<div class="title">AOP 331: Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</div>
<strong>Short Title: ROS leading to growth inhibition via DNA damage and reduced proliferation</strong>
<div class="title">AOP 331: Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</div>
<strong>Short Title: ROS leading to growth inhibition via LPO and cell death</strong>
<td><a href="/aops/383">Aop:383 - Inhibition of Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 leading to liver fibrosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/382">Aop:382 - Angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) agonism leading to lung fibrosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/384">Aop:384 - Hyperactivation of ACE/Ang-II/AT1R axis leading to chronic kidney disease </a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/396">Aop:396 - Deposition of ionizing energy leads to population decline via impaired meiosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/409">Aop:409 - Frustrated phagocytosis leads to malignant mesothelioma</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/413">Aop:413 - Oxidation and antagonism of reduced glutathione leading to mortality via acute renal failure</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/416">Aop:416 - Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation leading to lung cancer through IL-6 toxicity pathway</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/418">Aop:418 - Aryl hydrocarbon receptor activation leading to impaired lung function through AHR-ARNT toxicity pathway</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/386">Aop:386 - Deposition of ionizing energy leading to population decline via inhibition of photosynthesis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/387">Aop:387 - Deposition of ionising energy leading to population decline via mitochondrial dysfunction</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/319">Aop:319 - Binding to ACE2 leading to lung fibrosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/451">Aop:451 - Interaction with lung resident cell membrane components leads to lung cancer</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/476">Aop:476 - Adverse Outcome Pathways diagram related to PBDEs associated male reproductive toxicity</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/492">Aop:492 - Glutathione conjugation leading to reproductive dysfunction via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/497">Aop:497 - ERa inactivation alters mitochondrial functions and insulin signalling in skeletal muscle and leads to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/500">Aop:500 - Activation of MEK-ERK1/2 leads to deficits in learning and cognition via ROS and apoptosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/505">Aop:505 - Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation leads to cancer via inflammation pathway</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/513">Aop:513 - Reactive Oxygen (ROS) formation leads to cancer via Peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor (PPAR) pathway</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/521">Aop:521 - Essential element imbalance leads to reproductive failure via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/540">Aop:540 - Oxidative Stress in the Fish Ovary Leads to Reproductive Impairment via Reduced Vitellogenin Production</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/462">Aop:462 - Activation of reactive oxygen species leading the atherosclerosis</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/299">Aop:299 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and follicular atresia</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/311">Aop:311 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and oocyte apoptosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/327">Aop:327 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (1)</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/328">Aop:328 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (2)</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/329">Aop:329 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (3)</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/330">Aop:330 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (4)</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/26">Aop:26 - Calcium-mediated neuronal ROS production and energy imbalance</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/534">Aop:534 - Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) inhibition leads to cancer through oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/273">Aop:273 - Mitochondrial complex inhibition leading to liver injury</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/488">Aop:488 - Increased reactive oxygen species production leading to decreased cognitive function</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/298">Aop:298 - Increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer via chronic ROS</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/298">Aop:298 - Increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) leading to human treatment-resistant gastric cancer</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/27">Aop:27 - Cholestatic Liver Injury induced by Inhibition of the Bile Salt Export Pump (ABCB11)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/511">Aop:511 - The AOP framework on ROS-mediated oxidative stress induced vascular disrupting effects </a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/207">Aop:207 - NADPH oxidase and P38 MAPK activation leading to reproductive failure in Caenorhabditis elegans</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/423">Aop:423 - Toxicological mechanisms of hepatocyte apoptosis through the PARP1 dependent cell death pathway </a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/481">Aop:481 - AOPs of amorphous silica nanoparticles: ROS-mediated oxidative stress increased respiratory dysfunction and diseases.</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/282">Aop:282 - Adverse outcome pathway on photochemical toxicity initiated by light exposure</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/569">Aop:569 - Decreased DNA methylation of FAM50B/PTCHD3 leading to IQ loss of children via PI3K-Akt pathway</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/598">Aop:598 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Aop:599 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/600">Aop:600 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/601">Aop:601 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/602">Aop:602 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/603">Aop:603 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell cycle disruption</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/608">Aop:608 - Thyroid Hormone Excess Leading to Reduced, Swimming Performance via Hypomyelination</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/613">Aop:613 - Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation leading to early life stage mortality via increased reactive oxygen species production</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/622">Aop:622 - Calcineurin inhibitor induced nephrotoxicity leading to kidney failure</a></td>
<p>ROS is a normal constituent found in all organisms, <em>lifestages, and sexes.</em></p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p>Biological State: increased reactive oxygen species (ROS)</p>
<p>Biological compartment: an entire cell -- may be cytosolic, may also enter organelles.</p>
<p>Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are O2- derived molecules that can be both free radicals (e.g. superoxide, hydroxyl, peroxyl, alcoxyl) and non-radicals (hypochlorous acid, ozone and singlet oxygen) (Bedard and Krause 2007; Ozcan and Ogun 2015). ROS production occurs naturally in all kinds of tissues inside various cellular compartments, such as mitochondria and peroxisomes (Drew and Leeuwenburgh 2002; Ozcan and Ogun 2015). Furthermore, these molecules have an important function in the regulation of several biological processes – they might act as antimicrobial agents or triggers of animal gamete activation and capacitation (Goud et al. 2008; Parrish 2010; Bisht et al. 2017). <br />
<p>Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are O<sub>2</sub>- derived molecules that can be both free radicals (e.g. superoxide, hydroxyl, peroxyl, alcoxyl) and non-radicals (hypochlorous acid, ozone and singlet oxygen) (Bedard and Krause 2007; Ozcan and Ogun 2015). ROS production occurs naturally in all kinds of tissues inside various cellular compartments, such as mitochondria and peroxisomes (Drew and Leeuwenburgh 2002; Ozcan and Ogun 2015). Furthermore, these molecules have an important function in the regulation of several biological processes – they might act as antimicrobial agents or triggers of animal gamete activation and capacitation (Goud et al. 2008; Parrish 2010; Bisht et al. 2017). <br />
However, in environmental stress situations (exposure to radiation, chemicals, high temperatures) these molecules have its levels drastically increased, and overly interact with macromolecules, namely nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates and lipids, causing cell and tissue damage (Brieger et al. 2012; Ozcan and Ogun 2015). </p>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Reactive oxygen species (ROS) refers to the chemical species superoxide, hydrogen peroxide, and their secondary reactive products. In the biological context, ROS are signaling molecules with important roles in cell energy metabolism, cell proliferation, and fate. Therefore, balancing ROS levels at the cellular and tissue level is an important part of many biological processes. Disbalance, mainly an increase in ROS levels, can cause cell dysfunction and irreversible cell damage.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">ROS are produced from both exogenous stressors and normal endogenous cellular processes, such as the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC). Inhibition of the ETC can result in the accumulation of ROS. Exposure to chemicals, heavy metal ions, or ionizing radiation can also result in increased production of ROS. Chemicals and heavy metal ions can deplete cellular antioxidants reducing the cell’s ability to control cellular ROS and resulting in the accumulation of ROS. Cellular antioxidants include glutathione (GSH), protein sulfhydryl groups, superoxide dismutase (SOD). </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">ROS are radicals, ions, or molecules that have a single unpaired electron in their outermost shell of electrons, which can be categorized into two groups: free oxygen radicals and non-radical ROS [Liou et al., 2010]. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">highly reactive lipid- or carbohydrate-derived carbonyl compounds</span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Potential sources of ROS include NADPH oxidase, xanthine oxidase, mitochondria, nitric oxide synthase, cytochrome P450, lipoxygenase/cyclooxygenase, and monoamine oxidase [Granger et al., 2015]. ROS are generated through NADPH oxidases consisting of p47<sup>phox</sup> and p67<sup>phox</sup>. ROS are generated through xanthine oxidase activation in sepsis [Ramos et al., 2018]. Arsenic produces ROS [Zhang et al., 2011]. Mitochondria-targeted paraquat and metformin mediate ROS production [Chowdhury et al., 2020]. ROS are generated by bleomycin [Lu et al., 2010]. Radiation induces dose-dependent ROS production [Ji et al., 2019]. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">ROS are generated in the course of cellular respiration, metabolism, cell signaling, and inflammation [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea et al. 2017]. Hydrogen peroxide is also made by the endoplasmic reticulum in the course of protein folding. Nitric oxide (NO) is produced at the highest levels by nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells and phagocytes. NO production is one of the main mechanisms by which phagocytes kill bacteria [Wang et al., 2017]. The other species are produced by reactions with superoxide or peroxide, or by other free radicals or enzymes.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">ROS activity is principally local. Most ROS have short half-lives, ranging from nano- to milliseconds, so diffusion is limited, while reactive nitrogen species (RNS) nitric oxide or peroxynitrite can survive long enough to diffuse across membranes [Calcerrada et al. 2011]. Consequently, local concentrations of ROS are much higher than average cellular concentrations, and signaling is typically controlled by colocalization with redox buffers [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea et al. 2017]. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Although their existence is limited temporally and spatially, ROS interact with other ROS or with other nearby molecules to produce more ROS and participate in a feedback loop to amplify the ROS signal, which can increase RNS. Both ROS and RNS also move into neighboring cells, and ROS can increase intracellular ROS signaling in neighboring cells [Egea et al. 2017].</span></span></p>
<p>In the primary event, photoreactive chemicals are excited by the absorption of photon energy. The energy of the photoactivated chemicals transfer to oxygen and then generates the reactive oxygen species (ROS), including superoxide (O<sub>2</sub><sup>−</sup>) via type I reaction and singlet oxygen (<sup>1</sup>O<sub>2</sub>) via type II reaction, as principal intermediate species in phototoxic reaction (Foote, 1991, Onoue et al. , 2009).</p>
</div>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p>Photocolorimetric assays (Sharma et al. 2017; Griendling et al. 2016) or through commercial kits purchased from specialized companies.</p>
<p>Yuan, Yan, et al., (2013) described ROS monitoring by using H<sub>2</sub>-DCF-DA, a redox-sensitive fluorescent dye. Briefly, the harvested cells were incubated with H<sub>2</sub>-DCF-DA (50 µmol/L final concentration) for 30 min in the dark at 37°C. After treatment, cells were immediately washed twice, re-suspended in PBS, and analyzed on a BD-FACS Aria flow cytometry. ROS generation was based on fluorescent intensity which was recorded by excitation at 504 nm and emission at 529 nm.</p>
<p>Lipid peroxidation (LPO) can be measured as an indicator of oxidative stress damage Yen, Cheng Chien, et al., (2013).</p>
<p>Chattopadhyay, Sukumar, et al. (2002) assayed the generation of free radicals within the cells and their extracellular release in the medium by addition of yellow NBT salt solution (Park et al., 1968). Extracellular release of ROS converted NBT to a purple colored formazan. The cells were incubated with 100 ml of 1 mg/ml NBT solution for 1 h at 37 °C and the product formed was assayed at 550 nm in an Anthos 2001 plate reader. The observations of the ‘cell-free system’ were confirmed by cytological examination of parallel set of explants stained with chromogenic reactions for NO and ROS.</p>
<p>On the basis of the pathogenesis of drug-induced phototoxicity, a reactive oxygen species (ROS) assay was proposed to evaluate the phototoxic risk of chemicals. The ROS assay can monitor generation of ROS, such as singlet oxygen and superoxide, from photoirradiated chemicals, and the ROS data can be used to evaluate the photoreactivity of chemicals (Onoue et al. , 2014, Onoue et al. , 2013, Onoue and Tsuda, 2006). The ROS assay is a recommended approach by guidelines to evaluate the phototoxic risk of chemicals (ICH, 2014, PCPC, 2014).</p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Many fluorescent compounds can be used to detect ROS, some of which are specific, and others are less specific. </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・ROS can be detected by fluorescent probes such as <em>p</em>-methoxy-phenol derivative [Ashoka et al., 2020].</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・Chemiluminescence analysis can detect the superoxide, where some probes have a wider range for detecting hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide, and peroxynitrite [Fuloria et al., 2021].</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・ROS in the blood can be detected using superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPION)-based biosensor [Lee et al., 2020].</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・Hydrogen peroxide (H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) can be detected with a colorimetric probe, which reacts with H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> in a 1:1 stoichiometry to produce a bright pink colored product, followed by the detection with a standard colorimetric microplate reader with a filter in the 540-570 nm range.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・The levels of ROS can be quantified using multiple-step amperometry using a stainless steel counter electrode and non-leak Ag|AgCl reference node [Flaherty et al., 2017].</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">・Singlet oxygen can be measured by monitoring the bleaching of <em>p</em>-nitrosodimethylaniline at 440 nm using a spectrophotometer with imidazole as a selective acceptor of singlet oxygen [Onoue et al., 2014].</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Alternative methods involve the detection of redox-dependent changes to cellular constituents such as proteins, DNA, lipids, or glutathione [Dickinson and Chang 2011; Wang et al. 2013; Griendling et al. 2016]. However, these methods cannot generally distinguish between the oxidative species behind the changes and cannot provide good resolution for the kinetics of oxidative activity.</span></span></p>
</div>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Akai, K., et al. (2004). "Ability of ferric nitrilotriacetate complex with three pH-dependent conformations to induce lipid peroxidation." Free Radic Res. Sep;38(9):951-62. doi: 10.1080/1071576042000261945</p>
<p>Ashoka, A. H., et al. (2020). "Recent Advances in Fluorescent Probes for Detection of HOCl and HNO." ACS omega, 5(4), 1730-1742. doi:10.1021/acsomega.9b03420</p>
<p>B.H. Park, S.M. Fikrig, E.M. Smithwick Infection and nitroblue tetrazolium reduction by neutrophils: a diagnostic aid Lancet, 2 (1968), pp. 532-534</p>
<p>Bedard, Karen, and Karl-Heinz Krause. 2007. “The NOX Family of ROS-Generating NADPH Oxidases: Physiology and Pathophysiology.” Physiological Reviews 87 (1): 245–313.</p>
<p>Bisht, Shilpa, Muneeb Faiq, Madhuri Tolahunase, and Rima Dada. 2017. “Oxidative Stress and Male Infertility.” Nature Reviews. Urology 14 (8): 470–85.</p>
<p>Brieger, K., S. Schiavone, F. J. Miller Jr, and K-H Krause. 2012. “Reactive Oxygen Species: From Health to Disease.” Swiss Medical Weekly 142 (August): w13659.</p>
<p>Calcerrada, P., et al. (2011). "Nitric oxide-derived oxidants with a focus on peroxynitrite: molecular targets, cellular responses and therapeutic implications." Curr Pharm Des 17(35): 3905-3932.</p>
<p>Chattopadhyay, Sukumar, et al. "Apoptosis and necrosis in developing brain cells due to arsenic toxicity and protection with antioxidants." Toxicology letters 136.1 (2002): 65-76.</p>
<p>Chowdhury, A. R., et al. (2020). "Mitochondria-targeted paraquat and metformin mediate ROS production to induce multiple pathways of retrograde signaling: A dose-dependent phenomenon." Redox Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2020.101606. PMID: 32604037; PMCID: PMC7327929.</p>
<p>Dickinson, B. C. and Chang C. J. (2011). "Chemistry and biology of reactive oxygen species in signaling or stress responses." Nature chemical biology 7(8): 504-511.</p>
<p>Drew, Barry, and Christiaan Leeuwenburgh. 2002. “Aging and the Role of Reactive Nitrogen Species.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 959 (April): 66–81.</p>
<p>Egea, J., et al. (2017). "European contribution to the study of ROS: A summary of the findings and prospects for the future from the COST action BM1203 (EU-ROS)." Redox biology 13: 94-162.</p>
<p>Flaherty, R. L., et al. (2017). "Glucocorticoids induce production of reactive oxygen species/reactive nitrogen species and DNA damage through an iNOS mediated pathway in breast cancer." Breast Cancer Research, 19(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-017-0823-8</p>
<p>Foote CS. Definition of type I and type II photosensitized oxidation. Photochem Photobiol. 1991;54:659.</p>
<p>Fuloria, S., et al. (2021). "Comprehensive Review of Methodology to Detect Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) in Mammalian Species and Establish Its Relationship with Antioxidants and Cancer." Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) 10(1) 128. doi:10.3390/antiox10010128</p>
<p>Go, Y. M. and Jones, D. P. (2013). "The redox proteome." J Biol Chem 288(37): 26512-26520.</p>
<p>Goud, Anuradha P., Pravin T. Goud, Michael P. Diamond, Bernard Gonik, and Husam M. Abu-Soud. 2008. “Reactive Oxygen Species and Oocyte Aging: Role of Superoxide, Hydrogen Peroxide, and Hypochlorous Acid.” Free Radical Biology & Medicine 44 (7): 1295–1304.</p>
<p>Granger, D. N. and Kvietys, P. R. (2015). "Reperfusion injury and reactive oxygen species: The evolution of a concept" Redox Biol. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2015.08.020. PMID: 26484802; PMCID: PMC4625011.</p>
<p>Griendling, K. K., et al. (2016). "Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species, Reactive Nitrogen Species, and Redox-Dependent Signaling in the Cardiovascular System: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association." Circulation research 119(5): e39-75.</p>
<p>Griendling, Kathy K., Rhian M. Touyz, Jay L. Zweier, Sergey Dikalov, William Chilian, Yeong-Renn Chen, David G. Harrison, Aruni Bhatnagar, and American Heart Association Council on Basic Cardiovascular Sciences. 2016. “Measurement of Reactive Oxygen Species, Reactive Nitrogen Species, and Redox-Dependent Signaling in the Cardiovascular System: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.” Circulation Research 119 (5): e39–75.</p>
<p>ICH. ICH Guideline S10 Guidance on Photosafety Evaluation of Pharmaceuticals.: International Council on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use; 2014.</p>
<p>Itziou, A., et al. (2011). "In vivo and in vitro effects of metals in reactive oxygen species production, protein carbonylation, and DNA damage in land snails Eobania vermiculata." Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 60(4), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-010-9583-5</p>
<p>Ji, W. O., et al. "Quantitation of the ROS production in plasma and radiation treatments of biotargets." Sci Rep. 2019 Dec 27;9(1):19837. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56160-0. PMID: 31882663; PMCID: PMC6934759.</p>
<p>Kruk, J. and Aboul-Enein, H. Y. (2017). "Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species in Carcinogenesis: Implications of Oxidative Stress on the Progression and Development of Several Cancer Types." Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 17:11. doi:10.2174/1389557517666170228115324</p>
<p>Lee, D. Y., et al. (2020). "PEGylated Bilirubin-coated Iron Oxide Nanoparticles as a Biosensor for Magnetic Relaxation Switching-based ROS Detection in Whole Blood." Theranostics, 10(5), 1997-2007. doi:10.7150/thno.39662</p>
<p>Li, Z., et al. (2020). "Inhibition of MiR-25 attenuates doxorubicin-induced apoptosis, reactive oxygen species production and DNA damage by targeting pten." International Journal of Medical Sciences, 17(10), 1415–1427. https://doi.org/10.7150/ijms.41980</p>
<p>Liou, G. Y. and Storz, P. "Reactive oxygen species in cancer." Free Radic Res. 2010 May;44(5):479-96. doi:10.3109/10715761003667554. PMID: 20370557; PMCID: PMC3880197.</p>
<p>Lu, Y., et al. (2010). "Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase/akt regulates bleomycin-induced fibroblast proliferation and collagen production." American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 42(4), 432–441. https://doi.org/10.1165/rcmb.2009-0002OC</p>
<p>Onoue, S., et al. (2013). "Establishment and intra-/inter-laboratory validation of a standard protocol of reactive oxygen species assay for chemical photosafety evaluation." J Appl Toxicol. 33(11):1241-50. doi: 10.1002/jat.2776. Epub 2012 Jun 13. PMID: 22696462.</p>
<p>Onoue S, Hosoi K, Toda T, Takagi H, Osaki N, Matsumoto Y, et al. Intra-/inter-laboratory validation study on reactive oxygen species assay for chemical photosafety evaluation using two different solar simulators. Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA. 2014;28:515-23.</p>
<p>Onoue S, Hosoi K, Wakuri S, Iwase Y, Yamamoto T, Matsuoka N, et al. Establishment and intra-/inter-laboratory validation of a standard protocol of reactive oxygen species assay for chemical photosafety evaluation. Journal of applied toxicology : JAT. 2013;33:1241-50.</p>
<p>Onoue S, Kawamura K, Igarashi N, Zhou Y, Fujikawa M, Yamada H, et al. Reactive oxygen species assay-based risk assessment of drug-induced phototoxicity: classification criteria and application to drug candidates. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2008;47:967-72.</p>
<p>Onoue S, Seto Y, Gandy G, Yamada S. Drug-induced phototoxicity; an early<em> in vitro</em> identification of phototoxic potential of new drug entities in drug discovery and development. Current drug safety. 2009;4:123-36.</p>
<p>Onoue S, Tsuda Y. Analytical studies on the prediction of photosensitive/phototoxic potential of pharmaceutical substances. Pharmaceutical research. 2006;23:156-64.</p>
<p>Ozcan, Ayla, and Metin Ogun. 2015. “Biochemistry of Reactive Oxygen and Nitrogen Species.” In Basic Principles and Clinical Significance of Oxidative Stress, edited by Sivakumar Joghi Thatha Gowder. Rijeka: IntechOpen.</p>
<p>Parrish, A. R. 2010. “2.27 - Hypoxia/Ischemia Signaling.” In Comprehensive Toxicology (Second Edition), edited by Charlene A. McQueen, 529–42. Oxford: Elsevier.</p>
<p>PCPC. PCPC 2014 safety evaluation guidelines; Chapter 7: Evaluation of Photoirritation and Photoallergy potential. Personal Care Products Council; 2014.</p>
<p>Ramos, M. F. P., et al. (2018). "Xanthine oxidase inhibitors and sepsis." Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 32:2058738418772210. doi:10.1177/2058738418772210</p>
<p>Ravanat, J. L., et al. (2014). "Radiation-mediated formation of complex damage to DNA: a chemical aspect overview." Br J Radiol 87(1035): 20130715.</p>
<p>Schutzendubel, A. and Polle, A. (2002). "Plant responses to abiotic stresses: heavy metal-induced oxidative stress and protection by mycorrhization." Journal of Experimental Botany, 53(372), 1351–1365. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1351</p>
<p>Seto Y, Kato M, Yamada S, Onoue S. Development of micellar reactive oxygen species assay for photosafety evaluation of poorly water-soluble chemicals. Toxicology in vitro : an international journal published in association with BIBRA. 2013;27:1838-46.</p>
<p>Sharma, Gunjan, Nishant Kumar Rana, Priya Singh, Pradeep Dubey, Daya Shankar Pandey, and Biplob Koch. 2017. “p53 Dependent Apoptosis and Cell Cycle Delay Induced by Heteroleptic Complexes in Human Cervical Cancer Cells.” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & Pharmacotherapie 88 (April): 218–31.</p>
<p>Silva, R., et al. (2019). "Light exposure during growth increases riboflavin production, reactive oxygen species accumulation and DNA damage in Ashbya gossypii riboflavin-overproducing strains." FEMS Yeast Research, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/foy114</p>
<p>Tsuchiya K, et al. (2005). "Oxygen radicals photo-induced by ferric nitrilotriacetate complex." Biochim Biophys Acta. 1725(1):111-9. doi:10.1016/j.bbagen.2005.05.001</p>
<p>Wang, J., et al. (2017). "Glucocorticoids Suppress Antimicrobial Autophagy and Nitric Oxide Production and Facilitate Mycobacterial Survival in Macrophages." Scientific reports, 7(1), 982. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01174-9</p>
<p>Wang, X., et al. (2013). "Imaging ROS signaling in cells and animals." Journal of molecular medicine 91(8): 917-927.</p>
<p>Yen, Cheng Chien, et al. "Inorganic arsenic causes cell apoptosis in mouse cerebrum through an oxidative stress-regulated signaling pathway." Archives of toxicology 85 (2011): 565-575.</p>
<p>Yuan, Yan, et al. "Cadmium-induced apoptosis in primary rat cerebral cortical neurons culture is mediated by a calcium signaling pathway." PloS one 8.5 (2013): e64330.</p>
<p>Zhang, Z., et al. (2011). "Reactive oxygen species mediate arsenic induced cell transformation and tumorigenesis through Wnt/β-catenin pathway in human colorectal adenocarcinoma DLD1 cells. " Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 256(2), 114-121. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2011.07.016</p>
<h3>List of Key Events in the AOP</h3>
<h4><a href="/events/1634">Event: 1634: Increase, Oxidative DNA damage</a></h4>
<h5>Short Name: Increase, Oxidative DNA damage</h5>
<td><a href="/aops/296">Aop:296 - Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/220">Aop:220 - Cyp2E1 Activation Leading to Liver Cancer</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/17">Aop:17 - Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/284">Aop:284 - Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress leads to chronic kidney disease</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/377">Aop:377 - Dysregulated prolonged Toll Like Receptor 9 (TLR9) activation leading to Multi Organ Failure involving Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/411">Aop:411 - Oxidative stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function </a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/299">Aop:299 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and follicular atresia</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/424">Aop:424 - Oxidative stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function via CFTR dysfunction</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/425">Aop:425 - Oxidative Stress Leading to Decreased Lung Function via Decreased FOXJ1</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/429">Aop:429 - A cholesterol/glucose dysmetabolism initiated Tau-driven AOP toward memory loss (AO) in sporadic Alzheimer's Disease with plausible MIE's plug-ins for environmental neurotoxicants</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/311">Aop:311 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and oocyte apoptosis</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/452">Aop:452 - Adverse outcome pathway of PM-induced respiratory toxicity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/464">Aop:464 - Calcium overload in dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra leading to parkinsonian motor deficits</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/470">Aop:470 - Deposition of energy leads to abnormal vascular remodeling</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/478">Aop:478 - Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of cataracts</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/330">Aop:330 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (4)</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/479">Aop:479 - Mitochondrial complexes inhibition leading to left ventricular function decrease via increased myocardial oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/481">Aop:481 - AOPs of amorphous silica nanoparticles: ROS-mediated oxidative stress increased respiratory dysfunction and diseases.</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/482">Aop:482 - Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of bone loss</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/483">Aop:483 - Deposition of Energy Leading to Learning and Memory Impairment</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/505">Aop:505 - Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation leads to cancer via inflammation pathway</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/521">Aop:521 - Essential element imbalance leads to reproductive failure via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/26">Aop:26 - Calcium-mediated neuronal ROS production and energy imbalance</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/488">Aop:488 - Increased reactive oxygen species production leading to decreased cognitive function</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/396">Aop:396 - Deposition of ionizing energy leads to population decline via impaired meiosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/437">Aop:437 - Inhibition of mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) complexes leading to kidney toxicity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/535">Aop:535 - Binding and activation of GPER leading to learning and memory impairments</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/171">Aop:171 - Chronic cytotoxicity of the serous membrane leading to pleural/peritoneal mesotheliomas in the rat.</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/138">Aop:138 - Organic anion transporter (OAT1) inhibition leading to renal failure and mortality</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/177">Aop:177 - Cyclooxygenase 1 (COX1) inhibition leading to renal failure and mortality</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/186">Aop:186 - unknown MIE leading to renal failure and mortality</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/200">Aop:200 - Estrogen receptor activation leading to breast cancer </a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/444">Aop:444 - Ionizing radiation leads to reduced reproduction in Eisenia fetida via reduced spermatogenesis and cocoon hatchability</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/447">Aop:447 - Kidney failure induced by inhibition of mitochondrial electron transfer chain through apoptosis, inflammation and oxidative stress pathways</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/476">Aop:476 - Adverse Outcome Pathways diagram related to PBDEs associated male reproductive toxicity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/497">Aop:497 - ERa inactivation alters mitochondrial functions and insulin signalling in skeletal muscle and leads to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/457">Aop:457 - Succinate dehydrogenase inhibition leading to increased insulin resistance through reduction in circulating thyroxine</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/459">Aop:459 - AhR activation in the thyroid leading to Subsequent Adverse Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Mammals</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/507">Aop:507 - Nrf2 inhibition leading to vascular disrupting effects via inflammation pathway</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/509">Aop:509 - Nrf2 inhibition leading to vascular disrupting effects through activating apoptosis signal pathway and mitochondrial dysfunction</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/510">Aop:510 - Demethylation of PPAR promotor leading to vascular disrupting effects</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/511">Aop:511 - The AOP framework on ROS-mediated oxidative stress induced vascular disrupting effects </a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/538">Aop:538 - Adverse outcome pathway of PFAS-induced vascular disrupting effects via activating oxidative stress related pathways </a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/260">Aop:260 - CYP2E1 activation and formation of protein adducts leading to neurodegeneration</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/450">Aop:450 - Inhibition of AChE and activation of CYP2E1 leading to sensory axonal peripheral neuropathy and mortality</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/501">Aop:501 - Excessive iron accumulation leading to neurological disorders</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/540">Aop:540 - Oxidative Stress in the Fish Ovary Leads to Reproductive Impairment via Reduced Vitellogenin Production</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/471">Aop:471 - Neuron defect induced early behavioral change</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/31">Aop:31 - Oxidation of iron in hemoglobin leading to hematotoxicity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/534">Aop:534 - Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) inhibition leads to cancer through oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/462">Aop:462 - Activation of reactive oxygen species leading the atherosclerosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/598">Aop:598 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Aop:599 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/600">Aop:600 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/601">Aop:601 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/602">Aop:602 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/603">Aop:603 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell cycle disruption</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/608">Aop:608 - Thyroid Hormone Excess Leading to Reduced, Swimming Performance via Hypomyelination</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/616">Aop:616 - organic UV filter and its Photoproducts reproductive toxicity pathways </a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/622">Aop:622 - Calcineurin inhibitor induced nephrotoxicity leading to kidney failure</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/625">Aop:625 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via insulin resistance-associated oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/628">Aop:628 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via lipogenesis-associated oxidative stress</a></td>
<p><strong>Taxonomic applicability:</strong> Theoretically, DNA oxidation can occur in any cell type, in any organism. Oxidative DNA lesions have been measured in mammalian cells (human, mouse, calf, rat) in vitro and in vivo, and in prokaryotes.</p>
<p><span style="color:#27ae60"><strong>Taxonomic applicability:</strong>Occurrence of oxidative stress is not species specific. </span></p>
<p><strong>Life stage applicability:</strong> This key event is not life stage specific (Mesa & Bassnett, 2013; Suman et al., 2019). </p>
<p><span style="color:#27ae60"><strong>Life stage applicability:</strong> Occurrence of oxidative stress is not life stage specific. </span></p>
<p><strong>Sex applicability:</strong> This key event is not sex specific (Mesa & Bassnett, 2013). </p>
<p><span style="color:#27ae60"><strong>Sex applicability:</strong>Occurrence of oxidative stress is not sex specific. </span></p>
<p><strong>Evidence for Perturbation by Prototypic Stressor:</strong> H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub> and KBrO<sub>3</sub> – A concentration-dependent increase in oxidative lesions was observed in both Fpg- and hOGG1-modified comet assays of TK6 cells treated with increasing concentrations of glucose oxidase (an enzyme that generates H<sub>2</sub>O<sub>2</sub>) and potassium bromate for 4 h (Platel et al., 2011). </p>
<p>Evidence indicates that oxidative DNA damage is also induced by X-rays (Bahia et al., 2018), <sup>60</sup>Co γ-rays, <sup>12</sup>C ions, α particles, electrons (Georgakilas, 2013), UVB (Mesa and Bassnett, 2013), γ-rays, <sup>56</sup>Fe ions (Datta et al., 2012), and protons (Suman et al., 2019). </p>
<p><span style="color:#27ae60"><strong>Evidence for perturbation by prototypic stressor:</strong> There is evidence of the increase of oxidative stress following perturbation from a variety of stressors including exposure to ionizing radiation and altered gravity (Bai et al., 2020; Ungvari et al., 2013; Zhang et al., 2009). </span></p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p>The nitrogenous bases of DNA are susceptible to oxidation in the presence of oxidizing agents. Oxidative adducts form mainly on C5 and to a lesser degree on C6 of thymine and cytosine, and on C8 of guanine and adenine. Guanine is most prone to oxidation due to its low oxidation potential (Jovanovic and Simic, 1986). Indeed, 8-oxo-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG)/8-hydroxy-2’-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is the most abundant and well-studied oxidative DNA lesion in the cell (Swenberg et al., 2011). It causes an A(anti):8-oxo-G(syn) mispair instead of the normal C(anti):8-oxo-G(syn) pair. This pairing does not cause large structural changes to the DNA backbone, and therefore remains undetected by the polymerase’s proofreading mechanism. Consequently, one of the daughter strands will have an AT pair instead of the correct GC pair after replication (Markkanen, 2017). </p>
<p>Oxidative stress is defined as an imbalance in the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and antioxidant defenses. High levels of oxidizing free radicals can be very damaging to cells and molecules within the cell. As a result, the cell has important defense mechanisms to protect itself from ROS. For example, Nrf2 is a transcription factor and master regulator of the oxidative stress response. During periods of oxidative stress, Nrf2-dependent changes in gene expression are important in regaining cellular homeostasis (Nguyen, et al., 2009) and can be used as indicators of the presence of oxidative stress in the cell. </p>
<p>In addition to the directly damaging actions of ROS, cellular oxidative stress also changes cellular activities on a molecular level. Redox sensitive proteins have altered physiology in the presence and absence of ROS, which is caused by the oxidation of sulfhydryls to disulfides on neighboring amino acids (Antelmann & Helmann 2011). Importantly Keap1, the negative regulator of Nrf2, is regulated in this manner (Itoh, et al. 2010). </p>
<p>ROS also undermine the mitochondrial defense system from oxidative damage. The antioxidant systems consist of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase and glutathione reductase, as well as antioxidants such as α-tocopherol and ubiquinol, or antioxidant vitamins and minerals including vitamin E, C, carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin, selenium, and zinc (Fletcher, 2010). The enzymes, vitamins and minerals catalyze the conversion of ROS to non-toxic molecules such as water and O2. However, these antioxidant systems are not perfect and endogenous metabolic processes and/or exogenous oxidative influences can trigger cumulative oxidative injuries to the mitochondria, causing a decline in their functionality and efficiency, which further promotes cellular oxidative stress (Balasubramanian, 2000; Ganea & Harding, 2006; Guo et al., 2013; Karimi et al., 2017). </p>
<p>However, an emerging viewpoint suggests that ROS-induced modifications may not be as detrimental as previously thought, but rather contribute to signaling processes (Foyer et al., 2017). </p>
<p>Formamidopyrimidine lesions on guanine and adenine (FaPyG and FaPyA), 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyadenine (8-oxodA), and thymidine glycol (Tg) are other common oxidative lesions. We refer the reader to reviews on this topic to see the full set of potential oxidative DNA lesions (Whitaker et al., 2017). Oxidative DNA lesions are present in the cell at a steady state due to endogenous redox processes (Swenberg et al., 2010). Under normal conditions, cells are able to withstand the baseline level of oxidized bases through efficient repair and regulation of free radicals in the cell. However, direct chemical insult from specific compounds, exposure to various forms of radiation, or induction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) from the reduction of endogenous molecules, as well as through the release of inflammatory cell-derived oxidants, can lead to increased DNA oxidation, a state known as oxidative stress (Turner et al., 2002; Schoenfeld et al., 2012; Tangvarasittichai and Tangvarasittichai, 2019). It is worth noting that ROS must be generated near the DNA to cause damage, otherwise, if ROS was produced more distantly, then it can be removed by the cell (Nilsson & Liu, 2020). Furthermore, although cells do possess repair mechanisms to deal with oxidative DNA damage, sometimes the repair intermediates can interfere with genome function or decrease stability of the genome. This creates a balancing act between when it is best to repair damage and when it is best to leave it (Poetsch, 2020a). </p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Sources of ROS Production </strong></p>
<p>This KE describes an increase in oxidative lesions of a broad spectrum (ie. superoxide radical (O2•−), hydroxyl radical (OH), peroxyl radical (RO22), single oxygen (1O2 ) in the nuclear DNA above the steady-state level. Oxidative DNA damage can occur in any cell type with nuclear DNA under oxidative stress.</p>
<p><strong>Direct Sources: </strong>Direct sources involve the deposition of energy onto water molecules, breaking them into active radical species. When ionizing radiation hits water, it breaks it into hydrogen (H*) and hydroxyl (OH*) radicals by destroying its bonds. The hydrogen will create hydroxyperoxyl free radicals (HO2*) if oxygen is available, which can then react with another of itself to form hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and more O2 (Elgazzar and Kazem, 2015). Antioxidant mechanisms are also affected by radiation, with catalase (CAT) and peroxidase (POD) levels rising as a result of exposure (Seen et al. 2018; Ahmad et al. 2021). </p>
<p><strong>Indirect Sources</strong>: An indirect source of ROS is the mitochondria, which is one of the primary producers in eukaryotic cells (Powers et al., 2008). As much as 2% of the electrons that should be going through the electron transport chain in the mitochondria escape, allowing them an opportunity to interact with surrounding structures. Electron-oxygen reactions result in free radical production, including the formation of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) (Zhao et al., 2019). The electron transport chain, which also creates ROS, is activated by free adenosine diphosphate (ADP), O2, and inorganic phosphate (Pi) (Hargreaves et al. 2020; Raimondi et al. 2020; Vargas-Mendoza et al. 2021). The first and third complexes of the transport chain are the most relevant to mammalian ROS production (Raimondi et al., 2020). The mitochondria has its own set of DNA and it is a prime target of oxidative damage (Guo et al., 2013). ROS is also produced through nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (Nox) stimulation, an event commenced by angiotensin II, a product/effector of the renin-angiotensin system (Nguyen Dinh Cat et al. 2013; Forrester et al. 2018). Other ROS producers include xanthine oxidase, immune cells (macrophage, neutrophils, monocytes, and eosinophils), phospholipase A2 (PLA2), monoamine oxidase (MAO), and carbon-based nanomaterials (Powers et al. 2008; Jacobsen et al. 2008; Vargas-Mendoza et al. 2021). </p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p>Relative Quantification of Oxidative DNA Lesions</p>
<p><strong>Oxidative Stress:</strong> Direct measurement of ROS is difficult because ROS are unstable. The presence of ROS can be assayed indirectly by measurement of cellular antioxidants, or by ROS-dependent cellular damage. Listed below are common methods for detecting the KE, however there may be other comparable methods that are not listed </p>
<ul>
<li>Comet assay (single cell gel electrophoresis) with Fpg and hOGG1 modifications (Smith et al., 2006; Platel et al., 2011)
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
<li>Oxoguanine glycosylase (hOGG1) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg) are base excision repair (BER) enzymes in eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells, respectively</li>
<li>Both enzymes are bi-functional; the glycosylase function cleaves the glycosidic bond between the ribose and the oxidized base, giving rise to an abasic site, and the apurinic/apymidinic (AP) site lyase function cleaves the phosphodiester bond via β-elimination reaction and creates a single strand break</li>
<li>Treatment of DNA with either enzyme prior to performing the electrophoresis step of the comet assay allows detection of oxidative lesions by measuring the increase in comet tail length when compared against untreated samples.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Enzyme-linked immunosorbant assay (ELISA) (Dizdaroglu et al., 2002; Breton et al., 2003; Xu et al., 2008; Zhao et al. 2017)
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
<li>8-oxodG can be detected using immunoassays, such as ELISA, that use antibodies against 8-oxodG lesions. It has been noted that immunodetection of 8-oxodG can be interfered by certain compounds in biological samples.</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Detection of ROS by chemiluminescence (https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165993606001683) </li>
<li>Detection of ROS by chemiluminescence is also described in OECD TG 495 to assess phototoxic potential. </li>
<li>Glutathione (GSH) depletion. GSH can be measured by assaying the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH:GSSG) using a commercially available kit (e.g., http://www.abcam.com/gshgssg-ratio-detection-assay-kit-fluorometric-green- ab138881.html). </li>
<li>TBARS. Oxidative damage to lipids can be measured by assaying for lipid peroxidation using TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) using a commercially available kit. </li>
<li>8-oxo-dG. Oxidative damage to nucleic acids can be assayed by measuring 8-oxo-dG adducts (for which there are a number of ELISA based commercially available kits),or HPLC, described in Chepelev et al. (Chepelev, et al. 2015). </li>
</ul>
<p>Absolute Quantification of Oxidative DNA Lesions</p>
<p> </p>
<p><strong>Molecular Biology:</strong> Nrf2. Nrf2’s transcriptional activity is controlled post-translationally by oxidation of Keap1. Assay for Nrf2 activity include: </p>
<ul>
<li>Quantification of 8-oxodG using HPLC-EC (Breton et al., 2003; Chepelev et al., 2015)
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
<li>8-oxodG can be separated from digested DNA and precisely quantified using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with electrochemical detection</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Mass spectrometry LC-MRM/MS (Mangal et al., 2009)
<ul style="list-style-type:circle">
<li>Liquid chromatography can also be coupled with multiple reaction monitoring/ mass spectrometry to detect and quantify oxidative lesions. Correlation between lesions measured by hOGG1-modified comet assay and LC-MS has been reported</li>
</ul>
</li>
<li>Immunohistochemistry for increases in Nrf2 protein levels and translocation into the nucleus Western blot for increased Nrf2 protein levels </li>
<li>Western blot of cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions to observe translocation of Nrf2 protein from the cytoplasm to the nucleus qPCR of Nrf2 target genes (e.g., Nqo1, Hmox-1, Gcl, Gst, Prx, TrxR, Srxn), or by commercially available pathway-based qPCR array (e.g., oxidative stress array from SABiosciences) </li>
<li>Whole transcriptome profiling by microarray or RNA-seq followed by pathway analysis (in IPA, DAVID, metacore, etc.) for enrichment of the Nrf2 oxidative stress response pathway (e.g., Jackson et al. 2014) </li>
<li>OECD TG422D describes an ARE-Nrf2 Luciferase test method </li>
<p>In general, there are a variety of commercially available colorimetric or fluorescent kits for detecting Nrf2 activation.</p>
<ul>
<li>DNA is hydrolyzed to release either free bases or nucleosides and then undergoes derivatization in order to increase their volatility. Finally, samples run through a gas chromatograph and then a mass spectrometer. The mass spectrometer results are used to determine oxidative DNA damage by identifying modified bases or nucleosides (Dizdaroglu, 1994). </li>
</ul>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Assay Type & Measured Content </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Description </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Dose Range Studied </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Assay Characteristics (Length/Ease of use/Accuracy) </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>ROS </p>
<p>Sequencing assays </p>
<p>Formation in the Mitochondria assay (Shaki et al., 2012) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>“The mitochondrial ROS measurement was performed flow cytometry using DCFH-DA. Briefly, isolated kidney mitochondria were incubated with UA (0, 50, 100 and 200 µM) in respiration buffer containing (0.32 mM sucrose, 10mM Tris, 20 mM Mops, 50 µM EGTA, 0.5 mM MgCl2, 0.1 mM KH2PO4 and 5 mM sodium succinate) [32]. In the interval times of 5, 30 and 60 min following the UA addition, a sample was taken and DCFH-DA was added (final concentration, 10 µM) to mitochondria and was then incubated for 10 min.Uranyl acetate-induced ROS generation in isolated kidney mitochondria were determined through the flow cytometry (Partec, Deutschland) equipped with a 488-nm argon ion laser and supplied with the Flomax software and the signals were obtained using a 530-nm bandpass filter (FL-1 channel). Each determination is based on the mean fluorescence intensity of 15,000 counts.” </p>
<ul>
<li>Various markers are used to detect and highlight sites of DNA damage; the result is then processed and sequenced. This category encompasses a wide range of assays such as snAP-seq, OGG1-AP-seq, oxiDIP-seq, OG-seq, and click-code-seq (Yun et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2018; Amente et al., 2019; Poetsch, 2020b). </li>
<li>We note that other types of oxidative lesions can be quantified using the methods described above.</li>
</ul>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0, 50,100 and 200 µM of Uranyl Acetate </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> Long/ Easy High accuracy </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Mitochondrial Antioxidant Content Assay Measuring GSH content (Shaki et al., 2012) </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>“GSH content was determined using DTNB as the indicator and spectrophotometer method for the isolated mitochondria. The mitochondrial fractions (0.5 mg protein/ml) were incubated with various concentrations of uranyl acetate for 1 h at 30 °C and then 0.1 ml of mitochondrial fractions was added into 0.1 mol/l of phosphate buffers and 0.04% DTNB in a total volume of 3.0 ml (pH 7.4). The developed yellow color was read at 412 nm on a spectrophotometer (UV-1601 PC, Shimadzu, Japan). GSH content was expressed as µg/mg protein.” </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0, 50, </p>
<p>100, or </p>
<p>200 µM </p>
<p>Uranyl Acetate </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>H2O2 Production Assay Measuring H2O2 Production in isolated mitochondria (Heyno et al., 2008) </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>“Effect of CdCl2 and antimycin A (AA) on H2O2 production in isolated mitochondria from potato. H2O2 production was measured as scopoletin oxidation. Mitochondria were incubated for 30 min in the measuring buffer </p>
<p>(see the Materials and Methods) containing 0.5 mM succinate as an electron donor and 0.2 µM mesoxalonitrile 3‐chlorophenylhydrazone (CCCP) as an uncoupler, 10 U horseradish peroxidase and 5 µM scopoletin.” </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0, 10, 30 </p>
<p>µM Cd2+ </p>
<p> </p>
<p>2 µM antimycin A </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Flow Cytometry ROS & Cell Viability (Kruiderig et al., 1997) </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>“For determination of ROS, samples taken at the indicated time points were directly transferred to FACScan tubes. Dih123 (10 mM, final concentration) was added and cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (95% air/5% CO2) for 10 min. At t 5 9, propidium iodide (10 mM, final concentration) was added, and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at 60 ml/min. Nonfluorescent Dih123 is cleaved by ROS to fluorescent R123 and detected by the FL1 detector as described above for Dc (Van de Water 1995)”“For determination of ROS, samples taken at the indicated time points were directly transferred to FACScan tubes. Dih123 (10 mM, final concentration) was added and cells were incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere (95% air/5% CO2) for 10 min. At t 5 9, propidium iodide (10 mM, final concentration) was added, and cells were analyzed by flow cytometry at 60 ml/min. Nonfluorescent Dih123 is cleaved by ROS to fluorescent R123 and detected by the FL1 detector as described above for Dc (Van de Water 1995)” </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Strong/easy medium </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>DCFH-DA </p>
<p>Assay Detection of hydrogen peroxide production (Yuan et al., </p>
<p>2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Intracellular ROS production was measured using DCFH-DA as a probe. Hydrogen peroxide oxidizes DCFH to DCF. The probe is hydrolyzed intracellularly to DCFH carboxylate anion. No direct reaction with H2O2 to form fluorescent production. </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>0-400 </p>
<p>µM </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Long/ Easy High accuracy </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>H2-DCF-DAAssay Detection of superoxide production (Thiebault etal., 2007) </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>This dye is a stable nonpolar compound which diffuses readily into the cells and yields H2-DCF. Intracellular OH or ONOO- react with H2-DCF when cells contain peroxides, to form the highly fluorescent compound DCF, which effluxes the cell. Fluorescence intensity of DCF is measured using a fluorescence spectrophotometer. </p>
<p>The dye (CM-H2DCFDA) diffuses into the cell and is cleaved by esterases, the thiol reactive chlormethyl group reacts with intracellular glutathione which can be detected using flow cytometry. </p>
</td>
<td>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Long/Easy/ High Accuracy </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Method of Measurement </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>References </strong></p>
</td>
<td>
<p><strong>Description </strong></p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p><strong>OECD-Approved Assay </strong></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Chemiluminescence </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Lu, C. et al., 2006; </p>
<p>Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>ROS can induce electron transitions in molecules, leading to electronically excited products. When the electrons transition back to ground state, chemiluminescence is emitted and can be measured. Reagents such as luminol and lucigenin are commonly used to amplify the signal. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Spectrophotometry </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>NO has a short half-life. However, if it has been reduced to nitrite (NO2-), stable azocompounds can be formed via the Griess Reaction, and further measured by spectrophotometry. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Direct or Spin Trapping-Based electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) Spectroscopy </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The unpaired electrons (free radicals) found in ROS can be detected with EPR and is known as electron paramagnetic resonance. A variety of spin traps can be used. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Nitroblue Tetrazolium Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The Nitroblue Tetrazolium assay is used to measure O2.− levels. O2.− reduces nitroblue tetrazolium (a yellow dye) to formazan (a blue dye), and can be measured at 620 nm. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Fluorescence analysis of dihydroethidium (DHE) or Hydrocyans </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fluorescence analysis of DHE is used to measure O2.− levels. O2.− is reduced to O2 as DHE is oxidized to 2-hydroxyethidium, and this reaction can be measured by fluorescence. Similarly, hydrocyans can be oxidized by any ROS, and measured via fluorescence. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Amplex Red Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fluorescence analysis to measure extramitochondrial or extracellular H2O2 levels. In the presence of horseradish peroxidase and H2O2, Amplex Red is oxidized to resorufin, a fluorescent molecule measurable by plate reader. </p>
<p>An indirect fluorescence analysis to measure intracellular H2O2 levels. H2O2 interacts with peroxidase or heme proteins, which further react with DCFH, oxidizing it to dichlorofluorescein (DCF), a fluorescent product. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>HyPer Probe </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Fluorescent measurement of intracellular H2O2 levels. HyPer is a genetically encoded fluorescent sensor that can be used for in vivo and in situ imaging. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Cytochrome c Reduction Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Griendling, K. K., et al., 2016) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The cytochrome c reduction assay is used to measure O2.− levels. O O2.− is reduced to O2 as ferricytochrome c is oxidized to ferrocytochrome c, and this reaction can be measured by an absorbance increase at 550 nm. </p>
<p>The redox state of tissue is detected through nuclear magnetic resonance/magnetic resonance imaging, with the use of a nitroxide spin probe or biradical molecule. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Glutathione (GSH) depletion </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Biesemann, N. et al., 2018) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>A downstream target of the Nrf2 pathway is involved in GSH synthesis. As an indication of oxidation status, GSH can be measured by assaying the ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione (GSH:GSSG) using a commercially available kit (e.g., <a href="http://www.abcam.com/gshgssg-ratio-detection-assay-kit-fluorometric-green-ab138881.html" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">http://www.abcam.com/gshgssg-ratio-detection-assay-kit-fluorometric-green-ab138881.html</a>). </p>
<p>Oxidative damage to lipids can be measured by assaying for lipid peroxidation with TBARS using a commercially available kit. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Protein oxidation (carbonylation) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Azimzadeh et al., 2017; Azimzadeh et al., 2015; Ping et al., 2020) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Can be determined with ELISA or a commercial assay kit. Protein oxidation can indicate the level of oxidative stress. </p>
</td>
<td colspan="2">
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Seahorse XFp Analyzer </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Leung et al. 2018 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>The Seahorse XFp Analyzer provides information on mitochondrial function, oxidative stress, and metabolic dysfunction of viable cells by measuring respiration (oxygen consumption rate; OCR) and extracellular pH (extracellular acidification rate; ECAR). </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<p>Molecular Biology: Nrf2. Nrf2’s transcriptional activity is controlled post-translationally by oxidation of Keap1. Assays for Nrf2 activity include: </p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Method of Measurement </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>References </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Description </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>OECD-Approved Assay </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Immunohistochemistry </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Amsen, D., de Visser, K. E., and Town, T., 2009) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Immunohistochemistry for increases in Nrf2 protein levels and translocation into the nucleus </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>qPCR </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Forlenza et al., 2012) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>qPCR of Nrf2 target genes (e.g., Nqo1, Hmox-1, Gcl, Gst, Prx, TrxR, Srxn), or by commercially available pathway-based qPCR array (e.g., oxidative stress array from SABiosciences) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Whole transcriptome profiling via microarray or via RNA-seq followed by a pathway analysis </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>(Jackson, A. F. et al., 2014) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Whole transcriptome profiling by microarray or RNA-seq followed by pathway analysis (in IPA, DAVID, metacore, etc.) for enrichment of the Nrf2 oxidative stress response pathway </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p> </p>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Amente, S. et al. (2019), “Genome-wide mapping of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2’-deoxyguanosine reveals accumulation of oxidatively-generated damage at DNA replication origins within transcribed long genes of mammalian cells”, <em>Nucleic Acids Research 2019</em>, Vol. 47/1, Oxford University Press, England, https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky1152 </p>
<p>Ahmad, S. et al. (2021), “60Co-γ Radiation Alters Developmental Stages of Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) Through Apoptosis Pathways Gene Expression”, Journal Insect Science, Vol. 21/5, Oxford University Press, Oxford, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab080" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/ieab080</a> </p>
<p>Bahia, S. et al. (2018), “Oxidative and nitrative stress-related changes in human lens epithelial cells following exposure to X-rays”, <em>International journal of radiation biology</em>, Vol. 94/4, England, https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2018.1439194 </p>
<p>Antelmann, H. and J. D. Helmann (2011), “Thiol-based redox switches and gene regulation.”, Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, Vol. 14/6, Mary Ann Leibert Inc., Larchmont, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3400" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3400</a> </p>
<p>Breton J, Sichel F, Bainchini F, Prevost V. (2003). Measurement of 8-Hydroxy-2′-Deoxyguanosine by a Commercially Available ELISA Test: Comparison with HPLC/Electrochemical Detection in Calf Thymus DNA and Determination in Human Serum. Anal Lett 36:123-134.</p>
<p>Amsen, D., de Visser, K. E., and Town, T. (2009), “Approaches to determine expression of inflammatory cytokines”, in Inflammation and Cancer, Humana Press, Totowa, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-447-6_5" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-59745-447-6_5</a> </p>
<p>Cabrera, M. P., R. Chihuailaf and F. Wittwer Menge (2011), “Antioxidants and the integrity of ocular tissues”, <em>Veterinary medicine international</em>, Vol. 2011, SAGE-Hindawi Access to Research, United States, https://doi.org/10.4061/2011/905153 </p>
<p>Azimzadeh, O. et al. (2015), “Integrative Proteomics and Targeted Transcriptomics Analyses in Cardiac Endothelial Cells Unravel Mechanisms of Long-Term Radiation-Induced Vascular Dysfunction”, Journal of Proteome Research, Vol. 14/2, American Chemical Society, Washington, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1021/pr501141b" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1021/pr501141b</a> </p>
<p>Cadet, J. et al. (2012), “Oxidatively generated complex DNA damage: tandem and clustered lesions”, <em>Cancer letters</em>, Vol. 327/1, Elsevier Ireland Ltd, Ireland. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2012.04.005 </p>
<p>Azimzadeh, O. et al. (2017), “Proteome analysis of irradiated endothelial cells reveals persistent alteration in protein degradation and the RhoGDI and NO signalling pathways”, International Journal of Radiation Biology, Vol. 93/9, Informa, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1339332" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2017.1339332</a> </p>
<p>Chepelev N, Kennedy D, Gagne R, White T, Long A, Yauk C, White P. (2015). HPLC Measurement of the DNA Oxidation Biomarker, 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine, in Cultured Cells and Animal Tissues. Journal of Visualized Experiments 102:e52697.</p>
<p>Azzam, E. I. et al. (2012), “Ionizing radiation-induced metabolic oxidative stress and prolonged cell injury”, Cancer Letters, Vol. 327/1-2, Elsevier, Ireland, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.012 </p>
<p>Collins, A. R. (2014), “Measuring oxidative damage to DNA and its repair with the comet assay”, <em>Biochimica et biophysica acta. General subjects</em>, Vol. 1840/2, Elsevier B.V., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.04.022 </p>
<p>Bai, J. et al. (2020), “Irradiation-induced senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells aggravates osteogenic differentiation dysfunction via paracrine signaling”, American Journal of Physiology - Cell Physiology, Vol. 318/5, American Physiological Society, Rockville, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00520.2019." rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpcell.00520.2019.</a> </p>
<p>Datta, K. et al. (2012), “Exposure to heavy ion radiation induces persistent oxidative stress in mouse intestive”, <em>PloS One</em>, Vol. 7/8, Public Library of Science, United States, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0042224 </p>
<p>Balasubramanian, D (2000), “Ultraviolet radiation and cataract”, Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics, Vol. 16/3, Mary Ann Liebert Inc., Larchmont, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2000.16.285.%22%20/t%20%22_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1089/jop.2000.16.285.</a> </p>
<p>Dizdaroglu, M. (1994), “Chemical determination of oxidative DNA damage by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry”, <em>Methods in Enzymology</em>, Vol. 234, Elsevier Science & Technology, United States, https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(94)34072-2 </p>
<p>Biesemann, N. et al., (2018), “High Throughput Screening of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in Human Differentiated Myotubes Identifies Novel Enhancers of Muscle Performance in Aged Mice”, Scientific Reports, Vol. 8/1, Nature Portfolio, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27614-8" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-27614-8</a>. </p>
<p>Dizdaroglu, M. et al. (2002), “Free radical-induced damage to DNA : mechanisms and measurement”, <em>Free radical biology & medicine</em>, Vol. 32/11, United States, pp. 1102-1115 </p>
<p>Elgazzar, A. and N. Kazem. (2015), “Chapter 23: Biological effects of ionizing radiation” in The Pathophysiologic Basis of Nuclear Medicine, Springer, New York, pp. 540-548 </p>
<p>Eaton, J. W. (1995), “UV-mediated cataractogenesis: a radical perspective”, <em>Documenta ophthalmologica</em>, Vol. 88/3-4, Springer, Dordrecht, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01203677 </p>
<p>Eruslanov, E., & Kusmartsev, S. (2010). Identification of ROS using oxidized DCFDA and flow-cytometry. Methods in molecular biology ,N.J., Vol. 594, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-411-1_4 </p>
<p>Fletcher, A. E. (2010), “Free radicals, antioxidants and eye diseases: evidence from epidemiological studies on cataract and age-related macular degeneration”, <em>Ophthalmic Research</em>, Vol. 44/3, Karger international, Basel, https://doi.org/10.1159/000316476 </p>
<p>Fletcher, A. E (2010), “Free radicals, antioxidants and eye diseases: evidence from epidemiological studies on cataract and age-related macular degeneration”, Ophthalmic Research, Vol. 44, Karger International, Basel, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1159/000316476.%22%20/t%20%22_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1159/000316476.</a> </p>
<p>Georgakilas, A. G et al. (2013), “Induction and repair of clustered DNA lesions: what do we know so far?”, Radiation Research, Vol. 180/1, <em>The Radiation Research Society</em>, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR3041.1 </p>
<p>Forlenza, M. et al. (2012), “The use of real-time quantitative PCR for the analysis of cytokine mRNA levels” in Cytokine Protocols, Springer, New York, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-439-1_2 </p>
<p>Jose, D. et al. (2009). “Spectroscopic studies of position-specific DNA “breathing” fluctuations at replication forks and primer-template junctions”, <em>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</em>, Vol. 106/11, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0900803106 </p>
<p>Forrester, S.J. et al. (2018), “Angiotensin II Signal Transduction: An Update on Mechanisms of Physiology and Pathophysiology”, Physiological Reviews, Vol. 98/3, American Physiological Society, Rockville, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00038.201" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00038.201</a> </p>
<p>Jovanovic S, Simic M. (1986). One-electron redox potential of purines and pyrimidines. J Phys Chem 90:974-978.</p>
<p>Foyer, C. H., A. V. Ruban, and G. Noctor (2017), “Viewing oxidative stress through the lens of oxidative signalling rather than damage”, Biochemical Journal, Vol. 474/6, Portland Press, England, https://doi.org/10.1042/BCJ20160814 </p>
<p>Kruk, J., K. Kubasik-Kladna and H. Y. Aboul-Enein (2015), “The role oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of eye diseases: current status and a dual role of physical activity”, <em>Mini-reviews in medicinal chemistry</em>, Vol. 16/3, Bentham Science Publishers Ltd, Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.2174/1389557516666151120114605 </p>
<p>Ganea, E. and J. J. Harding (2006), “Glutathione-related enzymes and the eye”, Current eye research, Vol. 31/1, Informa, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680500477347.%22%20/t%20%22_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1080/02713680500477347.</a> </p>
<p>Lee, J. et al. (2004), “Reactive oxygen species, aging, and antioxidative nutraceuticals”, <em>Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety</em>, Vol. 3/1, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4337.2004.tb00058.x </p>
<p>Griendling, K. K. et al. (2016), “Measurement of reactive oxygen species, reactive nitrogen species, and redox-dependent signaling in the cardiovascular system: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association”, Circulation research, Vol. 119/5, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000110" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1161/RES.0000000000000110</a> </p>
<p>Mangal D, Vudathala D, Park J, Lee S, Penning T, Blair I. (2009). Analysis of 7,8-Dihydro-8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine in Cellular DNA during Oxidative Stress. Chem Res Toxicol 22:788-797.</p>
<p>Guo, C. et al. (2013), “Oxidative stress, mitochondrial damage and neurodegenerative diseases”, Neural regeneration research, Vol. 8/21, Publishing House of Neural Regeneration Research, China, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.21.009" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.21.009</a> </p>
<p>Markkanen, E. (2017), “Not breathing is not an option: How to deal with oxidative DNA damage”, <em>DNA repair</em>, Vol. 59, Elsevier B.V., Netherlands, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2017.09.007 </p>
<p>Hargreaves, M., and L. L. Spriet (2020), “Skeletal muscle energy metabolism during exercise.”, Nature Metabolism, Vol. 2, Nature Portfolio, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-0251-4" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-020-0251-4</a> </p>
<p>Mesa, R. and S. Bassnett (2013), “UV-B induced DNA damage and repair in the mouse lens”,<em> Investigative ophthalmology & visual science</em>, Vol. 54/10, the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, United States, https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.13-12644 </p>
<p>Hladik, D. and S. Tapio (2016), “Effects of ionizing radiation on the mammalian brain”, Mutation Research/Reviews in Mutation Research, Vol. 770, Elsevier, Amsterdam, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.08.003" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.08.003</a> </p>
<p>Nilsson R. and Liu N. (2020), “Nuclear DNA damages generated by reactive oxygen molecules (ROS) under oxidative stress and their relevance to human cancers, including ionizing radiation-induced neoplasia part I: Physical, chemical and molecular biology aspects”, Radiation Medicine and Protection, Vol. 1/3(3), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radmp.2020.09.002 </p>
<p>Itoh, K., J. Mimura and M. Yamamoto (2010), “Discovery of the negative regulator of Nrf2, Keap1: a historical overview”, Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, Vol. 13/11, Mary Ann Leibert Inc., Larchmont, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3222" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2010.3222</a> </p>
<p>Pendergrass, W. et al. (2010), “X-ray induced cataract is preceded by LEC loss, and coincident with accumulation of cortical DNA, and ROS; similarities with age-related cataracts”,<em> Molecular vision</em>, Vol. 16, Molecular Vision, United States, pp. 1496-1513 </p>
<p>Jackson, A.F. et al. (2014), “Case study on the utility of hepatic global gene expression profiling in the risk assessment of the carcinogen furan.”, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Vol. 274/11, Elsevier, Amsterdam, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.10.019" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2013.10.019</a> </p>
<p>Platel A, Nesslany F, Gervais V, Claude N, Marzin D. (2011). Study of oxidative DNA damage in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells by use of the thymidine kinase gene-mutation assay and the <em>in vitro </em>modified comet assay: Determination of No-Observed-Genotoxic-Effect-Levels. Mutat Res 726:151-159.</p>
<p>Jacobsen, N.R. et al. (2008), “Genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, and reactive oxygen species induced by single-walled carbon nanotubes and C60 fullerenes in the FE1-MutaTM Mouse lung epithelial cells”, Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis, Vol. 49/6, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20406" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1002/em.20406</a> </p>
<p>Poetsch, Anna R. (2020a), “The genomics of oxidative DNA damage, repair, and resulting mutagenesis”, <em>Computational and structural biotechnology journal 2020</em>, Vol. 18, Elsevier B.V., Netherlands https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2019.12.013 </p>
<p>Karimi, N. et al. (2017), “Radioprotective effect of hesperidin on reducing oxidative stress in the lens tissue of rats”, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Investigation, Vol. 7/3, Phcog Net, Bengaluru, <a href="https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_60_17.%E2%80%AF" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.4103/jphi.JPHI_60_17. </a> </p>
<p>Poetsch, A. R. (2020b), “AP-Seq: A method to measure apurinic sites and small base adducts genome-wide”, The Nucleus, Springer US, New York, Sacca, S. C. et al. (2009), “Gene-environment interactions in ocular diseases”, <em>Mutation research – fundamental and molecular mechanisms of mutagenesis</em>, Vol. 667/1-2, Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrfmmm.2008.11.002 </p>
<p>Leung, D.T.H., and Chu, S. (2018), “Measurement of Oxidative Stress: Mitochondrial Function Using the Seahorse System” In: Murthi, P., Vaillancourt, C. (eds) Preeclampsia. Methods in Molecular Biology, vol 1710. Humana Press, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-7498-6_22 </p>
<p>Schoenfeld, M. P. et al. (2012), “A hypothesis on biological protection from space radiation through the use of new therapeutic gases as medical counter measures”, <em>Medical gas research</em>, Vol. 2/1, BioMed Central Ltd, India, https://doi.org/10.1186/2045-9912-2-8 </p>
<p>Lu, C., G. Song, and J. Lin (2006), “Reactive oxygen species and their chemiluminescence-detection methods”, TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 25/10, Elsevier, Amsterdam, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2006.07.007" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2006.07.007</a> </p>
<p>Smith C, O'Donovan M, Martin E. (2006). hOGG1 recognizes oxidative damage using the comet assay with greater specificity than FPG or ENDOIII. Mutagenesis 21:185-190.</p>
<p>Nguyen Dinh Cat, A. et al. (2013), “Angiotensin II, NADPH oxidase, and redox signaling in the vasculature”, Antioxidants & redox signaling, Vol. 19/10, Mary Ann Liebert, Larchmont, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4641" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4641</a> </p>
<p>Stohs, S. J. (1995), “The role of free radicals in toxicity and disease”, <em>Journal of Basic and Clinical Physiology and Pharmacology</em>, Vol. 6/3-4, Freund Publishing House Ltd, https://doi.org/10.1515/JBCPP.1995.6.3-4.205 </p>
<p>Ping, Z. et al. (2020), “Oxidative Stress in Radiation-Induced Cardiotoxicity”, Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity, Vol. 2020, Hindawi, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3579143" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3579143</a> </p>
<p>Suman, S. et al. (2019), “Fractionated and acute proton radiation show differential intestinal tumorigenesis and DNA damage and repair pathway response in ApcMin/+ mice”, <em>International Journal of Radiation Oncology</em>, Biology, Physics, Vol. 105/3, Elsevier Inc, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2532 </p>
<p>Powers, S.K. and M.J. Jackson. (2008), “Exercise-Induced Oxidative Stress: Cellular Mechanisms and Impact on Muscle Force Production”, Physiological Reviews, Vol. 88/4, American Physiological Society, Rockville, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2007" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00031.2007</a> </p>
<p>Swenberg J. et al. (2011). "Endogenous versus Exogenous DNA Adducts: Their Role in Carcinogenesis, Epidemiology, and Risk Assessment." Toxicol Sci 120:S130-S145.</p>
<p>Raimondi, V., F. Ciccarese and V. Ciminale. (2020), “Oncogenic pathways and the electron transport chain: a dangeROS liason”, British Journal of Cancer, Vol. 122/2, Nature Portfolio, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0651-y" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-019-0651-y</a> </p>
<p>Tangvarasittichai, O and S. Tangvarasittichai (2018), “Oxidative stress, ocular disease, and diabetes retinopathy”,<em> Current Pharmaceutical Design</em>, Vol. 24/40, Bentham Science Publishers, https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612825666190115121531 </p>
<p>Seen, S. and L. Tong. (2018), “Dry eye disease and oxidative stress”, Acta Ophthalmologica, Vol. 96/4, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Hoboken, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13526" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1111/aos.13526</a> </p>
<p>Turner, N. D. et al. (2002), “Opportunities for nutritional amelioration of radiation-induced cellular damage”, <em>Nutrition</em>, Vol. 18/10, Elsevier Inc, New York, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0899-9007(02)00945-0 </p>
<p>Ungvari, Z. et al. (2013), “Ionizing Radiation Promotes the Acquisition of a Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype and Impairs Angiogenic Capacity in Cerebromicrovascular Endothelial Cells: Role of Increased DNA Damage and Decreased DNA Repair Capacity in Microvascular Radiosensitivity”, The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, Vol. 68/12, Oxford University Press, Oxford, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt057." rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt057.</a> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>Whitaker A, Schaich M, Smith MS, Flynn T, Freudenthal B. (2017). Base excision repair of oxidative DNA damage: from mechanism to disease. Front Biosci 22:1493-1522.</p>
<p>Vargas-Mendoza, N. et al. (2021), “Oxidative Stress, Mitochondrial Function and Adaptation to Exercise: New Perspectives in Nutrition”, Life, Vol. 11/11, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, Basel, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3390/life11111269" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3390/life11111269</a> </p>
<p>Wu, J. (2018), “Nucleotide-resolution genome-wide mapping of oxidative DNA damage by click-code-seq”,<em> Journal of the American Chemical Society 2018</em>, American Chemical Society, United States https://doi-org.proxy.bib.uottawa.ca/10.1021/jacs.8b03715 </p>
<p>Wang, H. et al. (2019), “Radiation-induced heart disease: a review of classification, mechanism and prevention”, International Journal of Biological Sciences, Vol. 15/10, Ivyspring International Publisher, Sydney, <a href="https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.35460" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.7150/ijbs.35460</a> </p>
<p>Xu, X. et al. (2008). “Fluorescence recovery assay for the detection of protein-DNA binding”, <em>Analytical Chemistry</em>, Vol. 80/14, https://doi.org/10.1021/ac8007016 </p>
<p>Zhang, R. et al. (2009), “Blockade of AT1 receptor partially restores vasoreactivity, NOS expression, and superoxide levels in cerebral and carotid arteries of hindlimb unweighting rats”, Journal of applied physiology, Vol. 106/1, American Physiological Society, Rockville, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01278.2007" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.01278.2007</a>. </p>
<p>Zhao M, Howard E, Guo Z, Parris A, Yang X. (2017). p53 pathway determines the cellular response to alcohol-induced DNA damage in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. PLoS One 12:e0175121.</p>
<p>Zhao, R. Z. et al. (2019), “Mitochondrial electron transport chain, ROS generation and uncoupling”, International journal of molecular medicine, Vol. 44/1, Spandidos Publishing Ltd., Athens, <a href="https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2019.4188" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3892/ijmm.2019.4188</a> </p>
<td><a href="/aops/212">Aop:212 - Histone deacetylase inhibition leading to testicular atrophy</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/329">Aop:329 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (3)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/393">Aop:393 - AOP for thyroid disorder caused by triphenyl phosphate via TRβ activation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/413">Aop:413 - Oxidation and antagonism of reduced glutathione leading to mortality via acute renal failure</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/396">Aop:396 - Deposition of ionizing energy leads to population decline via impaired meiosis</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/492">Aop:492 - Glutathione conjugation leading to reproductive dysfunction via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/521">Aop:521 - Essential element imbalance leads to reproductive failure via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/615">Aop:615 - Suppression of Keap1 cysteine oxidation leading to liver inflammation</a></td>
<p dir="ltr">ROS is a normal constituent found in all organisms, therefore, all organisms containing lipid membranes may be affected by lipid peroxidation. </p>
<p>Structure: Regardless of sex or life stage, when exposed to free radicals, there is potential for lipid peroxidation as a auxiliary response where there are lipid membranes.</p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p>Lipid peroxidation is the direct damage to lipids in the membrane of the cell or the membranes of the organelles inside the cells. Ultimately the membranes will break due to the build-up damage in the lipids. This is mainly caused by oxidants which attack lipids specifically, since these contain carbon-carbon double bonds. During lipid peroxidation several lipid radicals are formed in a chain reaction. These reactions can interfere and stimulate each other. Antioxidants, such as vitamin E, can react with lipid peroxy radicals to prevent further damage in the cell (Cooley et al. 2000).</p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p>The main product of lipid peroxidation, malondialdehyde and 4-hydroxyalkenals, is used to measure the degree of this process. This is measured by photocolorimetric assays, quantification of fatty acids by gaseous liquid chromatography (GLC) or high performance (HPLC) (L. Li et al. 2019; Jin et al. 2010a) or through commercial kits purchased from specialized companies.</p>
<p> </p>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Cooley HM, Evans RE, Klaverkamp JF. 2000. Toxicology of dietary uranium in lake whitefish (Coregonus clupeaformis). Aquatic Toxicology. 48(4):495–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-445X(99)00057-0</p>
<p>Jin, Yuanxiang, Xiangxiang Zhang, Linjun Shu, Lifang Chen, Liwei Sun, Haifeng Qian, Weiping Liu, and Zhengwei Fu. 2010a. “Oxidative Stress Response and Gene Expression with Atrazine Exposure in Adult Female Zebrafish (Danio Rerio).” Chemosphere 78 (7): 846–52.</p>
<p>Li, Luxiao, Shanshan Zhong, Xia Shen, Qiujing Li, Wenxin Xu, Yongzhen Tao, and Huiyong Yin. 2019. “Recent Development on Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Analysis of Oxidized Lipids.” Free Radical Biology & Medicine 144 (November): 16–34.</p>
<h4><a href="/events/1446">Event: 1446: Decrease, Coupling of oxidative phosphorylation</a></h4>
<td><a href="/aops/267">Aop:267 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via glucose depletion</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/263">Aop:263 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Aop:264 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/265">Aop:265 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via increased cytosolic calcium</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Aop:266 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/268">Aop:268 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via mitochondrial swelling</a></td>
<td>MolecularInitiatingEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/534">Aop:534 - Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) inhibition leads to cancer through oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/598">Aop:598 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/612">Aop:612 - Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation leading to early life stage mortality via reduced adenosine triphosphate</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/613">Aop:613 - Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation leading to early life stage mortality via increased reactive oxygen species production</a></td>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is in general considered applicable to most eukaryotes, as the mitochondrion and oxidative phosphorylation are highly conserved (Roger 2017). <!--![endif]----></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is considered applicable to all life stages, as ATP synthesis by oxidative phosphorylation is an essential biological process for most living organisms.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is considered sex-unspecific, as both males and females use oxidative phosphorylation as a main process to generate ATP.</p>
<p><!--![endif]----></p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p>The disruption of the cell cycle leads to a decrease in cell number. The cell cycle consists of G<sub>1</sub>, S, G<sub>2</sub>, M, and G<sub>0</sub> phases. The cell cycle regulation is disrupted by the cell cycle arrest in certain cell cycle phases. The histone gene expression is regulated in cell cycle phases [Heintz et al., 1983].</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Decreased coupling of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), or uncoupling of OXPHOS, describes dissipation of protonmotive force (PMF) across the inner mitochondrial membrane (IMM) by environmental stressors. In eukaryotes, the mitochondrial electron transport chain mediates a series of redox reactions to create a PMF across the IMM. The PMF is used as energy to drive adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis through phosphorylation of adenosine diphosphate (ADP). These processes are coupled and referred to as OXPHOS. A number of chemicals can dissipate the PMF, leading to uncoupling of OXPHOS. This key event describes the main outcome of the interactions between an uncoupler and the transmembrane PMF. An uncoupler can bind to a proton in the mitochondrial inter membrane space, transport the proton to the matrix side of the IMM, release the proton and move back to the inter membrane space. These processes are repeated until the transmembrane PMF is dissipated. This KE is therefore a lumped term of these processes and represents the final consequence of the interactions.</p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p>The percentage of cells at G<sub>1</sub>, G<sub>0</sub>, S, and G<sub>2</sub>/M phases can be detected by flow cytometry [Li et al., 2013]. Cell cycle distribution was analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter (FACS) analysis with a Partec PAS-II sorter [Zupkovitz et al., 2010]. The four cell-cycle phases in living cells can be measured with four-color fluorescent proteins using live-cell imaging [Bajar et al., 2016]. The incorporation of [<sup>3</sup>H]deoxycytidine or [<sup>3</sup>H]thymidine into cell DNA during the S phase can be monitored as DNA synthesis [Heintz et al., 1982].</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation can be indicated by reduced mitochondrial membrane potential, increased proton leak and/or increased oxygen consumption rate.</p>
<ul>
<li>Mitochondrial membrane potential can be determined using ToxCast high-throughput screening bioassays such as “APR_HepG2_MitoMembPot”, “APR_Hepat_MitoFxnI”, and “APR_Mitochondrial_membrane_potential”, and the Tox21 high-throughput screening assay “tox21-mitotox-p1”.</li>
<li>Mitochondrial membrane potential can also be measured using commercially available fluorescent probes such as TMRM (tetramethylrhodamine, methyl ester, perchlorate), TMRE (tetramethylrhodamine, ethyl ester, perchlorate) and JC-1 (Perry 2011).</li>
<li>Proton leak and oxygen consumption rate can be measured using a high-resolution respirometry (Affourtit 2018) or a Seahorse XF analyzer (Divakaruni 2014).</li>
</ul>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Bajar, B.T. et al. (2016), "Fluorescent indicators for simultaneous reporting of all four cell cycle phases", Nat Methods 13:993-996 </p>
field-separator'></span><![endif]-->Affourtit C, Wong H-S, Brand MD. 2018. Measurement of proton leak in isolated mitochondria. In Palmeira CM, Moreno AJ, eds, <em>Mitochondrial Bioenergetics: Methods and Protocols</em>. Springer New York, New York, NY, pp 157-170.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Attene-Ramos MS, Huang R, Sakamuru S, Witt KL, Beeson GC, Shou L, Schnellmann RG, Beeson CC, Tice RR, Austin CP, Xia M. 2013. Systematic study of mitochondrial toxicity of environmental chemicals using quantitative high throughput screening. <em>Chemical Research in Toxicology</em> 26:1323-1332. DOI: 10.1021/tx4001754.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Attene-Ramos MS, Huang RL, Michael S, Witt KL, Richard A, Tice RR, Simeonov A, Austin CP, Xia MH. 2015. Profiling of the Tox21 chemical collection for mitochondrial function to identify compounds that acutely decrease mitochondrial membrane potential. <em>Environ Health Persp</em> 123:49-56. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.1408642.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Divakaruni AS, Paradyse A, Ferrick DA, Murphy AN, Jastroch M. 2014. Chapter Sixteen - Analysis and Interpretation of Microplate-Based Oxygen Consumption and pH Data. In Murphy AN, Chan DC, eds, <em>Methods in Enzymology</em>. Vol 547. Academic Press, pp 309-354.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Escher BI, Schwarzenbach RP. 2002. Mechanistic studies on baseline toxicity and uncoupling of organic compounds as a basis for modeling effective membrane concentrations in aquatic organisms. <em>Aquatic Sciences</em> 64:20-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00027-002-8052-2.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Legradi J, Dahlberg A-K, Cenijn P, Marsh G, Asplund L, Bergman Å, Legler J. 2014. Disruption of Oxidative Phosphorylation (OXPHOS) by Hydroxylated Polybrominated Diphenyl Ethers (OH-PBDEs) Present in the Marine Environment. <em>Environmental Science & Technology</em> 48:14703-14711. DOI: 10.1021/es5039744.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Naven RT, Swiss R, Klug-Mcleod J, Will Y, Greene N. 2012. The development of structure-activity relationships for mitochondrial dysfunction: Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation. <em>Toxicol Sci</em> 131:271-278. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfs279.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Perry SW, Norman JP, Barbieri J, Brown EB, Gelbard HA. 2011. Mitochondrial membrane potential probes and the proton gradient: a practical usage guide. <em>BioTechniques</em> 50:98-115. DOI: 10.2144/000113610.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Roger AJ, Munoz-Gomez SA, Kamikawa R. 2017. The origin and diversification of mitochondria. <em>Curr Biol</em> 27:R1177-R1192. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.015.</p>
<p>Heintz, N. et al. (1983), "Regulation of human histone gene expression: Kinetics of accumulation and changes in the rate of synthesis and in the half-lives of individual histone mRNAs during the HeLa cell cycle", Molecular and Cellular Biology 3:539-550</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Russom CL, Bradbury SP, Broderius SJ, Hammermeister DE, Drummond RA. 1997. Predicting modes of toxic action from chemical structure: Acute toxicity in the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). <em>Environ Toxicol Chem</em> 16:948-967. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160514">https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5620160514</a>.</p>
<p>Li, Q. et al. (2013), "Glyphosate and AMPA inhibit cancer cell growth through inhibiting intracellular glycine synthesis", Drug Des Devel Ther 7:635-643</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Shim J, Weatherly LM, Luc RH, Dorman MT, Neilson A, Ng R, Kim CH, Millard PJ, Gosse JA. 2016. Triclosan is a mitochondrial uncoupler in live zebrafish. <em>J Appl Toxicol</em> 36:1662-1667. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3311.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Sugiyama Y, Shudo T, Hosokawa S, Watanabe A, Nakano M, Kakizuka A. 2019. Emodin, as a mitochondrial uncoupler, induces strong decreases in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) levels and proliferation of B16F10 cells, owing to their poor glycolytic reserve. <em>Genes to Cells</em> 24:569-584. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12712">https://doi.org/10.1111/gtc.12712</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Terada H. 1990. Uncouplers of oxidative phosphorylation. <em>Environ Health Perspect</em> 87:213-218. DOI: 10.1289/ehp.9087213.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Troger F, Delp J, Funke M, van der Stel W, Colas C, Leist M, van de Water B, Ecker GF. 2020. Identification of mitochondrial toxicants by combined in silico and in vitro studies – A structure-based view on the adverse outcome pathway. <em>Computational Toxicology</em> 14:100123. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100123">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comtox.2020.100123</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Weatherly LM, Shim J, Hashmi HN, Kennedy RH, Hess ST, Gosse JA. 2016. Antimicrobial agent triclosan is a proton ionophore uncoupler of mitochondria in living rat and human mast cells and in primary human keratinocytes. <em>Journal of Applied Toxicology</em> 36:777-789. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3209">https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3209</a>.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Xia M, Huang R, Shi Q, Boyd WA, Zhao J, Sun N, Rice JR, Dunlap PE, Hackstadt AJ, Bridge MF, Smith MV, Dai S, Zheng W, Chu PH, Gerhold D, Witt KL, DeVito M, Freedman JH, Austin CP, Houck KA, Thomas RS, Paules RS, Tice RR, Simeonov A. 2018. Comprehensive analyses and prioritization of Tox21 10K chemicals affecting mitochondrial function by in-depth mechanistic studies. <em>Environ Health Perspect</em> 126:077010. DOI: 10.1289/EHP2589.</p>
<td><a href="/aops/328">Aop:328 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (2)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/329">Aop:329 - Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (3)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Aop:264 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/263">Aop:263 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/290">Aop:290 - Mitochondrial ATP synthase antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/291">Aop:291 - Mitochondrial ATP synthase antagonism leading to growth inhibition (2)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/286">Aop:286 - Mitochondrial complex III antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/399">Aop:399 - Inhibition of Fyna leading to increased mortality via decreased eye size (Microphthalmos)</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/287">Aop:287 - Mitochondrial complex III antagonism leading to growth inhibition (2)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/460">Aop:460 - Antagonism of Smoothened receptor leading to orofacial clefting</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Aop:266 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/267">Aop:267 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via glucose depletion</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/598">Aop:598 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/502">Aop:502 - Decrease, cholesterol synthesis leads to orofacial clefting</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Aop:599 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/600">Aop:600 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/601">Aop:601 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/612">Aop:612 - Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation leading to early life stage mortality via reduced adenosine triphosphate</a></td>
<p>This key event is in general applicable to all eukaryotes, as most organisms are known to use cell proliferation to achieve growth.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is in general considered applicable to all eukaryotes utilizing ATP as a direct source of energy and signaling molecule.</p>
<p>This key event is in general applicable to all life stages. As cell proliferation not only occurs in developing organisms, but also in adults.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is considered applicable to all life stages, as all developmental stages require energy supply to maintain necessary physiological processes.</p>
<p>This key event is sex-unspecific, as both genders use the same cell proliferation mechanisms.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is considered sex-unspecific, as both males and females use ATP as an essential energy molecule.</p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Decreased cell proliferation describes the outcome of reduced cell division and cell growth. Cell proliferation is considered the main mechanism of tissue and organismal growth (Conlon 1999). Decreased cell proliferation has been associated with abnormal growth-factor signaling and cellular energy depletion (DeBerardinis 2008).</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Decreased adenosine triphosphate (ATP) pool describes the loss of balance between ATP synthesis and ATP consumption, leading to reduced total ATP. As a primary form of biological energy, ATP is used by many biological processes <!--[if supportFields]><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
ZH-CN;mso-bidi-language:AR-SA'><span style='mso-element:field-end'></span></span><![endif]-->. Decrease in ATP level normally attributes to metabolic disorders in major ATP synthetic pathways, such as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid β-oxidation, glycolysis and plant photophosphorylation.</p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Multiple types of <em>in vitro</em> bioassays can be used to measure this key event:</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">-The ATP pool in cells or tissue can be quantified using a well-established ATP bioluminescent assay (Lemasters 1978; Wibom 1990). Assay principles: ATP can react with luciferase and luciferin from firefly and the luminescence emitted from the reaction is proportional to the ATP concentration: <!--![endif]----></p>
<ul>
<li>ToxCast high-throughput screening bioassays such as “BSK_3C_Proliferation”, “BSK_CASM3C_Proliferation” and “BSK_SAg_Proliferation” can be used to measure cell proliferation status.</li>
<li>Commercially available methods such as the well-established 5-bromo-2’-deoxyuridine (BrdU) (Raza 1985; Muir 1990) or 5-ethynyl-2’-deoxyuridine (EdU) assay. Both assays measure DNA synthesis in dividing cells to indicate proliferation status.<!--![endif]----></li>
<p style="text-align:justify">-ToxCast high-throughput screening bioassays, such as “NCCT_HEK293T_CellTiterGLO” and “NIS_HEK293T_CTG_Cytotoxicity” can be used to measure this KE.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"> </p>
<p><!--![endif]----></p>
<h4>References</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Conlon I, Raff M. 1999. Size control in animal development. <em>Cell</em> 96:235-244. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80563-2.</p>
field-separator'></span><![endif]-->Bonora M, Patergnani S, Rimessi A, De Marchi E, Suski JM, Bononi A, Giorgi C, Marchi S, Missiroli S, Poletti F, Wieckowski MR, Pinton P. 2012. ATP synthesis and storage. <em>Purinergic Signalling</em> 8:343-357. DOI: 10.1007/s11302-012-9305-8.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">DeBerardinis RJ, Lum JJ, Hatzivassiliou G, Thompson CB. 2008. The biology of cancer: metabolic reprogramming fuels cell growth and proliferation. <em>Cell Metabolism</em> 7:11-20. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2007.10.002</a>.</p>
<p>Lemasters JJ, Hackenbrock CR. 1978. [4] Firefly luciferase assay for ATP production by mitochondria. <em>Methods in Enzymology</em>. Vol 57. Academic Press, pp 36-50.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Muir D, Varon S, Manthorpe M. 1990. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for bromodeoxyuridine incorporation using fixed microcultures. <em>Analytical Biochemistry</em> 185:377-382. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(90)90310-6">https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(90)90310-6</a>.</p>
<p>Wibom R, Lundin A, Hultman E. 1990. A sensitive method for measuring ATP-formation in rat muscle mitochondria. <em>Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation</em> 50:143-152. DOI: 10.1080/00365519009089146.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Raza A, Spiridonidis C, Ucar K, Mayers G, Bankert R, Preisler HD. 1985. Double labeling of S-phase murine cells with bromodeoxyuridine and a second DNA-specific probe. <em>Cancer Research</em> 45:2283-2287.</p>
<td><a href="/aops/296">Aop:296 - Oxidative DNA damage leading to chromosomal aberrations and mutations</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/48">Aop:48 - Binding of agonists to ionotropic glutamate receptors in adult brain causes excitotoxicity that mediates neuronal cell death, contributing to learning and memory impairment.</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/272">Aop:272 - Deposition of energy leading to lung cancer</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/13">Aop:13 - Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development induces impairment of learning and memory abilities</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/322">Aop:322 - Alkylation of DNA leading to reduced sperm count</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/38">Aop:38 - Protein Alkylation leading to Liver Fibrosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/216">Aop:216 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA strand breaks and follicular atresia</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/12">Aop:12 - Chronic binding of antagonist to N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors (NMDARs) during brain development leads to neurodegeneration with impairment in learning and memory in aging</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/238">Aop:238 - Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA strand breaks and oocyte apoptosis</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/144">Aop:144 - Endocytic lysosomal uptake leading to liver fibrosis</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/478">Aop:478 - Deposition of energy leading to occurrence of cataracts</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/17">Aop:17 - Binding of electrophilic chemicals to SH(thiol)-group of proteins and /or to seleno-proteins involved in protection against oxidative stress during brain development leads to impairment of learning and memory</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/483">Aop:483 - Deposition of Energy Leading to Learning and Memory Impairment</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/278">Aop:278 - IKK complex inhibition leading to liver injury</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/470">Aop:470 - Deposition of energy leads to abnormal vascular remodeling</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/281">Aop:281 - Acetylcholinesterase Inhibition Leading to Neurodegeneration</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/273">Aop:273 - Mitochondrial complex inhibition leading to liver injury</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/377">Aop:377 - Dysregulated prolonged Toll Like Receptor 9 (TLR9) activation leading to Multi Organ Failure involving Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/265">Aop:265 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via increased cytosolic calcium</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Aop:264 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Aop:266 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/268">Aop:268 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via mitochondrial swelling</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/479">Aop:479 - Mitochondrial complexes inhibition leading to left ventricular function decrease via increased myocardial oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/490">Aop:490 - Co-activation of IP3R and RyR leads to reduced IQ and increased socio-economic burden through non-cholinergic mechanisms</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/494">Aop:494 - AhR activation leading to liver fibrosis </a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Aop:599 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/624">Aop:624 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via insulin resistance-associated mitochondrial dysfunction</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/625">Aop:625 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via insulin resistance-associated oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/626">Aop:626 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via insulin resistance-associated endoplasmic reticulum stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/627">Aop:627 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via lipogenesis-associated mitochondrial dysfunction</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/628">Aop:628 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via lipogenesis-associated oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>KeyEvent</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/629">Aop:629 - Increased 11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity leading to MASLD progression via lipogenesis-associated endoplasmic reticulum stress</a></td>
<p>Taxonomic applicability: DNA strand breaks are relevant to all species, including vertebrates such as humans, that contain DNA (Cannan & Pederson, 2016). </p>
<p>Life stage applicability: This key event is not life stage specific as all life stages display strand breaks. However, there is an increase in baseline levels of DNA strand breaks seen in older individuals though it is unknown whether this change due to increased break induction or a greater retention of breaks due to poor repair (White & Vijg, 2016). </p>
<p>Sex applicability: This key event is not sex specific as both sexes display evidence of strand breaks. In some cell types, such as peripheral blood mononuclear cells, males show higher levels of single strand breaks than females (Garm et al., 2012). </p>
<p>Evidence for perturbation by a stressor: There are studies demonstrating that increased DNA strand breaks can result from exposure to multiple stressor types including ionizing & non-ionizing radiation, chemical agents, and oxidizing agents (EPRI, 2014; Hamada, 2014; Cencer et al., 2018; Cannan & Pederson, 2016; Yang et al., 1998). </p>
<p>Cell death is an universal event occurring in cells of any species (Fink and Cookson,2005).<sup> </sup></p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p>DNA strand breaks are a type of damage resulting from the hydrolysis of phosphodiester groups in the backbone of DNA molecules (Gates, 2009) and can occur on a single strand (single strand breaks; SSBs) or both strands (double strand breaks; DSBs). SSBs arise when the sugar phosphate backbones connecting adjacent nucleotides in DNA are simultaneously hydrolyzed such that the hydrogen bonds between complementary bases are not able to hold the two strands together. DSBs are generated when both strands are simultaneously broken at sites that are sufficiently close to one another that base-pairing and chromatin structure are insufficient to keep the two DNA ends juxtaposed. As a consequence, the two DNA ends generated by a DSB can physically dissociate from one another, becoming difficult to repair and increasing the chance of inappropriate recombination with other sites in the genome (Jackson, 2002). SSB can turn into DSB if the replication fork stalls at the lesion leading to fork collapse. Strand breaks are intermediates in various biological events, including DNA repair (e.g., excision repair), as well as other normal cellular processes where DSBs act as genetic shufflers to generate genetic diversity for V(D)J recombination in lymphoid cells, and chromatin remodeling in both somatic cells and germ cells, and meiotic recombination in gametes. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Two types of cell death can be distinguished by morphological features, although it is likely that these are two ends of a spectrum with possible intermediate forms. Apoptosis involves shrinkage, nuclear disassembly, and fragmentation of the cell into discrete bodies with intact plasma membranes. These are rapidly phagocytosed by neighbouring cells. An important feature of apoptosis is the requirement for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to initiate the execution phase. In contrast, necrotic cell death is characterized by cell swelling and lysis. This is usually a consequence of profound loss of mitochondrial function and resultant ATP depletion, leading to loss of ion homeostasis, including volume regulation, and increased intracellular Ca2+. The latter activates a number of nonspecific hydrolases (i.e., proteases, nucleases, and phospholipases) as well as calcium dependent kinases. Activation of calpain I, the Ca2+-dependent cysteine protease cleaves the death-promoting Bcl-2 family members Bid and Bax which translocate to mitochondrial membranes, resulting in release of truncated apoptosis-inducing factor (tAIF), cytochrome c and endonuclease in the case of Bid and cytocrome c in the case of Bax. tAIF translocates to cell nuclei, and together with cyclophilin A and phosphorylated histone H2AX (γH2AX) is responsible for DNA cleavage, a feature of programmed necrosis. Activated calpain I has also been shown to cleave the plasma membrane Na+–Ca2+ exchanger, which leads to build-up of intracellular Ca2+, which is the source of additional increased intracellular Ca2+. Cytochrome c in cellular apoptosis is a component of the apoptosome.</p>
<p>Strand breaks are intermediates in various biological events, including DNA repair (e.g., excision repair), V(D)J recombination in developing lymphoid cells and chromatin remodeling in both somatic cells and germ cells. The spectrum of damage can be complex, particularily if the stressor is from large amounts of deposited energy which can result in complex lesions and clustered damage defined as two or more oxidized bases, abasic sites or strand breaks on opposing DNA strands within a few helical turns. These lesions are more difficult to repair and have been studied in many types of models (Barbieri et al., 2019 and Asaithamby et al., 2011). DSBs and complex lesions are of particular concern, as they are considered the most lethal and deleterious type of DNA lesion. If misrepaired or left unrepaired, DSBs may drive the cell towards genomic instability, apoptosis or tumorigenesis (Beir, 1999). </p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p>Please refer to the table below for details regarding these and other methodologies for detecting DNA DSBs. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">DNA damage activates nuclear poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase-1(PARP-1), a DNA repair enzyme. PARP-1 forms poly(ADP-ribose) polymers, to repair DNA, but when DNA damage is extensive, PAR accumulates, exits cell nuclei and travels to mitochondrial membranes, where it, like calpain I, is involved in AIF release from mitochondria. A fundamental distinction between necrosis and apoptosis is the loss of plasma membrane integrity; this is integral to the former but not the latter. As a consequence, lytic release of cellular constituents promotes a local inflammatory reaction, whereas the rapid removal of apoptotic bodies minimizes such a reaction. The distinction between the two modes of death is easily accomplished in vitro but not in vivo. Thus, although claims that certain drugs induce apoptosis have been made, these are relatively unconvincing. DNA fragmentation can occur in necrosis, leading to positive TUNEL staining <span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">(<span style="font-size:16px">see explanation below</span>)</span></span>. Conversely, when apoptosis is massive, it can exceed the capacity for rapid phagocytosis, resulting in the eventual appearance of secondary necrosis.</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td>
<p><strong>Method of Measurement </strong></p>
<p>Comet Assay (Single Cell Gel Eletrophoresis - Alkaline) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Collins, 2004; Olive and Banath, 2006; Platel et al., 2011; Nikolova et al., 2017 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>To detect SSBs or DSBs, single cells are encapsulated in agarose on a slide, lysed, and subjected to gel electrophoresis at an alkaline pH (pH >13); DNA fragments are forced to move, forming a "comet"-like appearance </p>
<p>Measurement of γ-H2AX in cells by ELISA, normalized to total levels of H2AX </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Ager et al., 1990; Gardiner et al., 1985; Herschleb et al., 2007; Kawashima et al., 2017 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>To detect DSBs, cells are embedded and lysed in agarose, and the released DNA undergoes gel electrophoresis in which the direction of the voltage is periodically alternated; Large DNA fragments are thus able to be separated by size </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>The TUNEL (Terminal Deoxynucleotidyl Transferase dUTP Nick End Labeling) Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Loo, 2011 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>To detect strand breaks, dUTPs added to the 3’OH end of a strand break by the DNA polymerase terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT) are tagged with a fluorescent dye or a reporter enzyme to allow visualization </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>In Vitro DNA Cleavage Assays using Topoisomerase </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Nitiss, 2012 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Cleavage of DNA can be achieved using purified topoisomerase; DNA strand breaks can then be separated and quantified using gel electrophoresis </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>PCR assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Figueroa‑González & Pérez‑Plasencia, 2017 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Assay of strand breaks through the observation of DNA amplification prevention. Breaks block Taq polymerase, reducing the number of DNA templates, preventing amplification </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Sucrose density gradient centrifuge </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Raschke et al. 2009 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Division of DNA pieces by density, increased fractionation leads to lower density pieces, with the use of a sucrose cushion </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Alkaline Elution Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Kohn, 1991 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Cells lysed with detergent-solution, filtered through membrane to remove all but intact DNA </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>Unwinding Assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Nacci et al. 1992 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>DNA is stored in alkaline solutions with DNA-specific dye and allowed to unwind following removal from tissue, increased strand damage associated with increased unwinding </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Yes </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>STRIDE assay </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Zilio and Ulrich, 2021 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>STRIDE (SensiTive Recognition of Individual DNA Ends) combines in situ nick translation with the proximity ligation assay (PLA) to detect single-strand breaks (sSTRIDE) or double-strand breaks (dSTRIDE). In this process, lesions labeled through nick translation with biotinylated nucleotides are identified by a PLA signal, which arises from the interaction of two anti-biotin antibodies from different species. </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>
<p>sBLISS </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>Bouwmann et al. 2020 </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>sBLISS (in-suspension breaks labeling in situ and sequencing) labels double-strand breaks (DSBs) in cells immobilized on glass coverslips, using double-stranded oligonucleotide adaptors that facilitate selective linear amplification through T7-mediated in vitro transcription (IVT), followed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) library preparation </p>
<p> </p>
</td>
<td>
<p>No </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align:justify">Two alternative pathways - either extrinsic (receptor-mediated) or intrinsic (mitochondria-mediated) - lead to apoptotic cell death. The initiation of cell death begins either at the plasma membrane with the binding of TNF or FasL to their cognate receptors or within the cell. The latter is due to the occurrence of intracellular stress in the form of biochemical events such as oxidative stress, redox changes, covalent binding, lipid peroxidation, and consequent functional effects on mitochondria, endoplasmic reticulum, microtubules, cytoskeleton, or DNA. The intrinsic mitochondrial pathway involves the initiator, caspase-9, which, when activated, forms an “apoptosome” in the cytosol, together with cytochrome c, which translocates from mitochondria, Apaf-1 and dATP. The apoptosome activates caspase-3, the central effector caspase, which in turn activates downstream factors that are responsible for the apoptotic death of a cell (Fujikawa, 2015). Intracellular stress either directly affects mitochondria or can lead to effects on other organelles, which then send signals to the mitochondria to recruit participation in the death process (Fujikawa, 2015; Malhi et al., 2010).<sup> </sup>Constitutively expressed nitric oxide synthase (nNOS) is a Ca2+-dependent cytosolic enzyme that forms nitric oxide (NO) from L-arginine, and NO reacts with the free radical such as superoxide (O2−) to form the very toxic free radical peroxynitrite (ONOO−). Free radicals such as ONOO−, O2 − and hydroxyl radical (OH−) damage cellular membranes and intracellular proteins, enzymes and DNA (Fujikawa, 2015; Malhi et al., 2010; Kaplowitz, 2002; Kroemer et al., 2009). </p>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Ager, D. D., et al. (1990). Measurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Radiation research, 122/(2), 181–187. </p>
<p>Anderson, D. & Laubenthal J. (2013), “Analysis of DNA Damage via Single-Cell Electrophoresis. In: Makovets S, editor. DNA Electrophoresis. Totowa.”, NJ: Humana Press. p 209-218. </p>
<p>Asaithamby, A., B. Hu and D.J. Chen. (2011) “Unrepaired clustered DNA lesions induce chromosome breakage in human cells.” Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108(20): 8293-8298 . </p>
<p>Barbieri, S., G. Babini, J. Morini et a l (2019). . Predicting DNA damage foci and their experimental readout with 2D microscopy: a unified approach applied to photon and neutron exposures. Scientific Reports 9(1): 14019 </p>
<p>Bouwman, B. et al. (2020), “Genome-wide detection of DNA double-strand breaks by in-suspension BLISS”, Nature protocols,.15/12, Springer Nature, London, <a href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0397-2" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-020-0397-2</a> </p>
<p>Bryce, S. et al. (2016), “Genotoxic mode of action predictions from a multiplexed flow cytometric assay and a machine learning approach.”, Environ Mol Mutagen. 57:171-189. Doi: 10.1002/em.21996. </p>
<p>Burma, S. et al. (2001), “ATM phosphorylates histone H2AX in response to DNA double-strand breaks.”, J Biol Chem, 276(45): 42462-42467. doi:10.1074/jbc.C100466200 </p>
<p>Cannan, W.J. and D.S. Pederson (2016), "Mechanisms and Consequences of Double-Strand DNA Break Formation in Chromatin.", Journal of Cellular Physiology, Vol.231(/1), Wiley, New York, https://doi.org/10.1002/jcp.25048. </p>
<p>Cencer, C. et al. (2018), “PARP-1/PAR Activity in Cultured Human Lens Epithelial Cells Exposed to Two Levels of UVB Light”, Photochemistry and Photobiology, Vol.(94/1), Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, https://doi.org/10.1111/php.12814. </p>
<p>Charlton, E. D. et al. (1989), “Calculation of Initial Yields of Single and Double Stranded Breaks in Cell Nuclei from Electrons, Protons, and Alpha Particles.”, Int. J. Radiat. Biol. 56(1): 1-19. doi: 10.1080/09553008914551141. </p>
<p>Collins, R. A. (2004), “The Comet Assay for DNA Damage and Repair. Molecular Biotechnology.”, Mol Biotechnol. 26(3): 249-61. doi:10.1385/MB:26:3:249 </p>
<p>EPRI (2014), Epidemiology and mechanistic effects of radiation on the lens of the eye: Review and scientific appraisal of the literature, EPRI, California. </p>
<p>Figueroa‑González, G. and C. Pérez‑Plasencia. (2017), “Strategies for the evaluation of DNA damage and repair mechanisms in cancer”, Oncology Letters, Vol.133(/6), Spandidos Publications, Athens, https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.6002. </p>
<p>Garcia-Canton, C. et al. (2013), “Assessment of the in vitro p-H2AX assay by High Content Screening asa novel genotoxicity test.”, Mutat Res. 757:158-166. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2013.08.002 </p>
<p>Gardiner, K. et al. (1986), “Fractionation of Large Mammalian DNA Restriction Fragments Using Vertical Pulsed-Field Gradient Gel Electrophoresis.”, Somatic Cell and Molecular Genetics. 12(2): 185-95.Doi: 10.1007/bf01560665. </p>
<p>Garm, C. et al. (2012), “Age and gender effects on DNA strand break repair in peripheral blood mononuclear cells”, Aging Cell, Vol.12/1, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Oxford, https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.12019. </p>
<p>Hamada, N. (2014), “What are the intracellular targets and intratissue target cells for radiation effects?”, Radiation research, Vol. 181/1, The Radiation Research Society, Indianapolis, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR13505.1. </p>
<p>Herschleb, J. et al. (2007), “Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.”, Nat Protoc. 2(3): 677-684. doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.94 </p>
<p>Iliakis, G. et al. (2015), “Alternative End-Joining Repair Pathways Are the Ultimate Backup for Abrogated Classical Non-Homologous End-Joining and Homologous Recombination Repair: Implications for the Formation of Chromosome Translocations.”, Mutation Research/Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis. 2(3): 677-84. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2007.94 </p>
<p>Jackson, S. (2002). “Sensing and repairing DNA double-strand breaks.”, Carcinogenesis. 23:687-696. Doi:10.1093/carcin/23.5.687. </p>
<p>Ji, J. et al. (2017), “Phosphorylated fraction of H2AX as a measurement for DNA damage in cancer cells and potential applications of a novel assay.”, PLoS One. 12(2): e0171582. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0171582 </p>
<p>Kawashima, Y.(2017), “Detection of DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.”, Genes Cells 22:84-93. Doi: 10.1111/gtc.12457. </p>
<p>Khoury, L. et al. (2013), “Validation of high-throughput genotoxicity assay screening using cH2AX in-cell Western assay on HepG2 cells.”, Environ Mol Mutagen, 54:737-746. Doi: 10.1002/em.21817. </p>
<p>Khoury, L. et al. (2016), “Evaluation of four human cell lines with distinct biotransformation properties for genotoxic screening.”, Mutagenesis, 31:83-96. Doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/gev058" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">10.1093/mutage/gev058</a>. </p>
<p>Kohn, K.W. (1991), “Principles and practice of DNA filter elution”, Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Vol.49(/1), Elsevier, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/0163-7258(91)90022-E. </p>
<p>Loo, DT. (2011), “In Situ Detection of Apoptosis by the TUNEL Assay: An Overview of Techniques. In: Didenko V, editor. DNA Damage Detection In Situ, Ex Vivo, and In Vivo. Totowa.”, NJ: Humana Press. p 3-13.doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_1" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">10.1007/978-1-60327-409-8_1</a>. </p>
<p>Mah, L. J. et al. (2010), “Quantification of gammaH2AX foci in response to ionising radiation.”, J Vis Exp(38). doi:10.3791/1957. </p>
<p>Nacci, D. et al. (1992), “Application of the DNA alkaline unwinding assay to detect DNA strand breaks in marine bivalves”, Marine Environmental Research, Vol.33(/2), Elsevier BV, Amsterdam, https://doi.org/10.1016/0141-1136(92)90134-8. </p>
<p>Nikolova, T., F. et al. (2017), “Genotoxicity testing: Comparison of the γH2AX focus assay with the alkaline and neutral comet assays.”, Mutat Res 822:10-18. Doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.07.004" rel="noreferrer noopener" target="_blank">10.1016/j.mrgentox.2017.07.004</a>. </p>
<p>Nitiss, J. L. et al. (2012), “Topoisomerase assays. ”, Curr Protoc Pharmacol. Chapter 3: Unit 3 3. </p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p> </p>
<p>OECD. (2014). Test No. 489: “In vivo mammalian alkaline comet assay.” OECD Guideline for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4 . </p>
<p><strong>Necrosis:</strong></p>
<p>Olive, P. L., & Banáth, J. P. (2006), “The comet assay: a method to measure DNA damage in individual cells.”, Nature Protocols. 1(1): 23-29. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.5. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) is a soluble cytoplasmic enzyme that is present in almost all cells and is released into extracellular space when the plasma membrane is damaged. To detect the leakage of LDH into cell culture medium, a tetrazolium salt is used in this assay. In the first step, LDH produces reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NADH) when it catalyzes the oxidation of lactate to pyruvate. In the second step, a tetrazolium salt is converted to a colored formazan product using newly synthesized NADH in the presence of an electron acceptor. The amount of formazan product can be colorimetrically quantified by standard spectroscopy. Because of the linearity of the assay, it can be used to enumerate the percentage of necrotic cells in a sample (Chan et al., 2013). </p>
<p>Platel A. et al. (2011), “Study of oxidative DNA damage in TK6 human lymphoblastoid cells by use of the thymidine kinase gene-mutation assay and the in vitro modified comet assay: Determination of No-Observed-Genotoxic-Effect-Levels.”, Mutat Res 726:151-159. Doi: 10.1016/j.mrgentox.2011.09.003. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">The MTT assay is a colorimetric assay for assessing cell viability. NAD(P)H-dependent cellular oxidoreductase enzymes may reflect the number of viable cells present. These enzymes are capable of reducing the tetrazolium dye MTT 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide to its insoluble formazan, which has a purple color. Other closely related tetrazolium dyes include XTT, MTS and the WSTs. Tetrazolium dye assays can also be used to measure cytotoxicity (loss of viable cells) or cytostatic activity (shift from proliferation to quiescence) of potential medicinal agents and toxic materials. MTT assays are usually done in the dark since the MTT reagent is sensitive to light (Berridgeet al.,2005).</p>
<p>Raschke, S., J. Guan and G. Iliakis. (2009), “Application of alkaline sucrose gradient centrifugation in the analysis of DNA replication after DNA damage”, Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol.521, Humana Press, Totowa, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60327-815-7_18. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Propidium iodide (PI) is an intercalating agent and a fluorescent molecule used to stain necrotic cells. It is cell membrane impermeant so it stains only those cells where the cell membrane is destroyed. When PI is bound to nucleic acids, the fluorescence excitation maximum is 535 nm and the emission maximum is 617 nm (Moore et al.,1998)</p>
<p>Redon, C. et al. (2010), “The use of gamma-H2AX as a biodosimeter for total-body radiation exposure in non-human primates.”, PLoS One. 5(11): e15544. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015544 </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Alamar Blue (resazurin) is a fluorescent dye. The oxidized blue non fluorescent Alamar blue is reduced to a pink fluorescent dye in the medium by cell activity (O'Brien et al., 2000) (12).</p>
<p>Revet, I. et al. (2011), “Functional relevance of the histone γH2Ax in the response to DNA damaging agents.” Proc Natl Acad Sci USA.108:8663-8667. Doi: 10.1073/pnas.1105866108 </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Neutral red uptake, which is based on the ability of viable cells to incorporate and bind the supravital dye neutral red in lysosomes (Repetto et al., 2008)(13). <span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif">Moreover, quantification of ATP, signaling the presence of metabolically active cells, can be performed (CellTiter-Glo; Promega).</span></span></p>
<p style="text-align:justify">ATP assay: Quantification of ATP, signaling the presence of metabolically active cells (CellTiter-Glo; Promega).</p>
<p>Rothkamm, K. & Horn, S. (2009), “γ-H2AX as protein biomarker for radiation exposure.”, Ann Ist Super Sanità, 45(3): 265-71. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><br />
<strong>Apoptosis:</strong></p>
<p>White, R.R. and J. Vijg. (2016), “Do DNA Double-Strand Breaks Drive Aging?”, Molecular Cell, Vol.63, Elsevier, Amsterdam, http://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcel.2016.08.004. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">TUNEL is a common method for detecting DNA fragmentation that results from apoptotic signalling cascades. The assay relies on the presence of nicks in the DNA which can be identified by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase or TdT, an enzyme that will catalyze the addition of dUTPs that are secondarily labeled with a marker. It may also label cells that have suffered severe DNA damage.</p>
<p>Yang, Y. et al. (1998), “The effect of catalase amplification on immortal lens epithelial cell lines”, Experimental Eye Research, Vol.67(/6), Academic Press Inc, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1006/exer.1998.0560. </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Caspase activity assays measured by fluorescence. During apoptosis, mainly caspase-3 and -7 cleave PARP to yield an 85 kDa and a 25 kDa fragment. PARP cleavage is considered to be one of the classical characteristics of apoptosis. Antibodies to the 85 kDa fragment of cleaved PARP or to caspase-3 both serve as markers for apoptotic cells that can be monitored using immunofluorescence (Li, Peng et al., 2004).</p>
<p>Zilio, N. and H. D. Ulrich (2021), “Exploring the SSBreakome: genome-wide mapping of DNA single-strand breaks by next-generation sequencing”, The FEBS journal, 288(13), Wiley, Hoboken, https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.15568 </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Hoechst 33342 staining: Hoechst dyes are cell-permeable and bind to DNA in live or fixed cells. Therefore, these stains are often called supravital, which means that cells survive a treatment with these compounds. The stained, condensed or fragmented DNA is a marker of apoptosis (Loo, 2002; Kubbies and Rabinovitch, 1983). </p>
<p> </p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Acridine Orange/Ethidium Bromide staining is used to visualize nuclear changes and apoptotic body formation that are characteristic of apoptosis. Cells are viewed under a fluorescence microscope and counted to quantify apoptosis.</p>
<h4>References</h4>
<ul>
<li>Fujikawa, D.G. (2015), The role of excitotoxic programmed necrosis in acute brain injury, Comput Struct Biotechnol J, vol. 13, pp. 212-221.</li>
<li>Malhi, H. et al. (2010), Hepatocyte death: a clear and present danger, Physiol Rev, vol. 90, no. 3, pp. 1165-1194.</li>
<li>Kaplowitz, N. (2002), Biochemical and Cellular Mechanisms of Toxic Liver Injury, Semin Liver Dis, vol. 22, no. 2,<span style="color:#000000"> </span><a class="external free" href="http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433631" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"><span style="color:#000000">http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/433631</span></a><span style="color:#000000"> </span>(accessed on 20 January 2016).</li>
<li>Kroemer, G. et al., (2009), Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death, Cell Death Differ, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 3-11.</li>
<li>Chan, F.K., K. Moriwaki and M.J. De Rosa (2013), Detection of necrosis by release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity, Methods Mol Biol, vol. 979, pp. 65–70.</li>
<li>Berridge, M.V., P.M. Herst and A.S. Tan (2005), Tetrazolium dyes as tools in cell biology: new insights into their cellular reduction. Biotechnology Annual Review, vol. 11, pp 127-152.</li>
<li>Moore, A, et al.(1998), Simultaneous measurement of cell cycle and apoptotic cell death,Methods Cell Biol, vol. 57, pp. 265–278.</li>
<li>Li, Peng et al. (2004), Mitochondrial activation of apoptosis, Cell, vol. 116, no. 2 Suppl,pp. S57-59, 2 p following S59.</li>
<li>Loo, D.T. (2002), TUNEL Assay an overview of techniques, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 203: In Situ Detection of DNA Damage, chapter 2, Didenko VV (ed.), Humana Press Inc.</li>
<li>Kubbies, M. and P.S. Rabinovitch (1983), Flow cytometric analysis of factors which influence the BrdUrd-Hoechst quenching effect in cultivated human fibroblasts and lymphocytes, Cytometry, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 276–281.</li>
<li>Fink, S.L. and B.T. Cookson (2005), Apoptosis, pyroptosis, and necrosis: mechanistic description of dead and dying eukaryotic cells, Infect Immun, vol. 73, no. 4, pp.1907-1916.</li>
<li>O'Brien J, Wilson I, Orton T, Pognan F. 2000. Investigation of the Alamar Blue (resazurin) fluorescent dye for the assessment of mammalian cell cytotoxicity. European journal of biochemistry / FEBS 267(17): 5421-5426.</li>
<li>Repetto G, del Peso A, Zurita JL. 2008. Neutral red uptake assay for the estimation of cell viability/cytotoxicity. Nature protocols 3(7): 1125-1131.</li>
<td><a href="/aops/263">Aop:263 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/290">Aop:290 - Mitochondrial ATP synthase antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/291">Aop:291 - Mitochondrial ATP synthase antagonism leading to growth inhibition (2)</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/286">Aop:286 - Mitochondrial complex III antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/287">Aop:287 - Mitochondrial complex III antagonism leading to growth inhibition (2)</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/245">Aop:245 - Reduction in photophosphorylation leading to growth inhibition in aquatic plants</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/265">Aop:265 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via increased cytosolic calcium</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Aop:264 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Aop:266 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/267">Aop:267 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via glucose depletion</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/268">Aop:268 - Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via mitochondrial swelling</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/473">Aop:473 - Energy deposition from internalized Ra-226 decay lower oxygen binding capacity of hemocyanin</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Aop:325 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Aop:324 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Aop:326 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Aop:596 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Aop:331 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/598">Aop:598 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Aop:332 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Aop:599 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Aop:333 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/600">Aop:600 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/602">Aop:602 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/603">Aop:603 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell cycle disruption</a></td>
<td>AdverseOutcome</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/601">Aop:601 - Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event is sex-unspecific.</p>
<h4>Key Event Description</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Decreased growth refers to a reduction in size and/or weight of a tissue, organ or individual organism. Growth is normally controlled by growth factors and mainly achieved through cell proliferation (Conlon 1999).</p>
<h4>How it is Measured or Detected</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Growth can be indicated by measuring weight, length, total volume, and/or total area of a tissue, organ or individual organism. </p>
<h4>Regulatory Significance of the AO</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">Growth is a regulatory relevant chronic toxicity endpoint for almost all organisms. Multiple OECD test guidelines have included growth either as a main endpoint of concern, or as an additional endpoint to be considered in the toxicity assessments. Relevant test guidelines include, but not only limited to:</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"> </p>
<p>-Test No. 201: Freshwater Alga and Cyanobacteria, Growth Inhibition Test</p>
<p>-Test No. 228: Determination of Developmental Toxicity to Dipteran Dung Flies (Scathophaga stercoraria L. (Scathophagidae), Musca autumnalis De Geer (Muscidae))</p>
<p>-Test No. 241: The Larval Amphibian Growth and Development Assay (LAGDA)</p>
<p>-Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents</p>
<p>-Test No. 408: Repeated Dose 90-Day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents</p>
style='mso-element:field-separator'></span><![endif]-->Conlon I, Raff M. 1999. Size control in animal development. <em>Cell</em> 96:235-244. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80563-2.</p>
<td><a href="/aops/299">Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and follicular atresia</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/505">Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS) formation leads to cancer via inflammation pathway</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Not Specified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/521">Essential element imbalance leads to reproductive failure via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/311">Deposition of energy leading to population decline via DNA oxidation and oocyte apoptosis</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/186">unknown MIE leading to renal failure and mortality</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and cell death</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/497">ERa inactivation alters mitochondrial functions and insulin signalling in skeletal muscle and leads to insulin resistance and metabolic syndrome</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/540">Oxidative Stress in the Fish Ovary Leads to Reproductive Impairment via Reduced Vitellogenin Production</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Low</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/462">Activation of reactive oxygen species leading the atherosclerosis</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/396">Deposition of ionizing energy leads to population decline via impaired meiosis</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/26">Calcium-mediated neuronal ROS production and energy imbalance</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/534">Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) inhibition leads to cancer through oxidative stress</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/481">AOPs of amorphous silica nanoparticles: ROS-mediated oxidative stress increased respiratory dysfunction and diseases.</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/600">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/330">Excessive reactive oxygen species production leading to mortality (4)</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/601">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/602">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/603">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell cycle disruption</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h4>Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship</h4>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Life Stage: The life stage applicable to this key event relationship is all life stages. Older individuals are more likely to manifest this adverse outcome pathway (adults > juveniles > embryos) due to accumulation of reactive oxygen species.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Sex: This key event relationship applies to both males and females.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Taxonomic: This key event relationship appears to be present broadly, with representative studies including mammals (humans, lab mice, lab rats), teleost fish, and invertebrates (cladocerans, mussels).</span></span></p>
<h4>Key Event Relationship Description</h4>
<p>Induction of oxidative stress occurs as a result of an imbalance between the production of radical species and the antioxidant defense systems (Juan et al. 2021). ROS can damage DNA, lipids, and proteins (Shields et al. 2021). Superoxide dismutase is an enzyme in a common cellular defense pathway, in which superoxide dismutase converts superoxide radicals to hydrogen peroxide. When cellular defense mechanisms are unable to mitigate ROS formation from mitochondrial respiration and stressors (biological, chemical, radiation), increased ROS levels cause oxidative stress.</p>
<h4>Evidence Supporting this KER</h4>
<strong>Biological Plausibility</strong>
<p>The biological plausibility linking increases in oxidative stress to reactive oxygen species (ROS) is strong. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are produced by many normal cellular processes (ex. cellular respiration, mitochondrial electron transport, specialized enzyme reactions) and occur in multiple chemical forms (ex. superoxide anion, hydroxyl radical, hydrogen peroxide). Antioxidant enzymes play a major role in reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels in cells (Ray et al. 2012) to prevent cellular damage to lipids, proteins, and DNA (Juan et al. 2021). Oxidative stress occurs when antioxidant enzymes do not prevent ROS levels from increasing in cells, often induced by environmental stressors (biological, chemical, radiation).</p>
<p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Lu et al. 2016; Alomar et al. 2017; Chen et al. 2017; Veneman et al. 2017; Barboza et al. 2018; Choi et al. 2018; Espinosa et al. 2018</span></span></span></p>
<p style="text-align:center"><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif"><span style="color:black">Browne et al. 2013; Jeong et al. 2016, 2017; Paul-Pont et al. 2016; Lei et al. 2018; Yu et al. 2018</span></span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-size:16px"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">The accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), and resulting oxidative stress, is well-established (see Shields 2021 for overview). In the studies listed in the above table, changes in enzyme activity and changes in gene expression are the most common oxidative stress effects detected due to increases in reactive oxygen species (see additional study details in table below). Increases in gene expression or enzyme activity of superoxide dismutase, catalase, glutathione peroxidase, and other antioxidants are frequently used as indicators of oxidative stress.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Diet exposure of 0.01, 0.1, 0.5 mg/day of 5 and 20 um polystyrene microplastic particles.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Five-week old male mice showed changes in enzyme levels responsible for eliminating ROS. Decreased catalase at 0.1/0.5 mg/day, increased glutathione peroxidase at all doses, increased superoxide dismutase at all doses.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Cerebral and epithelial human cell lines showed measured increased percent effect of ROS (as superoxide generated) with corresponding decreases in cell viability.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 20, 200, 2000 ug/L of 5 and 20 um polystyrene microplastics.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Adult five-month old fish showed changes in enzyme levels responsible for eliminating ROS. Increased catalase at 200/2000 ug/L, increased superoxide dismutase at all doses.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Survey of wild fish with microplastic ingestion versus no microplastic ingestion.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 0.010, 0.016 mg/L of Mercury chloride, 0.26, 0.69 mg/L of 1-5 um polymer microspheres, and mixture.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Juvenile fish showed increased ROS (Brain and muscle lipid peroxidation levels) and corresponding changes in enzyme levels (increases in muscle lactate dehydrogenase, decreases in isocitrate dehydrogenase). </span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 50, 250 mg/L of 150-180 um, 300-355 um polyethylene microspheres</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">In vitro exposure of 100 mg/L of polyvinylchloride and polyethylene microplastics</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Fish head-kidney leucocytes showed increased gene expression of nuclear factor (nrf2), associated with oxidative stress, only statistically significant in S. aurata.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Lugworms showed decreased ability to respond to ROS by ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP) assay, statistically significant only with phenanthrene.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 10 ug/mL of 0.05, 0.5, 6 um diameter polystyrene microbeads.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Rotifers showed increased ROS levels, changes in phosphorylation of MAPK signaling proteins, and corresponding changes in enzyme and protein levels (decreased glutathione, increased superoxide dismutase, increased glutathione reductase, increased glutathione reductase, glutathione S-transferase). Enzyme statistical significance was seen most frequently with 0.05 diameter size class).</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 20 ug/mL of 0.05, 0.5, 6 um diameter polystyrene microbeads.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Copepods showed increased ROS for 0.05 um diameter size class only. Corresponding increases in enzymes were also seen only in 0.05 um diameter size class (glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase, glutathione S-transferase, superoxide disumutase).</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Aquatic exposure of 30 ug/L fluoranthene, 32 ug/L of 2 and 6 um polystyrene microbeads, and mixture for 7 days and depuration for 7 days.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Mussels showed increased ROS production in all treatments for 7 days, changes in enzyme and gene levels were observed for catalase, superoxide dismutase, glutathione S-transferase, glutathione reductase, and lipid peroxidation, statistical significance was not always observed.</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size:11pt"><span style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif">Yu et al. (2018)</span></span></p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>1 Assumed: study selected stressor(s) known to elevate reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels, endpoints verified increased oxidative stress and disrupted pathway.</p>
<p> </p>
<h4>Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage</h4>
<p>The reactive oxygen species (ROS) increase needed to elicit oxidative stress is highly dependent on many other variables including age, tissue, sex, nutritional status, and co-exposures to other stressors. It is consistently characterised as an 'excess' of ROS in order to create a state of oxidative stress. Consequently, the quantitative relationship is not easily generalized. </p>
<p><!--EndFragment --></p>
<p>Some examples of normal levels have been reported at 1-8 μM (H2O2) in normal human plasma, while only 1 μM ROS present in healthy cells (Lacy et al. 2000). Inflammatory lung diseases can cause H2O2 excesses to the level of a 20-fold increment. It can also cause the level of H2O2 in ischemia and reperfusion to reach 160 μM (Burgoyne et al. 2013).</p>
<strong>Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER</strong>
<p>AP-1 and NF-κB are ROS sensing transcription factors and act as redox sensors due to the presence of a single Cys in their DNA-binding domains (Abate et al. 2006). Oxidation of these Cys residues blocks their binding to the respective consensus DNA sequences. Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (APE1), functions as a reducing agent for various transcription factors (Evans et al. 2000). This ubiquitous multifunctional protein is induced by ROS (Ramana et al. 1998) and is involved in base excision repair (Demple and Sung 2005). Although reducing condition is favorable for DNA binding, both AP-1 and NF-κB can be activated by oxidative stress via induction of APE1. A Zn-finger DNA-binding protein, early growth response gene-1 (Egr-1), is activated by ROS, and a positive feedback loop between APE1 and Egr-1 regulates their early transcriptional activation after oxidative stress (Pines et al. 2005). Egr-1 also induces SOD1 and thus reduces free radical-induced damage (Minc et al. 1999).</p>
<h4>References</h4>
<p>Abate, C., Patel, L., Rauscher III, F. J., & Curran, T. (1990). Redox regulation of fos and jun DNA-binding activity in vitro. Science, 249(4973), 1157-1161.</p>
<p>Alomar, C., Sureda, A., Capo, X., Guijarro, B., Tejada, S. and Deudero, S. 2017. Microplastic ingestion by Mullus surmuletus Linnaeus, 1758 fish and its potential for causing oxidative stress. Environmental Research 159: 135-142.</p>
<p>Barboza, LG.A., Vieira, L.R., Branco, V., Figueiredo, N., Carvalho, F., Carvalho, C., and Guilhermino, L. 2018. Microplastics cause neurotoxicity, oxidative damage and energy-related changes and interact with the bioaccumulation of mercury in the European seabass, Dicentrachus labrux (Linneaeus, 1758). Aquatic Toxicology 195: 49-57.</p>
<p>Browne, M.A. Niven, S.J., Galloway, T.S., Rowland, S.J., and Thompson, R.C. 2013. Microplastic moves pollutants and additives to worms, reducing functions linked to health and biodiversity. Current Biology 23: 2388-2392.</p>
<p>Burgoyne, J. R., Oka, S. I., Ale-Agha, N., & Eaton, P. (2013). Hydrogen peroxide sensing and signaling by protein kinases in the cardiovascular system. Antioxidants & redox signaling, 18(9), 1042-1052.</p>
<p>Chen, Q., Gundlach, M., Yang, S., Jiang, J., Velki, M., Yin, D., and Hollert, H. 2017 Quantitative investigation of the mechanisms of microplastics and nanoplastics toward larvae locomotor activity. Science of the Total Environment 584-585: 1022-1031.</p>
<p>Choi, J.S., Jung, Y.J., Hong, N.H., Hong, S.H., and Park, J.W. 2018. Toxicological effects of irregularly shaped and spherical microplastics in a marine teleost, the sheepshead minnow (Cyprinodon variegatus). Marine Pollution Bulletin 129: 231-240.</p>
<p>Demple, B., & Sung, J. S. (2005). Molecular and biological roles of Ape1 protein in mammalian base excision repair. DNA repair, 4(12), 1442-1449.</p>
<p>Deng, Y., Zhang, Y., Lemos, B., and Ren, H. 2017. Tissue accumulation of microplastics in mice and biomarker responses suggest widespread health risks of exposure. Science Reports 7: 1-10.</p>
<p>Espinosa, C., Garcia Beltran, J.M., Esteban, M.A., and Cuesta, A. 2018. In vitro effects of virgin microplastics on fish head-kidney leucocyte activities. Environmental Pollution 235: 30-38.</p>
<p>Evans, A. R., Limp-Foster, M., & Kelley, M. R. (2000). Going APE over ref-1. Mutation Research/DNA Repair, 461(2), 83-108.</p>
<p>Imhof, H.K., Rusek, J., Thiel, M., Wolinska, J., and Laforsch, C. 2017. Do microplastic particles affect Daphnia magna at the morphological life history and molecular level? Public Library of Science One 12: 1-20.</p>
<p>Jeong, J. and Choi, J. 2020. Development of AOP relevant to microplastics based on toxicity mechanisms of chemical additives using ToxCast™ and deep learning models combined approach. Environment International 137:105557.</p>
<p>Jeong, C.B., Kang, H.M., Lee, M.C., Kim, D.H., Han, J., Hwang, D.S. Souissi, S., Lee, S.J., Shin, K.H., Park, H.G., and Lee, J.S. 2017. Adverse effects of microplastics and oxidative stress-induced MAPK/NRF2 pathway-mediated defense mechanisms in the marine copepod Paracyclopina nana. Science Reports 7: 1-11.</p>
<p>Jeong, C.B., Wong, E.J., Kang, H.M., Lee, M.C., Hwang, D.S., Hwang, U.K., Zhou, B., Souissi, S., Lee, S.J., and Lee, J.S. 2016. Microplastic size-dependent toxicity, oxidative stress induction, and p-JNK and p-p38 activation in the Monogonout rotifer (Brachionus koreanus). Environmental Science and Technology 50: 8849-8857.</p>
<p>Juan, C.A., de la Lastra, J.M.P., Plou, F.J., and Lebena, E.P. 2021. The chemistry of reactive oxygen species (ROS) revisited: Outlining their role in biological macromolecules (DNA, lipids and proteins) and induced pathologies. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 22: 4642.</p>
<p><span style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#222222; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:13px">Lacy, F., Kailasam, M. T., O’Connor, D. T., Schmid-Schönbein, G. W., & Parmer, R. J. (2000). Plasma hydrogen peroxide production in human essential hypertension: role of heredity, gender, and ethnicity. </span><em>Hypertension</em><span style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#222222; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:13px">, </span><em>36</em><span style="background-color:#ffffff; color:#222222; font-family:Arial,sans-serif; font-size:13px">(5), 878-884.</span></p>
<p>Lei, L., Wu, S., Lu, S., Liu, M., Song, Y., Fu, Z., Shi, H., Raley-Susman, K.M., and He, D. 2018. Microplastic particles cause intestinal damage and other adverse effects in zebrafish Danio rerio and nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Science of the Total Environment 619-620: 1-8.</p>
<p>Marshall, H. E., Merchant, K., & Stamler, J. S. (2000). Nitrosation and oxidation in the regulation of gene expression. The FASEB Journal, 14(13), 1889-1900.</p>
<p>Minc, E., De Coppet, P., Masson, P., Thiery, L., Dutertre, S., Amor-Guéret, M., & Jaulin, C. (1999). The human copper-zinc superoxide dismutase gene (SOD1) proximal promoter is regulated by Sp1, Egr-1, and WT1 via non-canonical binding sites. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 274(1), 503-509.</p>
<p>Paul-Pont, I., Lacroix, C., Gonzalez Fernandez, D., Hegaret, H., Lambert, C., Le Goic, N., Frere, L., Cassone, A.L., Sussarellu, R. Fabioux, C., Guyomarch, J., Albentosa, M., Huvet, A., and Soudant, P. 2016. Exposure of marine mussels Mytillus spp. to polystyrene microplastics: Toxicity and influence on fluoranthene bioaccumulation. Environmental Pollution 216: 724-737.</p>
<p>Pines, A., Bivi, N., Romanello, M., Damante, G., Kelley, M. R., Adamson, E. D., ... & Tell, G. (2005). Cross-regulation between Egr-1 and APE/Ref-1 during early response to oxidative stress in the human osteoblastic HOBIT cell line: evidence for an autoregulatory loop. Free radical research, 39(3), 269-281.</p>
<p>Ramana, C. V., Boldogh, I., Izumi, T., & Mitra, S. (1998). Activation of apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease in human cells by reactive oxygen species and its correlation with their adaptive response to genotoxicity of free radicals. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95(9), 5061-5066.</p>
<p>Ray, P.D., Huang, B.-W., and Tsuji, Y. 2012. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis and redox regulation in cellular signalling. Cellular Signalling 24:981-990.</p>
<p>Schrinzi, G.F., Perez-Pomeda, I., Sanchis, J., Rossini, C., Farre, M., and Barcelo, D. 2017. Cytotoxic effects of commonly used nanomaterials and microplastics on cerebral and epithelial human cells. Environmental Research 159: 579-587.</p>
<p>Shields, H.J., Traa, A., and Van Raamsdonk, J.M. 2021. Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Reactive Oxygen Species on Lifespan: A Comprehensive Review of Comparative and Experimental Studies.</p>
<p>Veneman, W.J., Spaink, H.P., Brun, N.R., Bosker, T., and Vijver, M.G. 2017. Pathway analysis of systemic transcriptome responses to injected polystyrene particles in zebrafish larvae. Aquatic Toxicology 190: 112-120.</p>
<p>Yu, P., Liu, Z., Wu, D., Chen, M., Lv, W., and Zhao, Y. 2018. Accumulation of polystyrene microplastics in juvenile Eriocheir sinensis and oxidative stress effects in the liver. Aquatic Toxicology 200: 28-36.</p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
</div>
<div>
<h4><a href="/relationships/3362">Relationship: 3362: Increase, Oxidative DNA damage leads to Cell cycle, disrupted</a></h4>
<h4><a href="/relationships/3116">Relationship: 3116: Increase, Oxidative Stress leads to Increase, LPO</a></h4>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/521">Essential element imbalance leads to reproductive failure via oxidative stress</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h4>Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship</h4>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h4><a href="/relationships/2205">Relationship: 2205: Decrease, Cell proliferation leads to Decrease, Growth</a></h4>
<h4><a href="/relationships/2203">Relationship: 2203: Decrease, Coupling of OXPHOS leads to Decrease, ATP pool</a></h4>
<td><a href="/aops/263">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>High</td>
<td>High</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
<td>Not Specified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/325">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/290">Mitochondrial ATP synthase antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/326">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/286">Mitochondrial complex III antagonism leading to growth inhibition (1)</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/267">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via glucose depletion</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell growth</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/333">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/332">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via oxidative DNA damage and reduced cell proliferation</a></td>
<td><a href="/aops/612">Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activation leading to early life stage mortality via reduced adenosine triphosphate</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
<h4>Evidence Supporting Applicability of this Relationship</h4>
<p>Relationship 2205 is considered applicable to all eukaryotes (both unicellular and multicellular), as growth (or population growth of alga) is well known to be achieved through cell proliferation in animals, plants and some microorganisms.</p>
<p>Relationship 2203 is considered applicable to eukaryotes, as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP synthesis are highly conserved in these organisms. Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to ATP depletion is a well-documented relationship in many taxa, such as human, rodents and fish.</p>
<p>Relationship 2205 is considered applicable to both all sexes, as cell proliferation leading to growth is a fundamental process and not sex-specific.</p>
<p>Relationship 2203 is considered applicable to all genders, as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP synthesis are fundamental biological processes and are not sex-pecific.</p>
<p>Relationship 2205 is considered applicable to all lifestages, as cell proliferation leading to growth is essential for maintaining basic biological processes throughout an organism’s life.</p>
<p>Relationship 2203 is considered applicable to all life-stages, as mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and ATP synthesis are essential energy production processes for maintaining basic biological activities.</p>
<h4>Key Event Relationship Description</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event relationship describes reduced cell proliferation (cell growth, division or a combination of these) leading to reduced tissue, organ or individual growth.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">This key event relationship describes the dissipation of protonmotive force across the inner mitochondrial membrane by uncouplers (uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation), leading to reduced total adenosine triphosphate (ATP) pool in cells or organisms.</p>
<h4>Evidence Supporting this KER</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The overall evidence supporting Relationship 2205 is considered</strong> moderate.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The overall evidence supporting Relationship 2203 is considered</strong> high.</p>
<strong>Biological Plausibility</strong>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The biological plausibility of Relationship 2205 is considered</strong> high.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The biological plausibility of Relationship 2203 is considered</strong> high.</p>
<p><strong>Rationale</strong>: The biological structural and functional relationship between cell proliferation and growth is well established. It is commonly accepted that the size of an organism, organ or tissue is dependent on the total number and volume of the cells it contains, and the amount of extracellular matrix and fluids (Conlon 1999). Impairment to cell proliferation can logically affect tissue and organismal growth.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rationale</strong>: In eukaryotic cells, the major metabolic pathways responsible for ATP production are OXPHOS, citric acid (TCA) cycle, glycolysis and photosynthesis. Oxidative phosphorylation is much (theoretically 15-18 times) more efficient than the rest due to high energy derived from oxygen during aerobic respiration (Schmidt-Rohr 2020). As the ATP level is relatively balanced between production and consumption (Bonora 2012), ATP depletion is a plausible consequence of reduced ATP synthetic efficiency following uncoupling of OXPHOS.</p>
<strong>Empirical Evidence</strong>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The empirical support of Relationship 2205 is considered</strong> low.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The empirical support of Relationship 2203 is considered</strong> high.</p>
<p><strong>Rationale</strong>: Because cell proliferation is typically measured in vitro, while growth of an organism is measured in vivo, few studies have measured both in the same experiment. There is one zebrafish study reporting concordant relationship between reduced cell proliferation and embryo growth with some inconsistencies (Bestman 2015). <!--![endif]----></p>
<p><strong>Rationale:</strong> The majority of relevant studies show good incidence, temporal and/or dose concordance in different organisms and cell types after exposure to known uncouplers, with relatively few exceptions.</p>
<p><strong>Evidence</strong>:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong><em>Temporal concordance</em></strong>: Exposure of zebrafish embryos to 0.5 µM of the classical uncoupler 2,4-DNP led to significantly uncoupling of OXPHOS after 21h, whereas significant reduction in ATP was only observed after 45h <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E-->(Bestman 2015). <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E--></li>
<li><strong><em>Dose concordance:</em></strong> The uncoupler triclosan induced significant uncoupling of OXPHOS in zebrafish embryos at 15 µM, whereas higher (30 µM) concentration was required to caused significant ATP depletion <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E-->(Shim 2016).</li>
<li><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E--><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%20%2D%2D%3E--><strong><em>Dose concordance:</em></strong> Exposure to 1 µM of of the uncoupler CCCP led to 40% uncoupling of OXPHOS in rat RBL-2H3 cells, whereas the same magnitude of effect for ATP reduction required 1.6 µM of CCCP (Weatherly 2016).</li>
<li><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%20%2D%2D%3E--><strong><em>Dose concordance:</em></strong> Exposure to 10 µM of the uncoupler triclosan caused significant uncoupling of OXPHOS in rat RBL-2H3 cells, whereas significant reduction in ATP was observed at a higher concentration (30 µM) <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E-->(Weatherly 2018).</li>
<li><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E--><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%20%2D%2D%3E--><strong><em>Dose concordance: </em></strong>Significant effect on uncoupling of OXPHOS required 2 µM FCCP, whereas a significant reduction in ATP required 20 µM FCCP in human RD cells <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E-->(Kuruvilla 2003).</li>
<li><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E--><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%20%2D%2D%3E--><strong><em>Incidence concordance</em></strong>: In human colon cancer cells (SW480), exposure to 150 µM of the uncoupler flavanoid morin caused 60% reduction in MMP, whereas only around 35% decrease in ATP <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E-->(Sithara 2017).</li>
<li><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%2D%2D%3E--><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%20%2D%2D%3E--><strong><em>Incidence concordance: </em></strong>Exposure of rat RBL-2H3 cells to 10 µM of the uncoupler triclosan led to 50% uncoupling of OXPHOS, whereas only 40% reduction in ATP (Weatherly 2016).</li>
<li><strong><em>Incidence concordance:</em></strong> Exposure to 5 µM of the uncoupler CCCP caused 71% uncoupling of OXPHOS, whereas only 64% reduction of ATP in human HL-60 cells (Sweet 1999).</li>
<li><strong><em>Incidence concordance:</em></strong> Exposure of human HeLa cells to 50 µM of the uncoupler CCCP for 1h led to 77% uncoupling of OXPHOS and 25% reduction in ATP <!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bif%20supportFields%5D%3E%3Cspan%0Astyle%3D'font-size%3A10.0pt%3Bfont-family%3A%22Calibri%22%2Csans-serif%3Bmso-fareast-font-family%3A%0A%E7%AD%89%E7%BA%BF%3Bmso-fareast-theme-font%3Aminor-fareast%3Bbackground%3Ayellow%3Bmso-highlight%3Ayellow%3B%0Amso-ansi-language%3AEN-US%3Bmso-fareast-language%3AZH-CN%3Bmso-bidi-language%3AAR-SA'%3E%3Cspan%0Astyle%3D'mso-element%3Afield-begin'%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3Cspan%0Astyle%3D'mso-spacerun%3Ayes'%3E%C2%A0%3C%2Fspan%3EADDIN%20EN.CITE%20%3Cspan%20style%3D'mso-element%3Afield-begin'%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3Cspan%0Astyle%3D'mso-spacerun%3Ayes'%3E%C2%A0%3C%2Fspan%3EADDIN%20EN.CITE.DATA%20%3C!%5Bif%20gte%20mso%209%5D%3E%3Cxml%3E%0A%20%3Cw%3Adata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w%3Adata%3E%0A%3C%2Fxml%3E%3C!%5Bendif%5D%3E%3Cspan%20style%3D'mso-element%3Afield-end'%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3Cspan%0Astyle%3D'mso-element%3Afield-separator'%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%3E-->(Koczor 2009)<!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bif%20gte%20mso%209%5D%3E%3Cxml%3E%0A%20%3Cw%3Adata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w%3Adata%3E%0A%3C%2Fxml%3E%3C!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%3E--><!--{C}%3C!%2D%2D%5Bif%20supportFields%5D%3E%3Cspan%20style%3D'font-size%3A10.0pt%3B%0Afont-family%3A%22Calibri%22%2Csans-serif%3Bmso-fareast-font-family%3A%E7%AD%89%E7%BA%BF%3Bmso-fareast-theme-font%3A%0Aminor-fareast%3Bbackground%3Ayellow%3Bmso-highlight%3Ayellow%3Bmso-ansi-language%3AEN-US%3B%0Amso-fareast-language%3AZH-CN%3Bmso-bidi-language%3AAR-SA'%3E%3Cspan%20style%3D'mso-element%3A%0Afield-end'%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C%2Fspan%3E%3C!%5Bendif%5D%2D%2D%3E-->.</li>
<li><em><strong>Incidence concordance</strong></em>: Exposure of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans to 50 µM Arsenite for 1h led to approximately 45% uncoupling of OXPHOS and 20% reduction in ATP (Luz 2016).</li>
</ul>
<strong>Uncertainties and Inconsistencies</strong>
<ul>
<li style="text-align:justify">In zebrafish embryos exposed to 2,4-DNP, significant growth inhibition (AO), as indicated by whole embryo length, caudal primary (CaP) motor neuron axons and otic vesicle length (OVL) ratio after 21h, somite width and eye diameter after 45h exposure was identified, after 21h, whereas a non- significant reduction in cell proliferation was observed (Bestman 2015).</li>
<li style="text-align:justify">A significant decrease followed by a significant increase in total ATP was observed in human RD cells during a 48h exposure to the uncoupler FCCP (Kuruvilla 2003), possibly due to the enhancement of other ATP synthetic pathways (e.g., glycolysis) as a compensatory action to impaired OXPHOS (Jose 2011</li>
</ul>
<h4>Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage</h4>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>The quantitative understanding of Relationship 2203 is</strong> high.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify"><strong>Rationale:</strong> Multiple mathematical models have been developed for describing the quantitative relationships between uncoupling of OXPHOS and ATP synthesis in vertebrates (Beard 2005; Schmitz 2011; Heiske 2017; Kubo 2020). These models, however, are highly complex metabolic or systems biological models and warrant further simplification to be used for this AOP. <!--![endif]----></p>
<strong>Response-response relationship</strong>
<p style="text-align:justify">A regression based quantitative response-response relationship between uncoupling of OXPHOS and ATP depletion was proposed for the crustacean <em>Daphnia magna</em> under UVB stress (Song 2020).</p>
<strong>Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER</strong>
<ul>
<li style="text-align:justify">It is known that mild uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation can enhance the activity of the mitochondrial electron transport chain to produce more ATP, and/or activate other ATP synthetic pathways (e.g., glycolysis) as a compensatory action to impaired OXPHOS (Jose 2011).</li>
<p style="text-align:justify">Beard DA. 2005. A biophysical model of the mitochondrial respiratory system and oxidative phosphorylation. PLOS Computational Biology 1:e36. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010036.</p>
<p style="text-align:justify">Bestman JE, Stackley KD, Rahn JJ, Williamson TJ, Chan SS. 2015. The cellular and molecular progression of mitochondrial dysfunction induced by 2,4-dinitrophenol in developing zebrafish embryos. Differentiation 89:51-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2015.01.001.</p>
<p>Bestman JE, Stackley KD, Rahn JJ, Williamson TJ, Chan SS. 2015. The cellular and molecular progression of mitochondrial dysfunction induced by 2,4-dinitrophenol in developing zebrafish embryos. Differentiation 89:51-69. DOI: 10.1016/j.diff.2015.01.001.</p>
<p>Binder BJ, Landman KA, Simpson MJ, Mariani M, Newgreen DF. 2008. Modeling proliferative tissue growth: a general approach and an avian case study. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 78:031912. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.78.031912.</p>
<p>Bonora M, Patergnani S, Rimessi A, De Marchi E, Suski JM, Bononi A, Giorgi C, Marchi S, Missiroli S, Poletti F, Wieckowski MR, Pinton P. 2012. ATP synthesis and storage. Purinergic Signalling 8:343-357. DOI: 10.1007/s11302-012-9305-8.</p>
<p>Conlon I, Raff M. 1999. Size control in animal development. Cell 96:235-244. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80563-2.</p>
<p>Heiske M, Letellier T, Klipp E. 2017. Comprehensive mathematical model of oxidative phosphorylation valid for physiological and pathological conditions. The FEBS Journal 284:2802-2828. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14151">https://doi.org/10.1111/febs.14151</a>.</p>
<p>Jarrett AM, Lima EABF, Hormuth DA, McKenna MT, Feng X, Ekrut DA, Resende ACM, Brock A, Yankeelov TE. 2018. Mathematical models of tumor cell proliferation: A review of the literature. Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy 18:1271-1286. DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2018.1527689.</p>
<p>Jose C, Bellance N, Rossignol R. 2011. Choosing between glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation: A tumor's dilemma? Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Bioenergetics 1807:552-561. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.012">https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.012</a>.</p>
<p>Mosca G, Adibi, M., Strauss, S., Runions, A., Sapala, A., Smith, R.S. 2018. Modeling Plant Tissue Growth and Cell Division. In Morris R., ed, Mathematical Modelling in Plant Biology. Springer, Cham.</p>
<p>Koczor CA, Shokolenko IN, Boyd AK, Balk SP, Wilson GL, Ledoux SP. 2009. Mitochondrial DNA damage initiates a cell cycle arrest by a Chk2-associated mechanism in mammalian cells. J Biol Chem 284:36191-36201. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M109.036020.</p>
<p>Schmidt-Rohr K. 2020. Oxygen is the high-energy molecule powering complex multicellular life: fundamental corrections to traditional bioenergetics. ACS Omega 5:2221-2233. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.9b03352.</p>
<p>Schmitz JPJ, Vanlier J, van Riel NAW, Jeneson JAL. 2011. Computational modeling of mitochondrial energy transduction. 39:363-377. DOI: 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v39.i5.20.</p>
<p>Shim J, Weatherly LM, Luc RH, Dorman MT, Neilson A, Ng R, Kim CH, Millard PJ, Gosse JA. 2016. Triclosan is a mitochondrial uncoupler in live zebrafish. J Appl Toxicol 36:1662-1667. DOI: 10.1002/jat.3311.</p>
<p>Sithara T, Arun KB, Syama HP, Reshmitha TR, Nisha P. 2017. Morin inhibits proliferation of SW480 colorectal cancer cells by inducing apoptosis mediated by reactive oxygen species formation and uncoupling of Warburg effect. Frontiers in Pharmacology 8. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00640.</p>
<p>Song Y, Xie L, Lee Y, Tollefsen KE. 2020. De novo development of a quantitative adverse outcome pathway (qAOP) network for ultraviolet B (UVB) radiation using targeted laboratory tests and automated data mining. Environmental Science & Technology 54:13147-13156. DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c03794.</p>
<p>Sweet S, Singh G. 1999. Changes in mitochondrial mass, membrane potential, and cellular adenosine triphosphate content during the cell cycle of human leukemic (HL-60) cells. Journal of Cellular Physiology 180:91-96. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199907)180:1">https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199907)180:1</a><91::AID-JCP10>3.0.CO;2-6.</p>
<p>Weatherly LM, Nelson AJ, Shim J, Riitano AM, Gerson ED, Hart AJ, de Juan-Sanz J, Ryan TA, Sher R, Hess ST, Gosse JA. 2018. Antimicrobial agent triclosan disrupts mitochondrial structure, revealed by super-resolution microscopy, and inhibits mast cell signaling via calcium modulation. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 349:39-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.04.005.</p>
<p>Weatherly LM, Shim J, Hashmi HN, Kennedy RH, Hess ST, Gosse JA. 2016. Antimicrobial agent triclosan is a proton ionophore uncoupler of mitochondria in living rat and human mast cells and in primary human keratinocytes. Journal of Applied Toxicology 36:777-789. DOI: <a href="https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3209">https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3209</a>.</p>
</div>
<div>
<h4><a href="/relationships/2768">Relationship: 2768: Decrease, ATP pool leads to Cell injury/death</a></h4>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
<td>Not Specified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<h4><a href="/relationships/2767">Relationship: 2767: Cell injury/death leads to Decrease, Growth</a></h4>
<td><a href="/aops/265">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via increased cytosolic calcium</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
<td>Not Specified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/264">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via ATP depletion associated cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td>Moderate</td>
<td>Not Specified</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/266">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via decreased Na-K ATPase activity</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/268">Uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation leading to growth inhibition via mitochondrial swelling</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/324">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via uncoupling of oxidative phosphorylation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/331">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via lipid peroxidation and cell death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/596">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via protein oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>
<td>adjacent</td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><a href="/aops/599">Excessive reactive oxygen species leading to growth inhibition via fatty acid oxidation and cell injury/death</a></td>