This Key Event Relationship is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.

Relationship: 3801

Title

A descriptive phrase which clearly defines the two KEs being considered and the sequential relationship between them (i.e., which is upstream, and which is downstream). More help

Increase, DNA strand breaks leads to Apoptosis

Upstream event
The causing Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help
Downstream event
The responding Key Event (KE) in a Key Event Relationship (KER). More help

Key Event Relationship Overview

The utility of AOPs for regulatory application is defined, to a large extent, by the confidence and precision with which they facilitate extrapolation of data measured at low levels of biological organisation to predicted outcomes at higher levels of organisation and the extent to which they can link biological effect measurements to their specific causes.Within the AOP framework, the predictive relationships that facilitate extrapolation are represented by the KERs. Consequently, the overall WoE for an AOP is a reflection in part, of the level of confidence in the underlying series of KERs it encompasses. Therefore, describing the KERs in an AOP involves assembling and organising the types of information and evidence that defines the scientific basis for inferring the probable change in, or state of, a downstream KE from the known or measured state of an upstream KE. More help

AOPs Referencing Relationship

AOP Name Adjacency Weight of Evidence Quantitative Understanding Point of Contact Author Status OECD Status
Alkylation of DNA leading to decreased sperm count adjacent High Moderate Carole Yauk (send email) Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite

Taxonomic Applicability

Latin or common names of a species or broader taxonomic grouping (e.g., class, order, family) that help to define the biological applicability domain of the KER.In general, this will be dictated by the more restrictive of the two KEs being linked together by the KER.  More help
Term Scientific Term Evidence Link
human and other cells in culture human and other cells in culture High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI

Sex Applicability

An indication of the the relevant sex for this KER. More help
Sex Evidence
Unspecific High

Life Stage Applicability

An indication of the the relevant life stage(s) for this KER.  More help
Term Evidence
All life stages High

Key Event Relationship Description

Provides a concise overview of the information given below as well as addressing details that aren’t inherent in the description of the KEs themselves. More help

DNA strand breaks activate a series of DNA damage response (DDR) pathways that together determine whether damaged cells go through cell cycle arrest, repair, or cell death. When the levels of DNA damage exceed the DNA repair capacity, DDR signaling shifts the cellular response toward elimination of damaged cells by various forms of cell death. Thus, DNA strand breaks are potent inducers of programmed cell death (i.e., apoptosis) when damage is irreparable or sustained.

Evidence Collection Strategy

Include a description of the approach for identification and assembly of the evidence base for the KER. For evidence identification, include, for example, a description of the sources and dates of information consulted including expert knowledge, databases searched and associated search terms/strings.  Include also a description of study screening criteria and methodology, study quality assessment considerations, the data extraction strategy and links to any repositories/databases of relevant references.Tabular summaries and links to relevant supporting documentation are encouraged, wherever possible. More help

Evidence Supporting this KER

Addresses the scientific evidence supporting KERs in an AOP setting the stage for overall assessment of the AOP. More help

The empirical support for this KER is strong based on a large body of literature connecting DNA strand breaks and the induction of apoptosis. Both SSBs and DSBs are frequently associated with increased apoptosis in a dose-concordant manner in somatic and germ cells, as well as animal models (Roos and Kaina, 2006). This concordance has been observed following exposures to many DNA-damaging agents; select examples in different tissues and models are provided below.

Evidence in vivo (exposure)

Saha et al. (2014) demonstrated clear temporal and dose concordance between DSB formation and apoptosis in the embryonic mouse brain. Mice were exposed in utero to acute doses of 10, 25, 50, 100 or 200 mGy X-rays, and embryo brains were examined 1 hour or 6 hour later. The number of 53BP1 foci per cell was quantified as a marker of DSB induction, while TUNEL staining (Terminal deoxynucleotidyl UTP Nick End Labeling) was used to monitor apoptosis. Significant increases in 53BP1 foci formation (at 1 hour) and TUNEL+ apoptotic cells (at 6 hours) were observed starting at 10 mGy, indicating that the two KEs occur within the same dose range and that DSBs occur earlier than apoptosis. At 6 hours post-irradiation, while the number of 53BP1 foci at lower doses remained relatively unchanged, it was reduced at50 mGy and returned to the control level at 100 mGy, indicating efficient repair. Despite this apparent resolution of DNA damage, apoptosis continued to increase in a dose-dependent manner, suggesting that even low and transient DSBs are sufficient to induce apoptosis in this sensitive tissue (Saha et al., 2014).

Acetaminophen (200 mg/kg) induces DNA fragmentation and apoptosis in hepatocytes after intraperitoneal administration in mice (Bajt et al., 2011). Liver cells collected from exposed mice showed the release of histone-associated DNA fragments, mitochondrial pro-apoptotic proteins (apoptosis-inducing factor AIF, Smac, endonuclease G, and cytochrome c) into the cytosol at 6 hours post-treatment, accompanied by increased TUNEL+ staining at both 6 and 24 hours. This study also demonstrates the essentiality of mitochondrial pathways through the use of AIF-deficient mice. When treated with acetaminophen, these mice showed a marked reduction in presence of DNA strand breaks (TUNEL assay), % DNA fragmentation, and the expression of apoptotic markers compared to wild-type counterparts. This indicates that AIF is a necessary mediator of DNA fragmentation and apoptosis (Bajt et al., 2011). However, detection of DNA fragments does not allow discrimination between upstream DNA damage and downstream apoptotic DNA fragmentation (see Uncertainties and Inconsistencies). As only a single dose and timepoint were assessed for most markers, the data primarily support co-occurrence.

Evidence in vivo (genetic manipulation)

Using Nestin-Cre mice, Rodrigues et al. (2013) showed that deletion of Nibrin (Nbn, a key sensor of DSBs) and Atm kinase in neural stem/progenitor cells led to DSB accumulation (γH2AX+ cells, p53 stabilization) and concordantly enhanced apoptosis (TUNEL+ cells and cleaved caspase-3 staining) in specific regions of the developing brain (cerebellum, ganglionic eminences) and eye (lens) on embryonic days E15.5 and E17.5. The incidence of γH2AX+ cells (~6,000 to 10,000 cells/mm2) was consistently higher than that of TUNEL+ cells (~250 to 800 cells/mm2) and caspase-3+ cells (~200 to 800 cells/mm2) in the embryonic brains (Figure 1). A similar pattern was observed in eye lens and retina, supporting incidence concordance. Greater impairment of DDR signaling (Nbn/AtmNes-Cre double deletion) induced more DSBs and higher apoptosis than Nbn single deletion alone (NbnNes-Cre) (Figure 1). This establishes a graded response-response relationship between DSB formation and apoptosis (Rodrigues et al., 2013). However, in the retina region, apoptosis induced by Nbn deletion was prevented by simultaneous inactivation of ATM, despite the presence of DNA damage. These findings provide direct evidence of essentiality, showing that key signaling pathways downstream of DNA strand breaks are required for the induction of subsequent apoptotic cell death. The observed differences across tissue suggest that these responses are context-dependent and may be mediated by tissue-specific pathways (Rodrigues et al., 2013).

Loss of Apc (adenomatous polyposis coli) in mouse liver tissue led to an early increase in DSBs, as indicated by elevated γH2AX and Rad51 staining at day 4, accompanied by upregulation of DNA damage checkpoint proteins p53 and p21 (Méniel et al., 2015). This was followed by a subsequent increase in apoptotic cells at day 6. Quantitative immunohistochemistry analysis revealed that the incidence of γH2AX-positive and Rad51-positive cells was consistently higher than that of caspase-3-positive apoptotic cells. At day 4, γH2AX-positive cells increased from 0.9% in WT to 26.2% in Apc-deficient mice and 67.1% in Apc/p53 double knockout mice, while Rad51 increased from 2% in WT to 9.9% and 20.7% after genetic manipulation (Figure 2). At the same timepoint, caspase-3-positive cells remained low (~0.36-1.34% across genotypes). A similar pattern was observed at day 6. Additional deletion of p53 further increased markers of DNA damage, indicating that p53 plays an essential role in regulating DSB levels following Apc loss. Together, these findings support incidence concordance and temporal sequence in which DSBs precede activation of checkpoint signaling and subsequent induction of p53-dependent apoptosis.

Xiao et al. (2023) established a myocardial ischemia/reperfusion mouse model to study the role of a long non-coding RNA (cardiac ischemia reperfusion associated Ku70 interacting lncRNA, or CIRKIL) in coronary artery disease. Overexpression of CIRKIL in mouse hearts and 100 μmol/L H2O2-treated mouse cardiomyocytes induced parallel increases in DSBs (γH2AX expression), p53 activation, and apoptotic markers, including the ratio of pro-apoptotic Bax and anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 proteins (Bax/Bcl-2), caspase-3 activity, and TUNEL+ cells. Conversely, knockdown of CIRKIL, as well as single knockout or double knockout of CIRKIL and its partner Ku70, alleviated these myocardial injury and reduced markers of both DNA strand breaks and apoptosis. The consistent bidirectional changes in these endpoints by multiple genetic interventions supports the role of the CIRKIL/Ku70 pathway in linking DNA strand breaks to apoptotic responses, and provides indirect evidence of essentiality (Xiao et al., 2023).

Together, the in vivo evidence provides strong empirical support for temporal concordance between strand breaks and apoptosis. Concurrent changes in both KEs were often observed at the same dose level, supporting qualitative dose concordance. A few studies support incidence concordance. In addition, the data highlight that the progression from DNA strand breaks to apoptosis is influenced by tissue-specific sensitivity and mechanisms, which should be considered when evaluating the applicability of this KER.

Evidence in vitro

Roos et al. (2004) provided important mechanistic evidence linking DNA alkylation, impaired repair, DNA strand breaks, and apoptosis in human lymphocytes. O6-methylguanine (O6-MeG) is a key DNA lesion associated with apoptosis, and its removal is mediated by O6-MeG-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). To prevent repair of O6-MeG, cells were pre-treated with O6-benzylguanine to inactivate MGMT, followed by treatment with O6-MeG-generating agents, N-methyl-N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) or an anticancer drug temozolomide. In MGMT-depleted proliferating lymphocytes, O6-MeG lesions were processed by mismatch repair during DNA replication, leading to the formation of DSBs, as demonstrated by neutral comet assay and γH2AX expression analysis. MNNG (10 or 25 μM) induced DSBs within 3 hours and the level peaked at 24 hours post-exposure. Apoptosis (measured by sub-G1 DNA content analysis or Annexin V/PI staining) was only observed after 24 hours (and persisted up to 96 hours) following MNNG treatment (at multiple concentrations, up to 20 μM), occurring later than DSB formation. Similar effects were induced by temozolomide. Apoptosis was associated with p53 stabilization and upregulation of the Fas receptor, and was significantly reduced (~61%) by treatment with an anti-Fas neutralizing antibody. In contrast, non-proliferating cells showed minimal apoptosis at lower MNNG concentrations (≤ 10 μM), indicating that DNA replication and mismatch repair is required in converting O6-MeG to DSBs. Furthermore, ionizing radiation (5 Gy), which directly induces DSBs, triggered apoptosis in both proliferating and non-proliferating lymphocytes. Together, these data suggest that O6-MeG is converted during DNA replication into DSBs that trigger apoptosis via p53- and Fas-dependent pathways. In addition, MGMT inactivation provides direct evidence of essentiality, as impaired DNA repair enhances the persistence of DNA strand breaks and contributes to apoptosis.

He et al. (2018) studied the effects of loperamide (an antidiarrheal agent) on DNA damage and apoptosis in leukemia cell lines and human primary leukemia cells. Cells exposed to 5, 10, 20 μM loperamide for 24 hours exhibited clear evidence for DNA strand breaks, which were detected by the alkaline comet assay (identifying SSBs and alkali-labile sites) and increased expression of γH2AX. In the same concentration range, a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of apoptotic cells was quantified by Annexin V/7-aminoactinomycin D+ staining and flow cytometry. The induction of apoptosis was further confirmed by increased protein expression of two apoptotic markers, cleaved-caspase-3 and cleaved poly (ADP‑ribose) polymerase (PARP), and decreased expression of an anti‑apoptosis protein Mcl‑1 at 10 μM and 20 μM. Activation of the ATM‑CHK2 pathway following 5‑20 µM loperamide treatment supported the induction of a DDR pathway in leukemia cells. As an example, the effects of loperamide on strand break formation and apoptosis in Molt-4 acute lymphocytic leukemia cells are shown in Figure 3. Similar effects were observed in Thp1 acute myelocytic leukemia cells and primary human leukemia cells (He et al., 2018).

Similarly, exposure to quercetin (40-80 μM) and the positive control paclitaxel (0.45 μM) for 48 hours induced simultaneous strand breaks and apoptosis in MGMT-positive human glioblastoma T98G cells (Wang et al., 2023). DNA strand breaks were assessed using the alkaline and neutral comet assays, and γH2AX staining, capturing both SSBs and DSBs. Apoptosis was assessed by the TUNEL assay, Annexin V-FITC and PI double staining, the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2, and the expression of apoptosis-related proteins, including cleaved caspase-9, cleaved caspase-3, and cleaved PARP. Quercetin (starting at 40 μM) and paclitaxel induced concentration-dependent increases in tail moment (tail length × % tail DNA) in the comet assays and γH2AX expression, indicating DSB formation. At the same concentrations and timepoint, both compounds significantly increased apoptotic cells, accompanied by a higher Bax/Bcl-2 ratio and elevated expression of apoptosis-related markers. Notably, quercetin (≥ 40 μM) also downregulated MGMT expression and activity, suggesting reduced MGMT-mediated DNA repair (Wang et al., 2023). These data support dose and temporalconcordance between DNA strand breaks and apoptosis; the concurrent downregulation of MGMT supports a role of insufficient DNA repair in the accumulation of DNA strand breaks and subsequent apoptosis.

Yauk et al. (2016) studied micronucleus induction and apoptosis in human lymphoblastoid TK6 cells following 4-hour exposures to six genotoxic chemicals: 2-aminoanthracene (0.75-2 μg/mL), acetaminophen (1-10 mM), cyclophosphamide (1-20 μM), dibenz[a,h]anthracene (1-280 μg/mL), dimethylnitrosamine (1-10 mM), furan (2-5 mM) (Figure 4). Micronucleus frequency serves as a marker of chromosomal damage resulting from unrepaired DNA lesions (including DSBs), but it is not a direct measure of DNA strand breaks. Consistent dose-dependent increases in both micronucleus frequency and the number of apoptotic cells were observed 20 hours post-exposure across all tested chemicals (Figure 4). In general, significant increases in apoptosis occurred at slightly lower concentrations than those required to induce micronucleus formation, and fewer cells exhibited chromosome damage than apoptosis, indicating a lack of incidence and only partial dose concordance. These observations likely reflect differences in assay sensitivity and biological progression, as micronucleus formation is a late-stage cytogenetic outcome that requires progression through mitosis. Therefore, these differences do not contradict the overall relationship. As both endpoints were measured at the same time, these data support temporal concordance of this KER.

Liu et al. (2014) showed that inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway (a regulator of DDR) by BKM120 led to DNA damage and increased apoptosis in human and murine hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines (Huh7 and BNL). Cells pretreated with 1 μM BKM120 for 1 hour were irradiated (10 Gy for Huh7 cells and 5 Gy for BNL cells). Radiation induced DSB formation (assessed by γH2AX staining) within 30 minutes and the presence of the PI3K inhibitor led to prolonged foci retention (≥ 8 hours in Huh7 cells and ≥ 4 hours in BNL cells). In parallel, PI3K inhibition increased radiation-induced apoptosis, as indicated by elevated cleaved caspase-3 expression and increased Annexin V-positive cells at 24 hours. Co-treatment with rapamycin, an mTOR inhibitor downstream of PI3K, further enhanced both DSB persistence and apoptosis (Liu et al., 2014). These findings demonstrate strong temporal concordance, with DSBs occurring earlier than apoptotic responses; parallel increases were observed across experimental conditions. Although dose-response data are not available, modulation of DNA damage persistence through PI3K/AKT and downstream mTOR inhibition provides indirect essentiality support for the link between DNA strand breaks and apoptosis.

Additional empirical evidence from Chen et al. (2022) supports this KER in human nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells. Two cell lines, SUNE1 and HONE1, were transfected to overexpress ubiquitin-specific protease 44 (USP44). USP44 regulates ubiquitin signaling at DSB sites, thereby modulating DDR and repair processes. Following irradiation (6 Gy), both cell lines exhibited rapid induction of DNA strand breaks, as shown by significant increases in tail moment in the neutral comet assay and higher γH2AX foci numbers within 30 minutes to 4 hours post-exposure. Minimal or no DNA damage was observed at 24 hours, indicating efficient repair at later timepoints. In the same system, USP44 overexpression promoted radiation-induced apoptosis, demonstrated by Annexin V/PI staining at 24 hours in vitro and increased caspase-3 staining in subcutaneous xenograft tumors in mice (Chen et al., 2022). The alignment between early DSB formation and subsequent apoptotic responses supports strong temporal concordance; concurrent increases in both KEs following USP44 overexpression provide indirect essentiality evidence for this KER.

CDKN2AIP is a cell cycle-associated protein that has been implicated in the regulation of DNA damage repair, p53-dependent apoptosis, and spermatogenesis. An in vitro study by Cao et al. (2022) using Cdkn2aip-knockdown TM4 mouse testicular Sertoli cells exposed to γ-irradiation (5 Gy) showed impaired DSB repair, evidenced by persistent γH2AX and 53BP1 foci formation at 2h, 12h, and 24h, together with a significant increase in apoptosis measured by flow cytometry and TUNEL at 24h (Cao et al., 2022). This study provides evidence for temporal concordance and essentiality.

Overall, across multiple somatic cell types, radiation-induced, chemically or genetically induced DNA strand breaks are consistently associated with an increase in apoptosis. These studies demonstrate strong temporal concordance, with DNA strand breaks occurring early or concurrently with apoptotic responses. Evidence for dose concordance is supported in several studies but dose-response data are not always available. Evidence for incidence concordance is limited in vitro. The consistent direction of responses across experimental conditions provide strong empirical support for the relationship between these two KEs in somatic cells.

Evidence in germ cells

A study by Hamer et al., (2003) provided evidence linking DSBs and apoptotic responses in male germ cells. They first demonstrated the presence of basal γH2AX in testes of wild-type FvB/NAU mice. Following a single ionizing radiation (4 Gy), γH2AX foci were rapidly (within 3 hours) induced in spermatogonia, spermatocytes, and round spermatids. In spermatogonia, γH2AX and p53 colocalized in the nucleus and their interaction was enhanced following irradiation. These findings support co-occurrence of DSBs and p53-dependent apoptosis in spermatogonia.

Habas et al. reported the effects of known mutagens on testicular germ cells isolated from 10-12-week-old NMRI mice (National Medical Research Institute) or male Sprague-Dawley rats. Isolated testicular germ cells (spermatogonia, spermatocytes and spermatids) were exposed for 1 hour to one of seven genotoxic compounds at 50, 500, or 1000 μM, and were immediately subjected to alkaline comet or TUNEL analyses. The compounds included doxorubicin (Dox), which induces DNA strand breaks via topoisomerase II inhibition (Habas et al., 2017), and a panel of mutagens targeting germ cells at specific stages: alkylating agents N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) and N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU), which target pre-meiotic spermatogonia; 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) and 5-bromo-20-deoxy-uridine (5-BrdU), which produce the greatest responses in early meiotic spermatocytes; and methyl methanesulphonate (MMS) and ethyl methanesulphonate (EMS) that primarily target post-meiotic germ cells (Habas et al., 2016). Representative results (Figure 5) show highly consistent dose-dependent increases in both % tail DNA in the alkaline comet assay and the percentage of TUNEL+ apoptotic cells across male germ cells at all stages, with both effects being statistically significant at the same exposure concentrations (Habas et al., 2016, 2017). These data support dose and temporal concordance while extending the applicability of this KER to male germ cells.

Cao et al. (2022) demonstrated that loss of CDKN2AIP leads to a concurrent increase in DNA strand breaks and apoptosis in male germ cells. CDKN2AIP preferentially expresses in spermatocyte and spermatids and acts as a central regulator of DSBs repair. Analyses of Cdkn2aip-/- male C57BL/6 mice revealed a significant accumulation of DSBs (γH2AX analyses) in pachytene spermatocytes from postnatal day P35 testes, along with a higher incidence of TUNEL foci per cells in the seminiferous tubules (Cao et al., 2022). These data indicate a clear association between increased DSBs and male germ cell apoptosis, and provide evidence for the essential role of DNA damage repair in preventing DSB accumulation and subsequent apoptotic cell death.

Suh et al. (2006) examined oocytes from Balb/c mice exposed to γ-irradiation (0, 0.1, 0.45 Gy) on postnatal day 5. At 24 hours post-exposure, on average, oocytes exposed to 0.1 Gy had an average of three γH2AX-marked DSBs with minimal apoptosis; oocytes receiving 0.45 Gy had about ten DSBs and underwent apoptosis within 24 hours, as indicated by condensed chromatin and positive TUNEL staining (Suh et al., 2006). Consistent with early DNA damage induction, Stringer et al. (2020) reported dose- and time-dependent increases in nuclear localization of phosphorylated ATM in mouse oocytes as early as 30 minutes following irradiation (0.2, 0.45, 7 Gy), indicating activation of DNA damage responses. The presence of DSBs was evidenced by the formation of γH2AX foci at all doses. Apoptosis was indirectly monitored by follicle survival at 24 hours and oocyte retrieval rate. At the same timepoints and dose range, Rad51 (a marker of homologous recombination) localized to DNA damage sites in over 90% of oocytes in primordial follicles, whereas DNA-dependent protein kinase catalytic subunit (DNA-PKcs, a marker of non-homologous end joining) was mostly present in granulosa cells; this difference suggests cell type-specific utilization of repair pathways. Importantly, intervention studies in this system provide indirect evidence of essentiality. In Tap63 knockout mice (deficient in DNA damage-induced apoptotic signaling), primordial follicles were preserved despite the presence of DNA damage. Conversely, pharmacological inhibition of Rad51 increased persistence of unrepaired DNA damage and apoptosis, suggesting that efficient DNA repair mitigated the progression from DNA strand breaks to cell death.

Experimental evidence from isolated germ cells demonstrates that DNA strand breaks are closely associated with increased apoptosis across multiple stages of spermatogenesis and in oocytes. These findings support the applicability of this KER to germ cells and reinforce dose and temporal concordance.

Biological Plausibility
Addresses the biological rationale for a connection between KEupstream and KEdownstream.  This field can also incorporate additional mechanistic details that help inform the relationship between KEs, this is useful when it is not practical/pragmatic to represent these details as separate KEs due to the difficulty or relative infrequency with which it is likely to be measured.   More help

The biological plausibility of this KER is strong and supported by extensive understanding of the DDR pathways (Jackson and Bartek, 2009). The mechanistic processes that link DNA strand breaks to apoptosis are well characterized and detailed in many excellent reviews including Kaina (2003), Roos and Kaina (2006), and Zio et al. (2012). Both p53-dependent (encoded by Tp53) and p53-independent mechanisms contribute to DNA strand break-induced apoptosis (Roos and Kaina, 2006). It is important to note that activation of p53 and other DDR pathways does not immediately trigger apoptosis. Rather, the cellular response depends on the extent and persistence of DNA damage. In many cases, initial DDR activation promotes cell cycle arrest and DNA repair (reviewed by Williams and Schumacher, 2016). When DNA damage is extensive, irreparable, or persistent, the DDR signaling cascade shifts to favour programmed cell death, in part through the action of p53 and other stress sensors (Maréchal and Zou, 2013). This conditional response reflects a protective mechanism that preserves genomic integrity and prevents the propagation of cells with damaged DNA.

Sensing of DNA strand breaks by serine/threonine kinases

The serine/threonine kinases, ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated) and ATR (ATM- and Rad3-Related), are key sensors and mediators of cellular responses to DNA strand breaks in cells (Maréchal and Zou, 2013).

ATM is predominantly activated by double strand breaks (DSBs). The MRN (Mre11- Rad50-Nbs1) complexrecognizes DSB ends and recruits ATM to the damage sites (Maréchal and Zou, 2013). In undamaged cells, ATM exists predominantly as inactive dimers/oligomers; in the presence of DSBs, ATM undergoes autophosphorylation anddissociates into active monomers that phosphorylate a series of proteins involved in cell cycle arrest, DNA repair, and apoptosis, such as CHK2, Brca1, H2AX, and p53 (Lee, 2005). Of these, phosphorylation of histone H2AX at serine 139 (γH2AX) is one of the earliest cellular responses to DSBs. γH2AX foci form rapidly (within minutes) at sites of damage and are widely recognized as a sensitive marker of DNA damage following chemical exposure in both somatic cells and germ cells (Hamer et al., 2003). In the testis, basal γH2AX signaling is observed across multiple stages of germ cells and is associated with p53-mediated apoptosis signaling in spermatogonia following stress (Hamer et al., 2003).

ATR kinase, on the other hand, responds to a broader spectrum of DNA damage. ATR is activated by replication protein A (RPA)-coated single-stranded DNA (ssDNA), which arises during replication stress or as intermediates in DNA repair (Maréchal and Zou, 2013). ATR activation requires its binding partner, ATRIP (ATR-interacting protein), which recognizes RPA-coated ssDNA and localizes ATR to the damage sites (Maréchal and Zou, 2013). Both single strand breaks (SSBs) and DSBs (when resected by nucleases) can generate ssDNA and thus activate ATR (Maréchal and Zou, 2013).

p53-dependent DNA strand break-triggered apoptosis

Both ATM and ATR kinases phosphorylate and activate p53 transcription factor, a master regulator of apoptosis.ATM primarily phosphorylates p53 at serine-15, whereas ATR targets both serine-15 and serine-37 (Tibbetts et al., 1999).These partially overlapping activities ensure p53 activation during genotoxic stress. Once p53 is activated by ATM/ATR, it promotes the transcription of genes that favour apoptosis over survival, particularly when DNA damage is persistent or irreparable. To accomplish this, p53 activates pro-apoptotic genes (e.g., PumaBaxApaf-1Noxa), while inactivating anti-apoptotic factors such as members in the Bcl-2 family. These pro-apoptotic factors increase the permeability of the mitochondrial membrane and signal the release of cytochrome c (Wawryk-Gawda et al., 1998). Cytochrome c then binds Apf-1 adaptor and procaspase-9, aggregating the proteins and activating caspase-9, which in turn activates caspase-3 to induce apoptosis (Elmore, 2007).

p53-independent DNA strand break-triggered apoptosis

Cells can also respond to DNA strand breaks and undergo apoptosis through several p53-independent mechanisms (Roos and Kaina, 2006). DNA strand breaks induce ATM/ATR-dependent phosphorylation of checkpoint proteins CHK1 or CHK2, which can trigger apoptosis independently of p53 by stimulating E2F1-dependent expression of pro-apoptotic factor p73 (Urist et al., 2004). A newly identified p53-independent apoptosis pathway is triggered by DNA strand breaks through ribosome stalling mediated by Schlafen 11 (SLFN11, a tRNase). Upon DNA damage, SLFN11 causes ribosome stalling and global translation inhibition. The stalled ribosomes are recognized by ZAKα, a ribosome-associated stress sensor, which then initiates a MAPK signaling cascade that directly activates the mitochondrial apoptosis machinery, independent of the canonical p53 pathway (Boon et al., 2024). Other factors may be indirectly activated by DNA strand breaks and contribute to p53-independent apoptosis, such as pathways involving Bcl-2 degradation, caspase-2 activation, and NF-κB dependent Fas ligand transcription (Roos and Kaina, 2006).

In the female germ line, p63, a homologue of p53, acts in a conserved mechanism to preserve genomic fidelity. Specifically, a p63 isoform TAp63 is essential in the process of DNA damage-induced oocyte death not involving p53 (Suh et al., 2006). TAp63 is constitutively expressed in oocytes during meiotic arrest. In response to DNA damage, TAp63 is phosphorylated and binds to p53 cognate DNA sites and results in transcriptional activation of apoptosis pathways in female germ line (Suh et al., 2006).

Uncertainties and Inconsistencies
Addresses inconsistencies or uncertainties in the relationship including the identification of experimental details that may explain apparent deviations from the expected patterns of concordance. More help

A primary uncertainty in this KER arises from the use of the TUNEL assay, which can detect both the primary DNA strand breaks and the secondary DNA fragmentation that occurs during late-stage apoptosis, necrosis, or severe oxidative stress. This overlap makes it difficult to distinguish whether the DNA damage is an initiating event or a downstream consequence, particularly when both KEs are measured at the same timepoint (Bajt et al., 2011). For stressors like acetaminophen that can induce extensive necrosis, interpreting the TUNEL signal as a specific marker of apoptosis may confound the causal interpretation of this KER. To reduce this uncertainty, we recommend studies using multiple timepoints to establish temporal concordance, and using direct DNA damage assays (e.g., comet assays, γH2AX staining) and apoptosis specific markers (e.g., caspase activation or Annexin V staining) to strengthen confidence in the conclusions.

This KER is context-specific. Factors like developmental stage, activity of the repair pathways, and cellular sensitivity can modulate this KER. During ovarian reserve formation, meiotic germ cells naturally accumulate high levels of programmed DSBs that are efficiently repaired. In female FVB/N mice, Zhou et al. (2021) reported increased levels of DSBs from embryonic day 13.5 to postnatal day 2, with 23.94% to 83.76% germ cells stained positive for γH2AX. Despite the high incidence of DSBs, no detectable germ cell apoptosis was observed based on caspase-3 and TUNEL staining. A similar phenomenon is observed in the male germ line. During spermatogenesis, programmed DSBs occur during meiosis and chromatin remodeling processes (e.g., histone-to-protamine replacement during spermiogenesis) (Talibova et al., 2022) . Together, these observations indicate that the apoptotic response is not determined by the presence of DSBs per se, but their persistence and repair failure are critical modifiers.

Moreover, some studies report apoptosis in the absence of detectable DNA strand breaks. For example, in mice exposed daily to furan for 28 days, no treatment-related induction of DNA strand breaks or DNA cross links was noted in liver cells, as measured by the alkaline comet assay and γH2AX foci formation at 24 hours after last administration (Cordelli et al., 2010). However, a significant increase in TUNEL+ apoptotic cells was observed at the highest dose. While this suggests that apoptosis can arise through alternative pathways, the absence of detectable DNA damage may reflect limitations in the sampling time and assay sensitivity, as DNA lesions measured by the comet assay can be transient and rapidly repaired.

Known modulating factors

This table captures specific information on the MF, its properties, how it affects the KER and respective references.1.) What is the modulating factor? Name the factor for which solid evidence exists that it influences this KER. Examples: age, sex, genotype, diet 2.) Details of this modulating factor. Specify which features of this MF are relevant for this KER. Examples: a specific age range or a specific biological age (defined by...); a specific gene mutation or variant, a specific nutrient (deficit or surplus); a sex-specific homone; a certain threshold value (e.g. serum levels of a chemical above...) 3.) Description of how this modulating factor affects this KER. Describe the provable modification of the KER (also quantitatively, if known). Examples: increase or decrease of the magnitude of effect (by a factor of...); change of the time-course of the effect (onset delay by...); alteration of the probability of the effect; increase or decrease of the sensitivity of the downstream effect (by a factor of...) 4.) Provision of supporting scientific evidence for an effect of this MF on this KER. Give a list of references.  More help
Response-response Relationship
Provides sources of data that define the response-response relationships between the KEs.  More help
Time-scale
Information regarding the approximate time-scale of the changes in KEdownstream relative to changes in KEupstream (i.e., do effects on KEdownstream lag those on KEupstream by seconds, minutes, hours, or days?). More help
Known Feedforward/Feedback loops influencing this KER
Define whether there are known positive or negative feedback mechanisms involved and what is understood about their time-course and homeostatic limits. More help

Domain of Applicability

A free-text section of the KER description that the developers can use to explain their rationale for the taxonomic, life stage, or sex applicability structured terms. More help

This KER applies to eukaryotic cells exposed to genotoxic stressors that induce persistent or unrepaired DNA strand breaks. However, the applicability of this KER is context-dependent and influenced by cell type, developmental stage, DNA repair capacity, and DDR signaling status.

References

List of the literature that was cited for this KER description. More help

Bajt, M. L., Ramachandran, A., Yan, H.-M., Lebofsky, M., Farhood, A., Lemasters, J. J. & Jaeschke, H. (2011). Apoptosis-Inducing Factor Modulates Mitochondrial Oxidant Stress in Acetaminophen Hepatotoxicity. Toxicological Sciences, 122(2), 598–605. https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfr116

Boon, N. J., Oliveira, R. A., Körner, P.-R., Kochavi, A., Mertens, S., Malka, Y., Voogd, R., Horst, S. E. M. van der, Huismans, M. A., Smabers, L. P., Draper, J. M., Wessels, L. F. A., Haahr, P., Roodhart, J. M. L., Schumacher, T. N. M., Snippert, H. J., Agami, R. & Brummelkamp, T. R. (2024). DNA damage induces p53-independent apoptosis through ribosome stalling. Science, 384(6697), 785–792. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adh7950

Cao, Y., Sun, Q., Chen, Z., Lu, J., Geng, T., Ma, L. & Zhang, Y. (2022). CDKN2AIP is critical for spermiogenesis and germ cell development. Cell & Bioscience, 12(1), 136. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13578-022-00861-z

Chen, Y., Zhao, Y., Yang, X., Ren, X., Huang, S., Gong, S., Tan, X., Li, J., He, S., Li, Y., Hong, X., Li, Q., Ding, C., Fang, X., Ma, J. & Liu, N. (2022). USP44 regulates irradiation-induced DNA double-strand break repair and suppresses tumorigenesis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Nature Communications, 13(1), 501. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-28158-2

Cordelli, E., Leopardi, P., Villani, P., Marcon, F., Macrì, C., Caiola, S., Siniscalchi, E., Conti, L., Eleuteri, P., Malchiodi-Albedi, F. & Crebelli, R. (2010). Toxic and genotoxic effects of oral administration of furan in mouse liver. Mutagenesis, 25(3), 305–314. https://doi.org/10.1093/mutage/geq007

Elmore, S. (2007). Apoptosis: A Review of Programmed Cell Death. Toxicologic Pathology, 35(4), 495-516. doi:10.1080/01926230701320337

Habas, K., Anderson, D., & Brinkworth, M. (2016). Detection of phase specificity of in vivo germ cell mutagens in an in vitro germ cell system. Toxicology, 353-354, 1-10. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2016.04.001

Habas, K., Anderson, D., & Brinkworth, M. H. (2017). Germ cell responses to doxorubicin exposure in vitro. Toxicology Letters, 265, 70-76. doi:10.1016/j.toxlet.2016.11.016

Hamer, G., Roepers-Gajadien, H. L., Duyn-Goedhart, A. van, Gademan, I. S., Kal, H. B., Buul, P. P. W. van & Rooij, D. G. de. (2003). DNA double-strand breaks and gamma-H2AX signaling in the testis. Biology of Reproduction, 68(2), 628–634. https://doi.org/10.1095/biolreprod.102.008672

He, X., Zhu, L., Li, S., Chen, Z. & Zhao, X. (2018). Loperamide, an antidiarrheal agent, induces apoptosis and DNA damage in leukemia cells. Oncology Letters, 15(1), 765–774. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2017.7435

Jackson, S. P. & Bartek, J. (2009). The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease. Nature, 461(7267), 1071–1078. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08467

Kaina, B. (2003). DNA damage-triggered apoptosis: critical role of DNA repair, double-strand breaks, cell proliferation and signaling. Biochemical Pharmacology, 66(8), 1547–1554. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-2952(03)00510-0

Lee, J. (2005). ATM Activation by DNA Double-Strand Breaks Through the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 Complex. Science,308(5721), 551-554. doi:10.1126/science.1108297

Liu, W.-L., Gao, M., Tzen, K.-Y., Tsai, C.-L., Hsu, F.-M., Cheng, A.-L. & Cheng, J. C.-H. (2014). Targeting Phosphatidylinositide3-Kinase/Akt pathway by BKM120 for radiosensitization in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncotarget, 5(11), 3662–3672. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.1978

Maréchal A, Zou L. DNA Damage Sensing by the ATM and ATR Kinases. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology. 2013;5(9):a012716. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a012716.

Méniel, V., Megges, M., Young, M. A., Cole, A., Sansom, O. J., Clarke, A. R. (2015). Apc and p53 interaction in DNA damage and genomic instability in hepatocytes. Oncogene, 34(31), 4118–4129. https://doi.org/10.1038/onc.2014.342

Rodrigues, P. M. G., Grigaravicius, P., Remus, M., Cavalheiro, G. R., Gomes, A. L., Rocha-Martins, M., Martins, M. R., Frappart, L., Reuss, D., McKinnon, P. J., Deimling, A. von, Martins, R. A. P. & Frappart, P.-O. (2013). Nbn and Atm Cooperate in a Tissue and Developmental Stage-Specific Manner to Prevent Double Strand Breaks and Apoptosis in Developing Brain and Eye. PLoS ONE, 8(7), e69209. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0069209

Roos, W., Baumgartner, M. & Kaina, B. (2004). Apoptosis triggered by DNA damage O6-methylguanine in human lymphocytes requires DNA replication and is mediated by p53 and Fas/CD95/Apo-1. Oncogene, 23(2), 359–367. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207080

Roos, W. P. & Kaina, B. (2006). DNA damage-induced cell death by apoptosis. Trends in Molecular Medicine, 12(9), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2006.07.007

Saha, S., Woodbine, L., Haines, J., Coster, M., Ricket, N., Barazzuol, L., Ainsbury, E., Sienkiewicz, Z. & Jeggo, P. (2014). Increased apoptosis and DNA double-strand breaks in the embryonic mouse brain in response to very low-dose X-rays but not 50 Hz magnetic fields. Journal of The Royal Society Interface, 11(100), 20140783. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsif.2014.0783

Suh, E.-K., Yang, A., Kettenbach, A., Bamberger, C., Michaelis, A. H., Zhu, Z., Elvin, J. A., Bronson, R. T., Crum, C. P. & McKeon, F. (2006). p63 protects the female germ line during meiotic arrest. Nature, 444(7119), 624–628. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05337

Stringer, J. M., Winship, A., Zerafa, N., Wakefield, M. & Hutt, K. (2020). Oocytes can efficiently repair DNA double-strand breaks to restore genetic integrity and protect offspring health. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,117(21), 11513–11522. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2001124117

Talibova, G., Bilmez, Y. & Ozturk, S. (2022). DNA double-strand break repair in male germ cells during spermatogenesis and its association with male infertility development. DNA Repair, 118, 103386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2022.103386

Tibbetts, R. S., Brumbaugh, K. M., Williams, J. M., Sarkaria, J. N., Cliby, W. A., Shieh, S.-Y., Taya, Y., Prives, C. & Abraham, R. T. (1999). A role for ATR in the DNA damage-induced phosphorylation of p53. Genes & Development, 13(2), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.13.2.152

Urist, M., Tanaka, T., Poyurovsky, M. V. & Prives, C. (2004). p73 induction after DNA damage is regulated by checkpoint kinases Chk1 and Chk2. Genes & Development, 18(24), 3041–3054. https://doi.org/10.1101/gad.1221004

Wang, W., Yuan, X., Mu, J., Zou, Y., Xu, L., Chen, J., Zhu, X., Li, B., Zeng, Z., Wu, X., Yin, Z. & Wang, Q. (2023). Quercetin induces MGMT+ glioblastoma cells apoptosis via dual inhibition of Wnt3a/β-Catenin and Akt/NF-κB signaling pathways. Phytomedicine, 118, 154933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2023.154933

Wawryk-Gawda, E., Chylińska-Wrzos, P., Lis-Sochocka, M., Chłapek, K., Bulak, K., Jędrych, M. & Jodłowska-Jędrych, B. (2014). P53 protein in proliferation, repair and apoptosis of cells. Protoplasma, 251(3), 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-013-0548-1

Williams, A. B. & Schumacher, B. (2016). p53 in the DNA-Damage-Repair Process. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 6(5), a026070. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a026070

Xiao, H., Zhang, M., Wu, H., Wu, J., Hu, X., Pei, X., Li, D., Zhao, L., Hua, Q., Meng, B., Zhang, X., Peng, L., Cheng, X., Li, Z., Yang, W., Zhang, Q., Zhang, Y., Lu, Y. & Pan, Z. (2022). CIRKIL Exacerbates Cardiac Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury by Interacting With Ku70. Circulation Research, 130(5), e3–e17. https://doi.org/10.1161/circresaha.121.318992

Yauk, C. L., Buick, J. K., Williams, A., Swartz, C. D., Recio, L., Li, H., … Aubrecht, J. (2016). Application of the TGx‐28.65 transcriptomic biomarker to classify genotoxic and non‐genotoxic chemicals in human TK6 cells in the presence of rat liver S9. Environmental and Molecular Mutagenesis57(4), 243–260. http://doi.org/10.1002/em.22004

Zio, D. D., Cianfanelli, V. & Cecconi, F. (2012). New Insights into the Link Between DNA Damage and Apoptosis. Antioxidants & Redox Signaling, 19(6), 559–571. https://doi.org/10.1089/ars.2012.4938