This Event is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Event: 2083
Key Event Title
Occurrence of Cataracts
Short name
Biological Context
Level of Biological Organization |
---|
Organ |
Organ term
Key Event Components
Process | Object | Action |
---|---|---|
eye opacity | Lens | increased |
Key Event Overview
AOPs Including This Key Event
AOP Name | Role of event in AOP | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Deposition of energy leading to cataracts | AdverseOutcome | Vinita Chauhan (send email) | Open for citation & comment |
Taxonomic Applicability
Term | Scientific Term | Evidence | Link |
---|---|---|---|
human | Homo sapiens | High | NCBI |
rat | Rattus norvegicus | High | NCBI |
mouse | Mus musculus | High | NCBI |
rabbit | Oryctolagus cuniculus | High | NCBI |
Monkey | Monkey | Moderate | NCBI |
Pig | Pig | Moderate | NCBI |
guinea pig | Cavia porcellus | Moderate | NCBI |
rainbow trout | Oncorhynchus mykiss | Moderate | NCBI |
Life Stages
Life stage | Evidence |
---|---|
All life stages | High |
Sex Applicability
Term | Evidence |
---|---|
Female | High |
Male | High |
Key Event Description
Cataracts are a progressive condition in which the lens of the eye develops opacities and becomes cloudy, resulting in blurred vision as well as glare and haloes around lights (National Eye Institute, 2022). For this AOP, a cataract is defined when over 5% of the lens is opacified. It is one of the leading causes of blindness around the world (Raj et al., 2009; Liu et al., 2017), and surgery is currently the only cure.
The lens is a transparent, biconvex tissue located at the front of the eye. It is responsible for focusing light onto the retina, producing a clear image. However, under certain conditions, sections of the lens may develop small opacities, losing their transparency and resulting in blurred vision (Hildreth et al., 2009). As the lens has low metabolic and mitotic activity, there is very little tissue turnover. Therefore, damaged proteins that are not removed can acucmulate over time contributing to opacities and formation of cataracts (Hamada, 2017).
A variety of factors are essential for maintaining the transparency of the lens, and therefore preventing cataracts. These include proper organization, development and balance of proteins such as crystallins (Hildreth et al., 2009; Ainsbury et al., 2016; Hamada, 2017; Wu et al., 2018), no organelles within the mature lens fiber cells (Pendergrass, 2010; Fujimichi et al., 2014; Hamada, 2017; Heitmancik & Shiels, 2015), and a low water content in the lens (Ainsbury et al., 2016). Genetic factors can also play a role, such as mutations in genes coding for molecular chaperones, growth factors, gap-junction proteins, intermediated filament proteins, membrane proteins, and RNA binding proteins (Hamada & Fujimichi, 2015; Lachke, 2022). When any of these factors are affected, it causes light scattering, which increases lens opacity, contributing to cataract formation and density.
In general, there are three main categories of cataract: pediatric, age-related and those secondary to other causes. Age-related cataracts are the most common and can be subdivided into nuclear, cortical, or posterior subcapsular cataracts (PSC) based on which portion of the lens becomes opaque. In nuclear cataracts the opacities are in the nucleus of the lens, in cortical cataracts they are in the cortex, and in posterior subcapsular cataracts they are located beneath the posterior capsule (Van Kuijk, 1991). Research has shown that posterior subcapsular (PSC) cataracts are a subtype of cataract that are most often found with ionizing radiation exposure. This may be due to radiation exposure causing the improperly differentiated lens epithelial cells (LECs) to leave the germinative zone (GZ) and migrate along the posterior capsule towards the center of the lens. As atypical lens fiber cells (LFCs), and atypical LECs accumulate in this area, they may cause the development of a PSC cataract (Loganovsky et al., 2020).
Cataracts can be diagnosed through several different methods and there is no universally accepted grading system. The most common grading systems are the Lens Opacities Classification System I, II, or III (LOC I, II, or III), the Modified Merriam-Focht Cataract Scoring System, and the slit lamp grading system. They classify cataracts on a scale of severity, which is often subjective, relying upon the examiner’s judgement. However, there are some methods such as Scheimpflug imaging which are less subjective as they measure lens density (Barraquer et al., 2017; Singh Grewal & Singh Grewal, 2012).
How It Is Measured or Detected
Listed below are common methods for detecting the KE, however there may be other comparable methods that are not listed.
Assay |
Reference |
Description |
OECD Approved Assay |
Lens opacification grading systems |
Barraquer et al., 2017 |
Systems used to classify the severity of cataracts. There are multiple types including: the Modified Merriam-Focht Cataract Scoring System, Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOC III), Word Health Organization Cataract Grading System, Lens Opacities Classification System I (LOCI), Lens Opacities Classification System II (LOC II), Wisconsin Clinical and Photographic Cataract Grading System, Wilmer Clinical and Photographic Grading System, Oxford Clinical Cataract Grading System, Age-Related Eye Disease Study, National Eye Institute Clinical Cataract Grading System, Japanese Cooperative Cataract Research Group Cataract Grading System |
No |
Slit Lamp Grading System |
Barraquer et al., 2017; Robert & Alastair, 2017 |
Measures the light intensity reflected from opacities in nuclear cataracts. This also includes various techniques such as retroillumination. |
No |
Microscopy Examination |
Stirling and Griffiths, 1991 |
Tests can help to examine interlocking processes and membrane architecture of lens. |
No |
Histological staining |
Singh et al., 2003 |
Uses dyes such as trypan blue to differentiate different parts of the lens. |
No |
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) |
Sharma, 2016 |
Optical signals are sent towards a tissue, where they either pass through or are reflected. These signals are then interpreted to build a spatial image of the tissue. |
No |
Scheimpflug imaging |
Singh Grewal & Singh Grewal, 2012 |
This technique allows for the photography of obliquely tilted specimens without losing focus. Cataract grading systems that utilize this principle include the Oxford Scheimpflug System, the Nidek EAS-1000, and the Zeiss Schfeimpflug video camera. |
No |
Domain of Applicability
Taxonomic applicability: This KE is relevant to any species requiring a clear lens for vision.
Life stage applicability: This key event can occur at any life stage; however, it is most common in older adults. Among humans, cataract changes usually begin after the age of 50 and become increasingly prevalent with age.
Sex applicability: The adverse outcome can develop in both sexes and is not sex-specific. Females, however, have a small increased background risk of cataracts (Ainsbury et al., 2016). They also have a higher risk for radiation-induced cataracts including PSC, cortical and nuclear cataracts (Choshi et al., 1983, Nakashima et al., 2006; Henderson et al., 2010; Dynlacht et al., 2011; Azizova et al. 2018; Little et al., 2018; Garrett et al., 2020).
Evidence for perturbation by prototypic stressors: A large body of evidence supports cataract induction via both ionizing and non-ionizing radiation. This includes X-rays, γ-rays, UV, neutrons, protons, β particles, and various heavy ions (56Fe, 40Ar, 12C, 20Ne, 224Ra, and He). Of these, X-rays and γ-rays are the best supported (Yang & Ainsworth, 1987; Chmelevsky, 1988l; Brenner et al., 1991; Fedorenko, 1995; Char et al., 1998; Nakashima et al., 2006; Worgul et al., 2007; Davis et al., 2010; Karatasakis et al., 2018; Garrett et al., 2020; Kang et al., 2020; McCarron et al., 2021).
Regulatory Significance of the Adverse Outcome
References
Ainsbury, E. A. et al. (2016), “Ionizing radiation induced cataracts: recent biological and mechanistic developments and perspectives for future research”, Mutation research. Reviews in mutation research, Vol. 770, Elsevier B.V., https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2016.07.010
Barraquer, R. I. et al. (2017), “Validation of the nuclear cataract grading system BCN 10”, Ophthalmic Research, Vol. 57/4, Karger, https://doi.org/10.1159/000456720
Brenner, D. J. et al. (1991), “Accelerated heavy particles and the lens: VI. RBE studies at low doses”, Radiation Research, Vol. 128/1, Academic Press, Inc, United States, https://doi.org/10.2307/3578069
Char, D. H., S. M. Kroll, and J. Castro (1998), “Ten-year follow-up of helium ion therapy for uveal melanoma”, American Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 125/1, Elsevier Inc, New York, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9394(99)80238-4
Chmelevsky, D et al. (1988), “An epidemiological assessment of lens opacifications that impaired vision in patients injected with radium-224”, Radiation Research, Vol. 115/2, Academic Press, Oak Brook, https://doi.org/10.2307/3577161
Choshi, K et al. (1983), “Ophthalmologic changes related to radiation exposure and age in adult health study sample, Hiroshima and Nagasaki”, Radiation Research, Vol. 96/3, Academic Press, Oak Brook, https://doi.org/10.2307/3576122
Davis, J. G et al. (2010), “Dietary supplements reduce the cataractogenic potential of proton and HZE-particle radiation in mice”, Radiation Research, Vol. 173/3, The Radiation Research Society, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR1398.1
Dynlacht, J. R et al. (2011), “Age and hormonal status as determinants of cataractogenesis induced by ionizing radiation. I. Densely ionizing (high-LET) radiation”, Radiation Research, Vol. 175/1, The Radiation Research Society, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR2319.1
Fujimichi, Y., N. Hamada and M. Duncan (2014), “Ionizing irradiation not only inactivates clonogenic potential in primary normal human diploid lens epithelial cells but also stimulates cell proliferation in a subset of this population”, PloS one, Vol. 9/5, Public Library of Science, United States, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0098154
Garrett, J et al. (2020), “The protective effect of estrogen against radiation cataractogenesis is dependent upon the type of radiation”, Radiation Research, Vol. 194/5, Radiation Research Society, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-20-00015.1
Hamada, N. (2015), “Role of carcinogenesis related mechanisms in cataractogenesis and its implications for ionizing radiation cataractogenesis.” Cancer letters, Vol. 368,2 . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canlet.2015.02.017
Hamada, N. (2017), “Ionizing radiation sensitivity of the ocular lens and its dose rate dependence”, International journal of radiation biology, Vol. 93/10, Taylor & Francis, England, https://doi.org/10.1080/09553002.2016.1266407
Hausmann, J. C. et al. (2020), “Ophthalmic examination findings and intraocular pressure measurements in six species of Anura”, Journal of Zoo and Wildlife Medicine, Vol. 50/4, American Association of Zoo Veterinarians, United States, https://doi.org/10.1638/2019-0115
Henderson, M. A. et al. (2010), “Effects of estrogen and gender on cataractogenesis induced by high-let radiation” Radiation Research, Vol. 173/2, The Radiation Research Society, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR1917.1
Hildreth, C. J., A. E. Burke, and R. M. Glass (2009), “Cataracts”, JAMA: the journal of the American Medical Association, Vol. 301/19, https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.301.19.2060
Kang, L. H. et al. (2020), “Ganoderic acid A protects lens epithelial cells from UVB irradiation and delays lens opacity”, Chinese Journal of Natural Medicines, Vol. 18/12, Elsevier B. V., China, https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-5364(20)60037-1
Karatasakis, A. et al. (2018), “Radiation-associated lens changes in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: Results from the IC-CATARACT (CATaracts Attributed to Radiation in the CaTh lab) study”, Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, Vol. 91/4, Wiley Subscription Services, United States, https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.27173
Lachke, S. A. (2022), “RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional regulation in lens biology and cataract: mediating spatiotemporal expression of key factors that control the cell cycle, transcription, cytoskeleton and transparency”, Experimental Eye Research, Vol. 214, Elsevier Ltd, England, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exer.2021.108889
Little, M. P. et al. (2018), “Occupational radiation exposure and risk of cataract incidence in a cohort of US radiologic technologists”, European Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 33/12, Springer, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0435-3.
Liu, Y. et al. (2017), “Cataracts”, The Lancet (British edition), Vol. 390/10094, Elsevier Ltd, England, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)30544-5
Loganovsky. et al (2020),. “Radiation-Induced Cerebro-Ophthalmic Effects in Humans”,. Life (Basel, Switzerland), Vol10(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/life10040041
Loganovsky. eEt al (2021),. “Radiation-associated brain-ophthalmic effects in long-duration space missions”,. Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia. Vol. 80. 10.37039/1982.8551.20210058.
McCarron, R. A. et al. (2021), “Radiation-induced lens opacity and cataractogenesis: a lifetime study using mice of varying genetic backgrounds”, Radiation research, Vol. 197/1, Radiation Research Society, United States, https://doi.org/10.1667/RADE-20-00266.1
Nakashima, E. et al. (2006), “A reanalysis of atomic-bomb cataract data, 2000-2002: A threshold analysis”, Health Physics, Vol. 90/2, Health Physics Society, Philadelphia, https://doi.org/10.1097/01.HP.0000175442.03596.63
National Eye Institute (2022), Cataracts, https://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/cataractshttps://www.nei.nih.gov/learn-about-eye-health/eye-conditions-and-diseases/cataracts (accessed November 29, 2022)
Pendergrass, W. et al. (2010), “X-ray induced cataract is preceded by LEC loss, and coincident with accumulation of cortical DNA, and ROS; similarities with age-related cataracts”, Molecular vision, Vol. 16, Molecular Vision, United States, pp. 1496-1513
Raj et al. (2009), “Post-operative capsular opacification”, Nepalese journal of ophthalmology, Nepal, https://doi.org/10.3126/nepjoph.v1i1.3673
Singh, A. J. et al. (2003), “A histological analysis of lens capsules stained with trypan blue doe capsulorrhexis in phacoemulsification cataract surgery”, Eye, Vol. 17/5, Springer Nature, London, https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.eye.6700440
Sing Grewal, D. and S. P. Singh Grewal (2012), “Clinical applications of Scheimpflug imaging in cataract surgery”, Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, Vol. 26, Elsevier, pp. 25-32
Stirling, R.J. and P. G. Griffiths (1991), “Scanning EM studies of normal human lens fibres and fibres from nuclear cataracts”, Eye, Vol. 5/1, Springer Nature, London, https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.1991.17
Worgul, B. V et al. (2007), “Cataracts among Chernobyl clean-up workers: Implications regarding permissible eye exposures”, Radiation Research, Vol. 167/2, Radiation Research Society, Lawrence, https://doi.org/10.1667/RR0298.1
Wu, Shu-Yu et al. (2018), “Transgenic zebrafish models reveal distinct molecular mechanisms for cataract-linked αA-crystallin mutants”, PloS One, Vol. 13/11, Public Library of Science, United States, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207540
Yang, V. C. and E. J. Ainsworth (1987), “A histological study on the cataractogenic effects of heavy charged particles”, Vol. 11/1, National Science Council of the Republic of China, pp. 18-28