AOP-Wiki

AOP ID and Title:

AOP 398: Decreased ALDH1A (RALDH) activity leading to decreased fertility via disrupted meiotic initiation of fetal oogonia
Short Title: Decreased ALDH1A activity leading to decreased fertility

Graphical Representation

Authors

Monica Kam Draskau, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

Cassy M. Spiller, University of Queensland, Australia

Josephine Bowles, University of Queensland, Australia

Eleftheria M. Panagiotou, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Pauliina Damdimopoulou, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Johanna Zilliacus, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Anna Beronius, Karolinska Institute, Sweden

Terje Svingen, Terchnical University of Denmark, Denmark

 

Status

Author status OECD status OECD project SAAOP status
Under development: Not open for comment. Do not cite Under Development 1.97 Included in OECD Work Plan

Abstract

This AOP links inhibition of ALDH1A during fetal life with female infertility in adulthood. A key step in this AOP is a reduction in all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) locally in the fetal ovary, which prevents resident germ cells (oocytes) from entering meiosis. Evidence for this AOP, especially upstream events, draws heavily from mouse studies, both genetic models and from exposure studies (including explanted ovaries). Human evidence is also available, especially for downstream events where the oocyte pool/ovarian reserve is known to directly impact on fertility. In reproductive toxicity (animal studies and human epidemiology) fertility is an apical endpoint of high importance and has strong utility for chemical safety assessments. Infertility can be caused by many, and varied, factors, but this AOP focusses on linking perturbed meiosis through disrupted atRA signaling during development, thus supporting the use of data from in silico and in vitro measurements for interference with nuclear receptor activity (RAR/RXR) and atRA synthesis/expression to infer potential to cause in vivo effects.

Background

In mammals, the primordial germ cells are initially ‘bipotential’. They will develop into either oocytes or gonocytes in ovaries or testis, respectively, depending on cues from the somatic environment. Germ cells in the developing testis will enter a quiescent state and reactivate at the onset of puberty. In contrast, germ cells in the developing ovary will enter meiosis (prophase I) during fetal life. A key signaling event for this sexual dimorphic germ cell programming is retinoid signaling, with all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) acting as a meiosis-inducing factor (Spiller & Bowles, 2019).

The source of atRA during ovary development differs to some degree between species. In mice, the adjacent mesonephros, which expresses two enzymes necessary for the final step in atRA production, ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3, is likely the main source of atRA at early developmental stages (Bowles et al, 2018; Bowles et al, 2006; Koubova et al, 2006; Niederreither et al, 1999). There is also the capacity for atRA to be produced within the ovary itself, due to local expression of the atRA-synthesizing enzyme ALDH1A1 (Bowles et al, 2016; Mu et al, 2013).

In humans, ALDH1A enzymes (ALDH1A, -1B and -1C) are expressed in both testes and ovaries of the developing fetus, which suggest a capacity for de novo synthesis of atRA (Childs et al, 2011; Jørgensen & Rajpert-De Meyts, 2014; le Bouffant et al, 2010), as is also the case in rabbits (Díaz-Hernández et al, 2019). One team studying human fetal ovaries reported a peak of ALDH1A1 expression at the onset of meiosis (le Bouffant et al, 2010), suggesting that meiotic onset in the human ovary depends on provision of atRA at the correct time.  There seems to be conservation from rodent to human in terms of the requirement for atRA to induce the pre-meiotic factor STRA8. However, in mice atRA is produced by adjacent tissue and is present at high concentrations in the ovaries, whereas in human ovaries RA is present at only low levels and is then actively produced to induce meiosis in the ovary (Spiller & Bowles, 2019).

Summary of the AOP

Events

Molecular Initiating Events (MIE), Key Events (KE), Adverse Outcomes (AO)

Sequence Type Event ID Title Short name
1 MIE 1880 Decreased, ALDH1A (RALDH) enzyme activity Decreased, ALDH1A activity
2 KE 1881 Decreased, all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) concentration Decreased, atRA concentration
3 KE 1882 Disrupted, initiation of meiosis of oogonia in the ovary Disrupted, meiotic initiation in oocyte
4 KE 1883 Decreased, size of the ovarian reserve Decreased, ovarian reserve
5 KE 405 disrupted, ovarian cycle disrupted, ovarian cycle
6 AO 406 decreased, Fertility decreased, Fertility

Key Event Relationships

Upstream Event Relationship Type Downstream Event Evidence Quantitative Understanding
Decreased, ALDH1A (RALDH) enzyme activity adjacent Decreased, all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) concentration High Moderate
Decreased, all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) concentration adjacent Disrupted, initiation of meiosis of oogonia in the ovary Moderate Low
Disrupted, initiation of meiosis of oogonia in the ovary adjacent Decreased, size of the ovarian reserve High Moderate
Decreased, size of the ovarian reserve adjacent disrupted, ovarian cycle Moderate Low
disrupted, ovarian cycle adjacent decreased, Fertility High Low

Overall Assessment of the AOP

The majority of evidence supporting this AOP is derived from mouse studies, both in vitro (fetal ovary cultures) and in vivo (incl. genetic mouse models). There is also evidence from humans (in vitro ovary cultures), yet it is also recognized that there are some differences between mice and humans with regard to atRA synthesis, expression and potential role in meiotic initiation. Notably, an important link, yet not described as a separate key event, is the role for Stra8 in meiotic initiation alongside the established role for atRA to control Stra8 expression via RAR/RXR.

The evidence linking MIE with KE1 is considered as strong and regarded as canonical knowledge. Likewise, evidence for the downstream key events linking reduced oocyte pool/ovarian reserve with reduced fertility is very strong and regarded as canonical knowledge. The weak link in the overall AOP is the connection between reduced atRA levels and fertility via loss of oocytes during development. To strengthen this link, more evidence must be obtained; nevertheless, the remaining links are very strong and can be used to assess the impact of chemical stressors on female fertility. Yet, caution should be exercised with directly linking inhibition of ALDH1A2 with reduced fertility.

Domain of Applicability

Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
During development and at adulthood High
Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Female High
  • Sex: This AOP applies to females. atRA is also involved in meiosis of testicular gonocytes, but this occurs postnatally. In the female ovaries, atRA induces meiosis of oocytes during gestation, thus the spatiotemporal expression of atRA in the ovaries are tightly controlled. Finally, as this AOP is concerned with establishing the ovarian reserve/follicle pool through mechanisms that are unique to ovaries, restricting the AOP to female only is appropriate.

  • Life stages: This AOP spans the period from mid- to late-gestation in mammals, all the way to adulthood where fertility is manifested. The upstream event pertains to fetal/neonatal life stages, whereas the downstream events pertain to adult reproductive life stages. 

  • Taxonomy: Strongest evidence for the role of atRA in regulating oocyte entry into meiosis stems from mouse studies, so the taxonomic applicability is strongest for this animal model. Studies have also been done in rats. Evidence for the same mechanisms in humans is less substantiated (Li & Clagett-Dame, 2009; Griswold et al, 2012; Spiller & Bowles, 2022; Jørgensen & Rajpert-De Meyts, 2014).

Essentiality of the Key Events

Event

Direct evidence

Uncertainties, inconsistencies, and contradictory evidence

MIE 1880

Decreased, ALDH1A activity

 

 

LOW: There is direct experimental evidence from KO studies that ALDH1A is essential for atRA synthesis. Some studies on KO and inhibition of ALDH1A show an effect on initiation of meiosis in ovary but there are contradictory studies.

  • KO of ALDH1A isoforms blocks atRA synthesis in vivo in mice (Niederreither et al, 1999, Dupé et al, 2003; Fan et al, 2003; Molotkov & Duester, 2003).
  • KO of ALDH1A1 results in delayed germ cell meiosis in mouse fetal embryos (Bowles et al., 2016).
  • Inhibition of ALDH1A2 in mouse ovary culture results in failure to induce expression of meiotic marker Stra8 and subsequent germ cell loss (Rosario et al, 2020).
  • Inhibition of ALDH1A in mouse ovary cultures blocked germ cell meiotic entry (Mu et al, 2013).
  • Inhibition of ALDH1 partially inhibits meiotic entry in human fetal ovaries (Le Bouffant et al, 2010)

KO of ALDH1A2 and double knockout of ALDH1A2 and ALDH1A3 showed no reduction of Stra8 expression in fetal ovary and ALDH1A2 knockout did not prevent meiotic initiation (Kumar et al., 2012).

Triple KO of ALDH1A1-3 showed a reduced Stra8 expression in fetal ovary but the knockout did not prevent meiotic initiation (Chassot,et al, 2020).

These results indicate that atRA synthesis is not the only determinant for initiation of meiosis in oocytes as discussed in Spiller & Bowles, 2022 and Shimada and Ishiguro, 2023.

 

 

 

KE1881

Decreased atRA concentration

 

LOW: Some studies show that atRA is essential for initiation of meiosis in ovary but there are contradictory studies.

  • Oocytes fail to enter meiosis in ovaries of vitamin A deficient rats due to atRA deficiency (Li & Clagett-Dame, 2009)
  • Inhibition of RAR in mouse embryonic ovary cultures results in failure to induce Stra8 expression (Bowles et al, 2006; Koubova et al, 2006; Minkina et al, 2017).
  • atRA activates meiosis-related gene network in mouse embryonic stem cells (Aoki & Takada, 2012), increases meiosis resumption in mouse oocytes (Tahaei et al, 2011), promote germ cell meiotic initiation in cultured fetal human ovaries (Le Bouffant et al, 2010), mouse ovaries (Livera et al, 2000), and chicken ovaries (Yu et al, 2013) and camel oocytes (Saadeldin et al, 2019). RAR agonist accelerates meiotic entry in mouse fetal oocytes (Livera et al, 2000).

 

Triple knockout of RAR-α, -β, -γ showed a reduced Stra8 expression in fetal ovary but the knockout did not prevent meiotic initiation (Vernet et al, 2020).

 

Mutation of two retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) in the Stra8 promoter in mice reduced Stra8 expression in fetal ovary but did not prevent meiotic initiation (Feng et al, 2021).

 

These results, together with the studies on ALDH1A KO, described above indicate that atRA is not the only determinant for initiation of meiosis in oocytes as discussed in Spiller & Bowles, 2022 and Shimada & Ishiguro, 2023.

 

KE1882

Disrupted, initiation of meiosis in oogonia

 

HIGH: There is direct evidence from experimental studies that disruption of meiosis in ovary results in reduced fertility.

  • In mice, ablation of Stra8 prevents oocytes from entering meiosis in the fetal ovaries and mature females are infertile (Baltus et al, 2006; Zhou et al, 2008).
  • Mutation in Atm, a gene involved in recombination during meiosis, results in complete loss of primary oocytes in mice, and greatly reduced follicle pool in humans (Adelfalk et al, 2011; Agamanolis & Greenstein, 1979; Aguilar et al, 1968; Xu et al, 1996).
  • Mutation to Fanca and Fancd2 genes that are involved in recombination lead to oocyte degeneration and subfertility in mice (Cheng et al, 2000; Houghtaling et al, 2003; Wong et al, 2003).
  • Mice with Lhx8 ablation display total loss of oocytes. Lhx8-/- mice maintain oocytes during fetal development, but loose the oocytes shortly after birth by autophagy, likely because the oocytes have failed to enter meiosis in utero (Choi et al, 2008; D'Ignazio et al, 2018).

 

 

KE1883

Decreased size of the ovarian reserve

 

MODERATE: There is indirect evidence that chemicals that reduce the ovarian reserve also affect the ovarian cycle.

INDIRECT EVIDENCE

  • In mice and rats, a chemically induced reduced follicle pool results in irregular cycles in vivo (Mayer et al, 2004, Lohff et al, 2005, Lohff et al, 2006, Mayer et al, 2002, Flaws et al, 1994, Hooser et al, 1994, Hu et al, 2018, Hannon et al, 2014, Xu et al, 2010).
  • In humans, chemotherapy can affect ovarian reserve as well as the menstrual cycle (Jacobson et al, 2016; Meirow et al., 2010). Smoking, that reduces primordial follicles in mice (Tuttle et al, 2009) is also associated with irregular cycles in humans (El-Nemr et al, 1998; Sharara et al, 1994).

Contradictory evidence:

Several chemotherapy agents damage ovarian reserve and disrupt folliculogenesis. However, it has been shown that regular menses can resume upon treatment cessation (Jacobson et al, 2016). Therefore, in this case reduced ovarian reserve did not lead to permanent irregularities of ovarian cycle. In a systematic review and meta-analysis investigating the connection between the ovarian reserve and the length of the menstrual cycle, studies are mentioned where reduced ovarian reserve markers did not associate with irregular menstrual cycles (Younis et al, 2020). Several factors affect the impact of chemotherapy on ovarian health in humans, including the age at the treatment, size of ovarian reserve at treatment, and treatment regimen. However, late side effects of chemotherapy often include amenorrhea, premature ovarian insufficiency, and infertility.

KE405

Disrupted, ovarian cycle

 

MODERATE: There is indirect evidence that chemicals that affect the ovarian cycle also cause impaired fertility.

INDIRECT EVIDENCE

  • In mice and rats, a chemically induced cycle irregularity is associated with impaired fertility in vivo (Blystone et al., 2010, Takai et al., 2009, NTP, 2005)

 

 

Weight of Evidence Summary

Biological Plausibility, coherence, and consistency of the experimental evidence

The role for ALDH1A2 in the synthesis of atRA is well established as an essential component of regulating regional expression of retinoid species during development. It is also well established that atRA is an inducer of meiosis in germ cells in mice; however, there is some debate about the essentiality of atRA in this process in human fetal ovaries. The requirement for oocytes to enter the first phase of meiosis during fetal development is also well established, hence the biological plausibility linking meiotic failure with loss of oocytes at later developmental stages is strong.

Although non-meiotic oocytes can survive in germ cell nests and during nest breakdown, they will ultimately be eliminated from the oocyte pool of competent follicles. There is therefore a direct link between meiotic entry and fertility during adulthood. Thus, this AOP provides a plausible chain of events linking reduced atRA during fetal life with reduced ovarian reserve and fertility during reproductive age. The strength of the downstream KEs and KER – reduced ovarian reserve and reduced fertility – is very well documented and thus the biological plausibility is very strong. Evidence for a direct link between the AO and perturbed atRA synthesis, or reduced atRA levels, during early development comes mainly from mouse studies; yet the relationship is regarded biologically plausible also in humans, but with weight of evidence not being as strong. 

 

Concordance of dose-response relationships

The quantitative understanding of dose-response relationships in this AOP is limited. Whilst the relative levels of endogenous atRA produced by the ovary (for any species) remains unknown, similarly, the quantitative relationship between atRA levels and induction of meiosis also remains unclear. Nevertheless, it is has been conclusively shown that low levels of exogenous atRA can induce mouse and rat germ cells to enter meiosis both in vitro and ex vivo (Bowles et al, 2006; Livera et al, 2000). Likewise, atRA is necessary to achieve meiosis in in vitro-derived oocytes via PGCLCs (Miyauchi et al, 2017).

 

Temporal concordance among the key events and the adverse outcome

This AOP bridges two different life stages: fetal/perinatal and adult/reproductive age. The adverse outcome is the result of perturbation taking place during early stages of ovary development. In mice, rats and humans, the oocytes must enter meiosis prophase in order to establish the follicle pool/ovarian reserve postnatally. Thus, the AOP focusses on chemical perturbations during fetal life, which occurs around E13-E16 in mice and E15-E18 is rats, or first trimester in humans (Peters, 1970), but the adverse outcome does not manifest until adulthood. 

There is strong temporal concordance between the various key events, from inhibition of ALDH1A2 (RALDH2) that leads to reduced atRA synthesis. In turn, atRA must be present in the fetal ovaries at the time when oocytes are supposed to enter meiosis mid-gestation in mice (or first trimester in human). With a significant reduction in available atRA the oocytes will not enter meiosis, ultimately leading to the downstream key event of loss of oocytes beyond what is normal. The number of oocytes, or the oocyte pool/ovarian reserve, in turn will affect ovary function and fertility at reproductive stages, hence the temporal sequence of events is rational based on the biological process.

 

Strength, consistency, and specificity of association of adverse effect and initiating event

In mice, there is strong evidence to support the view that atRA is an inducer of meiosis in germ cells, with consistent results from in vitro (PGCLCs), ex vivo (ovary cultures) and in vivo studies as listed under KE 2477. There is strong evidence showing the importance of RA for female fertility, but this relates to many aspects of reproductive development and function from fetal life to adulthood, including maintaining pregnancy (Clagett-Dame & Knutson, 2011). Thus, it can be difficult to distill exactly how atRA-controlled meiotic entry of oocytes directly link to reduced fertility. Nevertheless, a direct relationship is strongly supported by the fact that Stra8-depleted mice are infertile with small ovaries lacking oocytes (Baltus et al, 2006) and that Stra8 induction in germ cells is controlled by atRA in mice, rats and humans (Bowles et al, 2006; Childs et al, 2011; Koubova et al, 2006; Livera et al, 2000). Furthermore, vitamin A-deficient (VAD) mice display delayed or failed meiotic entry of fetal oocytes depending on level of Vitamin A deficiency (Li & Clagett-Dame, 2009).

 

Uncertainties, inconsistencies and data gaps

In mice, there is strong evidence to support the view that atRA is important for initiating meiosis in germ cells (Bowles et al, 2016; Spiller et al, 2017; Teletin et al, 2017). Some studies suggest that atAR is not critical but important for meiotic entry under normal physiological conditions by evidencing meiosis in Aldh1a1, Aldh1a2 and Aldh1a3 ablated mice, individually and in tandem (Bellutti et al, 2019; Chassot et al, 2020; Kumar et al, 2011); however, additional studies have shown redundant roles between all three Aldha isoforms which can compensate for deletion of one or two (Bowles et al, 2016). More specifically, both double (Aldh1a2/3) and triple (Aldh1a1/2/3) knockout mouse models display reduced Stra8 expression in oocytes, yet oocytes eventually go through meiosis, which could suggest a redundant role for atRA for meiosis in the ovaries (Chassot et al, 2020; Kumar et al, 2011). A similar phenotype with reduced Stra8 expression but eventual meiotic initiation is seen for deletion of atRA receptors RAR-α, -β, -γ) in mice (Vernet et al, 2020). But, although RAR knockouts were also capable of producing offspring, it remains unclear if any of the above-mentioned mouse models display impaired fertility or whether the size of their oocyte pools are affected.

Quantitative Consideration

This AOP is still largely qualitative, as the quantitative understanding between chemical potency and perturbation of KEs are insufficient. This relates to the dose-response relationship between concentrations of atRA in the ovary relative to meiotic initiation of oocytes. It also relates to the relationship between number of lost oocytes during development relative to the oocyte pool/ovarian reserve, as there naturally is a large loss of oocytes during development.

Considerations for Potential Applications of the AOP (optional)

Currently disrupted retinoid signaling is not directly tested for in OECD TG studies; however, in, for example, the identification of endocrine disruptors, the R-modality is highlighted as a pathway that should be included. Hence, this AOP provides added support for inclusion of retinoid signaling-relevant assays to be included in testing or screening strategies.

This AOP can be used to identify chemicals that inhibit ALDH1A activity (e.g., through in vitro assays for retinoic acid biosynthesis) as potential reproductive toxicants, facilitating prioritization for further testing. It also provides a mechanistic basis for linking molecular-level perturbations to reproductive outcomes, supporting weight-of-evidence approaches in regulatory risk assessment and justifying restrictions on chemicals identified as disrupting this pathway.

References

Baltus AE, Menke DB, Hu YC, Goodheart ML, Carpenter AE, de Rooij DG, Page DC (2006) In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication. Nat Genet 38: 1430-1434

Bellutti L, Abby E, Tourpin S, Messiaen S, Moison D, Trautmann E, Guerquin MJ, Rouiller-Fabre V, Habert R, Livera G (2019) Divergent Roles of CYP26B1 and Endogenous Retinoic Acid in Mouse Fetal Gonads. Biomolecules 9: 536

Bowles J, Feng CW, Inseson J, Miles K, Spiller CM, Harley VR, Sinclair AH, Koopman P (2018) Retinoic Acid Antagonizes Testis Development in Mice. Cell Rep 24: 1330-1341

Bowles J, Feng CW, Miles K, Inseson J, Spiller CM, Koopman P (2016) ALDH1A1 provides a source of meiosis-inducing retinoic acid in mouse fetal ovaries. Nat Commun 7: 10845

Bowles J, Knight D, Smith C, Wilhelm D, Richman J, Mamiya S, Yashiro K, Chawengsaksophak K, Wilson MJ, Rossant J, Hamada H, Koopman P (2006) Retinoid signaling determines germ cell fate in mice. Science 312: 596-600

Chassot AA, Le Rolle M, Jolivet G, Stevant I, Guigonis JM, Da Silva F, Nef S, Pailhoux E, Schedl A, Ghyselinck NB, Chaboissier MC (2020) Retinoic acid synthesis by ALDH1A proteins is dispensable for meiosis initiation in the mouse fetal ovary. Sci Adv 6: eaaz1261

Chatzi C, Cunningham TJ, Duester G (2013) Investigation of retinoic acid function during embryonic brain development using retinaldehyde-rescued Rdh10 knockout mice. Dev Dyn 242: 1056-1065

Childs AJ, Cowan G, Kinnell HL, Anderson RA, Saunders PTK (2011) Retinoic Acid signalling and the control of meiotic entry in the human fetal gonad. PLoS One 6: e20249

Clagett-Dame M, Knutson D (2011) Vitamin A in Reproduction and Development. Nutrients 3: 385-428

Díaz-Hernández V, Caldelas I, Merchant-Larios H (2019) Gene Expression in the Supporting Cells at the Onset of Meiosis in Rabbit Gonads. Sex Dev 13: 125-136

Feng CW, Burnet G, Spiller CM, Cheung FKM, Chawengsaksophak K, Koopman P, Bowles J (2021) Identification of regulatory elements required for Stra8 expression in fetal ovarian germ cells of the mouse. Development 148: dev194977

Griswold MD, Hogarth CA, Bowles J, Koopman P (2012) Initiating meiosis: the case for retinoic acid. Biol Reprod 86: 35

Grive KJ, Freiman RN (2015) The developmental origins of the mammalian ovarian reserve. Development 142: 2554-2563

Jørgensen A, Rajpert-De Meyts E (2014) Regulation of meiotic entry and gonadal sex differentiation in the human: normal and disrupted signaling. Biomol Concepts 5: 331-341

Kalampokas T, Shetty A, Maheswari A (2014) Vitamin A Deficiency and Female Fertility Problems: A Case Report and Mini Review of the Literature. J Women's Health Care 3: 6

Koubova J, Menke DB, Zhou Q, Capel B, Griswold MD, Page DC (2006) Retinoic acid regulates sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2474-2479

Krężel W, Rühl R, de Lera AR (2019) Alternative retinoid X receptor (RXR) ligands. Mol Cell Endocrinol 491: 110436

Kumar S, Chatzi C, Brade T, Cunningham TJ, Zhao X, Duester G (2011) Sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation is regulated by Cyp26b1 independent of retinoic acid signalling. Nat Commun 2: 151

le Bouffant R, Guerquin MJ, Duquenne C, Frydman N, Coffigny H, Rouiller-Fabre V, Frydman R, Habert R, Livera G (2010) Meiosis initiation in the human ovary requires intrinsic retinoic acid synthesis. Hum Reprod 25: 2579-2590

Li H, Clagett-Dame M (2009) Vitamin A deficiency blocks the initiation of meiosis of germ cells in the developing rat ovary in vivo Biol Reprod 81: 996-1001

Livera G, Rouiller-Fabre V, Valla J, Habert R (2000) Effects of retinoids on the meiosis in the fetal rat ovary in culture. Mol Cell Endocrinol 165: 225-231

Miyauchi H, Ohta H, Nagaoka S, Nakaki F, Sasaki K, Hayashi K, Yabuta Y, Nakamura T, Yamamoto T, Saitou M (2017) Bone morphogenetic protein and retinoic acid synergistically specify female germ-cell fate in mice. EMBO J 36: 3100-3119

Mu X, Wen J, Guo M, Wang J, Li G, Wang Z, Teng Z, Cui Y, Xia G (2013) Retinoic acid derived from the fetal ovary initiates meiosis in mouse germ cells. J Cell Physiol 228: 627-639

Niederreither K, Subbarayan V, Dollé P, Chambon P (1999) Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for early mouse post-implantation development. Nat Genet 21: 444-448

Nilsson, C and Working Group (2020) Retinoids in Mammalian Reproduction, with an Initial Scoping Effort to Identify Regulatory Methods. Available at https://norden.diva-portal.org/smash/record.jsf?pid=diva2%3A1424722&dswid=-4522

Peters H (1970) Migration of gonocytes into the mammalian gonad and their differentiation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 259: 91-101

Shannon SR, Moise AR, Trainor PA (2017) New insights and changing paradigms in the regulation of vitamin A metabolism in development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 6: 10.1002/wdev.1264

Spiller C, Bowles J (2019) Sexually dimorphic germ cell identity in mammals. Curr Top Dev Biol 134: 252-288

Spiller C, Koopman P, Bowles J (2017) Sex Determination in the Mammalian Germline. Annu Rev Genet 51: 265-285

Teletin M, Vernet N, Ghyselinck NB, Mark M (2017) Roles of Retinoic Acid in Germ Cell Differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 125: 191-225

Vernet N, Condrea D, Mayere C, Féret B, Klopfenstein M, Magnant W, Alunni V, Teletin M, Souali-Crespo S, Nef S, Mark M, Ghyselinck NB (2020) Meiosis occurs normally in the fetal ovary of mice lacking all retinoic acid receptors. Sci Adv 6: eaaz1139

Appendix 1

List of MIEs in this AOP

Event: 1880: Decreased, ALDH1A (RALDH) enzyme activity

Short Name: Decreased, ALDH1A activity

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
retinoic acid biosynthetic process retinal dehydrogenase 1 decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Benomyl
WIN18,466
(~13~C,~15~N_2_)Cyanamide
Daidzein
Molinate
Pebulate
Vernolate
Butylate
Tri-allate
Cycloate

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Molecular

Cell term

Cell term
eukaryotic cell

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
human Homo sapiens Moderate NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female High

The retinoid signaling system is highly conserved across distant animal species (Bushue & Wan, 2010; Rhinn & Dollé, 2012).

Key Event Description

The oxidation of retinal to all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) is an irreversible reaction carried out by retinaldehyde dehydrogenases ALDH1A1, ALDH1A2, ALDH1A3 (RALDH1, RALDH2, RALDH3). ALDH1A2 is responsible for the second step of the metabolism of vitamin A into atRA (Chatzi et al, 2013; Shannon et al, 2017).The role of that reaction is to maintain atRA concentrations, with ALDH1A2 being most active during early development (Koppaka et al, 2012; Shannon et al, 2017). Raldh2-deficient mice exhibit severe developmental defects due to loss of atRA, but the phenotype is rescued by administration of exogenous RA (Niederreither et al, 1999). Thus, ALDH1A2 activity is essential for atRA-dependent developmental processes.

How it is Measured or Detected

There are no OECD validated assays for measuring ALDH1A2 inhibition.

ALDH1A2 mRNA and protein levels can be measured using various probes, antibodies as well as ELISA kits that are commercially available.

Enzyme activity can be assessed in assays including measurement of atRA formation (Arnold et al, 2015) or NADH formation (Harper et al, 2018; Schindler et al, 1998) and several ALDH activity assay kits using different approaches are commercially available; e.g. AldeflourTM kit (Flahaut et al, 2016).

References

Allen EMG, Anderson DGR, Florang VR, Khanna M, Hurley TD, Doorn JA (2010) Relative inhibitory potency of molinate and metabolites with aldehyde dehydrogenase 2: implications for the mechanism of enzyme inhibition. Chem Res Toxicol 23: 1843-1850

Arnold SL, Kent T, Hogarth CA, Schlatt S, Prasad B, Haenisch M, T. W, Muller CH, Griswold MD, Amory JK, Isoherranen N (2015) Importance of ALDH1A enzymes in determining human testicular retinoic acid concentrations. J Lipid Res 56: 342-357

Bushue N, Wan YJY (2010) Retinoid pathway and cancer therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62: 1285-1298

Chatzi C, Cunningham TJ, Duester G (2013) Investigation of retinoic acid function during embryonic brain development using retinaldehyde-rescued Rdh10 knockout mice. Dev Dyn 242: 1056-1065

Chen Y, Zhu JY, Hong KH, Mikles DC, Georg GI, Goldstein AS, Amory JK, Schönbrunn E (2018) Structural Basis of ALDH1A2 Inhibition by Irreversible and Reversible Small Molecule Inhibitors. ACS Chem Biol 13: 582-590

Flahaut M, Jauquier N, Nardou K, Bourloud KB, Joseph JM, Barras D, Widmann C, Gross N, Renella R, Mühlethaler-Mottet A (2016) Aldehyde dehydrogenase activity plays a Key role in the aggressive phenotype of neuroblastoma. BMC Cancer 16: 781

Harper AR, Le AT, Mather T, Burgett A, Berry W, Summers JA (2018) Design, synthesis, and ex vivo evaluation of a selective inhibitor for retinaldehyde dehydrogenase enzymes. Bioorg Med Chem 26: 5766-5779

Koppaka V, Thompson DC, Chen Y, Ellermann M, Nicolaou KC, Juvonen RO, Petersen D, Deitrich RA, Hurley TD, Vasilio V (2012) Aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitors: a comprehensive review of the pharmacology, mechanism of action, substrate specificity, and clinical application. Pharmacol Rev 64: 520-539

Lowe ED, Gao GY, Johnson LN, Keung WM (2008) Structure of daidzin, a naturally occurring anti-alcohol-addiction agent, in complex with human mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase. J Med Chem 51: 4482-4487

Nagasawa HT, DeMaster EG, Redfern B, Shirota FN, Goon DJ (1990) Evidence for nitroxyl in the catalase-mediated bioactivation of the alcohol deterrent agent cyanamide. J Med Chem 33: 3120-3122

Niederreither K, Subbarayan V, Dollé P, Chambon P (1999) Embryonic retinoic acid synthesis is essential for early mouse post-implantation development. Nat Genet 21: 444-448

Paik J, Haenisch M, Muller CH, Goldstein AS, Arnold S, Isoherranen N, Brabb T, Treuting PM, Amory JK (2014) Inhibition of retinoic acid biosynthesis by the bisdichloroacetyldiamine WIN 18,446 markedly suppresses spermatogenesis and alters retinoid metabolism in mice. J Biol Chem 289: 15104-15117

Quistad GB, Sparks SE, Casida JE (1994) Aldehyde dehydrogenase of mice inhibited by thiocarbamate herbicides. Life Sci 55: 1537-1544

Rhinn M, Dollé P (2012) Retinoic acid signalling during development. Development 139: 843-858

Schindler JF, Berst KB, Plapp BV (1998) Inhibition of human alcohol dehydrogenases by formamides. J Med Chem 41: 1696-1701

Shannon SR, Moise AR, Trainor PA (2017) New insights and changing paradigms in the regulation of vitamin A metabolism in development. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol 6: 10.1002/wdev.1264

Shirota FN, DeMaster EG, Nagasawa HT (1987) Cyanide is a product of the catalase-mediated oxidation of the alcohol deterrent agent, cyanamide. Toxicol Lett 37: 7-12

Staub RE, Quistad GB, Casida JE (1998) Mechanism for benomyl action as a mitochondrial aldehyde dehydrogenase inhibitor in mice. Chem Res Toxicol 11: 535-543

List of Key Events in the AOP

Event: 1881: Decreased, all-trans retinoic acid (atRA) concentration

Short Name: Decreased, atRA concentration

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
retinoic acid biosynthetic process all-trans-retinoic acid decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
WIN18,466
Ethanol
Diethylaminobenzaldehyde

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Tissue

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
Vertebrates Vertebrates Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
All life stages Moderate
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female High

The retinoid signaling system is highly conserved across animal species (Bushue & Wan, 2010b; Rhinn & Dollé, 2012). atRA acts as a ligand for the nuclear retinoic acid (RAR) receptors, which upon activation regulate gene transcription in target cells. The type and number of RARs differ between evolutionary distant animals, but functionally they are all involved in the regulation of development.   

Key Event Description

All-trans retinoic acid (atRA) is the active form of vitamin A/all-trans retinol and is involved in regulating a large number of developmental processes (Bushue & Wan, 2010a; Ghyselinck & Duester, 2019). Although 9-cis RA and 13-cis RA are other metabolic derivatives of vitamin A, atRA is generally considered the primary active metabolite during development, mainly acting as a short-range paracrine signaling molecule (Cunningham & Duester, 2015). atRA exerts dose-dependent effects on morphogenesis, so disruption to atRA concentrations during development can lead to malformations in numerous tissues and organs. During development the spatiotemporal regulation of atRA concentrations in target tissues is tightly controlled by a balance of synthesis and degradation enzymes (Kedishvili, 2013).

Cellular atRA synthesis starts by oxidation of vitamin A to retinaldehyde (RAL) by retinol dehydrogenase-10 (RDH10). RAL is then irreversibly converted to atRA by RAL dehydrogenases (ALDH1A1, ALD1A2, or ALDH1A3). To maintain appropriate retinoid levels in tissues, RAL can be converted back to retinol by enzymatic reactions; further retinoid levels can be controlled by enzymatic degradation of atRA by the cytochrome P450 enzymes CYP26A1, CYP26B1, or CYP26C1, which are differentially expressed throughout the mammalian body (Isoherranen & Zhong, 2019; Shimozono et al, 2013). Inhibition/disruption of any of the enzymes of the atRA synthesis pathway, or increased expression of the atRA degradation enzymes can lead to decreased concentrations of atRA in target cells (Kedishvili, 2013).

The atRA functions as a ligand for the nuclear retinoic acid receptors (RARs), which form heterodimers with the retinoid X receptors (RXRs); the atRA:RAR:RXR complex then binds to retinoic acid response elements (RAREs) upstream of target genes, leading to activation or repression of gene expression in target cells (Chambon, 1996; le Maire et al, 2019). The type and number of RAR/RXRs differ between evolutionary distant animals, but functionally they are all involved in the regulation of development (Gutierrez-Mazariegos et al, 2014).

How it is Measured or Detected

Direct measurements of atRA in serum (humans, animals) can be performed by various chromatographic methods (Gundersen, 2006), including high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS) (Morgenstern et al, 2021).

Indirect measurements in cells and animal models can be performed with reporter assays utilizing RAR-RXR-RARE or RXR-RXR-RARE promoter elements, which are activated by atRA, driving expression of reporter proteins. These reporter assays can detect the presence of atRA in tissues in a semi-quantitative manner. Examples include reporter mouse lines (Carlsen et al, 2021; Rossant et al, 1991; Solomin et al, 1998), reporter cell lines (Wagner et al, 1992) and transient transfection of constructs for in vitro cell-based assays (Chassot et al, 2020).

References

Arnold SLM, Kent T, Hogarth CA, Griswold MD, Amory JK, Isoherranen N (2015) Pharmacological inhibition of ALDH1A in mice decreases all-trans retinoic acid concentrations in a tissue specific manner. Biochem Pharmacol 95: 177-192

Bushue N, Wan YJ (2010a) Retinoid pathway and cancer therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62: 1285-1298

Bushue N, Wan YJY (2010b) Retinoid pathway and cancer therapeutics. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 62: 1285-1298

Carlsen H, Ebihara K, Kuwata NH, Kuwata K, Aydemir G, Ruhl R, Blomhoff R (2021) A transgenic reporter mouse model for in vivo assessment of retinoic acid receptor transcriptional activation. Int J Vitam Nutr Res: 1-13

Chambon P (1996) A decade of molecular biology of retinoic acid receptors. FASEB J 10: 940-954

Chassot AA, Le Rolle M, Jolivet G, Stevant I, Guigonis JM, Da Silva F, Nef S, Pailhoux E, Schedl A, Ghyselinck NB, Chaboissier MC (2020) Retinoic acid synthesis by ALDH1A proteins is dispensable for meiosis initiation in the mouse fetal ovary. Sci Adv 6: eaaz1261

Cunningham TJ, Duester G (2015) Mechanisms of retinoic acid signalling and its roles in organ and limb development. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16: 110-123

Deltour L, Ang HL, Duester G (1996) Ethanol inhibition of retinoic acid synthesis as a potential mechanism for fetal alcohol syndrome. FASEB J 10: 1050-1057

Ghyselinck NB, Duester G (2019) Retinoic acid signaling pathways. Development 146

Gundersen TE (2006) Methods for detecting and identifying retinoids in tissue. J Neurobiol 66: 631-644

Gutierrez-Mazariegos J, Schubert M, Laudet V (2014) Evolution of retinoic acid receptors and retinoic acid signaling. Subcell Biochem 70: 55-73

Isoherranen N, Zhong G (2019) Biochemical and physiological importance of the CYP26 retinoic acid hydroxylases. Pharmacol Ther 204: 107400

Kedishvili NY (2013) Enzymology of retinoic acid biosynthesis and degradation. J Lipid Res 54: 1744-1760

Le HGT, Dowling JE, Cameron DJ (2012) Early retinoic acid deprivation in developing zebrafish results in microphthalmia. Vis Neurosci 29: 219-228

le Maire A, Teyssier C, Balaguer P, Bourguet W, Germain P (2019) Regulation of RXR-RAR Heterodimers by RXR- and RAR-Specific Ligands and Their Combinations. Cells 8

Morgenstern J, Fleming T, Kliemank E, Brune M, Nawroth P, Fischer A (2021) Quantification of All-Trans Retinoic Acid by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry and Association with Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Metabolites 11

Rhinn M, Dollé P (2012) Retinoic acid signalling during development. Development 139: 843-858

Rossant J, Zirngibl R, Cado D, Shago M, Giguere V (1991) Expression of a retinoic acid response element-hsplacZ transgene defines specific domains of transcriptional activity during mouse embryogenesis. Genes Dev 5: 1333-1344

Shimozono S, Iimura T, Kitaguchi T, Higashijima S, Miyawaki A (2013) Visualization of an endogenous retinoic acid gradient across embryonic development. Nature 496: 363-366

Solomin L, Johansson CB, Zetterstrom RH, Bissonnette RP, Heyman RA, Olson L, Lendahl U, Frisen J, Perlmann T (1998) Retinoid-X receptor signalling in the developing spinal cord. Nature 395: 398-402

Wagner M, Han B, Jessell TM (1992) Regional differences in retinoid release from embryonic neural tissue detected by an in vitro reporter assay. Development 116: 55-66

Event: 1882: Disrupted, initiation of meiosis of oogonia in the ovary

Short Name: Disrupted, meiotic initiation in oocyte

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
meiosis I oocyte disrupted

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Acetaminophen
Indomethacin
Bis(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate
Bisphenol A

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Cellular

Organ term

Organ term
ovary sex cord

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Foetal High
Development High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Female High

Fetal oocytes need to enter meiosis prophase I to maintain the oocyte population and establish the oocyte pool. This process in conserver between mice, rats and humans.

Key Event Description

Oocyte meiosis

Oogonia, the female germ cells, are the precursors for the female oocytes. Primary oocytes are formed in the ovaries during fetal development when oogonia enter into prophase I of meiosis; meiotic entry initiates at around embryonic (E) day 13.5 in mice, E15.5 in rats, and gestational week 10-12 in humans. The entry into meiosis is driven by expression of the key genes Stra8, Meiosin and Rec8 and is followed by expression of meiotic proteins including SYCP3 and γH2AX (Baltus et al, 2006; Bowles et al, 2006; Ishiguro et al, 2020; Kojima et al, 2019; Koubova et al, 2014; Spiller et al, 2017). The crucial role for Stra8 in meiotic entry is conserved from mice to humans (Childs et al, 2011).

Disrupted meiotic entry as Key Event

The initiation of meiosis during fetal life is critical for maintenance of the oocytes throughout development and, eventually, for establishing the oocyte pool, or ‘oocyte reserve’ at birth. Without timely fetal entry into meiosis, the oogonia are depleted, as evidenced in Stra8-null mice (Baltus et al, 2006). The Stra8-null female mice are infertile and display abnormally small ovaries that are devoid of oocytes. For Stra8 to be expressed and, therefore, for meiosis to initiate, the oogonia require direct stimulation by atRA as evidenced in mice (Bowles et al, 2016; Bowles et al, 2006; Feng et al, 2021; Koubova et al, 2006; Spiller et al, 2017; Teletin et al, 2017), and humans (Childs et al, 2011; Le Bouffant et al, 2010).

How it is Measured or Detected

There are no OECD-validated assays for measuring meiotic inhibition.

The expression of meiotic factors, such as STRA8, SYCP3, γH2AX, can be assessed at mRNA and/or protein levels and levels measured using primers/probes and antibodies that are commercially available.

Indirect measurements in animal models can be performed using the Stra8 promoter element driving expression of reporter protein GFP (Feng et al, 2021). This reporter assay can detect the presence (GFP) or absence (GFP negative) of Stra8 promoter activation in a semi-quantitative manner.

References

Baltus AE, Menke DB, Hu YC, Goodheart ML, Carpenter AE, de Rooij DG, Page DC (2006) In germ cells of mouse embryonic ovaries, the decision to enter meiosis precedes premeiotic DNA replication. Nat Genet 38: 1430-1434

Bowles J, Feng CW, Miles K, Ineson J, Spiller C, Koopman P (2016) ALDH1A1 provides a source of meiosis-inducing retinoic acid in mouse fetal ovaries. Nat Commun 7: 10845

Bowles J, Knight D, Smith C, Wilhelm D, Richman J, Mamiya S, Yashiro K, Chawengsaksophak K, Wilson MJ, Rossant J, Hamada H, Koopman P (2006) Retinoid signaling determines germ cell fate in mice. Science 312: 596-600

Brieno-Enriquez MA, Reig-Viader R, Cabero L, Toran N, Martinez F, Roig I, Garcia Caldes M (2012) Gene expression is altered after bisphenol A exposure in human fetal oocytes in vitro. Mol Hum Reprod 18: 171-183

Childs AJ, Cowan G, Kinnell HL, Anderson RA, Saunders PT (2011) Retinoic Acid signalling and the control of meiotic entry in the human fetal gonad. PLoS One 6: e20249

Dean A, van den Driesche S, Wang Y, McKinnell C, Macpherson S, Eddie SL, Kinnell H, Hurtado-Gonzalez P, Chambers TJ, Stevenson K, Wolfinger E, Hrabalkova L, Calarrao A, Bayne RA, Hagen CP, Mitchell RT, Anderson RA, Sharpe RM (2016) Analgesic exposure in pregnant rats affects fetal germ cell development with inter-generational reproductive consequences. Sci Rep 6: 19789

Feng CW, Burnet G, Spiller CM, Cheung FKM, Chawengsaksophak K, Koopman P, Bowles J (2021) Identification of regulatory elements required for Stra8 expression in fetal ovarian germ cells of the mouse. Development 148

Holm JB, Mazaud-Guittot S, Danneskiold-Samsoe NB, Chalmey C, Jensen B, Norregard MM, Hansen CH, Styrishave B, Svingen T, Vinggaard AM, Koch HM, Bowles J, Koopman P, Jegou B, Kristiansen K, Kristensen DM (2016) Intrauterine Exposure to Paracetamol and Aniline Impairs Female Reproductive Development by Reducing Follicle Reserves and Fertility. Toxicol Sci 150: 178-189

Ishiguro KI, Matsuura K, Tani N, Takeda N, Usuki S, Yamane M, Sugimoto M, Fujimura S, Hosokawa M, Chuma S, Ko MSH, Araki K, Niwa H (2020) MEIOSIN Directs the Switch from Mitosis to Meiosis in Mammalian Germ Cells. Dev Cell 52: 429-445 e410

Kojima ML, de Rooij DG, Page DC (2019) Amplification of a broad transcriptional program by a common factor triggers the meiotic cell cycle in mice. Elife 8

Koubova J, Hu YC, Bhattacharyya T, Soh YQ, Gill ME, Goodheart ML, Hogarth CA, Griswold MD, Page DC (2014) Retinoic acid activates two pathways required for meiosis in mice. PLoS Genet 10: e1004541

Koubova J, Menke DB, Zhou Q, Capel B, Griswold MD, Page DC (2006) Retinoic acid regulates sex-specific timing of meiotic initiation in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103: 2474-2479

Lawson C, Gieske M, Murdoch B, Ye P, Li Y, Hassold T, Hunt PA (2011) Gene expression in the fetal mouse ovary is altered by exposure to low doses of bisphenol A. Biol Reprod 84: 79-86

Le Bouffant R, Guerquin MJ, Duquenne C, Frydman N, Coffigny H, Rouiller-Fabre V, Frydman R, Habert R, Livera G (2010) Meiosis initiation in the human ovary requires intrinsic retinoic acid synthesis. Hum Reprod 25: 2579-2590

Liu JC, Lai FN, Li L, Sun XF, Cheng SF, Ge W, Wang YF, Li L, Zhang XF, De Felici M, Dyce PW, Shen W (2017) Di (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate exposure impairs meiotic progression and DNA damage repair in fetal mouse oocytes in vitro. Cell Death Dis 8: e2966

Spiller C, Koopman P, Bowles J (2017) Sex Determination in the Mammalian Germline. Annu Rev Genet 51: 265-285

Teletin M, Vernet N, Ghyselinck NB, Mark M (2017) Roles of Retinoic Acid in Germ Cell Differentiation. Curr Top Dev Biol 125: 191-225

Zhang HQ, Zhang XF, Zhang LJ, Chao HH, Pan B, Feng YM, Li L, Sun XF, Shen W (2012) Fetal exposure to bisphenol A affects the primordial follicle formation by inhibiting the meiotic progression of oocytes. Mol Biol Rep 39: 5651-5657

Zhang XF, Zhang T, Han Z, Liu JC, Liu YP, Ma JY, Li L, Shen W (2015) Transgenerational inheritance of ovarian development deficiency induced by maternal diethylhexyl phthalate exposure. Reprod Fertil Dev 27: 1213-1221

Event: 1883: Decreased, size of the ovarian reserve

Short Name: Decreased, ovarian reserve

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
ovarian follicle development ovarian follicle decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Stressors

Name
Diethylstilbestrol
Bisphenol A
Genistein
Bis(2,4,6-trimethylphenyl)-lambda~2~-germane--selenium (1/1)

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Organ

Organ term

Organ term
ovary sex cord

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Fetal High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Female High

Follicle assembly occur in females during fetal life (humans) or around and after birth (rodents). Many of the mechanisms involved are preserved between mice, rats and humans.

Key Event Description

Formation of the follicle pool (follicle assembly)

During fetal life, primordial germ cells migrate to the genital ridges where they arrange into germ cell nests and proceed through to meiosis prophase I (Pepling & Spradling, 2001). Assembly into individual follicles occurs via mechanisms that are not well known, but involves germ cell nest break down and a reduction in oocyte numbers via programmed cell death. Somatic pre-granulosa cells infiltrate between the oocytes, arrange around them in a single layer, and establish what is called the primordial follicles (Escobar et al, 2008; Gawriluk et al, 2011; Pepling & Spradling, 2001). The primordial follicles constitute the follicle pool - a limited stock of oocytes that are available for maturation and potential fertilization determining the length of a female’s reproductive life span (Grive & Freiman, 2015).

The timing of follicle assembly differs between mammalian species, but the processes involved seem to be relatively well conserved (Grive & Freiman, 2015). In humans, follicle assembly occurs during mid-gestation whereas in mice and rats it is initiated around the time of birth and continues until approximately six days post partum.

 

Reduced follicle pool as Key Event

An intact follicle pool is critical for female fertility. Any disruption to the formation of the final pool can have adverse consequences for reproductive capacity, leading to sub- or infertility. Loss of oocytes/follicles can occur during any of the abovementioned stages during the process of follicle assembly – oocyte nest breakdown, programmed cell death or somatic pre-granulosa cell intrusion. Follicle assembly and establishment of the functional follicle pool is also dependent on the stages occurring before this process, e.g. migration of primordial germ cells to the genital ridges, sex determination and meiosis.

How it is Measured or Detected

In animal studies, counting of follicles of different sizes is included in OECD guidelines: TG 416 (Two-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study) and TG 443 (Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study). It is a time-consuming and labor-intensive method and it is not recommended to compare values between studies (Tilly, 2003).

In humans, there is no direct way to count the follicle pool in vivo. Instead, surrogate markers are used. The most established biomarker for estimation of the follicle pool is anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH). It is readily measured in a blood sample and the levels are rather stable throughout the menstrual cycle (Broer et al, 2014).

The size of the pool can also be measured indirectly by mRNA and protein expression of meiotic markers, or by assessing overall ovary histology by histological assessments (Zhang et al, 2012).

References

Broer SL, Broekmans FJM, Laven JSE, Fauser BCJM (2014) Anti-Müllerian hormone: ovarian reserve testing and its potential clinical implications. Hum Reprod Update 20: 688-701

Escobar ML, Echeverría OM, Ortíz R, Vázquez-Nin GH (2008) Combined apoptosis and autophagy, the process that eliminates the oocytes of atretic follicles in immature rats. Apoptosis 13: 1253-1266

Gawriluk TR, Hale AN, Flaws JA, Dillon CP, Green DR, Rucker 3rd EB (2011) Autophagy is a cell survival program for female germ cells in the murine ovary. Reproduction 141: 759-765

Grive KJ, Freiman RN (2015) The developmental origins of the mammalian ovarian reserve. Development 142: 2554-2563

Jefferson W, Newbold R, Padilla-Banks E, Pepling M (2006) Neonatal genistein treatment alters ovarian differentiation in the mouse: inhibition of oocyte nest breakdown and increased oocyte survival. Biol Reprod 74: 161-168

Mu X, Liao X, Chen X, Li Y, Wang M, Shen C, Zhang X, Wang Y, Liu X, He J (2015) DEHP exposure impairs mouse oocyte cyst breakdown and primordial follicle assembly through estrogen receptor-dependent and independent mechanisms. Journal of Hazardous Materials 298: 232-240

Pepling ME, Spradling AC (2001) Mouse ovarian germ cell cysts undergo programmed breakdown to form primordial follicles. Dev Biol 234: 339-351

Rodríguez HA, Santambrosio N, Santamaría CG, Muñoz-de-Toro M, Luque EH (2010) Neonatal exposure to bisphenol A reduces the pool of primordial follicles in the rat ovary. Reprod Toxicol 30: 550-557

Tilly JL (2003) Ovarian follicle counts--not as simple as 1, 2, 3. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 1: 11

Wang W, Hafner KS, Flaws JA (2014) In utero bisphenol A exposure disrupts germ cell nest breakdown and reduces fertility with age in the mouse. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 276: 157-164

Zhang HQ, Zhang XF, Zhang LJ, Chao HH, Pan B, Feng YM, Li L, Sun XF, Shen W (2012) Fetal exposure to bisphenol A affects the primordial follicle formation by inhibiting the meiotic progression of oocytes. Mol Biol Rep 39: 5651-5657

Event: 405: disrupted, ovarian cycle

Short Name: disrupted, ovarian cycle

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
ovulation cycle disrupted
ovulation cycle ovarian follicle disrupted

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Individual

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
mice Mus sp. Low NCBI
rat Rattus norvegicus Moderate NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Adult, reproductively mature
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Female High

The estrous cycle comprises the recurring physiologic changes that are induced by reproductive hormones in most mammalian females. Many of the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the reproductive axis are similar across species (particularly those mediated through the estrogen receptor), assessments of rodent estrous cyclicity can offer insight into potential adverse effects in humans (Goldman, Murr, & Cooper, 2007). While evaluations of vaginal cytology in the laboratory rodent can provide a valuable reflection of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis, other indices are more useful in humans to determine the functional status of the reproductive system (e.g. menses, basal body temperature, alterations in vaginal pH, cervical mucous viscosity, and blood hormone levels). Nevertheless, since many of the mechanisms involved in the regulation of the reproductive axis are similar across species (particularly those mediated through the estrogen receptor), assessments of rodent estrous cyclicity can offer insight into potential adverse effects in humans (Rasier, Toppari, Parent, & Bourguignon, 2006).

Key Event Description

Biological state

The female ovarian cycle is the result of a balanced cooperation between several organs and is determined by a complex interaction of hormones. Ovarian cycle irregularities include disturbances in the ovarian cycle (e.g. longer cycle, persistent estrus) and/or ovulation problems (deferred ovulation or anovulation). The estrous cycle (also oestrous cycle) comprises the recurring physiologic changes that are induced by reproductive hormones in females. Estrous cycles start after sexual maturity in females and are interrupted by anestrous phases or pregnancies. During this cycle numerous well defined and sequential alterations in reproductive tract histology, physiology and cytology occur, initiated and regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. The central feature of the mammalian estrous cycle is the periodic maturation of eggs that will be released at ovulation and luteinisation of the follicles after ovulation to form corpora lutea. Adapted from www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/43754807.pdf Biological compartments

The cyclic changes that occur in the female reproductive tract are initiated and regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian (HPO) axis. Although folliculogenesis occurs independently of hormonal stimulation up until the formation of early tertiary follicles, the gonadotrophins luteinising hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) are essential for the completion of follicular maturation and development of mature preovulatory (Graafian) follicles. The oestrous cycle consists of four stages: prooestrus, oestrus, metoestrus (or dioestrus 1) and dioestrus (or dioestrus 2) orchestrated by hormones. Levels of LH and FSH begin to increase just after dioestrus. Both hormones are secreted by the same secretory cells (gonadotrophs) in the pars distalis of the anterior pituitary (adenohypophysis). FSH stimulates the development of the zona granulosa and triggers expression of LH receptors by granulosa cells. LH initiates the synthesis and secretion of androstenedione and, to a lesser extent, testosterone by the theca interna; these androgens are utilised by granulosa cells as substrates in the synthesis of estrogen. Pituitary release of gonadotrophins thus drives follicular maturation and secretion of estrogen during prooestrus. Gonadotrophin secretion by the anterior pituitary is regulated by luteinising hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH), produced by the hypothalamus. LHRH is transported along the axons of hypothalamic neurones to the median eminence where it is secreted into the hypothalamic-hypophyseal portal system and transported to the anterior pituitary. The hypothalamus secretes LHRH in rhythmic pulses; this pulsatility is essential for the normal activation of gonadotrophs and subsequent release of LH and FSH. Adapted from www.oecd.org/chemicalsafety/testing/43754807.pdf

Follicles that produce estrogens have sequestered pituitary FSH which in turn stimulates the aromatase reaction. Such follicles can undergo normal development and ovulation and contain eggs that readily resume meiosis when released. In the absence of an active local aromatase (i.e., no follicle-stimulating hormone), the follicles and oocytes become atretic and regress without ovulating. If aromatase is present, the estrogen and follicle stimulating hormone can further develop the follicular cells for normal luteal function after ovulation takes place (Ryan, 1982).

General role in biology

A sequential progression of interrelated physiological and behavioural cycles underlines the female's successful production of young. In many but not all species the first and most basic of these is estrous cycle, which is itself a combination of cycles.

How it is Measured or Detected

Methods that have been previously reviewed and approved by a recognized authority should be included in the Overview section above. All other methods, including those well established in the published literature, should be described here. Consider the following criteria when describing each method: 1. Is the assay fit for purpose? 2. Is the assay directly or indirectly (i.e. a surrogate) related to a key event relevant to the final adverse effect in question? 3. Is the assay repeatable? 4. Is the assay reproducible?


The pattern of events in the estrous cycle may provide a useful indicator of the normality of reproductive neuroendocrine and ovarian function in the nonpregnant female. It also provides a means to interpret hormonal, histologic, and morphologic measurements relative to stage of the cycle, and can be useful to monitor the status of mated females. Regular cyclicity is one of the key parameters in assessment of female reproductive function in rodents. Parameters assessed for cyclicity: - Number of cycling females - Number of females with regular cycles - Number of cycles - Estrous cycle length - Percentage of time spent in the various estrous cycle stages Estrous cyclicity provides a method for evaluating the endocrine disrupting activity of each test chemical under physiologic conditions where endogenous concentrations of estrogen vary. Abnormal cycles were defined as one or more estrous cycles in the 21-day period with prolonged estrus (≥3 days) and/or prolonged metestrus or diestrus (≥4 days) within a given cycle (Goldman, Murr, & Cooper, 2007).

Estrous cycle normality can be monitored in the rat and mouse by observing the changes in the vaginal smear cytology. Visual observation of the vagina is the quickest method, requires no special equipment, and is best used when only proestrus or estrus stages need to be identified. For details see: (Westwood, 2008), (Byers, Wiles, Dunn, & Taft, 2012) and OECD guidelines (www.oecd.org).

The observation that animals do not ovulate while exhibiting estrous cycles indicates that estrous cyclicity alone may not be a sufficient surrogate of healthy function of ovaries; the measurements of serum hormones and particularly FSH can contribute to more sensitivity indicators of healthy function of ovaries (Davis, Maronpot, & Heindel, 1994).

Monitoring of oestrus cyclicity is included in OECD test guidelines (Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, 2008) [1], (Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, 2001)[2] and (Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study, 2012) [3]and in USA EPA OCSPP 890.1450.

In vitro testing

The follicle culture models were developed for the in-vitro production of mature oocytes and used to study the process of folliculogenesis and oogenesis in vitro (Cortvrindt & Smitz, 2002). These in vitro cultures demonstrate near-identical effects to those found in vivo, therefore might be able to acquire a place in fertility testing, replacing some in-vivo studies for ovarian function and female gamete quality testing (Stefansdottir, Fowler, Powles-Glover, Anderson, & Spears, 2014).

Regulatory Significance of the AO

Chemicals may be found to interfere with reproductive function in the female rat. This interference is commonly expressed as a change in normal morphology of the reproductive tract or a disturbance in the duration of particular phases of the estrous cycle. This key event lies within the scope of testing for endocrine disrupting activity of chemicals and therefore for testing of female reproductive and developmental toxicity. Monitoring of oestrus cyclicity is included in OECD test guidelines (Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents, 2008), (Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, 2001) and (Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study, 2012) and in USA EPA OCSPP 890.1450. While an evaluation of the estrous cycle in laboratory rodents can be a useful measure of the integrity of the hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian reproductive axis, it can also serve as a way of insuring that animals exhibiting abnormal cycling patterns are excluded from a study prior to exposure to a test compound. When incorporated as an adjunct to other endpoint measures, a determination of a female's cycling status can contribute important information about the nature of a toxicant insult to the reproductive system. In doing so, it can help to integrate the data into a more comprehensive mechanistic portrait of the effect, and in terms of risk assessment, may provide some indication of a toxicant's impact on human reproductive physiology. Significant evidence that the estrous cycle (or menstrual cycle in primates) has been disrupted should be considered an adverse effect (OECD, 2008). Included should be evidence of abnormal cycle length or pattern, ovulation failure, or abnormal menstruation.

References

Byers, S. L., Wiles, M. V, Dunn, S. L., & Taft, R. A. (2012). Mouse estrous cycle identification tool and images. PloS One, 7(4), e35538. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035538

Cortvrindt, R. G., & Smitz, J. E. J. (2002). Follicle culture in reproductive toxicology: a tool for in-vitro testing of ovarian function? Human Reproduction Update, 8(3), 243–54.

Davis, B. J., Maronpot, R. R., & Heindel, J. J. (1994). Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate suppresses estradiol and ovulation in cycling rats. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, 128(2), 216–23. doi:10.1006/taap.1994.1200

Goldman, J. M., Murr, A. S., & Cooper, R. L. (2007). The rodent estrous cycle: characterization of vaginal cytology and its utility in toxicological studies. Birth Defects Research. Part B, Developmental and Reproductive Toxicology, 80(2), 84–97. doi:10.1002/bdrb.20106

OECD. (2008). No 43: Guidance document on mammalian reproductive toxicity testing and assessment.

Rasier, G., Toppari, J., Parent, A.-S., & Bourguignon, J.-P. (2006). Female sexual maturation and reproduction after prepubertal exposure to estrogens and endocrine disrupting chemicals: a review of rodent and human data. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 254-255, 187–201. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2006.04.002

Ryan, K. J. (1982). Biochemistry of aromatase: significance to female reproductive physiology. Cancer Research, 42(8 Suppl), 3342s–3344s.

Stefansdottir, A., Fowler, P. A., Powles-Glover, N., Anderson, R. A., & Spears, N. (2014). Use of ovary culture techniques in reproductive toxicology. Reproductive Toxicology (Elmsford, N.Y.), 49C, 117–135. doi:10.1016/j.reprotox.2014.08.001

Test No. 407: Repeated Dose 28-day Oral Toxicity Study in Rodents. (2008). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264070684-en

Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity. (2001). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264070868-en

Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study. (2012). OECD Publishing. doi:10.1787/9789264185371-en

Westwood, F. R. (2008). The female rat reproductive cycle: a practical histological guide to staging. Toxicologic Pathology, 36(3), 375–84. doi:10.1177/0192623308315665

List of Adverse Outcomes in this AOP

Event: 406: decreased, Fertility

Short Name: decreased, Fertility

Key Event Component

Process Object Action
fertility decreased
fertilization fertility decreased

AOPs Including This Key Event

Biological Context

Level of Biological Organization
Individual

Domain of Applicability

Taxonomic Applicability
Term Scientific Term Evidence Links
rat Rattus norvegicus High NCBI
mouse Mus musculus High NCBI
human Homo sapiens High NCBI
Life Stage Applicability
Life Stage Evidence
Adult, reproductively mature High
Juvenile High
Adults High
Sex Applicability
Sex Evidence
Male High
Female High

Plausible domain of applicability

Taxonomic applicabilityThe impaired fertility may also have relevance for fish, mammals, amphibians, reptiles, birds and and invertebrates with sexual reproduction.

Life stage applicability: The impaired fertility can be measured at juveniles and adults.

Sex applicability: The impaired fertility can be measured in both male and female species. 

Key Event Description

Biological state

capability to produce offspring

Biological compartments

System

General role in biology

Fertility is the capacity to conceive or induce conception. Impairment of fertility represents disorders of male or female reproductive functions or capacity.

How it is Measured or Detected

As a measure, fertility rate, is the number of offspring born per mating pair, individual or population.

Regulatory Significance of the AO

Under REACH, information on reproductive toxicity is required for chemicals with an annual production/importation volume of 10 metric tonnes or more. Standard information requirements include a screening study on reproduction toxicity (OECD TG 421/422) at Annex VIII (10-100 t.p.a), a prenatal developmental toxicity study (OECD 414) on a first species at Annex IX (100-1000 t.p.a), and from March 2015 the OECD 443(Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study) is reproductive toxicity requirement instead of the two generation reproductive toxicity study (OECD TG 416). If not conducted already at Annex IX, a prenatal developmental toxicity study on a second species at Annex X (≥ 1000 t.p.a.).

Under the Biocidal Products Regulation (BPR), information is also required on reproductive toxicity for active substances as part of core data set and additional data set (EU 2012, ECHA 2013). As a core data set, prenatal developmental toxicity study (EU TM B.31) in rabbits as a first species and a two-generation reproduction toxicity study (EU TM B.31) are required. OECD TG 443 (Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study) shall be considered as an alternative approach to the multi-generation study.) According to the Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) regulation (EC, 200; Annex I: 3.7.1.1): a) “reproductive toxicity” includes adverse effects on sexual function and fertility in adult males and females, as well as developmental toxicity in the offspring; b) “effects on fertility” includes adverse effects on sexual function and fertility; and c) “developmental toxicity” includes adverse effects on development of the offspring.

References

OECD (2001), Test No. 416: Two-Generation Reproduction Toxicity, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070868-en.

OECD (2018), Test No. 443: Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Study, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264185371-en.

OECD (2018), Test No. 414: Prenatal Developmental Toxicity Study, OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264070820-en.

OECD (2018), "Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 421) and Combined Repeated Dose Toxicity Study with the Reproduction/Developmental Toxicity Screening Test (OECD TG 422)", in Revised Guidance Document 150 on Standardised Test Guidelines for Evaluating Chemicals for Endocrine Disruption, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264304741-25-en.

Appendix 2

List of Key Event Relationships in the AOP