API

Relationship: 883

Title

?

Decreased, Ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies) leads to Not Increased, Circulating Ketone Bodies

Upstream event

?

Decreased, Ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies)

Downstream event

?


Not Increased, Circulating Ketone Bodies

Key Event Relationship Overview

?


AOPs Referencing Relationship

?

AOP Name Directness Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding
Antagonist binding to PPARα leading to body-weight loss directly leads to Strong Moderate

Taxonomic Applicability

?

Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI

Sex Applicability

?

Sex Evidence
Male Moderate
Female Moderate

Life Stage Applicability

?

Term Evidence
Adults Moderate

How Does This Key Event Relationship Work

?


The KE, “ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies)” is critical to supporting general systemic energy homeostasis in fasting events (Cahill 2006, Evans et al 2004, Sengupta et al 2010). Interference with ketogenesis, for example by PPARα inhibition, has been demonstrated to inhibit β-hydroxybutyrate production (measured in serum) during fasting events in mice (Badman et al 2007, Potthoff 2009, Sengupta et al 2010). The Badman et al (2007) study indicated that metabolism of fatty acid substrates (measured as liver triglycerides) that would otherwise contribute to β-hydroxybutyrate production was additionally inhibited under PPARα knockout.

In a fasting state, humans transition from the use of exogenous glucose to glucose derived from glycogen within 4 hours with a steadily increasing proportion of glucose usage that is derived from gluconeogenesis up to 2 days (Cahill 2006). Beyond 2 days of fasting, ketone body production (β-hydroxybutyrate) increasingly supports the energy demands of the brain (Cahill 2006).

Physiological studies of the progression of human starvation have identified that the preferred metabolic fuel is glucose in the fed state and progressing through two days of fasting, afterward ketone bodies become increasingly important for meeting energy demands (Cahill 2006, Owen et al 2005). Substrates derived from carbohydrates, fats and protein can contribute to gluconeogenesis (Cahill 2006, Gerich et al 2001) whereas substrates derived from fatty acids are the primary contributors to ketogenesis (Desvergne and Wahli 1999). Mobilization of fatty acids as a metabolic fuel source increase dramatically during fasting to support both gluconeogenesis and ketogenesis (Evans et al 2004). Cahill (2006) and colleagues have demonstrated the importance of ketone body production, especially β-hydroxybutyrate, for maintaining energy homeostasis during starvation. β-hydroxybutyrate serves as an alternative substrate to glucose for providing energy to the brain in the starvation state, providing ATP at higher efficiency relative to the glucose substrate (Cahill 2006). Interference with ketogenesis, for example by PPARα inhibition, has been demonstrated to inhibit β-hydroxybutyrate production (measured in serum) during fasting events in mice (Badman et al 2007, Potthoff 2009, Sengupta et al 2010). The Badman et al (2007) study indicated that metabolism of fatty acid substrates (measured as liver triglycerides) that would otherwise contribute to β-hydroxybutyrate production was inhibited under PPARα knockout. Increased concentrations of circulating ketone bodies is indicative of potential metabolic fuel deficits in fasting animals (Cahill 2006), and a lack of increase in circulating ketone bodies during fasting, especially in conjunction with elevated blood triglycerides, indicates impaired ketogenesis and potentially impaired bioenergetic potential.

Weight of Evidence

?


As described in the section above, the KER for the KE, “decreased ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies)” -> the KE, “no increase of circulating ketone bodies” is well supported and received a “strong” weight of evidence score given that inhibition of decreased ketogenesis was demonstrated to reduce circulating ketone body concentrations under fasting conditions, but not relative to fed animals (Sengupta et al. 2010, Badman et al. 2007). The quantitative understanding was scored as “moderate” given that, although there is strong literature support of the quantitative relationships between the KE, “ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies)” and the KE, “no increase of circulating ketone bodies” under starvation events, there is less knowledge available regarding the specific inhibition of the PPARalpha signaling pathway as the source of “starvation” or depletion of available fatty acids as the starting stock for ketogenesis.

Biological Plausibility

?

Biological plausibility of this KER is strong given the supporting relationships cited in the literature described in the previous bullets above.

Empirical Support for Linkage

?

Include consideration of temporal concordance here

As described in the bullets above, there is fairly robust empirical support for this KER, including temporal concordance associated with starvation events.

Uncertainties or Inconsistencies

?

The data is fairly robust. Additional specific systems level investigations with PPARalpha signaling knockouts would be useful for understanding non-starvation related ketogenic processes.

Quantitative Understanding of the Linkage

?


Is it known how much change in the first event is needed to impact the second? Are there known modulators of the response-response relationships? Are there models or extrapolation approaches that help describe those relationships?

The results presented in the references cited above provide many of the quantitative relationships among KEs. Multiple signaling pathways are involved in the starvation response, so additional response-response relationships are likely to play a role in the systemic response as well as interaction with the KE, “decreased ketogenesis (production of ketone bodies)” and the KE, “no increase of circulating ketone bodies”. We are not currently aware of any models available to extrapolate results among KEs.

Evidence Supporting Taxonomic Applicability

?


The relationships described herein have been primarily established in human and rodent models.

References

?



Badman MK, Pissios P, Kennedy AR, Koukos G, Flier JS, Maratos-Flier E: Hepatic fibroblast growth factor 21 is regulated by PPARalpha and is a key mediator of hepatic lipid metabolism in ketotic states. Cell metabolism 2007, 5(6):426-437.

Cahill Jr., G.F., 2006. Fuel metabolism in starvation. Annual Review of Nutrition 26:1e22.

Desvergne B, Wahli W (1999) Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors: nuclear control of metabolism. Endocrine Reviews 20(5): 649-688. Evans RM, Barish GD, Wang YX: PPARs and the complex journey to obesity. Nat Med 2004, 10(4):355-361.

Gerich JE, Meyer C, Woerle HJ, Stumvoll M: Renal gluconeogenesis: its importance in human glucose homeostasis. Diabetes Care 2001, 24(2):382-391.

Owen OE: Ketone bodies as a fuel for the brain during starvation. Biochem Mol Biol Educ 2005, 33(4):246-251.

Potthoff MJ, Inagaki T, Satapati S, Ding X, He T, Goetz R, Mohammadi M, Finck BN, Mangelsdorf DJ, Kliewer SA et al: FGF21 induces PGC-1α and regulates carbohydrate and fatty acid metabolism during the adaptive starvation response. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106(26):10853-10858.

Sengupta S, Peterson TR, Laplante M, Oh S, Sabatini DM: mTORC1 controls fasting-induced ketogenesis and its modulation by ageing. Nature 2010, 468(7327):1100-1104.