This Event is licensed under the Creative Commons BY-SA license. This license allows reusers to distribute, remix, adapt, and build upon the material in any medium or format, so long as attribution is given to the creator. The license allows for commercial use. If you remix, adapt, or build upon the material, you must license the modified material under identical terms.
Event: 1632
Key Event Title
Increase in reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS)
Short name
Biological Context
Level of Biological Organization |
---|
Molecular |
Cell term
Organ term
Key Event Components
Key Event Overview
AOPs Including This Key Event
AOP Name | Role of event in AOP | Point of Contact | Author Status | OECD Status |
---|---|---|---|---|
Increased DNA damage leading to breast cancer | KeyEvent | Jessica Helm (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | Under Development |
RONS leading to breast cancer | MolecularInitiatingEvent | Jessica Helm (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | Under Development |
Ionizing Radiation-Induced AML | KeyEvent | Dag Anders Brede (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | |
Deposition of energy leads to reduced cocoon hatchability | MolecularInitiatingEvent | Deborah Oughton (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite | |
Energy deposition from Ra226 decay lowers oxygen binding capacity of hemocyanin | KeyEvent | Danielle Beaton (send email) | Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite |
Taxonomic Applicability
Life Stages
Sex Applicability
Key Event Description
Reactive oxygen and nitrogen species (RONS) are highly reactive oxygen- and nitrogen-based molecules that often contain or generate free radicals. Key molecules include superoxide ([O2]•−), hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), hydroxyl radical ([OH]•), lipid peroxide (ROOH), nitric oxide ([NO]•, and peroxynitrite ([ONOO-]) (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017)
RONS are generated in the course of cellular respiration, metabolism, cell signaling, and inflammation (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017). Superoxide and hydrogen peroxide are commonly produced by the mitochondrial electron transport chain and cytochrome c and by membrane bound NADPH oxidases and related molecules. Hydrogen peroxide is also made by the endoplasmic reticulum in the course of protein folding. Nitric oxide is produced at the highest levels by nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells and phagocytes. The other species are produced by reactions with superoxide or peroxide, or by other free radicals or enzymes.
RONS activity is principally local. Most reactive oxygen species (ROS) have short half-lives, ranging from nano- to milliseconds, so diffusion is limited, while reactive nitrogen species (RNS) nitric oxide or peroxynitrate can survive long enough to diffuse across membranes (Calcerrada, Peluffo et al. 2011). Consequently, local concentrations of ROS are much higher than average cellular concentrations and signaling is typically controlled by colocalization with redox buffers (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017). The effects of ROS and RNS are countered by cellular antioxidants, with glutathione and peroxiredoxins playing a major role (Dickinson and Chang 2011). Glutathione is slower but broad acting, while peroxiredoxins act quickly and are specific to peroxides. Peroxiredoxins are effective at low peroxide concentrations but can be deactivated at higher concentrations, suggesting the cellular response to peroxides may sometimes be non-linear.
Although their existence is limited temporally and spatially, reactive oxygen species (ROS) interact with other RONS or with other nearby molecules to produce more ROS and participate in a feedback loop to amplify the ROS signal, which can increase Reactive Nitrogen Species (RNS). Both ROS and RNS also move into neighboring cells and ROS can increase intracellular RONS signaling in neighboring cells (Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017).
RONS can modify a range of targets including amino acids, lipids, and nucleic acids to inactivate or alter target functionality (Calcerrada, Peluffo et al. 2011; Dickinson and Chang 2011; Go and Jones 2013; Ravanat, Breton et al. 2014; Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017). For example, phosphatases including the tumor suppressor PTEN can be reversibly deactivated by oxidation, and the movement of HDAC4 is peroxide dependent. Elevated ROS are implicated in proliferation and maintenance of stem cell population size (Dickinson and Chang 2011) and conversely in differentiation of stem cells and oncogene-induced senescence (Egea, Fabregat et al. 2017).
How It Is Measured or Detected
RONS is typically measured using fluorescent or other probes that react with RONS to change state, or by measuring the redox state of proteins or DNA (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Wang, Fang et al. 2013; Griendling, Touyz et al. 2016). Optimal methods for RONS detection have high sensitivity, selectivity, and spatiotemporal resolution to distinguish transient and localized activity, but most methods lack one or more of these parameters.
Molecular probes that indicate the presence of RONS species vary in specificity and kinetics (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Wang, Fang et al. 2013; Griendling, Touyz et al. 2016). Small molecule fluorescent probes can be applied to any tissue in vitro, but cannot be finely targeted to different cellular compartments. The non-selective probe DCHF was widely used in the past, but can produce false positive signals and is no longer recommended. Newer more selective small molecule probes such as boronate-based molecules are being developed but are not yet widely used. Alternatively, fluorescent protein-based probes can be genetically engineered, expressed in vivo, and targeted to cellular compartments and specific cells. However, these probes are very sensitive to pH in the physiological range and must be carefully controlled. EPR (electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy) provide the most direct and specific detection of free radicals, but requires specialized equipment.
Alternative methods involve the detection of redox-dependent changes to cellular constituents such as proteins, DNA, lipids, or glutathione (Dickinson and Chang 2011; Wang, Fang et al. 2013; Griendling, Touyz et al. 2016). However, these methods cannot generally distinguish between the oxidative species behind the changes, and cannot provide good resolution for kinetics of oxidative activity.
Table 1. Common methods for detecting oxidative activity
Target |
Name |
Method |
Strengths/Weaknesses |
Hydrogen peroxide- extracellular |
AmplexRed |
Small molecule fluorescent probes |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro. |
Hydrogen peroxide- mitochondrial |
MitoPy1 |
Small molecule fluorescent probes |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro. |
Hydrogen peroxide |
HyPer |
Protein-based fluorescent probes |
Sensitive, can be targeted to specific cells and compartments. Slower and pH sensitive. |
Hydrogen peroxide |
HyPer3 |
Protein-based fluorescent probes |
Rapid kinetics and larger dynamic range, can be targeted to specific cells and compartments. Sensitive to pH, less sensitive to H2O2. |
Hydrogen peroxide |
Boronate-based indicators |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Selective for H2O2 but can interact with peroxynitrite. |
Superoxide- intracellular |
DHE (dihydroethidium) |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro, but not targeted to different compartments. |
Superoxide- intracellular |
cpYFP |
Protein-based fluorescent probes |
Reversible. Can be targeted to specific cells and compartments. |
Superoxide- mitochondrial |
MitoSox |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro. |
Superoxide- mitochondrial |
mt-cpYFP |
Protein-based fluorescent probes |
Reversible. Can be targeted to specific cells and compartments. |
Superoxide- extracellular |
nitroblue tetrazolium |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro. |
Superoxide- intracellular or extracelluar |
various trityl probes |
EPR |
Very specific, but requires specialized equipment, not as sensitive in tissue. |
Nitric oxide |
Fe[DETC]2 and Fe[MGD]2, |
EPR |
Very specific, but requires specialized equipment, not as sensitive in tissue. |
Nitric oxide |
DAF-FM |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Can be applied to any tissue in vitro, but not targeted to different compartments |
Peroxynitrite |
EMPO |
EPR |
Very specific, but requires specialized equipment, not as sensitive in tissue. |
Peroxynitrite |
Boronate-based indicators |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Selective for H2O2 but can interact with (is inhibited by) peroxynitrite. |
Peroxynitrite |
8-nitroguanine (DNA) content |
HPLC-MS/MS |
Destruction of sample required for measurement. |
Non-specific oxidation |
DCHF |
Small molecule fluorescent probe |
Very non selective, and can produce false positive signals. |
Non-specific oxidation |
roGFP or FRET |
Protein-based fluorescent probes |
Slow acting. Good to look at steady state activity. |
Non-specific oxidation |
ratio of reduced to oxidized glutathione or cysteine |
Redox state detectors |
Slow acting. Good to look at steady state activity. Destruction of sample required for measurement. |
Non-specific oxidation |
8-oxoguanine (DNA) or protein carbonyl content |
HPLC-MS/MS |
Destruction of sample required for measurement. |
Non-specific oxidation |
TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substance) |
Lipid peroxidation |
Destruction of sample required for measurement. |
Domain of Applicability
This KE is broadly applicable across species.