To the extent possible under law, AOP-Wiki has waived all copyright and related or neighboring rights to KE:405
Key Event Title
irregularities, ovarian cycle
Key Event Components
Key Event Overview
AOPs Including This Key Event
|AOP Name||Role of event in AOP||Point of Contact||Author Status||OECD Status|
|Aromatase (Cyp19a1) reduction leading to reproductive toxicity||AdverseOutcome||Elise Grignard (send email)||Open for citation & comment||EAGMST Under Review|
Key Event Description
The female ovarian cycle is the result of a balanced cooperation between several organs and is determined by a complex interaction of hormones. Ovarian cycle irregularities include disturbances in the ovarian cycle (e.g. longer cycle, persistent estrus) and/or ovulation problems (deferred ovulation or anovulation). The estrous cycle (also oestrous cycle) comprises the recurring physiologic changes that are induced by reproductive hormones in females. Estrous cycles start after sexual maturity in females and are interrupted by anestrous phases or pregnancies. During this cycle numerous well defined and sequential alterations in reproductive tract histology, physiology and cytology occur, initiated and regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. The central feature of the mammalian estrous cycle is the periodic maturation of eggs that will be released at ovulation and luteinisation of the follicles after ovulation to form corpora lutea. Adapted from www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/43754807.pdf Biological compartments
The cyclic changes that occur in the female reproductive tract are initiated and regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. Although folliculogenesis occurs independently of hormonal stimulation up until the formation of early tertiary follicles, the gonadotrophins luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) are essential for the completion of follicular maturation and development of mature preovulatory (Graafian) follicles. The oestrous cycle consists of four stages: prooestrus, oestrus, metoestrus (or dioestrus 1) and dioestrus (or dioestrus 2) orchestrated by hormones. Levels of LH and FSH begin to increase just after dioestrus. Both hormones are secreted by the same secretory cells (gonadotrophs) in the pars distalis of the anterior pituitary (adenohypophysis). FSH stimulates the development of the zona granulosa and triggers expression of LH receptors by granulosa cells. LH initiates the synthesis and secretion of androstenedione and, to a lesser extent, testosterone by the theca interna; these androgens are utilised by granulosa cells as substrates in the synthesis of estrogen. Pituitary release of gonadotrophins thus drives follicular maturation and secretion of estrogen during prooestrus. Gonadotrophin secretion by the anterior pituitary is regulated by luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), produced by the hypothalamus. LHRH is transported along the axons of hypothalamic neurones to the median eminence where it is secreted into the hypothalamic-hypophyseal portal system and transported to the anterior pituitary. The hypothalamus secretes LHRH in rhythmic pulses; this pulsatility is essential for the normal activation of gonadotrophs and subsequent release of LH and FSH. Adapted from www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/43754807.pdf
Follicles that produce estrogens have sequestered pituitary FSH which in turn stimulates the aromatase reaction. Such follicles can undergo normal development and ovulation and contain eggs that readily resume meiosis when released. In the absence of an active local aromatase (i.e., no follicle-stimulating hormone), the follicles and oocytes become atretic and regress without ovulating. If aromatase is present, the estrogen and follicle stimulating hormone can further develop the follicular cells for normal luteal function after ovulation takes place (Ryan, 1982).
General role in biology
A sequential progression of interrelated physiological and behavioural cycles underlines the female's successful production of young. In many but not all species the first and most basic of these is estrous cycle, which is itself a combination of cycles.
How It Is Measured or Detected
Methods that have been previously reviewed and approved by a recognized authority should be included in the Overview section above. All other methods, including those well established in the published literature, should be described here. Consider the following criteria when describing each method: 1. Is the assay fit for purpose? 2. Is the assay directly or indirectly (i.e. a surrogate) related to a key event relevant to the final adverse effect in question? 3. Is the assay repeatable? 4. Is the assay reproducible?
The pattern of events in the estrous cycle may provide a useful indicator of the normality of reproductive neuroendocrine and ovarian function in the nonpregnant female. It also provides a means to interpret hormonal, histologic, and morphologic measurements relative to stage of the cycle, and can be useful to monitor the status of mated females. Regular cyclicity is one of the key parameters in assessment of female reproductive function in rodents. Parameters assessed for cyclicity: - Number of cycling females - Number of females with regular cycles - Number of cycles - Estrous cycle length - Percentage of time spent in the various estrous cycle stages Estrous cyclicity provides a method for evaluating the endocrine disrupting activity of each test chemical under physiologic conditions where endogenous concentrations of estrogen vary. Abnormal cycles were defined as one or more estrous cycles in the 21-day period with prolonged estrus (≥3 days) and/or prolonged metestrus or diestrus (≥4 days) within a given cycle (Goldman, Murr, & Cooper, 2007).
Estrous cycle normality can be monitored in the rat and mouse by observing the changes in the vaginal smear cytology. Visual observation of the vagina is the quickest method, requires no special equipment, and is best used when only proestrus or estrus stages need to be identified. For details see: (Westwood, 2008), (Byers, Wiles, Dunn, & Taft, 2012) and OECD guidelines (www.oecd.org).
The observation that animals do not ovulate while exhibiting estrous cycles indicates that estrous cyclicity alone may not be a sufficient surrogate of healthy function of ovaries; the measurements of serum hormones and particularly FSH can contribute to more sensitivity indicators of healthy function of ovaries (Davis, Maronpot, & Heindel, 1994).
Monitoring of oestrus cyclicity is included in OECD test guidelines (Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, 2008) , (Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, 2001) and (Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study, 2012) and in USA EPA OCSPP 890.1450.
In vitro testing
The follicle culture models were developed for the in-vitro production of mature oocytes and used to study the process of folliculogenesis and oogenesis in vitro (Cortvrindt & Smitz, 2002). These in vitro cultures demonstrate near-identical effects to those found in vivo, therefore might be able to acquire a place in fertility testing, replacing some in-vivo studies for ovarian function and female gamete quality testing (Stefansdottir, Fowler, Powles-Glover, Anderson, & Spears, 2014).
Domain of Applicability
The estrous cycle comprises the recurring physiologic changes that are induced by reproductive hormones in most mammalian females. Many of the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the reproductive axis are similar across species (particularly those mediated through the estrogen receptor), assessments of rodent estrous cyclicity can offer insight into potential adverse effects in humans (Goldman, Murr, & Cooper, 2007). While evaluations of vaginal cytology in the laboratory rodent can provide a valuable reflection of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, other indices are more useful in humans to determine the functional status of the reproductive system (e.g. menses, basal body temperature, alterations in vaginal pH, cervical mucous viscosity, and blood hormone levels). Nevertheless, since many of the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the reproductive axis are similar across species (particularly those mediated through the estrogen receptor), assessments of rodent estrous cyclicity can offer insight into potential adverse effects in humans (Rasier, Toppari, Parent, & Bourguignon, 2006).
Regulatory Significance of the Adverse Outcome
Chemicals may be found to interfere with reproductive function in the female rat. This interference is commonly expressed as a change in normal morphology of the reproductive tract or a disturbance in the duration of particular phases of the estrous cycle. This key event lies within the scope of testing for endocrine disrupting activity of chemicals and therefore for testing of female reproductive and developmental toxicity. Monitoring of oestrus cyclicity is included in OECD test guidelines (Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, 2008), (Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, 2001) and (Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study, 2012) and in USA EPA OCSPP 890.1450. While an evaluation of the estrous cycle in laboratory rodents can be a useful measure of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian reproductive axis, it can also serve as a way of insuring that animals exhibiting abnormal cycling patterns are excluded from a study prior to exposure to a test compound. When incorporated as an adjunct to other endpoint measures, a determination of a female's cycling status can contribute important information about the nature of a toxicant insult to the reproductive system. In doing so, it can help to integrate the data into a more comprehensive mechanistic portrait of the effect, and in terms of risk assessment, may provide some indication of a toxicant's impact on human reproductive physiology. Significant evidence that the estrous cycle (or menstrual cycle in primates) has been disrupted should be considered an adverse effect (OECD, 2008). Included should be evidence of abnormal cycle length or pattern, ovulation failure, or abnormal menstruation.
Byers, S. L., Wiles, M. V, Dunn, S. L., & Taft, R. A. (2012). Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PloS One, 7(4), e35538. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035538
Cortvrindt, R. G., & Smitz, J. E. J. (2002). Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology: a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function? Human Reproduction Update, 8(3), 243–54.
Davis, B. J., Maronpot, R. R., & Heindel, J. J. (1994). Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate suppresses estradiol and ovulation in cycling rats. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 128(2), 216–23. doi:10.1006/taap.1994.1200
Goldman, J. M., Murr, A. S., & Cooper, R. L. (2007). The rodent estrous cycle: characterization of vaginal cytology and its utility in toxicological studies. Birth Defects Research. Part B, Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, 80(2), 84–97. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20106
OECD. (2008). No 43: Guidance document on mammalian reproductive toxicity testing and assessment.
Rasier, G., Toppari, J., Parent, A.-S., & Bourguignon, J.-P. (2006). Female sexual maturation and reproduction after prepubertal exposure to estrogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals: a review of rodent and human data. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 254-255, 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2006.04.002
Ryan, K. J. (1982). Biochemistry of aromatase: significance to female reproductive physiology. Cancer Research, 42(8 Suppl), 3342s–3344s.
Stefansdottir, A., Fowler, P. A., Powles-Glover, N., Anderson, R. A., & Spears, N. (2014). Use of ovary culture techniques in reproductive toxicology. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 49C, 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.08.001
Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. (2008). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264070684-en
Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity. (2001). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264070868-en
Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. (2012). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264185371-en
Westwood, F. R. (2008). The female rat reproductive cycle: a practical histological guide to staging. Toxicologic Pathology, 36(3), 375–84. doi:10.1177/0192623308315665