Key Event Title
|Level of Biological Organization|
Key Event Components
|enzyme inhibitor activity||histone deacetylase 1||decreased|
Key Event Overview
AOPs Including This Key Event
|AOP Name||Role of event in AOP|
|Histone deacetylase inhibition leading to testicular atrophy||MolecularInitiatingEvent|
|HDAC inhibition leads to impeded craniofacial development||MolecularInitiatingEvent|
|HDAC inhibition leads to neural tube defects||MolecularInitiatingEvent|
|Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid|
|All life stages||Moderate|
Key Event Description
Nucleosomes consist of eight core histones, two of each histone H2A, H2B, H3 and H4 [Damaskos et al., 2017]. DNA strands (about 200 bp) wind around the core histones, which can be modified on their N-terminal ends. One possible modification is the acetylation of lysine residues, which decreases the binding strength between DNA and the core histone. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) hydrolyze the acetyl residues [Damaskos et al., 2017]. HDACs remove the acetyl groups from the lysine residues leading to the formation of a condensed and transcriptionally silenced chromatin. Thus, the inhibition of HDAC blocks this action and can result in hyperacetylation of histones associated mostly with increases in transcriptional activation. Histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDI) inhibits HDAC, causing increased acetylation of the histones and thereby facilitating binding of transcription factors [Taunton et al., 1996].
It is known that eukaryotic HDAC isoforms are classified into four classes: class I HDACs (isoforms 1, 2, 3, 8), class II HDACs (isoforms 4, 5, 6, 7, 9, 10), class III HDACs (the sirtuins), and HDAC11 [Gregoretti et al., 2004; Weichert, 2009; Barneda-Zahonero and Parra, 2012]. HDACs 1, 2 and 3 are ubiquitously expressed, whereas HDAC8 is predominantly expressed in cells with smooth muscle/myoepithelial differentiation [Weichert, 2009]. HDAC6 is not observed to be expressed in lymphocytes, stromal cells and vascular endothelial cells [Weichert, 2009]. Class III HDACs, sirtuins, are widely expressed and localized in different cellular compartments [Barneda-Zahonero and Parra, 2012]. SirT1 is highly expressed in testis, thymus and multiple types of germ cells [Bell et al., 2014]. HDAC11 expression is enriched in kidney, brain, testis, heart and skeletal muscle [Barneda-Zahonero and Parra, 2012]. The members of groups 1,2 and 4 are dependent on a zinc ion and a water molecule at their active sites, for their deacetylase function. The Sirtuins of class 3 depend on NAD+, and are considered impervious to most known HDAC inhibitors [Drummond et al., 2005].
Several structurally distinct groups of compounds have been found to inhibit HDACs of class 1, 2 and 4, among others short-chain fatty acids (e.g. butyrate and VPA), hydroxamic acids (e.g. TSA and SAHA) and epoxyketones (e.g. Trapoxin) [Drummond et al., 2005]. The hydroxamic acids seem to exert their inhibitory action by mimicking the acetyl-lysine target of HDACs, chelating the zinc ion in the active site and displacing the water molecule [Finnin et al., 1999]. Several recent high resolution crystal structures support this mode of inhibition [Decroos et al., 2015; Luckhurst et al., 2016]. The mode of inhibition of epoxyketones seems to function the formation of a stable transition state analog with the zinc ion in the active site [Porter and Christianson, 2017]. The inhibitory actions of the short-chain fatty acids are less well defined, but it has been speculated that VPA blocks access to the binding pocket [Göttlicher et al., 2001]. It has been shown that VPA exert similar gene regulatory effects to TSA, on a panel of migration related transcripts in neural crest cells [Dreser et al., 2015] supporting a mode of action similar to hydroxamic acid type HDAC inhibitors.
How It Is Measured or Detected
The measurement of HDAC inhibition monitors changes in histone acetylation. HDAC inhibition can be detected directly by the measurement of HDAC activity using commercially available colorimetric or fluorimetric kits or indirectly by increase of histone acetylation as the detection of global histone acetylation changes by Western blot or mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomic methods or as detection of site-specific histone acetylation changes using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) or ChIP-on-Chip. The measurement methods include the immunological detection of histone acetylation with anti-acetylated histone antibodies [Richon et al., 2004]. The histones are isolated from pellets of cells treated with HDIs, followed by acid-urea-triton gel electrophoresis, western blotting, and immunohistochemistry [Richon et al., 2003]. The HDAC activity is measured directly with ultra high performance liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS) by calculating the ratio of deacetylated peptide and acetylated peptide [Zwick et al., 2016]. ome in silico methods including molecular modelling, virtual screening and molecular dynamics are used to find the common HDAC inhibitor structures [Huang et al., 2016; Yanuar et al. 2016].
Domain of Applicability
The inhibition of HDAC by HDIs is well conserved between species from lower organism to mammals.
- HDAC inhibition restores the rate of resorption of subretinal blebs in hyper glycemia in brown Norway rat and HDAC activity was inhibited with HDIs in human ARPE19 cells [Desjardins et al., 2016].
- Treatment of HDIs inducing HDAC inhibition showed anti-tumor effects in human non-small cell lung cancer cells [Ansari et al., 2016; Miyanaga et al., 2008].
- HDAC acetylation level was increased by HDIs in MRL-lpr/lpr murine model of lupus splenocytes [Mishra et al., 2003].
- SAHA increased histone acetylation in brain and spleen of mice [Hockly et al., 2003].
- MAA inhibits HDAC activity in HeLa cells and spleens from C57BL/6 mice [Jansen et al., 2004].
- It is also reported that MAA inhibits HDAC activity in testis cytosolic and nuclear extract of juvenile rats (27 days old) [Wade et al., 2008].
- VPA and TSA inhibit HDAC enzymatic activity in mouse embryo and human HeLa cell nuclear extract [Di Renzo et al., 2007].
- The treatment with HDAC inhibitors, phenylbutyrate (PB) (2 mM) and TSA (200 nM), inhibits HDAC in adjuvant arthritis synovial cells derived from rats, causing higher acetylated histone [Chung et al., 2003].
Evidence for Perturbation by Stressor
Overview for Molecular Initiating Event
HDIs are classified according to chemical nature and mode of mechanism: the short chain fatty acids (e.g., butyrate, valproate), hydroxamic acids (e.g., suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid or SAHA, Trichostatin A or TSA), cyclic tetrapeptides (e.g., FK-228), benzamides (e.g., N-acetyldinaline and MS-275) and epoxides (depeudecin, trapoxin A) [Richon et al., 2003; Ropero and Esteller, 2007; Villar-Garea et al., 2004]. There is a report showing that TSA and butyrate competitively inhibits HDAC activity [Sekhavat et al., 2007]. HDIs inhibit preferentially HDACs with some selectiveness [Hu et al., 2003]. TSA inhibits HDAC1, HDAC3 and HDAC8, whereas MS-27-275 has inhibitory effect for HDAC1 and HDAC3 (IC50 value of ~0.2 mM and ~8 mM, respectively), but no effect for HDAC8 (IC50 value >10 mM) [Hu et al., 2003]. TSA inhibits HDAC1, 2, 3 of class I HDACs. [Damaskos et al., 2016].
Ansari, J. et al. (2016), "Epigenetics in non-small cell lung cancer: from basics to therapeutics", Transl Lung Cancer Res 5:155-171
Barneda-Zahonero, B. and Parra, M. (2012), "Histone deacetylases and cancer", Mol Oncol 6:579-589
Bell, E.L. et al. (2014), "SirT1 is required in the male germ cell for differentiation and fecundity in mice", Development 141:3495-3504
Chung, Y.L. et al. (2003), "A therapeutic strategy uses histone deacetylase inhibitors to modulate the expression of genes involved in the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis", Mol Ther 8:707-717
Damaskos, C. et al. (2016), "Histone deacetylase inhibitors: a novel therapeutic weapon against medullary thyroid cancer?", Anticancer Res 36:5019-5024
Damaskos, C. et al. (2017), "Histone deacetylase inhibitors: an attractive therapeutic strategy against breast cancer", Anticancer Research 37: 35-46.
Decroos, C. et al. (2015), "Biochemical and structural characterization of HDAC8 mutants associated with cornelia de lange syndrome spectrum disorders", Biochemistry 54: 6501–6513.
Desjardins, D. et al. (2016), "Histone deacetylase inhibition restores retinal pigment epithelium function in hyperglycemia", PLoS ONE 11: e0162596
Di Renzo, F. et al. (2007), "Boric acid inhibits embryonic histone deacetylases: A suggested mechanism to explain boric acid-related teratogenicity", Toxicol and Appl Pharmacol 220:178-185
Dreser, N. et al. (2015), "Grouping of histone deacetylase inhibitors and other toxicants disturbing neural crest migration by transcriptional profiling", Neurotoxicology 50: 56–70
Drummond, D.C. et al. (2005), "Clinical development of histone deacetylase inhibitors as anticancer agents", Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 45: 495–528
Finnin, M.S. et al. (1999), "Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors", Nature 401: 188–193
Göttlicher, M. et al. (2001), "Valproic acid defines a novel class of HDAC inhibitors inducing differentiation of transformed cells", EMBO J 20: 6969–6978
Gregoretti, I.V. et al. (2004), "Molecular evolution of the histone deacetylase family: functional implications of phylogenetic analysis", J Mol Biol 338: 17–31
Hockly, E. et al. (2003), "Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, ameliorates motor deficits in a mouse model of Huntington’s disease", Proc Nat Acad Sci 100:2041-2046
Hu, E. et al. (2003), "Identification of novel isoform-selective inhibitors within class I histone deacetylases", J Pharmacol Exp Ther 307:720-728
Huang, Y.X. et al. (2016), "Virtual screening and experimental validation of novel histone deacetylase inhibitors", BMC Pharmacol Toxicol 17(1):32
Jansen, M.S. et al. (2014), "Short-chain fatty acids enhance nuclear receptor activity through mitogen-activated protein kinase activation and histone deacetylase inhibition", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101(18):7199-7204
Luckhurst, C.A. et al. (2016), "Potent, Selective, and CNS-Penetrant Tetrasubstituted Cyclopropane Class IIa Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors", ACS Med Chem Lett 7:34–39
Mishra, N. et al. (2003), "Histone deacetylase inhibitors modulate renal disease in the MRL-lpr/lpr mouse", J Clin Invest 111:539-552
Miyanaga, A. et al. (2008), "Antitumor activity of histone deacetylase inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer cells: development of a molecular predictive model", Mol Cancer Ther 7:1923-1930
Porter, N.J., and Christianson, D.W. (2017), "Binding of the microbial cyclic tetrapeptide trapoxin A to the Class I histone deacetylase HDAC8", ACS Chem Biol 12:2281–2286
Richon, V.M. et al. (2003), "Histone deacetylase inhibitors: assays to assess effectiveness in vitro and in vivo", Methods Enzymol. 376:199-205
Ropero, S. and Esteller, M. (2007), "The role of histone deacetylases (HDACs) in human cancer", Mol Oncol 1:19-25
Sekhavat, A. et al. (2007), "Competitive inhibition of histone deacetylase activity by trichostatin A and butyrate", Biochemistry and Cell Biology 85:751-758
Taunton, J. et al. (1996), "A mammalian histone deacetylase related to the Yeast transcriptional regulator Rpd3p", Science 272:408-411
Villar-Garea, A. and Esteller, M. (2004), "Histone deacetylase inhibitors: understanding a new wave of anticancer agents", Int J Cancer 112:171-178
Wade, M.G. et al. (2008), "Methoxyacetic acid-induced spermatocyte death is associated with histone hyperacetylation in rats", Biol Reprod 78:822-831
Weichert, W. (2009) "HDAC expression and clinical prognosis in human malignancies", Cancer Letters 280:168-176
Yanuar, A. et al. (2016), "In silico approach to finding new active compounds from histone deacetylase (HDAC) family", Curr Pharm Des 22: 3488-3497
Zwick, V. et al. (2016), "Cell-based multi-substrate assay coupled to UHPLC-ESI-MS/MS for a quick identification of class-specific HDAC inhibitors", J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem 31: 209-214