~0.5-fold and ~0.6-fold) at both time points indicating impaired bone formation. In contrast, at day 7 and 28, significantly increased number of osteoclasts (~13-fold and ~2.1-fold) was found in conjunction with increased cathepsin K (~8-fold and ~4.3-fold) gene expression. Further, serum marker TRAP5b was significantly increased (~3.5-fold and ~2-fold, respectively) at day 7 and 28 indicating increased bone resorption. 

Wright et al., 2015 

In vivo. The right hindlimbs of 20-week-old male C57BI/6 mice were irradiated with 2 Gy of X-rays at a rate of 1.6 Gy/min. Apoptotic osteocytes were measured by TUNEL. Osteoclast number was determined by TRAP stain. 

In vitro. Osteocyte-like cells (MLO-Y4) and osteoblast cells (MC3T3) were irradiated with 0-20 Gy X-rays. Annexin V was used as a marker of cellular apoptosis. 

In vivo. 2 Gy X-ray exposure resulted in a 2.5-fold increase in percentage of apoptotic osteocytes in trabecular bone. Osteoclast number increased significantly by ~1.8-fold after 2 Gy irradiation in the right hindlimb. 

In vitro, exposure to increasing doses of radiation from 0-20 Gy led to a linear dose- dependent increase in osteocyte apoptosis (MLO-Y4 cell culture) up to ~13.7-fold above controls at 20 Gy. Osteoblast apoptosis (MC3T3 cell culture) similarly increased in a dose-dependent fashion from 4-20 Gy, with a maximum increase of ~2.5-fold at 20 Gy (only significant increase). Osteoclasts increased significantly in MLO-Y4 coculture at 8 Gy, and calvarial osteoblasts decreased by ~0.5-fold at 10 Gy. 

Chandra et al., 2014 

In vivo. 4-month-old female rats were irradiated with 16 Gy of small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) X-rays, fractionated into two 8 Gy doses at a rate of 1.65 Gy/min. TUNEL staining in tibial trabecular bone was performed to determine osteoblast apoptosis. Osteoblast number was determined using static histomorphometry. 

Exposure to 16 Gy X-rays increases osteoblast apoptosis by ~7-fold and resulted in a ~0.25-fold decrease in osteoblast number. A significant decrease in osteoclast surface was also observed and is inconsistent with other radiation studies. The authors suggest the imbalance of radiation effects may lead to relatively higher osteoclast activity compared to osteoblast activity, leading to overall bone resorption. 

Chandra et al., 2017 

In vivo. Male C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks) were exposed to 8 Gy X-ray radiation at a rate of 1.65 Gy/min. Apoptosis was determined with a TUNEL assay. Osteoblast number was determined by static histomorphometry. 

8 Gy radiation exposure led to a ~3.9-fold increase in the number of TUNEL-positive osteoblasts and a ~0.5-fold decrease in osteoblast number.   

Liu et al., 2018 

In vitro. hBMMSCs were irradiated with 8 Gy of X-rays at a rate of 1.24 Gy/min. Apoptosis was measured with using an Annexin V-FITC staining kit. ALP activity was determined with a kit, and bone deposition was determined by Alizarin red staining. 

Apoptosis rate of osteoblast precursor cells (hBMMSCs) exposed to 8 Gy X-ray radiation increased ~3-fold, resulting in a ~0.5-fold decrease in ALP activity and bone deposition, as measured by optical density of calcium nodules. 

Huang et al., 2019 

Ex vivo. bmMSCs from the tibiae and femur of rats were irradiated with 2 Gy of 60Co gamma rays at a rate of 0.83 Gy/min. Apoptosis was determined with Annexin V staining. bmMSCs were analyzed for changes in bone cell function 

following irradiation through measuring levels of ALP. 

Exposure to 2 Gy gamma radiation resulted in a ~4-fold increase in osteoblast apoptosis and led to a significant ~0.3-fold decrease in ALP activity. 

Li et al., 2020 

In vitro. Osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells of mice were irradiated with 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 Gy of X-ray radiation. Apoptosis was determined by the Bcl-2/Bax ratio through western blot as well as caspase-3 activity with an assay kit. ALP activity was determined with an assay kit. 

X-ray radiation exposure resulted in a significant, dose-dependent decrease in the Bcl- 2/Bax ratio at 0-4 Gy with a maximum decrease of ~0.6-fold below controls at 4 Gy, indicating a significant shift of osteoblasts towards apoptosis. There was also a dose- dependent increase in caspase-3 activity at 0.5-4 Gy with significant increases at 0.5 Gy and greater and a maximum increase of 1.6-fold above controls at 4 Gy. This was accompanied by a dose dependent linear decrease in ALP activity with significant decreases at 0.5 Gy and greater, and a maximum decrease of ~0.3-fold below controls at 4 Gy. 

Li et al., 2015 

In vitro. Calvarial osteoblasts of Male rats were irradiated using 0, 1, 2, 5, 10 Gy of 137Cs gamma rays at a rate of 0.76 Gy/min. Reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) was used to determine caspase-3 levels and apoptosis was measured by Annexin v fluorescence. ALP activity was determined to measure osteoblastogenesis. 

Osteoblasts exposed to 1-10 Gy radiation observed an exponential dose-dependent increase in caspase-3 with significant increases at 5 and 10 Gy and a maximum increase of 3-fold above controls at 10 Gy. A maximum increase in osteoblast apoptosis was observed under 2 Gy at ~1.6-fold above control, with the first significant increase at 1 Gy. This resulted in a roughly inverse-exponential dose-dependent decrease in ALP activity down to ~0.7-fold below controls at 10 Gy, with the first significant increase at 5 Gy. 

Huang et al., 2018 

In vitro. Murine RAW264.7 macrophage cells were irradiated with 2 Gy of gamma rays at a rate of 0.83 Gy/min. Annexin V- FITC/PI was used as a measure for apoptosis. TRAP staining was used to determine osteoclast differentiation. 

Exposure of RAW264.7 osteoclast cells to 2 Gy gamma radiation had a 5.26-fold increase in apoptosis percentage, from 1.86% to 9.78%. This resulted in a 2-fold increase in TRAP-stained cell number and 2.4-fold increase in total resorption area. 

Dose/Incidence concordance- Autophagy 

Reference 

Experiment Description 

Result 

Li et al., 2020 

In vitro. Osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells of mice were irradiated with 0.25, 0.5,1,2, and 4 Gy of X-ray radiation. Autophagy markers were determined by western blot. ALP activity was determined by an assay kit. 

X-ray irradiation of osteoblasts linearly and dose-dependently increased LC3II/LC3I protein expression up to ~2.5-fold above controls under 1 Gy, after which it remained consistently elevated under 2 and 4 Gy. There were also dose-dependent increases in ATG5 and Beclin-1 up to ~1.75- and 3-fold above controls under 4 Gy, respectively. These increases in markers of autophagy induction were accompanied by substantial, dose-dependent inverse-exponential decrease in ALP activity down to 0.3-fold below control levels under 2 Gy 

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

Time Concordance 

Reference 

Experiment Description 

Result 

Aguirre et al., 2009 

In vivo. Female Swiss Webster mice (C57BL/6 genetic background) were suspended via their tail to stimulate microgravity conditions. Bone homeostasis (biomechanical testing, bone histomorphometry) was assessed in lumbar vertebra (L1-L5). Bone resorption was determined by evaluating osteoclast number. Osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis were detected by ISEL. 

Hindlimb unloading of mice led to significant increase in cortical and trabecular osteocyte apoptosis and osteoblast apoptosis on day 3 of unloading, which remained increased up to day 18. Control mice had an increase in osteoblast apoptosis on day 18 such that the increased apoptosis under unloading conditions was non-significant on that day. Osteoblast number was significantly decreased by day 3 of unloading, returned to control levels by day 7, and surpassed controls by 2-fold on day 18. Significantly increased osteoclast number was not observed until day 18 of unloading. 

Yang et al., 2020 

In vitro. Male 14-week-old wildtype and transgenic mice (CD1 background) were unloaded using tail suspension. The tibia were scanned via micro-CT at 28 days after un-loading. Apoptosis was measured by TUNEL staining. Bone blood serum markers were measured via ELISA for OCN as indicator for bone formation, and TRAP-5b as indicator for bone resorption. In bone sections osteoclasts and osteoblasts were identified by hematoxylin, eosin and TRAP staining. 

On day 7 of unloading, ALP decreased ~0.4-fold and OCN decreased ~0.5-fold, while TRAP-5b increased ~3.5-fold, indicating enhanced osteoclast activity and decreased osteoblast activity. This was further shown by a ~13-fold increase in osteoclast number and 3.7-fold decrease in osteoblast number on day 7 of unloading. 

On day 28 of unloading, there were further decreases in osteoblastogenesis markers (~0.6-fold decrease in ALP activity and 0.6-fold decrease in OCN expression), and an overall 3-fold decrease in osteoblast number. 

Osteocyte and osteoblast apoptosis under in vitro simulated microgravity was increased by ~2-3-fold by day 7 of unloading. Significant decreases in several markers of osteoblastogenesis were observed on day 7, which were attenuated relative to contemporaneous controls on day 28. A similar trend was observed for osteoclastogenesis. 

Wright et al., 2015 

In vivo. The right hindlimbs of 20-week-old male C57BI/6 mice were irradiated with 2 Gy of X-rays at a rate of 1.6 Gy/min. Apoptotic osteocytes were measured by TUNEL. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts as measures of altered bone cell homeostasis were determined by TRAP. 

 In vitro. Osteocyte-like cells (MLO-Y4) and osteoblast cells (MC3T3) were irradiated with 2-20 Gy X-rays. Annexin V was used as a marker of cellular apoptosis. 

In vitro radiation exposure of osteocytes (MLO-Y4) resulted in significant increases in apoptosis by 24 hours post-exposure, which increased several-fold by 48 hours. 

Osteoblast (MC3T3) apoptosis was also increased by 24 hours post-irradiation and remained increased up to 48 hours. Calvarial osteocyte apoptosis was not increased until 10 days post-irradiation. In vivo radiation exposure resulted in significant increase in hindlimb trabecular osteocyte apoptosis at 7 days post-irradiation. Significantly increased osteoclast number was observed at around the same time at 1 week post- irradiation, however, no significant changes in osteoblast number were observed. 

Li et al., 2020 

In vitro. Osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells of mice were irradiated with 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, or 4 Gy of X-ray radiation. Apoptosis was determined by the Bcl-2/Bax ratio through western blot as well as caspase-3 activity with an assay kit. ALP activity was determined with an assay kit. All endpoints were measured 72h post-irradiation. 

X-ray radiation exposure from 0.25-4 Gy led to a dose-dependent decrease in the Bcl- 2/Bax ratio down to 40% below controls, indicating a significant shift of osteoblasts towards apoptosis. There was also a dose-dependent increase in caspase-3 activity from 0.5-4 Gy up to 1.6-fold above controls. This was accompanied by a dose dependent linear decrease in ALP activity down to 0.3-fold below controls under 4 Gy. 

Chandra et al., 2014 

In vivo. 3-month-old female rats were irradiated with 16 Gy of SARRP X-rays, fractionated into two 8 Gy doses at a rate of 1.65 Gy/min. TUNEL staining in tibial trabecular bone was performed to determine osteoblast apoptosis. Osteoblast number was determined using static histomorphometry. 

Exposure to 16 Gy X-rays increases osteoblast apoptosis by ~7-fold at 2 weeks post-irradiation and resulted in a ~0.25-fold decrease in osteoblast number by day 28 post-irradiation. A significant decrease in osteoclast surface was also observed on day 28 post-irradiation and is inconsistent with other radiation studies. The authors suggest the imbalance of radiation effects may lead to relatively higher osteoclast activity compared to osteoblast activity, leading to overall bone resorption. 

Chandra et al., 2017 

In vivo. An experiment was conducted on male C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks) exposed to 8 Gy X-ray radiation at a rate of 1.65 Gy/min. Apoptosis was determined with a TUNEL assay. Osteoblast number was determined by static histomorphometry. 

8 Gy radiation exposure led to a ~3.9-fold increase in the number of TUNEL-positive osteoblasts 2 weeks after irradiation and a 0.5-fold decrease in osteoblast number 4 weeks after irradiation. 

   

Liu et al., 2018 

In vitro. hBMMSCs were irradiated with 12 Gy of X-rays at a rate of 1.24 Gy/min. Apoptosis was measured using an Annexin V-fluorescein isothiocyanate staining kit. ALP activity was determined with a kit, and bone deposition was determined by Alizarin red staining. 

Apoptosis rate of osteoblast precursor cells (human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells) exposed to 12 Gy X-ray radiation increased 3-fold after 24h, resulting in a 0.5-fold decrease in ALP activity after 1 week and bone deposition after 3 weeks, as measured by optical density of calcium nodules. 

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Not Identified

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

The evidence for the taxonomic applicability to humans is low as majority of the evidence is from in vitro human-derived cells. The relationship is supported by mice and rat models using male and female animals. The relationship is plausible at any life stage. However, most studies have used adult animal models.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Aguirre, J. I. et al. (2006), "Osteocyte apoptosis is induced by weightlessness in mice and precedes osteoclast recruitment and bone loss", Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 21/4, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.060107.  

Bang, C., and Thum, T. (2012), “Exosomes: New players in cell-cell communication”, The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology, Vol. 44, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2012.08.007  

Chandra, A. et al. (2017), "Suppression of Sclerostin Alleviates Radiation-Induced Bone Loss by Protecting Bone-Forming Cells and Their Progenitors Through Distinct Mechanisms", Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 32/2, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2996

Chandra, A. et al. (2014), "PTH1-34 Alleviates Radiotherapy-induced Local Bone Loss by Improving Osteoblast and Osteocyte Survival", Bone, Vol. 67/1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2014.06.030.PTH1-34.

Chatziravdeli, V., G. N. Katsaras and G. I. Lambrou. (2019), "Gene Expression in Osteoblasts and Osteoclasts Under Microgravity Conditions: A Systematic Review", Current Genomics, Vol. 20/3, Bentham Science Publishers, https://doi.org/10.2174/1389202920666190422142053. 

Debnath, J., E. H. Baehrecke and G. Kroemer. (2005), “Does Autophagy Contribute To Cell Death?”, Autophagy, Vol. 1/2, Informa, London, https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.1.2.1738 

Donaubauer, A. J. et al. (2020), "The influence of radiation on bone and bone cells—differential effects on osteoclasts and osteoblasts", International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Vol. 21/17, MDPI, Basel, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21176377. 

Fadeel, B. and Orrenius, S. (2005), “Apoptosis: a basic biological phenomenon with wide-ranging implications in human disease”, Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 258/6, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01570.x.

Fan, Y. and Zong, W. (2013), “The cellular decision between apoptosis and autophagy”, Chinese Journal of Cancer, Vol. 32/3, Department of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.012.10106https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.012.10106Huang, B. et al. (2019), "Amifostine suppresses the side effects of radiation on BMSCs by promoting cell proliferation and reducing ROS production", Stem Cells International, Vol. 2019, Hindawi, https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8749090. 

Huang, B. et al. (2018), "Sema3a inhibits the differentiation of raw264.7 cells to osteoclasts under 2gy radiation by reducing inflammation", PLoS ONE, Vol. 13/7, PLOS, San Francisco, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200000. 

Jilka, R. L., B. Noble and R. S. Weinstein. (2013), "Osteocyte Apoptosis", Bone, Vol. 54/2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BONE.2012.11.038. 

Knowles, H. J., and Athanasou, N. A. (2009), “Acute hypoxia and osteoclast activity: A balance between enhanced resorption and increased apoptosis”, Journal of Pathology, Vol. 218/2, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/PATH.2534 

Kobayashi, S. (2015), “Choose Delicately and Reuse Adequately: The Newly Revealed Process of Autophagy”. Biological and Pharmaceutical Bulletin, Vol. 38/8, J- ST. 

Komori, T. (2013), "Functions of the osteocyte network in the regulation of bone mass", Cell and Tissue Research, Vol. 352, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00441-012-1546-x. 

Kozbenko, T. et al. (2022), “Deploying elements of scoping review methods for adverse outcome pathway development: a space travel case example”, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 98/12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2022.2110306 

Lacombe, J., G. Karsenty and M. Ferron. (2013), "Regulation of lysosome biogenesis and functions in osteoclasts", Cell Cycle, Vol. 12/17, Informa, London, https://doi.org/10.4161/cc.25825. 

Levine, B. and G. Kroemer. (2008), "Autophagy in the Pathogenesis of Disease", Cell, Vol. 132/1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.018. 

Li, R. et al. (2020), "Effect of autophagy on irradiation‑induced damage in osteoblast‑like MC3T3‑E1 cells", Molecular Medicine Reports, Spanditos Publications, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2020.11425 

Li, X. F. et al. (2015), "Inhibitory effects of autologous γ-irradiated cell conditioned medium on osteoblasts in vitro", Molecular Medicine Reports, Vol. 12/1, Spanditos Publications, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2015.3354. 

Liu, Y. et al. (2018), “Protective Effects of a-2-Macroglobulin on Human Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Radiation injury”, Molecular Medicine Reports, Vol. 18/5, Spanditos Publications, https://doi.org/10.3892/mmr.2018.9449. 

Liu, W. et al. (2015), “Osteoprotegerin Induces Apoptosis of Osteoclasts and Osteoclast Precursor Cells via the Fas/Fas Ligand Pathway”, PLOS ONE, Vol. 10/11, PLOS, San Francisco, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142519 

Medina, D. L. et al. (2011), “Transcriptional Activation of Lysosomal Exocytosis Promotes Cellular Clearance”, Vol. 21/3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2011.07.016 

Mizushima, N., and Komatsu, M. (2011), “Autophagy: Renovation of Cells and Tissues”, Cell, Vol. 147/4, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026 

Mizushima, N., Yoshimori, T., and Levine, B. (2010), “Methods in Mammalian Autophagy Research”, Cell, Vol. 140/3, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028 

Nakamura, T. et al. (2007), “Estrogen Prevents Bone Loss via Estrogen Receptor α and Induction of Fas Ligand in Osteoclasts”, Cell, Vol 130/5, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.07.025 

O’Brien, C. A., T. Nakashima and H. Takayanagi. (2013), "Osteocyte Control of Osteoclastogenesis", Bone, Vol. 54/2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.08.121. 

Plotkin, L. I. (2014), "Apoptotic osteocytes and the control of Targeted Bone Resorption", Current Osteoporosis Reports, Vol. 12/1, Nature, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11914-014-0194-3. 

Shapiro, I. et al. (2014), “Boning up on autophagy The role of autophagy in skeletal biology”, Autophagy, Vol. 10/1, Landes Bioscience, https://doi.org/10.4161/auto.26679 

Soysa, N. S. and N. Alles. (2019), “Positive and negative regulators of osteoclast apoptosis”, Bone Reports, Vol 11, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bonr.2019.100225 

Wang, S. et al. (2020a), “The Role of Autophagy and Mitophagy in Bone Metabolic Disorders”, International journal of biological sciences, Vol. 16/14, Ivyspring International Publisher, https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.46627 

Wang, Y. et al. (2020b), "Targeted Overexpression of the Long Noncoding RNA ODSM can Regulate Osteoblast Function In Vitro and In Vivo", Cell Death and Disease, Vol. 11, Springer Nature, Berlin, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-020-2325-3 

 Wright, L. E. et al. (2015), "Single-Limb Irradiation Induces Local and Systemic Bone Loss in a Murine Model", Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, Vol. 30/7, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2458. 

 Wu, C. H. et al. (2020), "4-Acetylantroquinonol B Inhibits Osteoclastogenesis By Inhibiting the Autophagy Pathway in a Simulated Microgravity Model", International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Vol. 21/18, MDPI, Basel, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21186971. 

 Xiong, J. and C. A. O’Brien. (2012), "Osteocyte RANKL: New Insights into the Control of Bone Remodeling", Journal of Bone Mineral Research, Vol. 27/3, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1547 

 Yang, J. et al. (2020), "Blocking Glucocorticoid Signaling in Osteoblasts and Osteocytes Prevents Mechanical Unloading-Induced Cortical Bone Loss", Bone, Vol. 130, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2019.115108. 

Zhao, Y. et al. (2012), “Autophagy regulates hypoxia-induced osteoclastogenesis through the HIF-1α/BNIP3 signaling pathway”, Journal of Cellular Physiology, Vol. 227/2, Wiley, https://doi.org/10.1002/JCP.22768