The authors have designated this AOP as all rights reserved. Re-use in any form requires advanced permission from the authors.

AOP: 552

Title

A descriptive phrase which references both the Molecular Initiating Event and Adverse Outcome.It should take the form “MIE leading to AO”. For example, “Aromatase inhibition leading to reproductive dysfunction” where Aromatase inhibition is the MIE and reproductive dysfunction the AO. In cases where the MIE is unknown or undefined, the earliest known KE in the chain (i.e., furthest upstream) should be used in lieu of the MIE and it should be made clear that the stated event is a KE and not the MIE.  More help

Inhibiton of L-Type Calcium Channels leading to heart failure via QT interval prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP)

Short name
A name that succinctly summarises the information from the title. This name should not exceed 90 characters. More help
L-Type Calcium Channels
The current version of the Developer's Handbook will be automatically populated into the Handbook Version field when a new AOP page is created.Authors have the option to switch to a newer (but not older) Handbook version any time thereafter. More help
Handbook Version v2.7

Graphical Representation

A graphical representation of the AOP.This graphic should list all KEs in sequence, including the MIE (if known) and AO, and the pair-wise relationships (links or KERs) between those KEs. More help
Click to download graphical representation template Explore AOP in a Third Party Tool

Authors

The names and affiliations of the individual(s)/organisation(s) that created/developed the AOP. More help

Sun-Woong Kanga, Myeong Hwa Song,Do-Sun Lim b and Kim Young Jun

aCenter for Biomimetic Research, Korea Institute of Toxicology, Daejeon 34114, Korea

bCardiovascular Center, Department of Cardiology, Korea University Anam Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

cEnvironemental Safety Group, KIST Europe, campus E 71 Saarbruecken, Germany 

Point of Contact

The user responsible for managing the AOP entry in the AOP-KB and controlling write access to the page by defining the contributors as described in the next section.   More help
Young Jun Kim   (email point of contact)

Contributors

Users with write access to the AOP page.  Entries in this field are controlled by the Point of Contact. More help
  • Young Jun Kim

Coaches

This field is used to identify coaches who supported the development of the AOP.Each coach selected must be a registered author. More help

OECD Information Table

Provides users with information concerning how actively the AOP page is being developed and whether it is part of the OECD Workplan and has been reviewed and/or endorsed. OECD Project: Assigned upon acceptance onto OECD workplan. This project ID is managed and updated (if needed) by the OECD. OECD Status: For AOPs included on the OECD workplan, ‘OECD status’ tracks the level of review/endorsement of the AOP . This designation is managed and updated by the OECD. Journal-format Article: The OECD is developing co-operation with Scientific Journals for the review and publication of AOPs, via the signature of a Memorandum of Understanding. When the scientific review of an AOP is conducted by these Journals, the journal review panel will review the content of the Wiki. In addition, the Journal may ask the AOP authors to develop a separate manuscript (i.e. Journal Format Article) using a format determined by the Journal for Journal publication. In that case, the journal review panel will be required to review both the Wiki content and the Journal Format Article. The Journal will publish the AOP reviewed through the Journal Format Article. OECD iLibrary published version: OECD iLibrary is the online library of the OECD. The version of the AOP that is published there has been endorsed by the OECD. The purpose of publication on iLibrary is to provide a stable version over time, i.e. the version which has been reviewed and revised based on the outcome of the review. AOPs are viewed as living documents and may continue to evolve on the AOP-Wiki after their OECD endorsement and publication.   More help
OECD Project # OECD Status Reviewer's Reports Journal-format Article OECD iLibrary Published Version
This AOP was last modified on December 03, 2024 09:31

Revision dates for related pages

Page Revision Date/Time
Blockade, L-Type Calcium Channels November 01, 2018 12:25
Altered, Action Potential March 31, 2022 06:49
Prolongation of QT interval December 13, 2021 05:03
Torsades de Pointes January 29, 2023 11:28
Increased uncoordinated cardiac contraction November 26, 2024 12:32
Heart failure December 03, 2024 10:15
Blockade, L-Type Calcium Channels leads to Altered, Action Potential November 20, 2024 14:26
Altered, Action Potential leads to Prolongation of QT interval November 20, 2024 14:27
Prolongation of QT interval leads to Torsades de Pointes December 13, 2021 05:15
Torsades de Pointes leads to uncoordinated cardiac contraction November 20, 2024 14:29
uncoordinated cardiac contraction leads to Heart failure November 27, 2024 08:23
Verapamil November 29, 2016 18:42
Diltiazem November 02, 2018 07:43
Nifedipine November 02, 2018 07:40
Amlodipine November 02, 2018 07:41
Cadmium October 25, 2017 08:33
Lead November 29, 2016 18:42
Mercury November 29, 2016 18:42
Organophosphates November 29, 2016 21:20
Nimodipine November 02, 2018 07:42

Abstract

A concise and informative summation of the AOP under development that can stand-alone from the AOP page. The aim is to capture the highlights of the AOP and its potential scientific and regulatory relevance. More help

The dysfunction of L-type calcium channels (LTCCs) is a critical molecular initiating event (MIE) in the progression to severe cardiac outcomes, including ventricular fibrillation and cardiomyopathy, mediated by QT interval prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP). LTCCs regulate calcium influx during the plateau phase of the cardiac action potential, essential for excitation-contraction coupling. Dysfunctional LTCCs, caused by genetic mutations, pharmacological agents, or electrolyte imbalances, lead to reduced or altered calcium currents (ICa,L), disrupting cardiac electrophysiology. This dysfunction prolongs action potential duration (APD), resulting in QT interval prolongation, a critical marker of delayed ventricular repolarization. QT prolongation predisposes cardiomyocytes to early afterdepolarizations (EADs), which create a substrate for TdP, a life-threatening polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia. Sustained TdP episodes can progress to ventricular fibrillation, characterized by chaotic electrical activity and ineffective ventricular contraction, leading to hemodynamic collapse. Repeated or prolonged episodes of TdP and ventricular fibrillation impose chronic stress on the myocardium, culminating in cardiomyopathy through structural remodeling, fibrosis, and reduced cardiac function. This AOP framework provides insights into the dose-response relationships between LTCC dysfunction and cardiac outcomes, supporting its application in regulatory toxicology, drug development, and risk assessment. It underscores the importance of screening pharmacological agents and environmental chemicals for QT prolongation and TdP risks to  cardiomyopathy. 

AOP Development Strategy

Context

Used to provide background information for AOP reviewers and users that is considered helpful in understanding the biology underlying the AOP and the motivation for its development.The background should NOT provide an overview of the AOP, its KEs or KERs, which are captured in more detail below. More help

The dysfunction of L-type calcium channels (LTCCs) plays a central role in the pathogenesis of severe cardiac arrhythmias and structural heart disease. LTCCs are pivotal in regulating calcium influx during the plateau phase of the cardiac action potential, maintaining normal cardiac excitation-contraction coupling. Dysfunctional LTCCs, whether due to genetic mutations (e.g., CACNA1C variants), pharmacological agents, or electrolyte imbalances, can disrupt the delicate balance of ionic currents necessary for proper cardiac function.

This AOP is particularly relevant in the context of QT interval prolongation, a widely recognized marker of delayed ventricular repolarization. QT prolongation, whether congenital or acquired, predisposes individuals to Torsades de Pointes (TdP), a potentially fatal ventricular arrhythmia. TdP is often episodic and can degenerate into ventricular fibrillation (VF), characterized by disorganized electrical activity and hemodynamic collapse. Furthermore, chronic or repeated arrhythmic episodes can impose sustained stress on the myocardium, leading to cardiomyopathy characterized by fibrosis, chamber dilation, and impaired contractility.

This AOP framework provides a mechanistic understanding of the progression from LTCC dysfunction to adverse cardiac outcomes, offering a valuable tool for multiple applications:

  • Regulatory Toxicology: Screening  chemicals for proarrhythmic risks, particularly QT prolongation and TdP potential.
  • Risk Assessment: Assessing the cardiotoxic potential of pharmacological agents and environmental toxins.

Understanding this AOP is critical for advancing cardiovascular safety and guiding regulatory and clinical decision-making, especially in drug discovery and toxicology evaluations. It bridges the gap between molecular events and clinical outcomes, fostering better risk management strategies for heart failuare.

Strategy

Provides a description of the approaches to the identification, screening and quality assessment of the data relevant to identification of the key events and key event relationships included in the AOP or AOP network.This information is important as a basis to support the objective/envisaged application of the AOP by the regulatory community and to facilitate the reuse of its components.  Suggested content includes a rationale for and description of the scope and focus of the data search and identification strategy/ies including the nature of preliminary scoping and/or expert input, the overall literature screening strategy and more focused literature surveys to identify additional information (including e.g., key search terms, databases and time period searched, any tools used). More help

1. Problem Formulation

Biological Context:

LTCCs are essential for cardiac action potential propagation and excitation-contraction coupling. Dysfunction in these channels is directly linked to cardiac arrhythmias and structural abnormalities.

The AOP focuses on the progression from LTCC dysfunction to ventricular fibrillation and cardiomyopathy, mediated by intermediate events such as QT interval prolongation and Torsades de Pointes (TdP).

Regulatory Relevance:

This AOP addresses cardiotoxicity risks in pharmacological agents, environmental chemicals, and genetic predispositions (e.g., congenital Long QT syndrome).

Applications include drug safety evaluation, regulatory toxicology, and therapeutic target discovery.

2. Key Components of the AOP

Molecular Initiating Event (MIE)

Dysfunction of L-Type Calcium Channels:

LTCC dysfunction can result from genetic mutations (e.g., CACNA1C), pharmacological blockade, or electrolyte imbalances (e.g., hypocalcemia).

Leads to impaired calcium influx (ICa,L), disrupting the cardiac action potential.

Key Events (KEs)

Altered Action Potential Duration (APD):

Reduced LTCC activity prolongs the repolarization phase, leading to increased action potential duration (APD90).

QT Interval Prolongation:

The prolongation of ventricular repolarization extends the QT interval on ECG, predisposing the heart to early afterdepolarizations (EADs).

Torsades de Pointes (TdP):

QT prolongation and EADs create conditions for reentrant circuits, leading to TdP, a polymorphic ventricular arrhythmia.

Ventricular Fibrillation (VF):

Sustained TdP progresses to VF, characterized by disorganized electrical activity and ineffective contraction.

Cardiomyopathy:

Repeated or chronic arrhythmias impose structural and functional stress on the myocardium, resulting in fibrosis, dilation, and reduced contractility.

Adverse Outcomes (AOs)

Cardiac Ventricular Fibrillation:

A life-threatening arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac death if untreated.

Cardiomyopathy:

Structural and functional myocardial damage leading to heart failure.

3. Evidence Gathering and Integration

Identification of Evidence

Molecular-Level Data:

Studies on LTCC function and dysfunction due to pharmacological agents, mutations, or electrolyte imbalances.

Electrophysiological Data:

Evidence linking ICa,L reductions to prolonged APD and arrhythmogenesis.

Clinical and Preclinical Studies:

QT prolongation and TdP occurrences in response to drugs, toxins, or genetic conditions.

Screening and Prioritization

Use of high-throughput screening platforms (e.g., ToxCast, Tox21) to identify compounds affecting LTCCs.

Prioritize evidence demonstrating dose-response relationships and temporal concordance.

Weight of Evidence Assessment

Apply the OECD’s weight-of-evidence approach:

Biological plausibility of each KE.

Empirical support for KERs.

Reproducibility across species and models.

Summary of the AOP

This section is for information that describes the overall AOP.The information described in section 1 is entered on the upper portion of an AOP page within the AOP-Wiki. This is where some background information may be provided, the structure of the AOP is described, and the KEs and KERs are listed. More help

Events:

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE)
An MIE is a specialised KE that represents the beginning (point of interaction between a prototypical stressor and the biological system) of an AOP. More help
Key Events (KE)
A measurable event within a specific biological level of organisation. More help
Adverse Outcomes (AO)
An AO is a specialized KE that represents the end (an adverse outcome of regulatory significance) of an AOP. More help
Type Event ID Title Short name
MIE 1529 Blockade, L-Type Calcium Channels Blockade, L-Type Calcium Channels
KE 698 Altered, Action Potential Altered, Action Potential
KE 1962 Prolongation of QT interval Prolongation of QT interval
KE 1963 Torsades de Pointes Torsades de Pointes
KE 2281 Increased uncoordinated cardiac contraction uncoordinated cardiac contraction
AO 1535 Heart failure Heart failure

Relationships Between Two Key Events (Including MIEs and AOs)

This table summarizes all of the KERs of the AOP and is populated in the AOP-Wiki as KERs are added to the AOP.Each table entry acts as a link to the individual KER description page. More help

Network View

This network graphic is automatically generated based on the information provided in the MIE(s), KEs, AO(s), KERs and Weight of Evidence (WoE) summary tables. The width of the edges representing the KERs is determined by its WoE confidence level, with thicker lines representing higher degrees of confidence. This network view also shows which KEs are shared with other AOPs. More help

Prototypical Stressors

A structured data field that can be used to identify one or more “prototypical” stressors that act through this AOP. Prototypical stressors are stressors for which responses at multiple key events have been well documented. More help

Life Stage Applicability

The life stage for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help
Life stage Evidence
Conception to < Fetal Moderate

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) can be selected.In many cases, individual species identified in these structured fields will be those for which the strongest evidence used in constructing the AOP was available. More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
Human, rat, mouse Human, rat, mouse High NCBI

Sex Applicability

The sex for which the AOP is known to be applicable. More help
Sex Evidence
Mixed High

Overall Assessment of the AOP

Addressess the relevant biological domain of applicability (i.e., in terms of taxa, sex, life stage, etc.) and Weight of Evidence (WoE) for the overall AOP as a basis to consider appropriate regulatory application (e.g., priority setting, testing strategies or risk assessment). More help

1. Molecular Initiating Event (MIE)

  • Dysfunction of L-Type Calcium Channels (LTCCs):
    • LTCCs play a crucial role in regulating calcium influx during the plateau phase (phase 2) of the cardiac action potential.
    • Dysfunction (e.g., due to blockade, mutations, or altered regulation) reduces calcium currents (ICa,L) or disrupts their timing, impairing cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.

2. Key Events (KEs)

KE1: Altered Action Potential Duration (APD)

  • Mechanism:
    • Reduced LTCC activity prolongs the repolarization phase (phase 3) of the cardiac action potential by altering the balance between inward (ICa,L) and outward (potassium) currents.
    • This leads to prolonged action potential duration, which predisposes myocytes to arrhythmogenic conditions.
  • Measurement:
    • Patch-clamp electrophysiology to measure action potential duration (e.g., APD90).

KE2: QT Interval Prolongation

  • Mechanism:
    • Prolonged action potential duration extends the QT interval on an electrocardiogram (ECG), reflecting delayed ventricular repolarization.
    • QT interval prolongation increases susceptibility to early afterdepolarizations (EADs), which can trigger arrhythmias.
  • Measurement:
    • ECG assessment of the QT interval.
    • Corrected QT interval (QTc) > 450 ms in men and > 460 ms in women indicates prolongation.

KE3: Torsades de Pointes (TdP)

  • Mechanism:
    • EADs and heterogeneity in repolarization create a substrate for reentrant circuits, resulting in TdP, a polymorphic ventricular tachyarrhythmia.
    • TdP is episodic and may self-terminate or progress to ventricular fibrillation.
  • Measurement:
    • ECG showing characteristic twisting QRS complexes around the isoelectric line.

KE4: Ventricular Fibrillation

  • Mechanism:
    • Sustained TdP progresses to ventricular fibrillation (VF), a lethal arrhythmia characterized by chaotic electrical activity and ineffective ventricular contraction.
  • Measurement:
    • ECG showing rapid, irregular, and uncoordinated electrical activity.

KE5: Cardiomyopathy

  • Mechanism:
    • Repeated episodes of TdP and VF, or prolonged QT interval without effective correction, result in chronic myocardial stress, hypoxia, and structural remodeling, leading to cardiomyopathy.
  • Measurement:
    • Echocardiography or cardiac MRI showing reduced ejection fraction, chamber dilation, or fibrosis.

3. Adverse Outcomes (AOs)

  • Cardiac Ventricular Fibrillation:
    • A life-threatening arrhythmia leading to sudden cardiac arrest if not corrected.
  • Cardiomyopathy:
    • Chronic structural and functional impairment of the myocardium, leading to heart failure and reduced quality of life.

4. Key Event Relationships (KERs)

  • MIE → KE1 (LTCC Dysfunction → Altered APD):

    • Dysfunctional LTCCs reduce inward calcium currents, prolonging repolarization and action potential duration.
    • Supported by experimental studies using LTCC blockers like verapamil and diltiazem.
  • KE1 → KE2 (Altered APD → QT Interval Prolongation):

    • Prolonged action potentials extend the QT interval on ECG, a well-documented marker of delayed ventricular repolarization.
  • KE2 → KE3 (QT Interval Prolongation → TdP):

    • QT prolongation increases the likelihood of EADs, which trigger TdP under conditions of repolarization heterogeneity.
  • KE3 → KE4 (TdP → Ventricular Fibrillation):

    • Sustained TdP degenerates into ventricular fibrillation, leading to hemodynamic collapse.
  • KE4 → AO (Ventricular Fibrillation → Cardiomyopathy):

    • Recurrent or sustained VF episodes result in myocardial damage and structural remodeling, culminating in cardiomyopathy.

Domain of Applicability

Addressess the relevant biological domain(s) of applicability in terms of sex, life-stage, taxa, and other aspects of biological context. More help

Species:

Humans and mammalian models (e.g., guinea pigs, rabbits, and dogs) are highly relevant due to similarities in cardiac electrophysiology.

Life Stages:

Most applicable to adults but also relevant for congenital QT prolongation syndromes in neonates and children.

Sex:

Females are more prone to QT prolongation and TdP due to hormonal influences on cardiac repolarization.

Essentiality of the Key Events

The essentiality of KEs can only be assessed relative to the impact of manipulation of a given KE (e.g., experimentally blocking or exacerbating the event) on the downstream sequence of KEs defined for the AOP. Consequently, evidence supporting essentiality is assembled on the AOP page, rather than on the independent KE pages that are meant to stand-alone as modular units without reference to other KEs in the sequence. The nature of experimental evidence that is relevant to assessing essentiality relates to the impact on downstream KEs and the AO if upstream KEs are prevented or modified. This includes: Direct evidence: directly measured experimental support that blocking or preventing a KE prevents or impacts downstream KEs in the pathway in the expected fashion. Indirect evidence: evidence that modulation or attenuation in the magnitude of impact on a specific KE (increased effect or decreased effect) is associated with corresponding changes (increases or decreases) in the magnitude or frequency of one or more downstream KEs. More help
Key Event Essentiality Supporting Evidence
Dysfunction of LTCCs High LTCC dysfunction directly alters calcium dynamics, initiating downstream effects.
Altered APD High Prolonged APD is necessary for QT prolongation and EAD generation.
QT Interval Prolongation High QT prolongation is a prerequisite for TdP and a marker for arrhythmic risk.
Torsades de Pointes (TdP) High TdP creates the substrate for VF; its suppression prevents VF progression.
Ventricular Fibrillation High VF is directly linked to sudden cardiac death and structural cardiac damage.
Cardiomyopathy High Cardiomyopathy results from cumulative stress caused by arrhythmic events.

1. Molecular Initiating Event (MIE): Dysfunction of L-Type Calcium Channels

Essentiality:

LTCCs regulate calcium influx during the cardiac action potential. Dysfunction due to genetic mutations, pharmacological blockade, or electrolyte imbalances reduces calcium currents (ICa,L) and disrupts cardiac excitation-contraction coupling.

Experimental evidence demonstrates that LTCC blockers (e.g., verapamil, diltiazem) and mutations in LTCC genes (e.g., CACNA1C) prolong action potential duration (APD), leading to arrhythmias.

Supportive Evidence:

Knockout or mutation studies in animal models show that disrupting LTCC function significantly alters cardiac repolarization, leading to prolonged QT intervals and arrhythmic events.

2. KE1: Altered Action Potential Duration (APD)

Essentiality:

Prolonged APD, resulting from impaired calcium influx via LTCCs, directly increases the risk of early afterdepolarizations (EADs), which are a precursor to arrhythmias.

Shortening or restoring normal APD through pharmacological interventions (e.g., potassium channel activators) reduces the likelihood of arrhythmogenic conditions.

Supportive Evidence:

Patch-clamp studies demonstrate a strong relationship between LTCC dysfunction and prolonged APD in cardiomyocytes.

Animal models treated with drugs that restore APD show reduced susceptibility to QT prolongation and TdP.

3. KE2: QT Interval Prolongation

Essentiality:

QT interval prolongation is a clinical biomarker for delayed ventricular repolarization and is strongly associated with an increased risk of Torsades de Pointes (TdP).

Interventions that shorten QT intervals (e.g., drugs that enhance potassium currents) reduce the occurrence of TdP.

Supportive Evidence:

Clinical studies show that QTc prolongation >500 ms is associated with a significantly increased risk of TdP.

Genetic models of Long QT syndrome, involving LTCC mutations, consistently exhibit prolonged QT intervals and arrhythmias.

4. KE3: Torsades de Pointes (TdP)

Essentiality:

TdP is a critical intermediate event that bridges QT prolongation and ventricular fibrillation. The presence of TdP significantly increases the likelihood of degeneration into VF.

Suppression of TdP episodes (e.g., via magnesium sulfate or isoproterenol) prevents the progression to VF.

Supportive Evidence:

Pharmacological agents that trigger TdP in experimental settings often progress to VF unless terminated.

In patients with drug-induced TdP, rapid correction of QT prolongation reduces the risk of VF.

5. KE4: Ventricular Fibrillation (VF)

Essentiality:

VF is the final arrhythmic event before sudden cardiac death. Without effective intervention, VF results in hemodynamic collapse.

Prevention or termination of VF (e.g., defibrillation) restores cardiac function and prevents structural damage to the myocardium.

Supportive Evidence:

Studies in animal models and clinical cases demonstrate that interventions to prevent VF (e.g., antiarrhythmic drugs or defibrillation) stop the progression to cardiomyopathy.

6. AO: Cardiomyopathy

Essentiality:

Cardiomyopathy represents the chronic adverse outcome of recurrent or prolonged arrhythmic events. Reducing the frequency or severity of arrhythmias (e.g., through antiarrhythmic drugs or ICDs) mitigates structural myocardial damage.

Preventing earlier KEs, such as TdP or VF, halts the progression to cardiomyopathy.

Supportive Evidence:

Chronic animal models of recurrent VF or sustained QT prolongation show myocardial remodeling and functional impairment consistent with cardiomyopathy.

Clinical interventions that correct arrhythmias reduce the incidence and severity of cardiomyopathy.

Evidence Assessment

Addressess the biological plausibility, empirical support, and quantitative understanding from each KER in an AOP. More help
Key Event Relationship Evidence
KE1: LTCC Dysfunction → KE2: Altered APD Strong evidence from pharmacological and genetic studies.
KE2: Altered APD → KE3: QT Interval Prolongation Well-documented temporal and dose-response relationships.
KE3: QT Prolongation → KE4: TdP Clinical and preclinical evidence support QTc thresholds for TdP induction.
KE4: TdP → KE5: Ventricular Fibrillation High concordance across experimental and clinical models.
KE5: Ventricular Fibrillation → AO: Cardiomyopathy Strong evidence of structural remodeling and fibrosis from VF episodes.

1. Biological Plausibility

Mechanistic Understanding:

The role of L-type calcium channels (LTCCs) in regulating cardiac action potential dynamics and excitation-contraction coupling is well-established.

Dysfunction of LTCCs disrupts calcium currents (ICa,L) and prolongs the action potential duration (APD), leading to delayed ventricular repolarization (QT prolongation).

QT prolongation creates a substrate for early afterdepolarizations (EADs), increasing the likelihood of Torsades de Pointes (TdP) and ventricular fibrillation (VF).

Supportive Evidence:

Pharmacological agents that block LTCCs (e.g., verapamil, diltiazem) or genetic mutations in CACNA1C consistently result in arrhythmias and structural cardiac damage.

Established electrophysiological principles link prolonged APD to arrhythmogenic risks.

2. Empirical Evidence

MIE → KE1 (Dysfunction of LTCCs → Altered APD)

Strength of Evidence:

Experimental studies in animal models and isolated cardiomyocytes show that LTCC dysfunction directly prolongs APD by reducing ICa,L during the plateau phase.

Pharmacological studies using LTCC blockers demonstrate dose-dependent increases in APD.

Temporal Concordance:

APD prolongation occurs rapidly (seconds to minutes) after LTCC dysfunction.

Reproducibility:

Observed across multiple species (e.g., guinea pigs, rabbits, humans) and experimental models.

KE1 → KE2 (Altered APD → QT Interval Prolongation)

Strength of Evidence:

Prolonged APD in cardiomyocytes translates to QT prolongation on the surface ECG.

Genetic conditions (e.g., Long QT Syndrome 8, involving CACNA1C) consistently exhibit QT prolongation.

Temporal Concordance:

QT prolongation occurs immediately following APD prolongation and persists as long as APD is prolonged.

Reproducibility:

Consistently demonstrated in both in vivo models and clinical studies of drug-induced QT prolongation.

KE2 → KE3 (QT Interval Prolongation → Torsades de Pointes)

Strength of Evidence:

QTc prolongation (>500 ms) strongly predicts TdP occurrence.

Early afterdepolarizations (EADs) triggered by prolonged QT intervals act as a mechanistic precursor to TdP.

Temporal Concordance:

TdP occurs following significant QT prolongation, especially under conditions of repolarization heterogeneity.

Reproducibility:

Observed in patients with drug-induced QT prolongation (e.g., by sotalol or dofetilide) and in animal models.

KE3 → KE4 (Torsades de Pointes → Ventricular Fibrillation)

Strength of Evidence:

TdP frequently degenerates into VF under conditions of electrical instability.

Clinical and experimental studies demonstrate TdP progression to VF.

Temporal Concordance:

VF follows prolonged or sustained TdP episodes.

Reproducibility:

Demonstrated in animal models and clinical cases.

KE4 → AO (Ventricular Fibrillation → Cardiomyopathy)

Strength of Evidence:

Chronic or recurrent VF episodes lead to myocardial remodeling, fibrosis, and reduced contractility, consistent with cardiomyopathy.

Clinical studies show structural damage in patients with a history of VF or sustained arrhythmias.

Temporal Concordance:

Cardiomyopathy develops over weeks to months following recurrent VF.

Reproducibility:

Observed in both animal models and human studies of arrhythmic cardiomyopathy.

Known Modulating Factors

Modulating factors (MFs) may alter the shape of the response-response function that describes the quantitative relationship between two KES, thus having an impact on the progression of the pathway or the severity of the AO.The evidence supporting the influence of various modulating factors is assembled within the individual KERs. More help
Modulating Factor (MF) Influence or Outcome KER(s) involved

Biological Modulating Factors

Genetic Variants:

Mutations in CACNA1C (LTCC α1-subunit) associated with Timothy Syndrome, predispose individuals to QT prolongation and arrhythmias.

Variations in potassium channels (e.g., KCNQ1, HERG) amplify the effects of LTCC dysfunction.

Age:

Neonates and elderly individuals are more susceptible to arrhythmias due to immature or aging cardiac conduction systems.

Sex:

Females have a higher risk of QT prolongation and TdP, influenced by hormonal modulation of repolarization currents.

Pre-existing Conditions:

Diseases like heart failure, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, or ischemic heart disease increase the likelihood of arrhythmias.

Chemical Modulating Factors

Drugs:

QT-prolonging drugs (e.g., sotalol, dofetilide, amiodarone) exacerbate LTCC dysfunction-induced arrhythmias.

LTCC blockers (e.g., verapamil, diltiazem) can mitigate or exacerbate arrhythmogenic risk depending on dose.

Primary Adverse Outcomes

Ventricular Fibrillation (VF):

Sustained TdP degenerates into VF, characterized by chaotic electrical activity and ineffective cardiac contraction, leading to sudden cardiac death if untreated.

Cardiomyopathy:

Chronic structural damage caused by recurrent VF episodes or sustained electrical instability results in myocardial remodeling, fibrosis, and reduced cardiac output.

MIE: Dysfunction of L-Type Calcium Channels

Impaired calcium influx (ICa,L) during the plateau phase of the action potential.

Measurement: Patch-clamp electrophysiology to quantify ICa,L reduction.

KE2: Altered Action Potential Duration (APD)

Prolonged action potential repolarization (APD90) due to decreased inward calcium currents and unopposed potassium efflux.

Measurement: Patch-clamp recordings in cardiomyocytes.

KE3: QT Interval Prolongation

Prolonged ventricular repolarization as reflected by an increased QT interval on ECG.

Measurement: ECG-derived QT and QTc intervals.

KE4: Torsades de Pointes (TdP)

Polymorphic ventricular tachycardia resulting from early afterdepolarizations (EADs) and repolarization heterogeneity.

Measurement: ECG with characteristic twisting QRS complexes around the isoelectric line.

KE5: Ventricular Fibrillation (VF)

Sustained, chaotic electrical activity in the ventricles, leading to loss of effective contraction.

Measurement: ECG with rapid, irregular, and uncoordinated waveforms.

AO: Cardiomyopathy

Structural remodeling and functional impairment of the myocardium caused by repeated arrhythmic episodes.

Measurement: Echocardiography, MRI, or histological analysis

Quantitative Understanding

Optional field to provide quantitative weight of evidence descriptors.  More help

Thresholds:

QTc > 500 ms significantly increases the risk of TdP.

Reductions in ICa,L > 20% are linked to APD prolongation and arrhythmogenesis.

Dose-Response Relationships:

QT prolongation, TdP frequency, and VF incidence increase with greater LTCC dysfunction or drug concentrations.

Quantitative relationships between APD prolongation and QT interval changes are well-defined in computational and experimental models.

Mathematical Models:

Computational models simulate the relationship between ICa,L reductions, APD prolongation, and arrhythmic risks, supporting predictive toxicology.

Susceptible Populations:

Need for more data on genetic predispositions (e.g., CACNA1C mutations) and age-/sex-related differences in susceptibility.

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)

Addressess potential applications of an AOP to support regulatory decision-making.This may include, for example, possible utility for test guideline development or refinement, development of integrated testing and assessment approaches, development of (Q)SARs / or chemical profilers to facilitate the grouping of chemicals for subsequent read-across, screening level hazard assessments or even risk assessment. More help

The evidence assessment for this AOP demonstrates strong biological plausibility and empirical support for the progression from LTCC dysfunction to cardiomyopathy via QT prolongation and TdP. Quantitative understanding of the dose-response and temporal relationships supports its predictive value in regulatory toxicology and risk assessment. Addressing identified evidence gaps will further enhance the robustness and applicability of this AOP.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this AOP. More help

Catterall WA (2011). Voltage-gated calcium channels. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology, 3(8), a003947. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a003947

Splawski I, et al. (2004). CaV1.2 calcium channel dysfunction causes a multisystem disorder including arrhythmia and autism. Cell, 119(1), 19–31. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.09.011

Zhou Q, et al. (2009). Mechanisms of cardiac arrhythmias associated with long QT syndrome. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 119(11), 2757–2772. DOI: 10.1172/JCI38082

Morad M, et al. (1988). Role of calcium channels in cardiac action potential plateau. Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, 20(10), 1081–1091. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2828(88)90531-5

De Ferrari GM, et al. (1995). Role of calcium channels in action potential prolongation: Effects of verapamil. Circulation Research, 76(5), 790–796. DOI: 10.1161/01.RES.76.5.790

Roden DM (2004). Drug-induced prolongation of the QT interval. New England Journal of Medicine, 350(10), 1013–1022. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMra032426

Antzelevitch C, et al. (2007). Early afterdepolarizations and the role of calcium channels in arrhythmogenesis. Heart Rhythm, 4(3), 299–301. DOI: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.11.012

Shah RR (2005). The significance of QT interval prolongation in drug development. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 60(4), 377–392. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2005.02362.x

Abi-Gerges N, et al. (2010). The role of QT interval prolongation in arrhythmogenicity. Journal of Pharmacological and Toxicological Methods, 61(1), 15–25. DOI: 10.1016/j.vascn.2009.12.004

Heist EK, et al. (2005). Torsades de Pointes and its progression to ventricular fibrillation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 45(1), 115–118. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.08.048

Volders PG, et al. (2000). Repolarization heterogeneity as a substrate for TdP and VF. Circulation, 102(6), 672–678. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.6.672

Nerbonne JM, Kass RS. (2005). Molecular physiology of cardiac repolarization: Insights into arrhythmogenesis. Nature Reviews Cardiology, 6(12), 975–985. DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1022

Tse G, et al. (2016). Mechanisms of electrical remodeling and arrhythmogenesis in cardiomyopathy. Frontiers in Physiology, 7, 105. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2016.00105

Viskin S, et al. (2000). Gender differences in the risk of drug-induced long QT syndrome. Circulation, 102(20), 2449–2453. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.102.20.2449

Surawicz B. (1989). Role of electrolyte imbalances in QT prolongation. American Heart Journal, 118(3), 687–692. DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90617-8

Abi-Gerges N, et al. (2004). Stress and adrenergic modulation in arrhythmogenesis. European Journal of Pharmacology, 486(1–2), 63–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.01.030