This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 128

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Agonism, Estrogen receptor leads to Increase, Vitellogenin synthesis in liver

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Estrogen receptor agonism leading to reproductive dysfunction adjacent High Undefined (send email) Under Development: Contributions and Comments Welcome
Estrogen receptor agonism leading to reduced survival and population growth due to renal failure adjacent High Low Camille Baettig (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite
Estrogen receptor agonism leads to reduced fecundity via increased vitellogenin in the liver adjacent Jason M. O'Brien (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
zebrafish Danio rerio High NCBI
fathead minnow Pimephales promelas High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

Original text - unknown contributor

High degree of plausibility in fathead minnow, zebrafish and other cyprinid species.

Added by C. Baettig June 24, 2024

In egg laying vertebrates such as fish vitellogenin (VTG) synthesis occurs in the female liver after activation of estrogen receptors (ERs), including ERα and ERβ isoforms, by endogenous steroids and a variety of exogenous chemicals that bind to ERs (e.g., Brock & Shapiro, 1983; Denslow et al., 1999; Miracle et al., 2006). In mature female fish VTG is incorporated into growing oocytes by the ovary and is converted into yolk protein. However, neither adult male fish nor juvenile fish normally produce VTG, but the hepatic ER is present in males, as are the genes that encode for vtg expression and can therefore be induced by exogenous compounds (Heppell et al., 1995).

Agonism of the ER is expected to increase vtg transcription and translation and under high estrogen stimulation the fold increase of vtg transcripts increases by orders of magnitude (Brock & Shapiro, 1983). As such, induction of VTG levels in male fish has been used extensively as a biomarker of estrogen exposure (Wheeler et al., 2005).

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Original text - unknown contributor

There are generally few inconsistencies for experimental studies using model fish species dervied from pathogen-free laboratory cultures. However, there can some uncertainties where wild fish have been used for experimental purposes.

Added by C. Baettig June 24, 2024

  • Some uncertainty remains regarding which ER subtypes regulate vtg gene expression in the liver of fish. In general, the literature suggests a close interplay between ER subtypes, primarily ERα and Erβ, in the regulation of vitellogenesis. Consequently, at present, the key event relationship is generalized to impacts on all ER subtypes, even though it remains possible that impacts on a particular sub-type may drive the effect on vitellogenin transcription and translation.
  • Using selective agonists and antagonists for ERα and ERβ, it was concluded that ERβ was primarily responsible for inducing vitellogenin production in rainbow trout and that compounds exhibiting ERα selectivity would not be detected using a vitellogenin ELISA bioassay (Leaños-Castañeda & Van Der Kraak, 2007). However, a subsequent study conducted in tilapia concluded that agonistic and antagonistic characteristics of mammalian, isoform-specific ER agonists and antagonists, cannot be reliably extrapolated to piscine ERs (Davis et al., 2010).
  • Based on RNA interference knock-down experiments Nelson and Habibi (2010) proposed a model in which all ER subtypes are involved in E2-mediated vitellogenesis, with ERβ isoforms stimulating expression of both vitellogenin and ERα gene expression, and ERα helping to drive vitellogenesis, particularly as it becomes more abundant following sensitization.

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help
Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Taxonomic applicability: Oviparous vertebrates.

Life stage: This KER is applicable to all life stages following the differentiation of the liver. Larvae prior to liver differentiation should not be included.

Sex: This KER is applicable to both sexes.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Navas, J.M., Segner, H. (2006) Vitellogenin synthesis in primary cultures of fish liver cells as endpoint for in vitro screening of the (anti)estrogenic activity of chemical substances. Aquatic Toxicology 80: 1-22

Thorpe, K.L., Benstead, R., Hutchinson, T.H., Tyler, C.R. (2007). Associations between altered vitellogenin concentrations and adverse health effects in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). Aquatic Toxicology 85: 176-183

  • Brock, M. L., & Shapiro, D. (1983). Estrogen regulates the absolute rate of transcription of the Xenopus laevis vitellogenin genes. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 258(9), 5449-5455.
  • Davis, L., Katsu, Y., Iguchi, T., Lerner, D., Hirano, T., & Grau, E. (2010). Transcriptional activity and biological effects of mammalian estrogen receptor ligands on three hepatic estrogen receptors in Mozambique tilapia. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology, 122(4), 272-278.
  • Denslow, N. D., Chow, M. C., Kroll, K. J., & Green, L. (1999). Vitellogenin as a biomarker of exposure for estrogen or estrogen mimics. Ecotoxicology, 8, 385-398.
  • Hornung, M. W., Jensen, K. M., Korte, J. J., Kahl, M. D., Durhan, E. J., Denny, J. S., Henry, T. R., & Ankley, G. T. (2004). Mechanistic basis for estrogenic effects in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) following exposure to the androgen 17α-methyltestosterone: conversion of 17α-methyltestosterone to 17α-methylestradiol. Aquatic Toxicology, 66(1), 15-23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2003.06.004
  • Leaños-Castañeda, O., & Van Der Kraak, G. (2007). Functional characterization of estrogen receptor subtypes, ERα and ERβ, mediating vitellogenin production in the liver of rainbow trout. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 224(2), 116-125.
  • Matozzo, V., Gagné, F., Marin, M. G., Ricciardi, F., & Blaise, C. (2008). Vitellogenin as a biomarker of exposure to estrogenic compounds in aquatic invertebrates: A review. Environment International, 34(4), 531-545. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.09.008
  • Miracle, A., Ankley, G., & Lattier, D. (2006). Expression of two vitellogenin genes (vg1 and vg3) in fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas) liver in response to exposure to steroidal estrogens and androgens. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 63(3), 337-342.
  • Molina-Molina, J.-M., Escande, A., Pillon, A., Gomez, E., Pakdel, F., Cavaillès, V., Olea, N., Aït-Aïssa, S., & Balaguer, P. (2008). Profiling of benzophenone derivatives using fish and human estrogen receptor-specific in vitro bioassays. Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 232(3), 384-395.
  • Nelson, E. R., & Habibi, H. R. (2010). Functional Significance of Nuclear Estrogen Receptor Subtypes in the Liver of Goldfish. Endocrinology, 151(4), 1668-1676. https://doi.org/10.1210/en.2009-1447
  • Palmer, B. D., & Selcer, K. W. (1996). Vitellogenin as a biomarker for xenobiotic estrogens: a review. Environmental Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Biomarkers and Risk Assessment: Fifth Volume, 3-22.
  • Shen, C., Zhu, K., Ruan, J., Li, J., Wang, Y., Zhao, M., He, C., & Zuo, Z. (2021). Screening of potential oestrogen receptor α agonists in pesticides via in silico, in vitro and in vivo methods. Environmental Pollution, 270, 116015.
  • Tollefsen, K.-E., Mathisen, R., & Stenersen, J. (2003). Induction of vitellogenin synthesis in an Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) hepatocyte culture: a sensitive in vitro bioassay for the oestrogenic and anti-oestrogenic activity of chemicals. Biomarkers, 8(5), 394-407.
  • Verderame, M., & Scudiero, R. (2017). Estrogen-dependent, extrahepatic synthesis of vitellogenin in male vertebrates: A mini-review. Comptes Rendus Biologies, 340(3), 139-144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crvi.2017.01.005
  • Wheeler, J. R., Gimeno, S., Crane, M., Lopez-Juez, E., & Morritt, D. (2005). Vitellogenin: a review of analytical methods to detect (anti) estrogenic activity in fish. Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods, 15(4), 293-306.
  • Xu, Y., Feng, R., Wang, L., Dong, L., Liu, R., Lu, H., & Wang, C. (2020). Computational and experimental investigations on the interactions of aryloxy-phenoxy-propionate herbicides to estrogen receptor alpha in zebrafish. Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 189, 110003.