This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 3391

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increased E2 availability leads to Activation, ERα

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
SULT1E1 inhibition leading to uterine adenocarcinoma via increased estrogen availability at target organ level adjacent Martina Panzarea (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite
Aromatase induction leading to estrogen receptor alpha activation via increased estradiol adjacent Martina Panzarea (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite
17β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2, inhibition leading to activation, estrogen receptor alpha adjacent Martina Panzarea (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Vertebrates Vertebrates NCBI
Invertebrates Invertebrates NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

The biological plausibility of this KERs is linked to the physiological role of E2 on estrogen-responsive tissues of all mammals.

The uterus in rodents and the human undergoes cyclical changes of growth and degeneration (Fig. 10 and 11). In both species, estrogens produced from the developing follicles stimulate endometrial growth, and progesterone is responsible for converting the estrogen primed endometrium into a receptive state. In rodents, if pregnancy does not occur, dioestrus (secretory phase in humans, cycle days 15–28) terminates with regression of the corpus luteum, and the endometrium is resorbed (menstruation in humans, cycle days 1–5). During proestrus (proliferative phase in humans, cycle days 6–14) follicles develop and start to produce estrogens that stimulate endometrial growth. During oestrous (peri-ovulatory period in humans, cycle days 13–15) ovarian follicles mature. The magnitude of uterine growth stimulation is largely dependent upon the duration of bioavailable E2 and receptor interaction (Groothius et al., 2007).

Bergman et al., 1992 studied the role of oestradiol during the mouse oestrus cycle. The study demonstrated that on proestrus, when plasma E2 levels are at the highest, the cell nuclear ER concentration in uterus was greater than metestrus. This increase was attributable to an increase in total cellular ER (cytosolic and nuclear) and secondarily to activation of ER (measured by its distribution from cytosolic to the nuclear fraction) (Tables 4 and 5).

Table 4. Uterine weight, DNA, RNA, and plasma concentrations of E2 during the estrous cycle of C57BL/6J mice. from Bergman et al., 1992

Table 5. Uterine weight, DNA, RNA, and plasma concentrations of E2 in E2-treated OVX mice. from Bergman et al., 1992

Overall, this study demonstrated in mice a strong association between E2 and the biosynthesis and intracellular distribution of the uterine ER and its mRNA.

The study indicated that the basis for increased nuclear ER on proestrus involves two estrogen-dependent components: 1. activation of ER to a nucleophilic state and 2. increased concentration of ER available for activation, the latter accounting for most of the increase in nuclear ER. The process probably begins early on the day of proestrus with increased activation of ER in response to the rising levels of E2. Increased activation of ER leads to increased DNA binding of ER, which increases ER mRNA and ER. Increased ER provides the substrate for a further increase in DNA-bound ER, which serves to amplify the effect of the rising E2 in a feed-forward cascade that ultimately leads to the dramatic increases in ER mRNA, ER, and polyadenylated RNA that are observed at midday on proestrus (Bergman et al., 2005).

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help
  • E2 availability in uterus is rarely measured as stand-alone endpoint. The evidence collected on different stressors indicates the induction of specific estrogen-responsive genes; however, there is still little knowledge in this field
  • There are few studies indicating which genes can be used as biomarkers indicative of an increase of E2 availability in uterus / ER activation in uterus.
  • It is well-known that there is large variability in the uterotrophic assay (Brown et al., 2015), this can be explained by the differences in the experimental design
  • The presence of phytoestrogen in the diet could influence the outcome of the experiments

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help

It is acknowledged that the increase of oestradiol (E2) content in malignant endometrium compared to macroscopically normal looking endometrium supports the idea of an important role of excessive estrogenic stimulation in the development and further progression of endometrial cancer in endometrial cancer.

However, further investigation on the impact of these modulation factors on quantitative aspects of the response-response function that describe the relationships between KEs should be performed

Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

In AOP504, there is only one study where the increase of E2 bioavailability in uterus and ER activation has been measured in the same experiment in vivo (Bergman et al., 1992). Therefore, there are not enough data available to make any definitive quantitative correlations.

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Bergman MD, Schachter BS, Karelus K, Combatsiaris EP, Garcia T and Nelson JF, 1992. Up-regulation of the uterine estrogen receptor and its messenger ribonucleic acid during the mouse estrous cycle: the role of estradiol. Endocrinology, 130:1923-1930. doi: 10.1210/endo.130.4.1547720

Jung EM, An BS, Choi KC and Jeung EB, 2012. Potential estrogenic activity of Triclosan  in the uterus of immature rats and rat pituitary GH3 cells. Toxicol Lett, 208:142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.10.017

Kitamura S, Suzuki T, Sanoh S, Kohta R, Jinno N, Sugihara K, Yoshihara Si, Fujimoto N, Watanabe H and Ohta S, 2005. Comparative Study of the Endocrine-Disrupting Activity of Bisphenol A and 19 Related Compounds. Toxicological Sciences, 84:249-259. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfi074

Louis GW, Hallinger DR and Stoker TE, 2013. The effect of Triclosan  on the uterotrophic response to extended doses of ethinyl estradiol in the weanling rat. Reprod Toxicol, 36:71-77. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2012.12.001

Montagnini BG, Pernoncine KV, Borges LI, Costa NO, Moreira EG, Anselmo-Franci JA, Kiss ACI and Gerardin DCC, 2018. Investigation of the potential effects of Triclosan  as an endocrine disruptor in female rats: Uterotrophic assay and two-generation study. Toxicology, 410:152-165. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2018.10.005

Rodríguez PE and Sanchez MS, 2010. Maternal exposure to Triclosan  impairs thyroid homeostasis and female pubertal development in Wistar rat offspring. J Toxicol Environ Health A, 73:1678-1688. doi: 10.1080/15287394.2010.516241

Sanders JM, Coulter SJ, Knudsen GA, Dunnick JK, Kissling GE and Birnbaum LS, 2016. Disruption of estrogen homeostasis as a mechanism for uterine toxicity in Wistar Han rats treated with tetrabromobisphenol A. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 298:31-39. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2016.03.007

Stoker TE, Gibson EK and Zorrilla LM, 2010. Triclosan  exposure modulates estrogen-dependent responses in the female wistar rat. Toxicol Sci, 117:45-53. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfq180

Sun L, Yu T, Guo J, Zhang Z, Hu Y, Xiao X, Sun Y, Xiao H, Li J, Zhu D, Sai L and Li J, 2016. The estrogenicity of methylparaben and ethylparaben at doses close to the acceptable daily intake in immature Sprague-Dawley rats. Sci Rep, 6:25173. doi: 10.1038/srep25173

Wikoff DS, Rager JE, Haws LC and Borghoff SJ, 2016. A high dose mode of action for tetrabromobisphenol A-induced uterine adenocarcinomas in Wistar Han rats: A critical evaluation of key events in an adverse outcome pathway framework. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol, 77:143-159. doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.01.018