This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 2878

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Depletion, GSH leads to Increased, Reactive oxygen species

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Glutathione conjugation leading to reproductive dysfunction via oxidative stress adjacent High High Leonardo Vieira (send email) Under Development: Contributions and Comments Welcome

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
fish fish High NCBI
mammals mammals High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help
Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

Biological plausibility for GSH depletion leading to ROS increase is rooted in the fact that this antioxidant is crucial to eliminate these reactive molecules from cells. When GSH is depleted from cytosol and mitochondria, there is an exaggerated accumulation of ROS, produced, mainly, by electron transport chain.

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Modulating Factor (MF) MF Specification Effect(s) on the KER Reference(s)
antioxidant vitamin E restores the activity of antioxidant enzymes Singh, Sandhir, and Kiran 2010
Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help

Drop in GSH levels and increase in ROS generation changes cellular redox potential, which can be calculated by the Nernst equation (Han et al. 2006): 

where Ecell is cell electrochemical voltage, Eo is the electromotive force, R is molar gas constant, T is the temperature in Kelvin, F is the Faraday constant, n is the number of electrons transferred in the reaction, and Q is [GSH]2/[GSSG].

If GSH levels drop until a certain threshold (~30 - 40% of depletion) in mitochondria, there is an excessive H2O2 release in cells (Han et al. 2006) and, hence, ROS exacerbation.

Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help

For HT22 cells exposed to 50 µM BSO (for 10 h), ROS production occurs in two phases: an initial slow increase for the first 6 h, followed by a much higher rate. The latter high rate of increase in ROS only starts after the cellular GSH levels drop to nearly zero (Tan et al. 1998).

Moreover, isolated rat hepatocyte suspensions exposed to DEM (0.5, 1, 2.5 and 5 mM) for 5 h reach maximum levels of GSH depletion after 1 h of exposure (Tirmenstein et al. 2000), whereas the maximum increase in ROS levels is observed only after four hours at the two highest concentrations of each depleter.

GSH has its levels reduced by more than 95% in PW cells after around 8 h of exposure to BSO and reacher maximum depletion level at 48 h, when  mitochondrial GSH supplies become undetectable as well, whereas ROS levels undergo a slight increase only 24 h post-exposure and reaches maximum values after 60 h of treatment (Armstrong et al. 2002).

Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

Considering the empirical domain of the evidence, the GSH depletion leading to increased, reactive oxygen species is known to occur in fish and mammals, but, based on scientific reasoning, the biologically plausible domain of applicability can be eukaryotic organisms in general. It can be measured at any stage of life and in both male and female species.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Tirmenstein, M. A., F. A. Nicholls-Grzemski, J. G. Zhang, and M. W. Fariss. 2000. “Glutathione Depletion and the Production of Reactive Oxygen Species in Isolated Hepatocyte Suspensions.” Chemico-Biological Interactions 127 (3): 201–17.

Abarikwu, Sunny O., Ebenezer O. Farombi, Mahendra P. Kashyap, and Aditya B. Pant. 2011. “Kolaviron Protects Apoptotic Cell Death in PC12 Cells Exposed to Atrazine.” Free Radical Research 45 (9): 1061–73.

Gao, Shuying, Zhichun Wang, Chonghua Zhang, Liming Jia, and Yang Zhang. 2016. “Oral Exposure to Atrazine Induces Oxidative Stress and Calcium Homeostasis Disruption in Spleen of Mice.” Oxidative Medicine and Cellular Longevity 2016 (November): 7978219.

Adeyemi, Joseph A., Airton da Cunha Martins-Junior, and Fernando Barbosa Jr. 2015. “Teratogenicity, Genotoxicity and Oxidative Stress in Zebrafish Embryos (Danio Rerio) Co-Exposed to Arsenic and Atrazine.” Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Toxicology & Pharmacology: CBP 172-173 (April): 7–12.

Park, Eun-Jung, and Kwangsik Park. 2007. “Induction of Reactive Oxygen Species and Apoptosis in BEAS-2B Cells by Mercuric Chloride.” Toxicology in Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA 21 (5): 789–94.

Tan, S., Y. Sagara, Y. Liu, P. Maher, and D. Schubert. 1998. “The Regulation of Reactive Oxygen Species Production during Programmed Cell Death.” The Journal of Cell Biology 141 (6): 1423–32.

Armstrong, J. S., K. K. Steinauer, B. Hornung, J. M. Irish, P. Lecane, G. W. Birrell, D. M. Peehl, and S. J. Knox. 2002. “Role of Glutathione Depletion and Reactive Oxygen Species Generation in Apoptotic Signaling in a Human B Lymphoma Cell Line.” Cell Death & Differentiation. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.cdd.4400959.

Ford, Rebecca J., Drew A. Graham, Steven G. Denniss, Joe Quadrilatero, and James W. E. Rush. 2006. “Glutathione Depletion in Vivo Enhances Contraction and Attenuates Endothelium-Dependent Relaxation of Isolated Rat Aorta.” Free Radical Biology & Medicine 40 (4): 670–78.

Trachootham, Dunyaporn, Weiqin Lu, Marcia A. Ogasawara, Rivera-Del Valle Nilsa, and Peng Huang. 2008. “Redox Regulation of Cell Survival.” Antioxidants & Redox Signaling 10 (8): 1343–74.

Han, Derick, Naoko Hanawa, Behnam Saberi, and Neil Kaplowitz. 2006. “Mechanisms of Liver Injury. III. Role of Glutathione Redox Status in Liver Injury.” American Journal of Physiology. Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology 291 (1): G1–7.

Singh, Mohan, Rajat Sandhir, and Ravi Kiran. 2010. “Oxidative Stress Induced by Atrazine in Rat Erythrocytes: Mitigating Effect of Vitamin E.” Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods 20 (3): 119–26.