This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 3629

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Redox cycling leads to Mito ROS dysfunction

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Redox cycling of a chemical by mitochondria leads to degeneration of nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons adjacent Stefan Schildknecht (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mice Mus sp. High NCBI
yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae High NCBI
Drosophila melanogaster Drosophila melanogaster High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Redox cycling is a process of alternate reduction and reoxidation steps. It is triggered in the presence of chemicals able to accept an electron from a reductant. Compounds with a lower electron reduction potential than O2 will react fastest and the newly formed free radical. These radicals due to their high reactivity may undergo electron transfer to molecular oxygen generating superoxide anion radical (O₂•⁻) (Kappus, 1986). Mitochondria may represent the major site of chemical redox cycling, although several membrane and cytosolic enzymes may trigger this reaction. This has been demonstrated for Paraquat (PQ) where alterations of mitochondrial redox state occurs earlier in mitochondria than in the cytosol (Castello et al., 2007; Rodriguez-Roche et al., 2013; Filograna et al., 2016) and higher protection from its toxicity is reached with mitochondrial, rather than cytosolic, expression of antioxidant enzymes (Mockett et al., 2003; Tien Nguyen-nhu and Knoops, 2003; Rodriguez-Roche et al., 2013; Filograna et al., 2016).

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

The implementation of AOP3 is based on a negotiated procedure with EFSA (reference NP/EFSA/PREV/2024/02). The update to AOP3 includes the upload of a revised version of the proposed AOP published in the EFSA Journal in 2017, which formed the basis for developing this relationship. Moreover, experimental evidence for a causal link between mitochondrial redox cycling of chemicals and elevated mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) production has been derived from studies using isolated mitochondria, submitochondrial particles, and cellular systems.

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

The weight of evidence supporting the relationship between the redox cycling of a chemical by mitochondria and the increase of production of ROS in mitochondria is strong thanks to the effects shown by the prototypical stressor (Paraquat) and its radicals.

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

The biological plausibility evolves from the measured that (i) PQ is reaching the brain (Prasad, 2007; Yin, 2011; Breckenridge, 2013; Liang, 2013), (ii) PQ is taken up into nigrostriatal neurons (Rappold, 2011) and mitochondria (Castello et al., 2007; Cochemé and Murphy, 2009) (iii) PQ is a redox cycler inducing O₂•⁻ production and a cascade of ROS in isolated rat brain mitochondria (Castello et al., 2007; Cochemé and Murphy, 2008) brain homogenates (Castello et al., 2007), yeast (Cochemé and Murphy, 2008) and brain cell cultures mitochondria (Castello et al., 2007; Cantu et al., 2011; Dranka et al., 2012; Huang et al., 2012; Rodriguez-Rocha et al., 2013).

Existing in vitro and in vivo data shows that compound-induced mitochondrial redox cycling causes mitochondrial ROS formation.

PQ2+ dependent generation of superoxide (O₂•⁻) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) has been observed in intact mitochondria (Murakami et al. 1997; Peixoto et al. 2004; McCarthy et al. 2004; James et al. 2005; Castello et al. 2007; Mohammadi-Bardbori et al. 2008; Rodriguez-Rocha et al. 2013; Sandy et al. 1986) as well as in mitochondrial fractions and microsomes (Tomita et al. 1991). Similarly, cellular in vitro models confirmed PQ2+- induced O₂•⁻ formation (Krall et al. 1988; Tampo et al. 1999; Tsukamoto et al. 2002).  Consistent with the accumulation of PQ2+ in mitochondria, multiple studies support a predominant role of the organelle, particularly the mitochondrial matrix, in ROS production (Castello et al. 2007; Pinho et al. 2019; Robb et al. 2015; Cocheme et al. 2008; Drechsel et al. 2009; Filograna et al. 2016). More detailed analyses demonstrated that PQ2+ predominantly enhances ROS formation in the mitochondrial matrix, with only minor cytosolic effects (Rodriguez-Rocha et al. 2013). This is in line with the spatial organization of complex I in the inner mitochondrial membrane, where electron transfer to redox cyclers via the N1a cluster occurs primarily on the matrix side (St-Pierre et al. 2002; Han et al. 2001; Muller et al. 2004). Because membranes are impermeable to charged species such as O₂•⁻, the localization of ROS formation largely dictates the site of oxidative stress. Accordingly, PQ2+ accumulation within the mitochondrial matrix, together with the impermeability of O₂•⁻, explains the preferential induction of ROS in this compartment.

Uncoupling of mitochondria with FCCP prevented PQ2+ uptake and abolished PQ2+ induced ROS formation, indicating that the presence of redox cyclers in the matrix is a prerequisite for ROS generation (Castello et al. 2007). Notably, MnSOD overexpression did not prevent PQ2+ induced mitochondrial membrane potential collapse (Rodriguez-Rocha et al. 2013).

To enhance mitochondrial targeting, MitoParaquat (MitoPQ2+) was developed by conjugating PQ2+ with a lipophilic cation. This modification enabled membrane potential-dependent accumulation and selective O₂•⁻ generation within the mitochondrial matrix, resulting in markedly higher toxicity compared to unmodified PQ2+. These findings further support the central role of intra-mitochondrial ROS in redox cycler toxicity (Robb et al. 2015). Additional indirect evidence includes PQ2+ induced oxidative damage to mitochondrial DNA and inactivation of matrix-localized aconitase (Cochemé et al. 2008; Cochemé et al. 2009).

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Besides mitochondria, NADPH-oxidase 1 (NOX1) (Cristovao et al., 2012) and plasma membrane microglia NOX (Rappold et al., 2011) also contribute to PQ-induced ROS production. Furthermore, in vitro data suggest that for time points of exposure longer than 48 h oxidative stress occurs both at mitochondria and cytosol in dependence to the dose. Thus, it is difficult to discriminate the source of PQ-induced ROS and the early involvement of mitochondria in vivo due to the extensive treatments and to the indirect detection of oxidative stress mainly by mean of lipoperoxidation, protein oxidation. Mitochondrial involvement is suggested by ex-vivo studies (Czerniczyniec et al., 2013, 2015).

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Modulating Factor (MF) MF Specification Effect(s) on the KER Reference(s)
Antioxidant factors  

1: manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase (MnSOD), CuZnSOD (SOD1);

2: glutathione peroxidase (GPX1 and GPX4) and peroxiredoxin (Prx)

3: Coenzyme Q

1: dismutated the released superoxide;

2: metabolize most of the H2O2

3: carries electrons from complex I and II to complex III of the mitochondrial respiratory chain. It also functions as a fat-soluble antioxidant

Napolitano et al., 2021
Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

Treatment

PQ redox cycling with superoxide formation

ROS formation (KE1)

Rat primary mesencephalic cell culture PQ at

0.25–1 mM

Inhibition of aconitase after 3: 43% at 0.25 mM; 58% at 0.5 mM

Increase in H2O2:  At 2 h 17% at 1 mM; At 4 h 28% at 0.5 mM and 64% at 1 mM; At 6 h 31% at 0.25 mM, 59% at 0.5 mM and 119% at 1 mM

N27 cell culture, PQ at 0.3–1 mM

Inhibition of aconitase, 80% at 0.5 mM, 98% at 1 mM at 4 h

Increase in H2O2 at 4–6 h; 25% at 0.3 mM and 33% at 1 mM

SK-N-SH human neuroblastoma cells treated with PQ 0.2 mM up to 1 mM. 6–62 h sampling

Dose and time related increase of O2 by electro paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. 50% at 0.2 mM, 80% at 0.5 mM and 150% at 1 mM at 24 h

Increase in DHE ROS production 800% at 0.5 mM at 48 h

SD rat treated at 25 mg/kg and observed 24 h later

H2O2 increase of 150% in isolated mitochondria from SN neurons corresponding to 42% mitochondrial lipid peroxidation. Decrease in Complex I 33% and Complex IV 21%.  Increase mitochondrial membrane potential

SD rat treated at 10 mg/kg weekly for 4 weeks

Increase in O2 production in isolated mitochondrial of 20%

Decrease in aconitase activity in mitochondrial of 50% in striatum

Increase in lipid peroxidation in isolated mitochondria of 30%

C57BL/6 mice treated with 10 mg/kg PQ i.p. once a week for 3 weeks

Increased neuronal lipid peroxidation measured 1 day after weekly injection each: 10 mg kg i.p.; 200% increase in lipid peroxidation at 2 and 4 days post-inj; 500–600% in lipid peroxidation after 2nd injection 2/4 days after; After third injection limited response due to significant neuronal cell loss

Swiss albino mice i.p. at 5 and 10 mg kg twice a week for 4 weeks

SOD activity ex vivo: At 5 mg/kg increase of 42%; At 10 mg/kg increase of 75%

Glutatathione s transferase activity ex vivo: At 5 mg/kg increase of 25%; At 10 mg/kg increase of 75%; Catalase activity ex vivo; At 5 increase of 17%; At 10 increase of 50%

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

Following PQ exposure in vitro, significant ROS formation occurs within a few hours. Signs of oxidative damage, such as lipid peroxidation and increased antioxidant activity, become evident in vivo only after several weeks of repeated PQ exposure.

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Taxonomic - Isolated mitochondria, cultured cells and whole organisms like yeast, worms, flies, rodents and plants generate O₂•⁻ in the presence of redox chemicals like Paraquat mostly increasing mitochondrial oxidative damage (Mason, 1990; Vafleteren, 1993, Sturz and Culotta, 2002; Van Remmen et al., 2004; Bonila et al., 2006).

In vivo, evidence about the effects of paraquat on ROS generation was reported for different species: yeast and bovine (Cochemé and Murphy, 2008), Rat (Cantu et al., 2009), Drosophila (Mockett et al. 2003) and Mice (Kirby et al., 2002).

Sex/Life stages - This KER is plausibly applicable to both sexes and any life stage. 

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Bonila E, Medina-Leendertz S, Villalobos V, Molero L, Bohorquez A, 2006. Paraquat-induced oxidative stress in Drosophila melanogaster: effects of melatonin, glutathione, serotonin, minocycline, lipoic acid and ascorbic acid. Neurochemical Research, 31, 1425–1432.

Breckenridge CB, Sturgess NC, Butt M, Wolf JC, Zadory D, Beck M, Mathews JM, Tisdel MO, Minnema D, Travis KZ, Cook AR, Botham PA, Smith LL, 2013. Pharmacokinetic, neurochemical, stereological and neuropathological studies on the potential effects of paraquat in the substantia nigra pars compacta and striatum of male C57BL/6J mice. Neurotoxicology, 37, 1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.neuro.2013.03.005

Cantu D, Schaack J, Patel M, 2009. Oxidative inactivation of mitochondrial aconitase results in iron and H2O2- mediated neurotoxicity in rat primary mesencephalic cultures. Public Library of Science (PLoS ONE), 4, e7095.

Cantu D, Fulton RE, Drechsel DA, Patel M, 2011. Mitochondrial aconitase knockdown attenuates paraquat-induced dopaminergic cell death via decreased cellular metabolism and release of iron and H2O2. Journal of Neurochemistry, 118, 79–92.

Castello PR, Drechsel DA, Patel M, 2007. Mitochondria are a major source of paraquat-induced reactive oxygenspecies production in the brain. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 14186–14193

Cochemé HM, Murphy MP, 2008. Complex I is the major site of mitochondrial superoxide production by paraquat. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 283, 1786–1798.

Cochemé HM, Murphy MP, 2009. Chapter 22 The uptake and interactions of the redox cycler paraquat with mitochondria. Methods in Enzymology, 456, 395–417. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(08)04422-4

Cristovao AC, Guhathakurta S, Bok E, Je G, Yoo SD, Choi DH, Kim YS, 2012. NADPH oxidase 1 mediates asynucleinopathy in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 14465–14477

Czerniczyniec A, Lores-Arnaiz S, Bustamante J, 2013. Mitochondrial susceptibility in a model of paraquat neurotoxicity. Free Radical Research, 47, 614–623.

Czerniczyniec A, Lanza EM, Karadayian AG, Bustamante J, Lores-Arnaiz S, 2015. Impairment of striatal mitochondrial function by acute paraquat poisoning. Journal of Bioenergetics and Biomembranes, 47, 395–408.

Day BJ, Shawen S, Liochev SI, Crapo JD. A metalloporphyrin superoxide dismutase mimetic protects against paraquat-induced endothelial cell injury, in vitro. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1995 Dec;275(3):1227-32. PMID: 8531085.

Dranka BP, Zielonka J, Kanthasamy AG, Kalyanaraman B, 2012. Alterations in bioenergetic function induced by Parkinson’s disease mimetic compounds: lack of correlation with superoxide generation. Journal of Neurochemistry, 122, 941–951.

Drechsel DA, Patel M. Differential contribution of the mitochondrial respiratory chain complexes to reactive oxygen species production by redox cycling agents implicated in parkinsonism. Toxicol Sci. 2009 Dec;112(2):427-34. doi: 10.1093/toxsci/kfp223. Epub 2009 Sep 18. PMID: 19767442; PMCID: PMC2777080.

Filograna R, Godena VK, Sanchez-Martinez A, Ferrari E, Casella L, Beltramini M, Bubacco L, Whitworth AJ, Bisaglia M, 2016. SOD-mimetic M40403 is protective in cell and "y models of paraquat toxicity: implications for Parkinson disease. Journal of Biological Chemistry, pii: jbc.M115.708057.

Fukushima T, Tawara T, Isobe A, Hojo N, Shiwaku K, Yamane Y. Radical formation site of cerebral complex I and Parkinson's disease. J Neurosci Res. 1995 Oct 15;42(3):385-90. doi: 10.1002/jnr.490420313. PMID: 8583507.

Han D, Williams E, Cadenas E. Mitochondrial respiratory chain-dependent generation of superoxide anion and its release into the intermembrane space. Biochem J. 2001 Jan 15;353(Pt 2):411-6. doi: 10.1042/0264-6021:3530411. PMID: 11139407; PMCID: PMC1221585.

Huang CL, Lee YC, Yang YC, Kuo TY, Huang NK, 2012. Minocycline prevents paraquat-induced cell death through attenuating endoplasmic reticulum stress and mitochondrial dysfunction. Toxicology Letters, 209, 203–210.

James AM, Cochemé HM, Smith RA, Murphy MP. Interactions of mitochondria-targeted and untargeted ubiquinones with the mitochondrial respiratory chain and reactive oxygen species. Implications for the use of exogenous ubiquinones as therapies and experimental tools. J Biol Chem. 2005 Jun 3;280(22):21295-312. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M501527200. Epub 2005 Mar 23. PMID: 15788391.

Kappus H, 1986. Overview of enzyme systems involved in bio-reduction of drugs and in redox cycling. Biochemical Pharmacology, 35, 1–6.

Kirby K, Hu J, Hilliker AJ, Phillips JP. RNA interference-mediated silencing of Sod2 in Drosophila leads to early adult-onset mortality and elevated endogenous oxidative stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Dec 10;99(25):16162-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.252342899. Epub 2002 Nov 27. PMID: 12456885; PMCID: PMC138582.

Krall J, Bagley AC, Mullenbach GT, Hallewell RA, Lynch RE. Superoxide mediates the toxicity of paraquat for cultured mammalian cells. J Biol Chem. 1988 Feb 5;263(4):1910-4. PMID: 2828357.

Liang LP, Kavanagh TJ, Patel M, 2013. Glutathione de!ciency in Gclm null mice results in complex I inhibition and dopamine depletion following paraquat administration Toxicological Sciences, 134, 366–373. doi: 10.1093/ toxsci/kft112

Mason RP, 1990. Redox cycling of radical anion metabolites of toxic chemicals and drugs and the Marcus theory of electron transfer. Environmental Health Perspectives, 87, 237–243.

McCarthy S, Somayajulu M, Sikorska M, Borowy-Borowski H, Pandey S. Paraquat induces oxidative stress and neuronal cell death; neuroprotection by water-soluble Coenzyme Q10. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2004 Nov 15;201(1):21-31. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2004.04.019. PMID: 15519605.

Mitra S, Chakrabarti N, Bhattacharyya A, 2011. Differential regional expression patterns ofa-synuclein, TNF-a, and IL-1b; and variable status of dopaminergic neurotoxicity in mouse brain after Paraquat treatment. Journal of Neuroinflammation, 8, 163.

Mockett RJ, Bayne AC, Kwong LK, Orr WC, Sohal RS. Ectopic expression of catalase in Drosophila mitochondria increases stress resistance but not longevity. Free Radic Biol Med. 2003 Jan 15;34(2):207-17. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(02)01190-5. PMID: 12521602.

Mohammadi-Bardbori A, Ghazi-Khansari M. Alternative electron acceptors: Proposed mechanism of paraquat mitochondrial toxicity. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol. 2008 Jul;26(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Feb 29. PMID: 21783880.

Mollace V, Iannone M, Muscoli C, Palma E, Granato T, Rispoli V, Nisticò R, Rotiroti D, Salvemini D. The role of oxidative stress in paraquat-induced neurotoxicity in rats: protection by non peptidyl superoxide dismutase mimetic. Neurosci Lett. 2003 Jan 2;335(3):163-6. doi: 10.1016/s0304-3940(02)01168-0. PMID: 12531458.

Muller FL, Liu Y, Van Remmen H. Complex III releases superoxide to both sides of the inner mitochondrial membrane. J Biol Chem. 2004 Nov 19;279(47):49064-73. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M407715200. Epub 2004 Aug 17. PMID: 15317809.

Murakami K, Yoshino M. Inactivation of aconitase in yeast exposed to oxidative stress. Biochem Mol Biol Int. 1997 Mar;41(3):481-6. doi: 10.1080/15216549700201501. PMID: 9090455.

Napolitano G, Fasciolo G, Venditti P. Mitochondrial Management of Reactive Oxygen Species. Antioxidants (Basel). 2021 Nov 17;10(11):1824. doi: 10.3390/antiox10111824. PMID: 34829696; PMCID: PMC8614740.

Peixoto F, Vicente J, Madeira VM. A comparative study of plant and animal mitochondria exposed to paraquat reveals that hydrogen peroxide is not related to the observed toxicity. Toxicol In Vitro. 2004 Dec;18(6):733-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tiv.2004.02.009. PMID: 15465637.

Peng J, Stevenson FF, Doctrow SR, Andersen JK. Superoxide dismutase/catalase mimetics are neuroprotective against selective paraquat-mediated dopaminergic neuron death in the substantial nigra: implications for Parkinson disease. J Biol Chem. 2005 Aug 12;280(32):29194-8. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M500984200. Epub 2005 Jun 9. PMID: 15946937.

Pinho BR, Reis SD, Hartley RC, Murphy MP, Oliveira JMA. Mitochondrial superoxide generation induces a parkinsonian phenotype in zebrafish and huntingtin aggregation in human cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 2019 Jan;130:318-327. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2018.10.446. Epub 2018 Oct 31. PMID: 30389496; PMCID: PMC6340810.

Prasad K, Winnik B, Thiruchelvam MJ, Buckley B, Mirochnitchenko O, 2007. Prolonged toxicokinetics and toxicodynamics of paraquat in mouse brain, 115, 1448–1453.

Rappold PM, Cui M, Chesser AS, Tibbett J, Grima JC, Duan L, Sen N, Javitch JA, Tieu K, 2011. Paraquat neurotoxicity is mediated by the dopamine transporter and organic cation transporter-3. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 20766–20771. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115141108

Robb EL, Gawel JM, Aksentijević D, Cochemé HM, Stewart TS, Shchepinova MM, Qiang H, Prime TA, Bright TP, James AM, Shattock MJ, Senn HM, Hartley RC, Murphy MP. Selective superoxide generation within mitochondria by the targeted redox cycler MitoParaquat. Free Radic Biol Med. 2015 Dec;89:883-94. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.08.021. Epub 2015 Oct 8. PMID: 26454075.

Rodriguez-Rocha H, Garcia-Garcia A, Pickett C, Li S, Jones J, Chen H, Webb B, Choi J, Zhou Y, Zimmerman MC, Franco R, 2013. Compartmentalised oxidative stress in dopaminergic cell death induced by pesticides and complex I inhibitors: distinct roles of superoxide anion and superoxide dismutases. Free Radical Biology and Medicine.

Sandy MS, Moldeus P, Ross D, Smith MT. Role of redox cycling and lipid peroxidation in bipyridyl herbicide cytotoxicity. Studies with a compromised isolated hepatocyte model system. Biochem Pharmacol. 1986 Sep 15;35(18):3095-101. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(86)90392-8. PMID: 3019355.

St-Pierre J, Buckingham JA, Roebuck SJ, Brand MD. Topology of superoxide production from different sites in the mitochondrial electron transport chain. J Biol Chem. 2002 Nov 22;277(47):44784-90. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M207217200. Epub 2002 Sep 16. PMID: 12237311.

Sturtz LA, Culotta VC. Superoxide dismutase null mutants of baker's yeast, Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Methods Enzymol. 2002;349:167-72. doi: 10.1016/s0076-6879(02)49332-9. PMID: 11912906.

Tampo Y, Tsukamoto M, Yonaha M. Superoxide production from paraquat evoked by exogenous NADPH in pulmonary endothelial cells. Free Radic Biol Med. 1999 Sep;27(5-6):588-95. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00110-0. PMID: 10490279.

Tien Nguyen-nhu N, Knoops B, 2003. Mitochondrial and cytosolic expression of human peroxiredoxin 5 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae protect yeast cells from oxidative stress induced by paraquat. Federation of the European Biochemical Societies’s Letters (FEBS)ers, 544, 148–152.

Tomita M. Comparison of one-electron reduction activity against the bipyridylium herbicides, paraquat and diquat, in microsomal and mitochondrial fractions of liver, lung and kidney (in vitro). Biochem Pharmacol. 1991 Jul 5;42(2):303-9. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(91)90717-j. PMID: 1650209.

Tsukamoto M, Tampo Y, Sawada M, Yonaha M. Paraquat-induced oxidative stress and dysfunction of the glutathione redox cycle in pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2002 Jan 15;178(2):82-92. doi: 10.1006/taap.2001.9325. PMID: 11814328.

Vanfleteren JR, 1993. Oxidative stress and ageing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Biochemical Journal, 292, 605–608.

Van Remmen H, Qi W, Sabia M, Freeman G, Estlack L, Yang H, Mao Guo Z, Huang TT, Strong R, Lee S, Epstein CJ, Richardson A. Multiple deficiencies in antioxidant enzymes in mice result in a compound increase in sensitivity to oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med. 2004 Jun 15;36(12):1625-34. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.03.016. PMID: 15182862.

Vasquez-Vivar J, Kalyanaraman B, Kennedy MC, 2000. Mitochondrial aconitase is a source of hydroxyl radical. An electron spin resonance investigation. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275, 14064–14069.

Yin L, Lu L, Prasad K, Richfeld EK, Unger EL, Xu J, Jones BC, 2011. Genetic-based, differential susceptibility to paraquat neurotoxicity in mice. Neurotoxicology and Teratology, 33, 415–421. doi: 10.1016/j.ntt.2011.02.012